Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
PlanningEnvironmentReal Estate

HEP Events Guidance Publications Awards Contacts

Bicycle Facilities and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Background

The Federal Highway Administration receives occasional inquiries about what bicycle facilities, signs, and markings are permitted in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The table below lists various bicycle-related signs, markings, signals, and other treatments and identifies their status (e.g., can be implemented, currently experimental) in the 2009 version of the MUTCD.

Description of Bicycle Facilities Status in the FHWA's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Are FHWA Experiments in Progress?
Signs and Markings
Bike Lanes
Conventional bike lanes Can be implemented at present time  
Continuation of bike lanes up to intersections Can be implemented at present time  
Dashed bike lanes through intersections Can be implemented at present time  
Use of green pavement markings for bike lanes and cycle tracks within intersections Interim approval has been granted. Requests to use green colored pavement need to comply with the provisions of Paragraphs 14 through 22 of Section 1A.10 Yes
Green bike lanes at conflict points such as heavy turning and merging locations Interim approval has been granted. Requests to use green colored pavement need to comply with the provisions of Paragraphs 14 through 22 of Section 1A.10 Yes
Green bike lanes or green behind bike lane symbols and standard arrows Interim approval has been granted. Requests to use green colored pavement need to comply with the provisions of Paragraphs 14 through 22 of Section 1A.10 Yes
Contraflow bike lanes Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used  
Combined bike lane/turn lane Experimental if bike lane markings are used, but can be implemented at the present time if Shared Lane Markings are used instead of bike lane markings Yes
Dashed bike lanes on narrow roadways (advisory bike lanes) This treatment is currently experimental Yes
Buffered bike lanes Can be implemented at present time if pavement markings and crashworthy channelizing devices for bicycles that are compliant with the MUTCD are used Yes
Bike lanes between traffic lanes on approaches to lane drop conditions Can be implemented at present time  
Bike lanes on left-hand side of one-way streets Can be implemented at present time  
Cycle Tracks
Protected cycle tracks, both one-way and two-way bicycle facilities Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Raised cycle tracks, both one-way and two-way bicycle facilities Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Cycle track two-stage signalized left turn with bike queuing space Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used  
Merging cycle track users with turn lanes in advance of high volume turn locations, allowing bicyclists to make a through movement at the intersection in order to reduce conflicts with the turning traffic Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used  
Truncated cycle track (ramp down to bike lane or shared right-turn lane) Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Other Signs and Markings
Shared lane markings Can be implemented at present time  
Green colorized pavement limited to behind the shared lane marking This treatment is currently experimental Yes
Green colorized pavement to communicate a longitudinal direction in conjunction with shared lane markings where no bike lane is used This treatment is currently experimental Yes
Bike boxes with advanced stop lines for motor vehicles and no-turn-on-red restrictions on the approach Currently is experimental; more research data is needed before a final decision can be made regarding this application Yes
Accommodating two-stage "delayed" left turns at signalized intersections via pavement markings and signal detection Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used  
Bike route wayfinding and marking system Can be implemented at present time if signs and pavement markings that are compliant with the MUTCD are used, but currently is experimental if a non-compliant sign or marking is used Yes
Rotated bicycle symbols in bike lanes at intersections and driveways oriented towards turning or entering motorists Can be implemented at present time  
Defining orange pavement markings for temporary traffic control usage to draw attention to the changed conditions, including for bike lanes, pedestrian crosswalks, yield markings, etc. Not allowed by the MUTCD; no experiments are being conducted regarding this treatment  
Defining unique, high-visibility pavement markings for bicycles and pedestrians (similar to Swiss usage of yellow for bike lanes and pedestrian crosswalks) Not allowed by the MUTCD; no experiments are being conducted regarding this treatment  
Active warning beacon for a bike boulevard Can be implemented at present time  
Signals
Bicycle traffic signal indications Bike symbols on traffic signal displays are currently experimental Yes
Bicycle traffic signal phasing at signalized intersections (such as protected lagging right turns for motorists made after through movement bicycle traffic) Can be implemented at present time if circular indications are used for the bicycle signal with a "BIKE SIGNAL" sign adjacent to the signal face  
Hybrid beacon for bike boulevard or other bike route crossing Bikes can be assisted in crossing a roadway by a pedestrian hybrid beacon type of device at the present time, but bike symbols on traffic signal displays are currently experimental Yes
Signal detection for bicycles Can be implemented at present time  
Right-turn-on-red motor vehicle restrictions Can be implemented at present time  
Other Treatments
Separation of travel modes on shared-use paths Can be implemented at present time  
Railing separating bicyclists and pedestrians at cycle tracks approaching signalized intersections Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Convex mirrors at signalized intersections to reduce "right hook" type crashes Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Bike routes on lower volume parallel roadways Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  
Median or refuge islands for bikeway crossings Not a traffic control device, so no MUTCD restriction on its use  

Disclaimer: Inclusion on this list does not constitute FHWA endorsement. The purpose of this list is to describe the status in the MUTCD of different bicycle-related treatments. Practitioners should consult any applicable design policies, including the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, and State laws of the State within which the treatment is contemplated for use. The design and implementation of traffic control devices requires careful consideration of the roadway environment to ensure the safety of all road users.

Web Resources:

Additional Information:

If you need additional information, please contact:

Gabe Rousseau
Bicycle and Pedestrian Program Manager
Federal Highway Administration
or
Kevin Dunn
MUTCD Team - Part 9
Federal Highway Administration

Updated: 03/13/2013
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000