Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
Planning • Environment • Real Estate
| Nonattainment or Maintenance Area | STATE | MPO or Portion of MPO | Use a Single Budget Area-Wide, or Sub-Area Budgets | Lead on Travel Demand and Emissions Modeling |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ | NJ | North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Inc. | The NJ MPO has its own separate budget, which covers both the NJ portions of the Allentown and New York City areas. No budgets currently in the SIP for the PA portion of the area. | Emissions reductions test completed for PA portion of the area. MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| PA | Lehigh Valley Transportation Study | |||
| Boston-Lawrence-Worcester(E. MA) MA-NH | MA | Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization | There are separate budgets for the portion of the area within Massachusetts and the portion of the area within New Hampshire. (A single budget for Massachusetts and a single budget for New Hampshire.) | In Massachusetts, the MPOs take the lead on travel demand modeling, and the State DOT takes the lead on emissions modeling. In New Hampshire, the MPOs take the lead on travel demand modeling, the State Department of Environmental Services takes the lead on emissions modeling, and the State DOT combines the analysis for the entire portion the area within New Hampshire. |
| Cape Cod Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Central Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Montachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Northern Middlesex Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Old Colony Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Southeastern Massachusetts Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| NH | Nashua Metropolitan Planning Organization | |||
| Rockingham Regional Planning Commission | ||||
| Salem-Plaistow-Windham Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Southern New Hampshire Planning Commission | ||||
| Strafford Planning Commission | ||||
| Charlotte-Gastonia, NC | NC | Gaston MPO | Sub-area budgets for each MPO. In the Gaston MPO, the State DOT takes the lead on travel demand modeling. In MUMPO, the MPO takes the lead on travel demand modeling. | The State air agency takes the lead on emissions modeling. |
| Mecklenburg Union MPO (MUMPO) | ||||
| Chicago-Gary-Lake County, IL-IN | IL | Chicago Area Transportation Study (CATS) | Separate budgets for each MPO | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| IN | Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission | |||
| Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, OH | OH | Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study (AMATS) | Single budget for entire area. | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) | ||||
| Dayton-Springfield, OH | OH | Coordinating Committee of the Clark County-Springfield Transportation Study | Single budget for entire area. | State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission (MVRPC) | ||||
| Grand Rapids, MI | MI | Grand Valley Metropolitan Council | Single budget for entire area. | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Macatawa Area Coordinating Council (Holland MPO) | ||||
| Greater Connecticut, CT | CT | Capitol Region Council of Governments | Single budget for entire area. | The State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Central Connecticut Regional Planning Agency | ||||
| Council of Governments Central Naugatuck Valley | ||||
| Greater Bridgeport/Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Northeastern Connecticut Council of Governments | ||||
| South Central Regional Council of Governments | ||||
| Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments | ||||
| Greensboro-Winston Salem-High Point, NC | NC | Greensboro MPO | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | The State DOT takes the lead on travel demand modeling and the State air quality agency takes the lead on emissions modeling. |
| High Point MPO | ||||
| Winston Salem Forsyth MPO | ||||
| Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA | PA | Lebanon County MPO | No budgets currently in the SIP. Emissions reductions test completed for entire area. | The State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Tri-County RPC | ||||
| Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY | KY | FIVCO Area Development District | Separate budgets for each MPO | In Kentucky, the State DOT takes the lead on travel demand modeling and the State air agency takes the lead on emissions modeling. In West Virginia, the MPO takes the lead on both. |
| WV | KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission | |||
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-W.Palm Beach, FL | FL | Broward County Metropolitan Planning Organization | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Metropolitan Planning Organization of Palm Beach County | ||||
| Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT | CT | Greater Bridgeport/Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization | There are separate budgets for the portions of the area within Connecticut and New York. The New Jersey MPO has its own separate budget, which covers both the New Jersey portions of the Allentown and New York City areas. | In Connecticut, the State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. In New Jersey, the MPO takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. In New York, the MPOs take the lead on travel demand modeling, while the State DOT takes the lead on emissions modeling. |
| Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials | ||||
| South Western Regional Planning Agency | ||||
| NJ | North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, Inc. | |||
| NY | New York Metropolitan Transportation Council | |||
| Newburgh-Orange County Transportation Council | ||||
| Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton, PA-NJ-DE-MD | DE | Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization | The county in Maryland has a separate budget. Each county in Delaware has separate sub-area budgets. The South Jersey MPO and the portion of the DVRPC in New Jersey each have their own sub-area budgets. The portion of the DVRPC in Pennsylvania has a separate budget. | In Delaware and Maryland, the State DOTs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. In New Jersey and Pennsylvania, the MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) | ||||
| MD | Wilmington Area Planning Council (WILMAPCO) | |||
| NJ | South Jersey Transportation Planning Organization | |||
| Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) | ||||
| PA | Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) | |||
| Portland, ME | ME | Kittery Area Comprehensive Transportation Committee (KACTS) | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | The State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling |
| Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation Study (PACTS) | ||||
| Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA | OR | Metro | Separate budgets for each MPO | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| WA | Southwest Washington Regional Transportation Council | |||
| Poughkeepsie, NY | NY | New York Metropolitan Transportation Council | No budgets currently in the SIP | Emissions reductions test completed for entire area. The MPOs take the lead on travel demand modeling and the State DOT takes the lead on emissions modeling. |
| Newburgh-Orange County Transportation Council | ||||
| Poughkeepsie-Dutchess County Transportation Council | ||||
| Raleigh-Durham, NC | NC | Capital Area MPO (CAMPO) | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | The State DOT takes the lead on travel demand modeling and the State air quality agency takes the lead on emissions modeling |
| Durham Chapel Hill Carrboro (DCHC) MPO | ||||
| Richmond, VA | VA | Richmond Area Metropolitan Planning Organization | Single budget for entire area. | The State DOT takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Tri-Cities Area Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Saginaw-Bay City-Midland, MI | MI | Bay City Area Transportation Study Policy Committee | This area has a limited maintenance plan; the budget is considered unconstrained. | In the Bay City MPO, the MPO takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. In the Saginaw MPO, the State DOT takes the lead on both. |
| Saginaw County Metropolitan Planning Commission | ||||
| Sacramento Metro, CA | CA | Metropolitan Transportation Commission | Single budget for entire area | Each MPO take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Sacramento Area Council of Governments | ||||
| San Joaquin Valley, CA | CA | Council of Fresno County Governments | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Kern County Council of Governments | ||||
| Kings County Association of Governments | ||||
| Madera County Transportation Commission | ||||
| Merced County Association of Governments | ||||
| San Joaquin Council of Governments | ||||
| Stanislaus Council of Governments | ||||
| Tulare County Association of Governments | ||||
| Springfield, (Western MA), MA | MA | Berkshire Regional Planning Commission | Single budget for entire area. | The MPOs take the lead on travel demand modeling, and the State DOT takes the lead on emissions modeling. |
| Pioneer Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Tampa-St.Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | FL | Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization | Sub-area budgets for each MPO | MPOs take the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. |
| Pinellas County Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Washington, DC-MD-VA | DC | National Capitol Transportation Planning Board | Single budget for entire area. | Each MPO takes the lead on travel demand modeling for their areas. The National Capitol Transportation Planning Board takes the lead on emissions modeling for the entire area. |
| MD | ||||
| VA | National Capitol Transportation Planning Board | |||
| Fredericksburg Metropolitan Planning Organization | ||||
| Youngstown-Warren-Sharon, OH-PA | OH | Eastgate Regional Council of Governments | Separate budgets for each MPO | In Ohio, the MPO takes the lead on both travel demand and emissions modeling. In Pennsylvania, the State DOT takes the lead on both. |
| PA | Shenango Valley Transportation Study |
