State Statutes and Policies for Construction Manager / General Contractor and Construction Manager-at-Risk

Project Delivery Methods for Transportation Projects

• Arizona: Arizona Revise Statute: 28-7366. Arizona DOT's Construction-manager-at-risk construction services and job-order-contracting construction services (http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/28/07366.htm&Title=28&DocType=ARS)
• Arizona Local Public Agencies: Arizona State 34-603 provides statutory authority for local public agencies in Arizona to use construction-manager-at-risk project delivery (http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/34/00603.htm&Title=34&DocType=ARS)
• California: Assembly Bill 2498 authorizes Caltrans to use the construction manager / general contractor project delivery method ". . . on no more than six projects, at least five of which shall have construction costs greater than ten million dollars ($10,000,000)." (http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_2451-2500/ab_2498_bill_20120929_chaptered.html)
• Connecticut: Substitute Senate Bill No. 33, Public Act No. 12-70 provides Connecticut DOT with the authority to use "construction-manager-at-risk" project delivery. State of Connecticut Public Act No. 12-70 (http://www.cga.ct.gov/2012/ACT/PA/2012PA-00070-R00SB-00033-PA.htm)
• Florida: For Florida DOT, "construction manager at-risk" was authorized with a number of other innovative contracting techniques under FS 337.025. The use of all innovative contracting techniques is limited to $120M annually. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/AltContract/General/Statute.shtm
• Minnesota: MnDOT obtained state legislative authority in 2012: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/const/tools/docs/CMGCStatutes.pdf (.pdf)
• Nevada: Section 338.169 of the Nevada Revised Statutes provided the Nevada DOT with the authority to evaluate construction manager at-risk project delivery. The statute has a sunset date of June 30, 2013. See: http://leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-338.html
• Oregon: The Oregon DOT uses an exemption from competitive bidding requirements pursuant to ORS 279C.335, as authorized by the Oregon Department of Transportation (Exemption No. 2007-51). (http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/279c.html)
• Utah: Utah Administrative Code Rule R916-4: Construction Manager/General Contractor Contracts (http://www.rules.utah.gov/publicat/code/r916/r916-004.htm)
• Washington State: Chapter 39.10 RCW - Alternative public works contracting procedures See : RCW 39.10.340 through 39.10.410 - General contractor/construction manager procedures (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=39.10)