List of Measures
| ID |
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR/ MEASURE |
GOAL |
PHASED IMPLEMENTATION * |
AGREED/ PROPOSED (REPORT CYCLE) |
CURRENTLY IN PLACE?
(ADD’L COST/IMPL. TIME) |
LEAD REPORTING AUTHORITY |
SUPPORTING JUSTIFICATION FOR PERFORMANCE INDICATOR/MEASURE AND OTHER COMMENTS |
| PROJECTS ON SHS (CALTRANS) |
PROJECTS OFF SHS (LOCAL) |
| 1 |
Use of Obligational Authority on Local Agency Projects |
100% |
1 |
Agreed
(Monthly) |
Not Applicable |
Yes |
Local Assistance |
On Local Agency projects on or off the State Highway System |
| 2 |
Time Growth: The ratio of total number of actual working days to the total planned number of working days. On State administered contracts only. |
< 110% |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Construction |
Assesses the ability to predict the number of days needed for the work itself, assumes 95 percent design quality. Data source: Construction Contract Administration System (CAS). |
| 3 |
Time administration: Percent of
Planned Construction Contract Acceptance (CCA) vs Actual CCA date as included in Caltrans CTC report. On State administered contracts only. |
> 95% |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Construction |
Assesses the ability to predict project completion dates, taking into account work windows, working days, weather and work type. This serves the public by completing projects on predicted date. Data source: Project Management Database for Delivery. |
| 4 |
Cost Growth: The ratio of total construction capital costs to the total original contract allotments. On State administered contracts only. |
< 100 |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Construction |
Assesses the quality of the design relative to accounting for site conditions and the planned work. Data source: CAS. |
| 5 |
Materials: Percent of contracts that comply with minimum testing frequencies. On State administered contracts only. |
> 100% |
2 |
Agreed
(Quarterly, starting December 2009) |
No
$450K/4PY one time + $75,000/1.5PY ongoing |
Not Available |
Construction |
This is a compliance indicator, as federal aid projects need to meet the minimum sampling and testing requirements. Construction will submit BCP for 2008/9 FY to finance the development and support of the system. After funding is secured, will take approximately 9 months to develop and implement. |
| 6 |
Engineer’s Estimate: Percent of projects with low bid within +/- 10% of Engineer’s Estimate; Percent of projects within low bid > 10% of Engineer’s Estimate. On State administered contracts only. |
50% |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Engineering Services |
The purpose of this measure is to assess the accuracy of the low bid vs. Engineer’s Estimate. FHWA’s guidance states that low bid should be within +/- 10% of the Engineer’s Estimate for at least 50% of the projects. |
| 7 |
CCO’s: Total $ and number broken down by CCO category. On State administered contracts only. |
Not Applicable |
2 |
Agreed
(Annually-Beginning FY 08) |
No
(60 days to complete after end of State FY) |
Not Available |
Construction |
The purpose of this annual analysis is to assess cost increases related to types of change. Further review could indicate needed changes in plans and specifications and may lend itself to the quality of the PS&E package. |
| 8 |
Current total project cost of Major Projects > $500 Million (forecast) vs. Latest approved budget vs. Baseline budget. Reasons for and deviations from the approved budget. |
No Growth |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
No
(Part of project cost) |
No
(Assumed by Project
Management) |
Project Management |
The purpose of this measure is to monitor the costs of Major Projects. This will allow for proactive efforts by FHWA to help keep projects within budget. Reference: SAFETEA-LU Section 1904 and FHWA Guidance for Major Projects. |
| 9 |
Current schedule of Major Projects > $500 Million vs. latest approved project schedule. |
No
Delays |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
No
(Part of project cost) |
No
(Assumed by Project
Management) |
Project Management |
The purpose of this measure is to monitor the schedule of Major Projects. This will allow for proactive efforts by FHWA to help keep projects within budget. Reference: SAFETEA-LU Section 1904 and FHWA Guidance for Major Projects. |
| 10 |
FHWA approval/disapproval of Federal Finance Plan and Project Management Plans on Major Projects > $500 Million are submitted within 30 days of receipt by Caltrans. |
< 30 days |
1 |
Agreed |
Defer to FHWA: This is a measure of FHWA performance. |
Defer to FHWA: This is a measure of FHWA performance. |
FHWA |
SAFETEA-LU, Sec 1904(a); 23 U.S.C. 106(h); FHWA Finance Plan Guidance
Ensures timely review of plan by FHWA enabling proactive management of major projects. |
| 11 |
Percentage of State Highway System planned delivery contract Ready-to-List (RTL) milestone vs actual RTL milestone date as included in Caltrans CTC report. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Project Management |
