SENT BY ELECTRONIC MAIL
Consultation with Indian Tribal Governments on Federal-aid Projects
Date: October 24, 2001
Original signed by:
From: Cynthia J. Burbank, Program Manager
Planning and Environment
In Reply Refer To: HEPH
To: Bill Jones
We have received your October 2, 2001, memorandum regarding consultation with Indian tribal governments. Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT) involvement and consultation with tribes is consistent with the FHWA Interim Guidance issued on November 9, 2000.
While the Interim Guidance states that the responsibility to initiate and carry out consultation cannot be delegated, it also states that FHWA may rely on the State DOTs to carry out day-to-day and project specific consultation, with the agreement of affected Indian tribes.
The provision in 36 CFR 800.2(c)(4) which allows FHWA to authorize CDOT to initiate consultation is one instance where FHWA would rely on the State DOT to carry out project specific consultation.
The FHWA cannot delegate its government-to-government responsibility and overall consultation and coordination responsibilities duties. The United States has a unique legal relationship with Indian tribal governments as set forth in the Constitution, treaties, statutes, Executive Order and court decisions - a relationship that States do not have with tribal governments. However, the arrangement that you have entered is not a delegation of Federal responsibilities.
The division office as part of FHWA's government-to-government relationship, and consultation and coordination, should discuss the Federal-aid program, the division office role, and the State role with interested tribal governments to ensure tribe's needs are appropriately considered. This is particularly important in statewide planning as required under 23 USC 135(d) and (0.
We concur in this procedure that ensures tribes have opportunity to provide input on projects
that affect them. Your memo indicates that the division office continues to provide program oversight and monitoring and would take the lead responsibility back should any tribal representative not accept the current arrangement. With these oversight mechanisms in place, we think this is an acceptable and appropriate arrangement.
Colorado Federal Aid Division
555 Zang Street, Room 250
Lakewood, CO 802284 040
February 12, 2001
Mr. Thomas E. Norton
Colorado Department of Transportation
4201 E. Arkansas Avenue
Denver, CO 80222
Ms. Georgianna Contiguglia
State Historic Preservation Officer
Colorado Historical Society
Denver, CO 80203
Dear Mr. Norton and Ms. Contiguglia:
Subject: Delegation of Native American Cultural Resources Consultation Responsibilities to the Colorado Department of Transportation
Under terms set forth in the revised Advisory Council on Historic Preservation regulations (36 CFR 800, Protection of Historic Properties), the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Colorado Division, is obligated to initiate government-to-government cultural resource consultations with Native American tribes on federally funded transportation projects. In an effort to streamline administration of the consultation process, FHWA has issued a blanket authorization to the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to undertake, on its behalf, all phases of the consultation process on FHWA-sponsored projects in Colorado. CDOT will henceforth coordinate consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) and Indian tribal governments, as appropriate.
By transferring project level consultation duties to CDOT, FHWA is in no way abrogating its responsibilities as outlined under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (as amended) and the revised Advisory Council regulations. According to 36 CFR 800.2(c)(4), "the agency official may authorize an applicant...to initiate consultation with the SHPO/THPO and others, but remains legally responsible for all findings and determinations charged to the agency official." FHWA will continue to function in an oversight capacity for Native American consultation and will maintain ultimate authority over all agreements, regulations and guidelines that may result from the consultation process. The approach to government-to-government coordination, however, will be greatly enhanced and facilitated by this arrangement.
CDOT has identified Staff Archaeologist Dan Jepson as the cultural resources consultation administrator for all federal-aid transportation projects undertaken by that agency. The FHWA Colorado Division Environment & Right-of-Way Programs Manager, Edrie Vinson, will provide program oversight. Any questions, comments, or concerns regarding this issue should be directed to Mr. Jepson at (303) 757-9631, or Ms. Vinson at (303) 969-6730, Ext. 378.
c: Forty-Four Federally Recognized Native American Tribes
Mr. George Gerstle, DTD, CDOT
Ms. Rebecca Vickers, EP, CDOT
Mr. Timothy Penny, HEPH-1
Ms. MaryAnn Nabor, NEPH-10
4201 East Arkansas Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80222
DATE: February 14, 2001
TO: Cecelia Joy, Dick Armand, Tammie Smith, John Crier, Carl Watson, Brad Beckham
FROM: Becky Vickers, Environmental Programs Office
SUBJECT: Native American Cultural Resources Consultation
Recently FHWA was allowed to delegate to the state DOTs the responsibility for consultation with Native American tribes on cultural resource issues. The FHWA Colorado Division has taken advantage of this streamlining opportunity and formalized the process with CDOT. Dan Jepson will remain the CDOT lead in this effort. As you may recall, several years ago CDOT identified Dan as the primary point of contact for consultation with tribal governments. This simply formalizes the arrangement and makes his coordination with FHWA more streamlined. Please continue to coordinate through Dan as usual for any projects with tribal issues related to cultural resources.
This agreement, which is attached, should be placed in your notebook of Memorandums of Agreement and Understanding under tab 27. A revised Table of Contents for the MOU/MOA notebook is also enclosed.
cc: Ron Speral/Edrie Vinson