Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures: Experience, Selection, and Design Guidance-Third Edition
Table 2.1
Countermeasure Group | FUNCTIONAL APPLICATIONS | SUITABLE RIVER ENVIRONMENT | MAINTENANCE | INSTALLATION EXPERIENCE BY STATE | DESIGN GUIDELINE REFERENCE* | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local Scour | Contraction Scour | Stream Instability | Overtopping Flow | River Type | Stream Size | Bend Radius | Velocity | Bed Material | Ice/Debris Load | Bank Slope | Floodplain | Estimated Allocation of Resources | |||||
Abutments | Piers4 | Floodplain and Channel | Vertical | Lateral | Approach Embankments | B = braided M = meandering S = straight |
W = wide M = moderate S = small |
L = long M = moderate S = short |
F = fast M = moderate S = slow |
C = coarse bed S = sand bed F = fine bed |
H = high M = moderate L = low |
V = very steep S = steep M = mild |
W = wide M = moderate N = narrow/none |
H = high M = moderate L = low |
|||
GROUP 1. HYDRAULIC COUNTERMEASURES | |||||||||||||||||
GROUP 1.A. RIVER TRAINING STRUCTURES | |||||||||||||||||
TRANSVERSE STRUCTURES | |||||||||||||||||
Impermeable spurs (jetties, groins, wing dams) | B, M | W, M | L, M | M - L | Widely Used | DG 2 | |||||||||||
Permeable spurs (fences, netting) | B, M | W, M | L, M | M, S | S, F | L | H - M | Widely Used | DG 2 | ||||||||
Transverse dikes | B, M | W, M | M - L | NE | |||||||||||||
Bendway weirs/Stream barbs1 | M | M, S | L | CO, ID, IL, MO, MT, OR, WA | DG 1 | ||||||||||||
Hardpoints | L | CA, ND, NE, SD | CH 8 | ||||||||||||||
Drop structures (check dams, grade control) | M | Widely Used | DG 3 | ||||||||||||||
Embankment Spurs | W | L | AK, OK | ||||||||||||||
LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURES | |||||||||||||||||
Longitudinal dikes (crib/rock toe/embankments) | L, M | M, L | M - L | AK, AZ, CA, OK, OR, MS | CH 8 | ||||||||||||
Retards | L, M | S, F | L | H - M | Widely Used | CH 8 | |||||||||||
Bulkheads | V, S | M | Widely Used | CH 8 | |||||||||||||
Guide banks | W, M | W, M | M - L | Widely Used | DG 15 | ||||||||||||
AREAL STRUCTURES/TREATMENTS | |||||||||||||||||
Jacks/tetrahedron jetty fields | B, M | W, M | L | M, S | S, F | M, L | W, M | M | Widely Used | CH 8 | |||||||
Vanes | B, M | W, M | L, M | M, S | S, F | L | H - M | IA | |||||||||
Channelization | B, M | M | MS, MO, MT, TX | CH 8 | |||||||||||||
Flow relief (overflow, relief bridge) | W | M | Widely Used | ||||||||||||||
Sediment detention basin | C, S | H - M | Widely Used | ||||||||||||||
GROUP 1.B. ARMORING COUNTERMEASURES | |||||||||||||||||
REVETMENTS AND BED ARMOR | |||||||||||||||||
Rigid | |||||||||||||||||
Soil cement | S, F | L | AZ, CO, NM | DG 7 | |||||||||||||
Roller compacted concrete | S, F | L | Widely Used | ||||||||||||||
Concrete pavement | S, M | M | Widely Used | ||||||||||||||
Rigid grout filled mattress/concrete fabric mat | S, M | M | GA, MA, MD, ME, SD, WA | ||||||||||||||
Fully grouted riprap | S, M | M | AZ, CA, CT, ME, MI, TN | CH 5 | |||||||||||||
Flexible/articulating | |||||||||||||||||
Riprap | S, M | M | Widely Used | DG 4 | |||||||||||||
Self launching riprap (windrow) | C,S | V, S | H - M | GA, CA, IL, PA | DG 4 | ||||||||||||
Riprap fill-trench | M | Widely Used | DG 4 | ||||||||||||||
Gabions/gabion mattress2 | S, F | M, L | M | Widely Used | DG 11 | ||||||||||||
Wire enclosed riprap mattress (rail bank/sausage) | M, S | S, F | M, L | S, M | M | AZ, CO, NM | DG 6 | ||||||||||
Articulated blocks (interlocking and/or cable tied) | S, M | M - L | Widely Used | DG 9 | |||||||||||||
Concrete/grout mattress (fabric-formed) | M, S | S, M | M - L | OR, CA, IA, IL, AZ | DG 10 | ||||||||||||
Partially grouted riprap | S, M | L | European practice | DG 12 | |||||||||||||
LOCAL SCOUR ARMORING | |||||||||||||||||
Riprap (fill/apron) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | S, M | H - M | Widely Used | DG 8, DG 14 | |||||||||
Fully grouted riprap | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | S, M | H - M | Widely Used | CH 5 | |||||||||
