Dynamic Passenger Information
Project Management Plan
Project Name: |
DPI (Dynamic Passenger Information) |
Prepared by: |
Keith Roan |
Date (MM/DD/YYYY): |
04/15/08 |
Version History (insert rows as needed): |
||
---|---|---|
Version |
Date (MM/DD/YYYY) |
Comments |
1.0 |
04/15/2008 |
Initial – Keith Roan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This project plan documents the project planning process and consists of the following basic tasks:
This plan documents and defines the objectives of the project, the approach to be taken, and the commitment being assumed. This document contains the details required to successfully execute the project. Once project execution begins, this plan will be reviewed, baselined, and updated on a regular basis.
Project Tradeoff Matrix and Status Summary
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
Configuration Management Planning
Project Name: DPI (Dynamic Passenger Information)
Date:
Plan Release #: 1.0
Project Manager: Keith Roan
Approvals:
Keith Roan Casey Emoto
Technology Support Services Manager Deputy Director Program/Project Dev. – CMA
Joonie Tolosa Jerry Oxsen
Mgr, Ops Analysis, Reporting Operations Manager
& Systems
Bill Capps Art Douwes
Manager, Service & Operations Planning Operations Manager, Engineering
Liz French Patrick Griffin
Sr. Planner Progmg & Grants Mgr, Public Affairs & Cust. Info
Dino Guevarra Heidi Samuels
Sales and Promotion and Supervisor Operations Manager, Bus Mtc Admin
George Tacke Camille Williams
Operations Manager, Ops, Transportation Accessible Services Program Manager
Project Name: DPI (Dynamic Passenger Information System)
Start Date: 1/1/04
Organization: Technology
Submitted By: Keith Roan
Prime Contractor: TBD
Date Awarded: TBD
Current Stage of Project: Planning
Project is on Schedule: No
If no, please provide details: Resource issues have constantly kept project running at a minimum until the last 2.5 years.
Project is within Budget: Yes
If no, please provide details
Yes/No
Is this an update Project Plan? If so, reason for update: No
Budget for project by fiscal year and is project funded? Yes
If so, for what amount(s) and period(s):
Budget Amount: $5.7 m Year: 2008 Funded? Yes
Budget Amount: Year: 2009 Funded? Yes
Budget Amount: Funded?
Total Amount: $5.7 m
Points of Contact
This is a list of individuals that will be involved with the project during the execution phase.
Position |
Name/Organization |
Phone |
|
Project Manager |
Keith Roan/Tech |
408-321-7109 |
keith.roan@vta.org |
CMA Contact |
Casey Emoto/CMA |
408-321-5564 |
casey.emoto@vta.org |
Senior Management Sponsor |
Gary Miskell//CIO – Tech |
408-321-7100 |
gary.miskell@vta.org |
Senior Management Sponsor |
Bill Lopez/COA – Administration Services |
408-321-5801 |
bill.lopez@vta.org |
Procurement Contact |
Tom Smith/CAMM |
408-952-4190 |
tom.smith@vta.org |
Compliance Review Manager |
Gary Epstein/Finance |
408-321-5683 |
gary.epstein@vta.org |
Program and Grants Management |
Liz French/Grants |
408-321-5737 |
liz.french@vta.org |
Stakeholders (Top 3): |
|
|
|
Operations |
Jerry Oxen/Operations Manager |
408-952-6858 |
jerry.oxsen@vta.org |
Customer Service/Public Affairs |
Patrick Griffin/Manager |
408-321-7506 |
patrick.griffin@vta.org |
|
|
|
|
Prime Contractor Information Company:
Position |
Name/Organization |
Phone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Problem
The lack of real time information provided to VTA’s customers concerning vehicle arrival times of buses and trains.
Statement of work (Goal)
Design, prototype and implement an automated real time information system by December 2009.
Project Objectives:
The primary objective of the DPI
System is to provide VTA’s customers with accurate and reliable real-time
transit information. This information includes the real-time location of
transit vehicles and the estimated next vehicle arrival and departure times for
all transit routes. It is envisioned that this information would be
accessible by way of the Internet and telephone, as well as electronic
information display boards at key transit stops within
The intent is to distribute project information to stakeholders in a timely manner. Communications tools for this project are listed below with additional items to be added as needed.
Managing a project requires the balancing of three factors: resources, schedule, and scope. These three factors are interrelated. The project trade off matrix shows the relative importance of each factor:
Schedule |
Scope |
Resources |
CONSTRAINED |
CONSTRAINED |
CONSTRAINED |
Identify variables to be constrained, improved, and accepted
+/- Status
Team/Phase |
Technical |
Schedule |
Cost |
Comment |
Initiating |
On |
Behind |
On |
Project was delayed several years due to resource issues and priority rankings of projects |
Planning |
On |
Behind |
On |
Took additional time to provide in depth project management plan and refine RFP |
Executing |
On |
Behind |
On |
Best knowledge due to Independent Cost Estimate |
The Project Organization defines the persons responsible for the following types of functions: project manager, development, manager, quality assurance, and configuration management. A project manager is required for every project.