Caltrans reports this quarterly to the Transportation Commission (CTC). Caltrans proposes to provide the same report to the FHWA. The report is only for State Highway projects. |
| 12 |
Cost of project development for all state transportation improvement (STIP) projects awarded in a fiscal year expressed in support/capital. “Project development” includes all non-capital costs incurred by the Department from completion of the Project Study Report through the award of the construction contract (also known as PE costs). |
3 year average < 20% |
1 |
Annual (FY) as required in Govt Code Section 14524.16 |
Yes |
Yes |
Project Management |
|
| 13 |
Number of projects with completed Constructability Reviews (CRs) plus Number of CR exception waivers vs. number of projects requiring CRs on State Highway projects only. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No* |
No |
Design |
Caltrans Policy requirement for projects on SHS. Available once RTL Cert Form is updated; will report # of CRs completed and # of exceptions granted. |
| 14 |
Number of Value Engineering Studies performed ($25 million and $20 million bridge projects) vs. required on State Highway projects only. |
100% |
3 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Design |
Federal law requirement and currently being tracked and reported for projects on SHS. |
| 15 |
Number of Value Engineering Studies performed under $25 million on State Highway projects only. |
Not Applicable |
3 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Design |
Data currently being tracked by Design (Office of Special Projects) for projects on SHS. |
| 16 |
Number of Value Engineering recommendations proposed and # and % of Value Engineering recommendations adopted into project design (broken down by District) on State Highway projects only. |
Not Applicable |
3 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Design |
Data to be used to support VA program in both FHWA and Caltrans. Data is tracked for projects on SHS. |
| 17 |
Value of approved VE recommendations/estimated capital cost of projects on State Highway projects only. |
5%
reduction |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Design |
Industry 10% and Federal Aid 5%. Data is tracked for projects on SHS. |
| 18 |
Median time to complete NEPA documents
- For EISs (NOI to ROD) 1
- For EAs (initiation of technical studies 2 to FONSI)
|
100% done in < national median times 3 |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No (track EIRs and NDs but not EIS/FONSI) |
Yes |
Environmental Analysis |
This measure directly supports FHWA’s Vital Few Environmental Streamlining and Stewardship goal. Improved timeliness will demonstrate our ability to help reduce project delays. The measure will also help assess how timeliness is affected under NEPA assignment. Note 1: NOIs may be used to convene participating agencies during early planning. If used to do so, the date for the initiation of technical studies for the project level analysis would be used. Note 2: Inside of Caltrans the date used would be “Maps to Environmental.” For Local Assistance projects, the signing of the PES form would set the start date. Note 3: The national median times are 72 months for an EIS and 34 months for a FONSI. The national goal for FHWA and a desired goal for Caltrans is 36 months for an EIS and 12 months for a FONSI. FHWA California Division and Caltrans Division of Environmental Analysis would work on developing a strategy to achieve these times, such as substantial changes to laws, regulations, and processes. |
| 19 |
Percent of NEPA documents approved within the anticipated completion date
a. For EISs
b. For EAs |
100% |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Environmental Analysis |
This measure directly supports FHWA’s Vital Few Environmental Streamlining and Stewardship goal. Improved timeliness will demonstrate our ability to help reduce project delays. The measure will also help assess how timeliness is affected under NEPA assignment. |
| 20 |
Percent of projects that have an Environmental Commitment Record (ECR) when the project goes to RTL (step 1 of 2)
Percent of ECRs completed/filled out at Construction Contract Acceptance (CCA). |
100% for Both |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes
Initiated 03/07 |
Environmental Analysis |
This is a compliance measure geared at assessing how well required environmental mitigation for projects is being implemented (23 CFR 635.309). It is supported by Caltrans’ June 10, 2005, memorandum from Richard Land, Chief Engineer, stating that “each district shall establish and maintain an Environmental Commitments Record (ECR) for each project.” |
| 21 |
Ratio of wetlands mitigated. |
1.5/1 (statewide avg) |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes
Initiated 03/07 |
Environmental Analysis |