Concrete armor units (Toskanes, tetrapods, etc.)3 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | M | M - L | AZ, PA, NY, VA | CH 5 | |||||||||
Grout filled bags/sand cement bags | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | M, L | M | H - M | Widely Used | DG 13 | ||||||||
Gabions/gabion mattress2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | S, F | M, L | S, M | M | FL, WA, TN, OR | DG 11 | |||||||
Articulated blocks (interlocking and/or cable tied) | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | S, M | M - L | Widely Used | DG 9 | |||||||||
Sheet pile/cofferdam | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | M - L | CA, CT, FL, NH, WA | |||||||||||
Partially grouted riprap | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | S, M | L | European practice | DG 12 | |||||||||
GROUP 2. STRUCTURAL COUNTERMEASURES | |||||||||||||||||
FOUNDATION STRENGTHENING | |||||||||||||||||
Crutch bents/Underpinning | N/A | L | FL, NC, OR, TX | ||||||||||||||
Cross bracing | N/A | L | NC, FL, LA | ||||||||||||||
Continuous spans | N/A | L | NC | ||||||||||||||
Pumped concrete/grout under footing | N/A | M | Widely Used | DG 13 | |||||||||||||
Lower foundation | N/A | L | CA, OR, TX | ||||||||||||||
PIER GEOMETRY MODIFICATION | |||||||||||||||||
Extended footings | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | L | Widely Used | ||||||||||
Pier shape modifications | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | M | FL | ||||||||||
Debris deflectors | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | H - M | CA, FL, NM, OR | ||||||||||
Sacrificial piles/dolphins | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | H - M | |||||||||||
GROUP 3. BIOTECHNICAL COUNTERMEASURES5 | |||||||||||||||||
Vegetated geosynthetic products | M, S | M, S | M, S | M, L | M, S | H - M | Widely Used | CH 6 | |||||||||
Fascines/woody mats | M, S | M, S | L | M, S | H - M | Widely Used | CH 6 | ||||||||||
Vegetated riprap | M, S | M - L | Widely Used | CH 6 | |||||||||||||
Root wads | M, S | M, S | L | M | H - M | Widely Used | CH 6 | ||||||||||
Live staking | M, S | M, S | M, L | M, S | H - M | Widely Used | CH 6 | ||||||||||
GROUP 4. MONITORING | |||||||||||||||||
FIXED INSTRUMENTATION | |||||||||||||||||
Sonar scour monitor | L | M | CO, FL, IN, NY, VA, TX | CH 9 | |||||||||||||
Magnetic sliding collar | S, F | M | Widely Used | CH 9 | |||||||||||||
Float out device | S, F | L | AZ, CA, NV | CH 9 | |||||||||||||
Sounding rods | M, S | C | M, L | H | AR, IA, NY | CH 9 | |||||||||||
PORTABLE INSTRUMENTATION | |||||||||||||||||
Physical probes | M, S | M, L | L | Widely Used | CH 9 | ||||||||||||
Sonar probes | M, S | L | L | Widely Used | CH 9 | ||||||||||||
VISUAL MONITORING | |||||||||||||||||
Periodic Inspection | M, L | H | Widely Used | CH 2 | |||||||||||||
Flood watch | M, L | H | Widely Used | CH 2 |
NOTES:
- There is limited but successful field experience using bendway weirs/stream barbs as stream instability countermeasures.
- Performance of welded vs. twisted wire, and PVC coated vs. uncoated wire gabions is not distinguished in the matrix.
- There is limited but successful field experience using concrete armor units for scour protection at bridge piers.
- Piers at new bridges cannot rely on countermeasures to reduce the design depths of foundation elements (Federal guidance).
- Biotechnical countermeasures are only intended for stream banks, not stream beds. This matrix assumes that any biotechnical treatments are fully grown, with well-established root systems. The toe of any streambank treatment should be reinforced with rock riprap or other armor material, as discussed in Chapter 6 of this document.
- See Chapter 3 for discussion of selection criteria for countermeasures.
- See Chapter 6 for discussion of biotechnical engineering countermeasures.
- See Chapter 8 for discussion of other countermeasures and case histories of performance.
- well suited/primary use
- suitable for the full range of the characteristic
- possible application/secondary use
- unsuitable/rarely used
- N/A not applicable
- CH# HEC-23 Chapter
- DG# HEC-23 Design Guideline