This is an activity list (work breakdown structure) that describes each task required by the project.. These work packages describe required schedule, identify requirements to be completed and describe specific work to be performed.
Activity# |
Activity Name |
Activity Name Description |
# of Days |
Start Date |
Dependency |
Milestone |
1 |
Design |
System Architecture |
90 |
10/1/08 |
|
No |
2 |
Develop |
Development - should be close to off the shelf with required GUI |
120 |
1/21/09 |
#1 |
No |
3 |
Integrate |
Integrate code |
120 |
4/15/09 |
#2 |
No |
4 |
Testing |
Test DPI in lab |
60 |
7/8/09 |
#3 |
Yes |
5 |
Pilot |
Run Pilot test on one sign in field |
15 |
9/2/09 |
#4 |
Yes |
6 |
Marketing |
Marketing & Outreach |
60 |
10/21/09 |
#5 |
No |
7 |
Installation |
Install along 522 route |
40 |
10/21/09 |
#5 |
Yes |
8 |
Countywide |
Install to additional locations |
30 |
10/21/09 |
#5 |
Yes |
9 |
Training |
Provide User Training |
10 |
10/21/09 |
#5 |
No |
10 |
Close-Out |
Close-Out and transfer to O&M |
60 |
11/4/09 |
#9 |
Yes |
This activity describes each task required in the project. These work packages describe required schedules, identify requirements to be completed and describe specific work to be performed.
The list of project deliverables that includes the date due and the person responsible for the delivery should be part of the plan. This information is derived from the project activity list, and is expanded to include the assignment of the deliverable to a specific author and tracking of delivery of the document.
List of all deliverables required by the project, the due date and the person responsible
Deliverable Name |
Due Date |
Date Delivered |
Point of Contact |
Design Document |
12/1/08 |
|
Keith Roan |
Test Plan |
4/1/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
Installation Plan |
7/2/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
Source Code |
7/2/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
Installation |
9/1/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
Training Plan |
8/2/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
Project Closeout |
11/4/09 |
|
Keith Roan |
The project schedule included in the project plan can either be a GANTT or PERT chart. IT should include milestones, task dependencies, task duration, work product delivery dates, quality milestones (reviews/audits/inspections), configuration management milestones, and action items (with deadlines and responsibilities).
Project Start Date: Wed 10/1/08
Project Finish Date: Tue 1/12/10
ID |
Task_Name |
Duration |
Start_Date |
Finish_Date |
Predecessors |
Resource_Names |
1 |
DPI |
335 days |
Wed 10/1/08 |
Tue 1/12/10 |
|
|
2 |
Phase II - Software/Hardware/Testing |
275 days |
Wed 10/1/08 |
Tue 10/20/09 |
|
|
3 |
Design |
3 mons |
Wed 10/1/08 |
Tue 12/23/08 |
|
Vendor |
4 |
Develop |
4 mons |
Wed 12/24/08 |
Tue 4/14/09 |
3 |
Vendor |
5 |
Integration |
4 mons |
Wed 4/15/09 |
Tue 8/4/09 |
4 |
Vendor |
6 |
Testing |
2 mons |
Wed 8/5/09 |
Tue 9/29/09 |
5 |
Vendor |
7 |
Pilot |
15 days |
Wed 9/30/09 |
Tue 10/20/09 |
6 |
Vendor |
8 |
Marketing |
60 days |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 1/12/10 |
|
|
9 |
Marketing/Outreach plan |
3 mons |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 1/12/10 |
7 |
|
10 |
Phase III - Bus Stop Installation |
30 days |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 12/1/09 |
|
|
11 |
Install/test signs down 522 route |
6 wks |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 12/1/09 |
7 |
Vendor |
12 |
Phase V - LR |
20 days |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 11/17/09 |
|
|
13 |
Countywide Installation |
1 mon |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 11/17/09 |
7 |
Vendor |
14 |
Training |
2 wks |
Wed 10/21/09 |
Tue 11/3/09 |
7 |
Vendor |
15 |
Phase VI - Project Closeout |
40 days |
Wed 11/4/09 |
Tue 12/29/09 |
|
|
16 |
Project Closeout |
2 mons |
Wed 11/4/09 |
Tue 12/29/09 |
14 |
Technology/Finance |
This estimated cost at completion is an assessment of the total project effort in terms or either time and/or dollars.