This is a compliance measure that supports FHWA’s policy on wetlands. In 1998, the Federal Clear Water Action Plan (CWAP) was issued, which in part, committed FHWA to achieving a net increase in wetland acreage resulting from federal-aid highway projects. FHWA has been collecting annual wetland mitigation data since 1996 in support of this policy. |
| 22 |
Percent of Biological Opinions received within 135 days from US FWS, US NOAA (Compliance Indicator) |
100% |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes
Initiated 03/07 |
USFWS |
This is a streamlining measure designed to draw attention to the importance of effective and continuous consultation with resource agencies. It also helps FHWA and Caltrans assess how well the Dispute Resolution Process is working. |
| 23 |
Percentage of “Cert 1s & 2s” compared to the total number of Certifications issued by the Division |
>90% |
1 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
No |
Right of Way |
Low frequency could identify problems such as: inadequate lead time to clear R/W; high R/W cost; unfair treatment of property owners and occupants contrary to law, or could indicate a need to revisit FHWA Certification policy. |
| 24 |
Percentage of ROW projects closed/final vouchered within 12 months oft construction contract acceptance (CCA) |
80% |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No
(Nominal $ &
Nominal time) |
No |
Right of Way |
Measurement of proper administration of funds. |
| 25 |
Percentage of California bridges classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete. |
TBD |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Maintenance (Structures Maintenance) |
The intent of the HBP is to reduce the number of deficient bridges on the NBI. This information is already being collected. |
| 26 |
Percentage of scour critical bridges on both the state and local system |
TBD |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Maintenance (Structures Maintenance) |
Every bridge included on the NBI is required to have a scour plan of action. Additionally, this information will provide information about bridge safety. This data is already being tracked. |
| 27 |
Scour critical bridge monitoring per federal mandate. Maintain monitoring systems and inspect all scour-critical bridges on a regular basis. |
100%
compliance |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Engineering Services & Maintenance (Structures Maintenance) |
SM&I maintain a list of scour-critical bridges. All bridges have some form of monitoring procedure or system in place. These bridges are also inspected on a regular (annual or two-year cycle) to evaluate the effects on any scour. |
| 28 |
NBIS: Inspect bridge inventory. Appraisal of the Nation’s Bridges |
100%
compliance |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Maintenance (Structures Maintenance) |
Inspect each bridge at the defined interval in the CFR. For routine, in-depth, fracture critical member, underwater, damage and special inspections enter the SI&A data into the State or Federal agency inventory within 90 days of the date of inspection for State or Federal agency bridges and within 180 days of the date of inspection for all other bridges. For existing bridge modifications that after recorded data and for new bridges, enter the SI&A data into the State or Federal agency bridges and within 90 days after the completion of the work. To inspect all state bridges and all local agency bridges on regular basis as set forth in 23 CFR 650 Part C and Report the data using FHWA established procedures as outlined in the Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory. |
| 29 |
Tally of DBE awards/commitments for SHS and non-SHS projects (June 1 and December 1) |
Annual DBE Goal varies |
3 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Civil Rights / Local Assistance |
Data needed to run constitutionally narrowly tailored program. See 49 CFR 26.51(f)(2). |
| 30 |
Percentage of UCP DBE certification applications pending more than 90 days after receipt of all required information |
Annual DBE Goal varies |
2 |
Agreed
(Quarterly) |
Yes |
Not Applicable |
Civil Rights |
Measure of attaining regulatory requirement. Encourages cooperation & coordination of UCP members. |
| 31 |
Percentage of Caltrans programs that analyze and monitor impacts and benefits by race and national origin of participants in and beneficiaries of Caltrans programs. Annually report the findings of one Title VI process review of six sub-recipients per year that would include their responsibilities in 49 CFR Part 21 and 23 CFR Part 200. |
Annual DBE Goal varies |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Not Applicable |
Civil Rights |
Measure of data needed to measure Title VI program objectives. |
| 32 |
Percentage of sub-recipients with completed accessibility self-evaluations, up to date transition plans, ADA coordinators, published grievance procedures, and compliant design standards. Number and dollar value of updates to Caltrans’ transition plan and number and dollar value of completed Caltrans transition plan items. |
