U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Arizona Division
| Appendix A - Performance Measures | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance/Compliance Indicator | Goal | Reporting Instrument |
Reporting Frequency |
Lead Reporting Authority | Comments |
| Planning | |||||
| Percent of STIP projects advanced | TBD | STIP FMIS |
Annual (FFY) | ADOT MPD | Current FFY + 3 year history to track trend and establish baseline |
| Number of STIP amendments | TBD | STIP STIP Amendments |
Annual (FFY) | ADOT MPD | |
| Percent of SPR funds expended | 90% of annual OA | FMIS | Annual (SFY) | ADOT MPD | |
| Percent of PL funds expended | 90% of annual OA | FMIS | Annual (SFY) | ADOT MPD | |
| Number of Long Range Plans updated according to schedule | 100% | State Report | Annual (FFY) | ADOT MPD | |
| Environment | |||||
| Months to complete an EA | 18 months | EDTS Report | Yes | FHWA | |
| Quality of EA documents | 90% of Draft EAs are approved on second submittal to FHWA | EDTS Report | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| 50% of Final EAs are approved on first submittal to FHWA | EDTS Report | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | ||
| Months to complete an EIS | 48 months | EDTS Report | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | National average is 56 months; HQ working on Every Day Counts initiative to reduce NEPA process time |
| Mitigation tracking and performance | 100% of Mitigation Measures applicable to contractor are included in PS&E package | ADOT OES Report | Annual (FFY) | ADOT PMs and OES FHWA |
100% of full oversight projects (N & X) will be reviewed State administered projects (A) will be reviewed through periodic process reviews |
| Mitigation tracking and performance (FFY11) | Systematic Tracking Process Developed (Yes/No) | Verified | One time determination | ADOT OES develop, FHWA verify | One time measure for FFY11 |
| Mitigation tracking and performance (FFY12) | 100% of Mitigation Measures included in contract | ADOT OES Report | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Districts and OES | Measure to commence in FFY12 after development of Mitigation Tracking System |
| Percentage of each class of NEPA Documentation (CE Group I, CE Group II, Condensed CE, EA, EIS)/td> | TBD | ADOT EPG | Annual (FFY) | ADOT EPG | ADOT to submit current FFY + 2 year history to establish baseline (Baseline determination on FFY10, FFY09, FFY08 data) |
| Design | |||||
| Number of projects with design exceptions (by oversight level) | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Roadway Design | |
| Number of design exceptions by project eliminated through design (by oversight level) | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Roadway Design | |
| Major Projects | |||||
| Number of cost estimate reviews completed prior to the draft environmental document | 100% | Report by FHWA | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Number of Project Management Plans completed within 90 days after completion of the final environmental document | 100% | Report by FHWA | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Number of Financial Management Plans completed prior to authorization of the project for construction | 100% | Report by FHWA | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Right of Way (ROW) | |||||
| Number of ROW projects authorized this fiscal year | Trend | Report from State | Annual (FFY) | ADOT ROW | |
| Percent of Federal-aid construction projects with conditional ROW certifications | Trend | Report from State | Annual (FFY) | ADOT ROW | |
| Utilities | |||||
| Percent of sampled Federal-aid projects w/authority to proceed, has Utility Clearance Certifications | 100% | PAR Review | Annual | FHWA | Sample size of no less than 10% |
| Number of projects experiencing delays and/or claims due to utility conflicts | 0% | Utility & RR Engineering Database (Report) | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Utility & RR Engineering | |
| Number of executed utility agreements designed to address utility conflicts | 100% | Utility & RR Engineering Database (Report) | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Utility & RR Engineering | |
| Civil Rights | |||||
| Percent of completed projects with DBE goal met | TBD | TBD | Annual (FFY) | TBD | |
| Percent of DBE participation on FA contracts verses percent identified in contract | TBD | TBD | Annual (FFY) | TBD | |
| Percent of OJT project goals met | TBD | TBD | Annual (FFY) | TBD | |
| Number of complaints filed in all areas of Civil Rights | TBD | TBD | Annual (FFY) | TBD | Report shall also include the actions taken |
| Construction | |||||
| Percent of projects above 10% or below 15% of the engineer's estimate (by level of oversight) | <10% | Report from ADOT% | Annual (FFY) | ADOT C&S | |
| Number of projects with more than 5 addendums (by level of oversight) | <10% | Report from ADOT | Annual (SFY) and Annual (FFY) | ADOT C&S | |
| Number of supplemental agreements per project (by level of oversight) | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ADOT Field Reports | |
| Finance | |||||
| Total dollar amount of inactive obligations | 4% | FMIS | Bi-annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Total number of projects with inactive obligations as a percentage of total federal-aid projects | Trend | FMIS | Bi-annual (FFY) | ADOT FMS | |
| Amount of AC authorized in fiscal year | Trend | Advantage | Annual (FFY) | ADOT FMS | |
| Total State (not local) highway expenditures this fiscal year (include all phases - planning, environment, construction, maintenance) | Trend Advantage | Annual (FFY) | ADOT | FMS | |
| Percent of the federal-aid program of total state highway program | Trend | Advantage | Annual (FFY) | ADOT FMS | |
