Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
PlanningEnvironmentReal Estate

HEP Events Guidance Publications Awards Contacts

Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access

Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide

< Previous

All facilities, including recreation trails and shared-use paths, require regular maintenance to reduce the damage caused over time by the effects of weather and use. Many maintenance issues can be reduced if properly addressed in the planning and designing phases before construction even begins. Outsloped trails generally provide adequate drainage of water, however unique situations will require careful planning and design to handle the damage that can be done by water. Adequate subgrade preparation and thickness, as well as the thickness of the recreation trail or shared-use path surface, are important in reducing future repairs. Considering the types, sizes, and weights of vehicles that may need access to the trail for maintenance or emergencies will be helpful in reducing the damage that may occur to the trail.

Figure 18-1. Obstacles, such as fallen trees, should be removed to maintain the tread in a condition that can be negotiated by all trail users.
Figure 18-1. Obstacles, such as fallen trees, should be removed to maintain the tread in a condition that can be negotiated by all trail users.

Proper maintenance is essential to promote user safety, to ensure ease of access, and to encourage the use of a designated route. The Department of Justice implementing regulations for the ADA require all accessible features and facilities to be maintained in operable working condition for use by individuals with disabilities (U.S. Department of Justice, 1991b). Accessible designs are useless if maintenance is neglected and trails are allowed to degrade to a state where they cannot be used or must be avoided during travel. Maintenance strategies should be included in the preliminary planning stages of new construction and alterations. Maintenance plans should also be created to address existing facilities. The extent and frequency of maintenance schedules will vary greatly depending on the location, amount of use, and resources available for the trail. It is recommended that a plan be developed that clearly specifies the frequency of maintenance and how reported maintenance concerns will be handled.

18.1 Facility maintenance

18.1.1 Assessment techniques

To maintain recreation trail or shared-use path conditions, current and potential problems should be identified through an objective assessment process. There are many methods available for identifying maintenance needs on existing trails. For example:

For a maintenance program to be effective, it must identify conditions that can impede access for people with disabilities and quickly respond with prompt repairs. Any citizen complaints reported should be given first priority for repair.

18.1.2 Shared-use path maintenance

Shared-use paths should be maintained to ensure that they continue to provide access to all pedestrians. Shared-use paths with a hardened surface, such as asphalt or a stabilized surface, may require sealing or recoating at periodic intervals. Shared-use paths should be inspected for conditions that are likely to inhibit access or cause user injuries. The following list of maintenance problems is based on information generated by the Bureau of Maintenance in the city of Portland, Oregon (1996), and the Division of Engineering for the Lexington-Fayette County Urban Government (1993):

18.1.3 Recreation trail maintenance

Regular recreation trail inspections can help managers identify public safety issues, routine maintenance needs, and resource management problems. A system to assess and catalog problems on recreation trails should be used to obtain a comprehensive list of potential maintenance items. Having a comprehensive list of sites needing maintenance also helps trail managers prioritize and budget for trail repair and improvement projects. Once identified, these problems can be scheduled for correction through a maintenance program. When a recreation trail has been severely damaged, rerouting might be considered.

Recreation trail maintenance activities include a number of preventative and corrective actions (Beers, 1993):

18.2 Information maintenance

In addition to maintaining the physical characteristics of shared-use paths and recreation trails, agencies should also maintain information regarding trail conditions. Access information is useless if it is not accurate, and it may even be dangerous if users attempt to negotiate trails that are beyond their ability level. Trails should be periodically reassessed verify that conditions have not changed. Reassessment every three years is recommended for recreation trails and shared-use paths that are unpaved. Assessment data should also be verified after a catastrophic event, such as a flood or an earthquake.

Signage should comply with ADAAG specifications. In general, signage should be reevaluated periodically and replaced when age and weathering reduces legibility. The design of the sign should consider the information that is being displayed, as well as actions taken to reduce theft or vandalism. Signs should be removed when their messages are no longer needed or the information has changed.

18.3 Citizen reporting

Those responsible for recreation trail and shared-use path maintenance should provide users with a convenient means to report sites in need of maintenance. The following techniques have been used successfully by a variety of municipalities to obtain maintenance input from users:

Citizen Report Programs can provide agencies with an efficient way of maintaining facilities. Users can often identify issues in a quicker manner than agencies.

People who take the time to submit problems to the appropriate agency need to have a timely written response or see fairly quick results to feel their efforts were worthwhile. If timely action or notification of pending action is not taken, participants could become frustrated and be less likely to spend time in the future identifying problems. If reported problems and issues are scheduled to be resolved in an upcoming project, then the citizen should be notified with the upcoming plan.

Updated: 02/10/2014
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000