Annual DBE Goal varies |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Not Applicable |
Civil Rights |
Local Assistance will have sub-recipients certify that they meet these sub-recipient requirements or they will meet all these requirements within two years or less (specify date), or they will justify why they will need more than two years to meet some requirements and when compliance will be met. Local Assistance will monitor and report progress annually to FHWA. |
| 33 |
Percent of all Damage Assessment Forms (DAFs) submitted to FHWA and that are approved by FHWA in less than 7 calendar days. |
100% |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No |
No |
FHWA |
Quality Measure for DAF preparation and effectiveness of communication. Compliance to existing guidelines for DAF development. |
| 34 |
Percentage of Permanent Repair projects brought to construction obligation within 2 FY after the incident year. |
80% |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Budgets |
Required to assess the timeliness of the completion of Permanent Repair work. Maintenance & Local Assistance involvement. |
| 35 |
Time from the date of incident to allocation of ER funds |
<12 months |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No |
No |
FHWA/Budgets |
Measures the Administration’s responsiveness in funding federal disaster projects. FHWA to do. Maintenance & Local Assistance involvement |
| 36 |
Use all available Federal Obligation Authority, which would otherwise lapse, prior to the end of the Federal fiscal year. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Budgets |
|
| 37 |
FHWA provides timely customer service on all project authorization/modification reviews and approvals (excluding final vouchers). Project authorizations/modifications are completed within 7 calendar days of receipt of supporting documentation. |
Within 7 days |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
FHWA |
This is an FHWA measure, for which Caltrans will provide supporting documentation. |
| 38 |
Percent of inactive obligations vs annual apportionment. Combine all 3 tiers as defined by 23CFR630.106(a)(5) i, ii, and iii. |
TBD |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Budgets |
23 CFR 630.106 Authorization to proceed and project monitoring. This review is performed to ensure compliance with Federal requirements and prudent obligation of Federal funds to ensure consistency and reliability in financial statement reporting and to support the FHWA annual certification of internal and financial controls to support the financial statement. Should exclude projects that are not truly inactive. |
| 39 |
Current Bill Submission. Caltrans submits each current bill to the FHWA California Division office for approval no later than 8:30 a.m. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Accounting |
31 CFR Part 205. Timely submission and approval of the current bill is required to ensure compliance with the Cash Management Improvement Act which provides the general rules and procedures for the efficient transfer of Federal financial assistance between the Federal Government and the States. |
| 40 |
Current Bill Approval. All current bills are approved by FHWA California Division no later than 9:00 a.m. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
FHWA |
31 CFR Part 205. Timely submission and approval of the current bill is required to ensure compliance with the Cash Management Improvement Act, which provides the general rules and procedures for the efficient transfer of Federal financial assistance between the Federal Government and the States. |
| 41 |
Annual Financial Statement Audit All accruals are submitted and corrective actions are addressed by requested deadlines. |
100% |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Accounting |
Chief Financial Officer Act of 1990 requires Federal agencies to establish a plan for improving financial management and DOT Order 8000.1C, Office of Inspector General Audit and Investigation Report Findings, Recommendations, and Follow-up Action, establishes reporting requirements. |
| 42 |
Responses to requests for current bill documentation are received by FHWA within 10 business days. |
< 10 days |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Accounting |
Improper Payments Information Act of 2002,
FHWA Order 4560.1A
Ensures timely completion of billing reviews. |
| 43 |
All in-eligible costs are credited and de-obligated within one month of issuance of Federal In-eligibility Notice. |
< 1 mo |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
Accounting/ Budgets |
Improper Payments Information Act of 2002,
FHWA Order 4560.1A
CMIA 31 CFR Part 205. Timely submission and approval of the current bill is required to ensure compliance with the Cash Management Improvement Act, which provides the general rules and procedures for the efficient transfer of Federal financial assistance between the Federal Government and the States.