| Percentage of federal-aid program expended in local areas | Trend | Advantage | Annual (FFY) | ADOT FMS | |
| Amount of ER funds obligated current fiscal year | Track | FIM | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | Recommend: Triennial Program Review by FHWA Operations |
| Maintenance | |||||
| Total amount of funds spent to maintain the State Highway System (SHS) | Trend | Report from ADOT (PECOS) | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Statewide Maintenance | |
| Total SHS maintenance funds by District | Trend | Report from ADOT (PECOS) | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Statewide Maintenance | |
| Maintenance dollars expended per lane mile on the SHS | Trend | Report from ADOT (PECOS) | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Statewide Maintenance | |
| Local Public Agency Projects | |||||
| Number of ADOT LPA Reviews completed in each of the Program Areas | Trend | Report | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Percentage of CA Agreements that have been updated in comparison to establish dates | 100% | Report | Annual (FFY) | FHWA | |
| Pavement and Materials | |||||
| Percentage of Pavement Rehab projects using recycled materials | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Pavement Management Section | Report provided by July 30th |
| Total dollar amount of Pavement Rehab Projects authorized this year | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Pavement Management Section | Report provided by July 30th |
| Number of Disputed HMA Tests settled through 3rd Party Referee Testing | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (SFY) | ADOT QA Section | |
| Percentage of State Highway System with Good Ride Quality (95% has Present Service Rating (PSR) > 3.2) | 95% over 3.2 | Report from ADOT | Annual (CY) | ADOT Pavement Management Section | Report provided by July 30th |
| Research Development and Technology | |||||
| Percent of recommendations implemented | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ATRC | |
| Number of studies initiated and completed in fiscal year | Trend | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ATRC | |
| Distribution of research studies by discipline area | Trend Alignment by state's needs | Report from ADOT | Annual (FFY) | ADOT | |
| Safety | |||||
| Number of Fatalities (FARS) | Trend | FARS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Fatalities (ALISS) | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of SHS Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number Fatality/100MVMT | Trend | ALISS HPMS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of SHS Fatality/100MVMT | Trend | ALISS HPMS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Pedestrian Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of SHS Pedestrian Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Roadway Departure Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history Category shall include head-on sideswipes |
| Number of SHS Roadway Departure Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Intersection Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of SHS Intersection Fatalities | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Percent of Fatalities related to alcohol (> 0.08 BAC) | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Alcohol-related Fatalities (> .08 BAC) | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Percent of seat belt use | Trend | GOHS Seat Belt Survey | CY | GOHS | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of Fatalities not wearing proper safety restraints | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Percent of total HSIP funds obligated/annual apportionment (LS 30 Funds) | 50% | FMIS | FFY | FHWA | Current year + 4 year history |
| Percent of HSIP obligated/total available (LS 30) | Trend | FMIS | FFY | FHWA | Current year + 4 year history |
| Number of HSIP projects started in FFY, # of projects ready to go, cost, anticipated benefits in terms of lives saved | TBD | TBD | FFY | TBD | |
| Status of Rural Safety Projects | TBD | TBD | FFY | TBD | |
| Work Zone | |||||
| Number of Fatalities and serious injuries | Trend | ALISS | CY | ADOT HES | Current year + 4 year history |
| Percent of projects identified as significant | TBD | TBD | Annual (FFY) | TBD | Evaluation of Work Zone Safety and Mobility Policy will clarify this performance measure |
| Bridges and Structures | |||||
| ADOT Condition Rating Index (CRI) | 92.5% | Annual Report | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Bridge GroupS | |
| Percent structurally deficient bridge per roadway type (NHS, Non-NHS, State Structures, Non-State Structures) | 19% National (trend to establish level in AZ) | Annual Report (NBIS) | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Bridge GroupS | |
| Percent structurally deficient or functionally obsolete based on deck area, district, agency, etc. | 19% National (trend to establish level in AZ) | Annual Report (NBIS) | Annual (SFY) | ADOT Bridge Group | Define matrix based on criteria (deck area, district, agency, etc.) |
| Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) | |||||
| Usage of 511 | 800,000 calls | 511 Server | Annual (FFY) | ADOT TTGS | |
| Usage of AZ511.com | 150 million hits | 511 Server | Annual (FFY) | ADOT TTGS | |
| Average Incident Response time - Phoenix | 45 minutes or less 90% of the time | HCRS (Highway Condition Reporting System) | Annual (FFY) | ADOT TTGS | |
| Average Incident Response time - Rural | 60 minutes or less 90% of the time | HCRS | Annual (FFY) | ADOT TTS | |
| DMS to Display Travel Time | TBD | HCRS | Annual (FFY) | ADOT TTG | ADOT only has funding identified to post travel times on DMS until January 21, 2011 |
| < Previous | Table of Contents |