Activity |
Analysis in Hours |
Analysis in Dollars |
||||||||
Budget Hours |
Actual Hours |
Est. to Comp |
Est. @ Comp |
Var. |
Budget Hours |
Actual Hours |
Est. to Comp |
Est. @ Comp |
Var. |
|
Project Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manage Project |
2,048 |
|
1,800 |
|
|
2,048 |
|
200,000 |
|
|
Design/Dev |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dev/Imp Base System Software |
1,120 |
|
1120 |
|
|
1,120 |
|
2,168,750 |
|
|
Integration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Format for MTC’s 511 system, S/W interface to VMB’s, PA Systems, H/W and peripherals |
640 |
|
640 |
|
|
640 |
|
92,000 |
|
|
Testing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System Testing |
320 |
|
320 |
|
|
320 |
|
225,000 |
|
|
Pilot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of S/W & H/W to each make of sign |
120 |
|
120 |
|
|
120 |
|
21,000 |
|
|
Marketing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing/Outreach plan |
120 |
|
120 |
|
|
120 |
|
23,000 |
|
|
Installation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VMS on Rapid |
240 |
|
240 |
|
|
240 |
|
450,000 |
|
|
Countywide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Countywide Installs |
160 |
|
160 |
|
|
160 |
|
642,500 |
|
|
Training |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training/Documentation |
80 |
|
80 |
|
|
80 |
|
162,500 |
|
|
Total |
4848 |
|
4848 |
|
|
4848 |
|
3,984,750 |
|
|
The staffing plan shows the number of personnel, by type, that are required on the project on a monthly basis. This information should be compared monthly on a planned versus actual basis. VTA will acquire a consultant to assist with the project management responsibilities of this project. Additional resources projected below are expected to be provided by the vendor. It is expected that the vendor will have a project manager, software/hardware developers, installation engineers, transportation engineers/planners, and electricians. The number of individuals in these areas is expected to begin with approximately eight individuals and peak at approximately 14.
This plan lists the project requirements, with references to the statement of work, work breakdown structure, and specifications.
No. |
Requirement |
RFP Reference |
Task Reference |
Specification Reference |
Completed |
Comments |
Project Requirements are available at VTA as a separate list. They were removed from this copy of the document in the Systems Engineering Guidebook for ITS website.
|
This plan lists anything that could potentially affect the successful completion of the project. The contractual, management, and technical risks associated are identified and assessed for the probability of the risk occurring, the cost to correct if the risk occurs, the impact of the risk on the project, and the suggested mitigation activities and cost of mitigation.
Category |
Probability |
Impact |
Risk |
Mitigation |
MANAGEMENT |
||||
Integration |
High |
High |
Integrating DPI with vendor 1 |
|
Integration |
Low |
High |
Integrating DPI with Vendor 2 |
|
Software |
Low |
Medium |
Trapeze licenses |
|
Integration |
Medium |
High |
511 system not ready for VTA IVR |
|
This plan lists the person responsible for project configuration management, the procedures used, and the planned configuration items, planned release dates for configuration items, and resources required to conduct Configuration Management.
CM Responsibility
Manager: Keith Roan
Additional Staff for CM
No additional staff anticipated at this time
Procedure Reference:
Configuration Items:
No |
Item |
Comments |
1 |
System / Management / Project Plan |
Project Plan |
2 |
System / Requirements / System Specifications |
System Specifications |
3 |
System / Test / Testing Plan |
Test Plan |
4 |
System / Management / Testing Plan |
Implementation |
QA Audits need to be included on the project schedule
This document defines the person responsible for project quality activities, the procedures used, the planned quality activities, and resources required to conduct QA activities.
QA Responsibility
Manager: Keith Roan
Additional Staff for QA
Support will be needed by system integrator, design team, and development members.
Procedure Reference:
Planned Quality Event: Ensure the QA is implemented throughout the project’s life cycle. Dates include QA audits and reviews, design walkthroughs and other project activities that QA staff will participate in.
No |
Item |
Comments |
1 |
Requirements Review |
Due: |
2 |
Code Walk Through |
|
3 |
Interface Prototype |
|
4 |
Testing Audit |
|
Ensure there is a repository
Ensure QA audits the baselines and CM activities on a regular basis. - describe
This plan list the top five know issues associated with the project, personnel responsible for resolving the issue, and an associated open and close date, with proposed or recommended solutions.
Issue |
Responsible Individual |
Open Date |
Closure Date |
Status |
Vendor 1 Interface |
Keith Roan |
|
|
|
Vendor 2 Interface |
Keith Roan |
|
|
|
IVR Interface – 511 System |
Keith Roan |
|
|
|
Audio Issue with Platforms |
Keith Roan |
|
|
|
This plan includes a list of action items that are maintained as part of project tracking.
Action Item # |
Description |
Responsible Individual |
Open Date |
Closure Date |
Status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|