Ensures timely repayment of Federal monies and facilitates funds management. |
| 44 |
Innovative Finance:
Responses to innovative financing requests, including approvals, disapprovals, and requests for additional information, are sent to Caltrans within 14 calendar days. |
< 14 days |
1 |
Agreed |
Yes |
Yes |
FHWA |
ISTEA, 1991;NHS Act, 1995;TEA-21, 1988 TIFIA
Ensures timely approval of legitimate financing requests and ultimately, project authorization. |
| 45 |
Percentage of all Federally funded and regionally significant projects obligated annually compared to those programmed. |
TBD (after baseline established) |
1 or 2 |
Agreed
(At end of each FSTIP cycle, every two years) |
Modifies existing reporting requirements to include non-Federal regionally significant projects. |
Programming |
Measures the effectiveness of the programming process. Are the programmed projects being obligated? This measure would require MPOs to report on non-Federally funded regionally significant projects in non-attainment areas. |
| 46 |
Kilograms of designated pollutants removed per CMAQ dollar spent; per project, per MPO |
TBD (after baseline is established) |
1 or 2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Programming |
Measuring whether the most cost-effective projects for CMAQ funding. MPOs already report on annual CMAQ obligations. This measure would simply require that the MPOs include total CMAQ funding as part of that annual report. |
| 47 |
Percentage of regionally significant projects that progress through the Long-range Plan timeline with each subsequent Plan revision, in non-attainment areas only, by MPO. |
100% |
2 |
Agreed
Updated each Plan cycle |
Not in place.
Additional cost and time to implement is likely, not yet known. |
Not in place.
Additional cost and time to implement is likely, not yet known. |
Planning |
Determine whether the planning process is being used to identify implementable projects, or if the out years of the long-range Plan are for storage of wish-list projects.
NOTE: With concurrence from FHWA this performance measure will be implemented beginning with the Regional Transportation Plans (RTPs) that are currently under development by the MPOs. DOTP staff will report on performance measure #57 beginning in January or February 2008. |
| 48 |
Number of conformity lapses statewide per FSTIP cycle. |
0 |
1 |
Agreed
(4 year cycle) |
Yes |
Yes |
Planning |
Measuring whether MPOs are complying with Federal conformity requirements. |
| 49 |
Statewide Transportation Plan updated and approved at least every 5 years (yes/no), reported annually based on the most recent Plan update. |
Yes |
1 |
Agreed
(5 yrs) |
Yes |
Yes |
Planning |
Measuring whether the State is meeting the Federal Statewide Planning requirements. |
| 50 |
A list of new technologies Caltrans has developed and/or deployed, and associated benefits. |
Yes |
1 |
Agreed |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Research and Innovation |
Technology deployment is an issue on national interest. Additionally, the collection of this information would aid in reporting to FHWA HQ. A systematic process of collecting this data would benefit both Caltrans and FHWA. |
| 51 |
Submit SP&R Part II Annual Workplan. |
Yes |
1 |
Agreed |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Research and Innovation |
Required by 23 CFR 420 |
| 52 |
Deliver Annual SPR (Part II) Accomplishment Report |
90% of the work plan complete |
1 |
Agreed |
Not Applicable |
Not Applicable |
Research and Innovation |
Required by 23 CFR 420 |
| 53 |
Fatality trend on State and Local Roads - # of fatalities (3-year trend:% decrease/increase) |
Varies |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Traffic Operations/Local Assistance |
Fundamental indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program. |
| 54 |
Fatality Rate trend on State and Local Roads - # of fatalities per 100 MVMT (3-year Annual trend:% decrease/increase) |
1 per 100 MVMT |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Yes |
Traffic Operations/Local Assistance |
Fundamental indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program. |
| 55 |
Delivery of safety projects: % of safety projects delivered on time State Highways only SHS Only |
95% |
1 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans expediting safety projects. Requires coordination with Project Delivery. |
| 56 |
Total dollars spent on safety projects |
Varies |
3 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Information available thru HSIP. |
| 57 |
Total Federal Aid dollars on safety projects |
Varies |
3 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No |
Yes |
Local Assistance |
Information available thru HSIP. |
| 58 |
MUTCD Compliance: California adopts latest National MUTCD within 2 years SHS Only. (Not a performance measure) |
2 years |
1 |
Agreed
(one time) |
Yes |
Not Applicable |
Traffic Operations |
Caltrans requests this indicator. |
| 59 |
Travel time on 20+ urban corridors with Corridor Management Plans underway and ongoing SHS Only |
TBD |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
Not Available |
Traffic Operations |
Supports national congestion goal. Raw travel times and TTI’s (Travel Time Index) will be provided from the Congestion Monitoring Report. |
| 60 |
Incident Clearance Time for Major incidents only. To be expanded later State Highways only SHS Only |
90 min |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Supports national congestion goal. |
| 61 |
Daily Vehicle Hour Delay for all urban freeways. SHS Only |
TBD |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Supports national congestion goal. |
| 62 |
Incident Type and Delay Factor (future performance measure) SHS Only |
TBD |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Data not available at this time. Retained as an agreed to “place holder” performance measure to strive for in the future. |
| 63 |
Run-Off-Road: # of fatalities (3-year Annual trend:% decrease/increase) SHS Only |
+ or -Change |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program by one of the most frequent crash types. |
| 64 |
Intersection: # of fatalities (3-year Annual trend: % decrease/increase) SHS Only |
+ or -Change |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program by one of the most frequent crash types. |
| 65 |
Pedestrian: # of fatalities (3-year Annual trend (% decrease/increase) SHS Only |
+ or -Change |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program by one of the most frequent crash types. |
| 66 |
Work Zone: # of fatalities (3-year Annual trend:% decrease/increase) SHS Only |
+ or -Change |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
Yes |
No |
Traffic Operations |
Indicator of effectiveness of Caltrans Traffic Safety Program by one of the most frequent crash types. Requires coordination with Construction, Maintenance and Human Resources-Office of Safety & Health |
| 67 |
Minor ITS Deployment Projects: Percent of projects with completed System Engineering Review Form (SERF). [Data collected - # ITS projects funded, # those same projects with no valid SERF on file.] |
100% Compliance |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
No
(2 PYs ongoing for Traffic Ops/
Planning) |
No
($50,000/1PY-one time; .5 PY ongoing) |
FHWA/Planning/
Traffic Ops- SHS; FHWA/Local Assistance-
Non-SHS |
23 CFR 940(11) All ITS projects shall be based on a systems engineering analysis – compliance determination. |
| 68 |
Major ITS Deployment Projects: Percent of projects with completed SERF and approved Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP). [Data collected - # ITS projects funded, # those same projects with no approved SEMP.] |
100% Compliance |
2 |
Agreed
(Annual) |
|
|
FHWA/Planning/
Traffic Ops- SHS; FHWA/Local Assistance-
Non-SHS |
23 CFR 940(11) All ITS projects shall be based on a systems engineering analysis – compliance determination.
|
California Division
