| Previous | Return to TOC | |
Interim Report to the U.S. Congress on the Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot Program SAFETEA-LU Section 1807, Continued
Addendum
Last Updated May 21, 2008
Since the Interim Report to Congress was issued, the four communities involved in the pilot program have provided an update on their projects. These updates are presented below:
- On page 13, there were two corrections to Table 1.3. The correct information is below:
| City of Columbia | Marin County | |
|---|---|---|
| Automobile Vehicle Miles Traveled11 | 831,470,000 | 2,223,546,818 |
- Footnote 11 on page 14 should read:
Marin County: Metropolitan Transportation Commission projected average weekday VMT for 2007. Average weekday data has been annualized to arrive at estimated average annual VMT. Minneapolis data are from MnDOT (2001), and include all VMT in Anoka, Hennepin, and Ramsey Counties. Sheboygan County: Wisconsin State DOT (2005). Columbia: City of Columbia, MO (2005), average daily VMT for the Columbia Urbanized Area (UA) has been annualized to estimate annual VMT.
There were several corrections for the City of Minneapolis and Sheboygan County portions of Table 2.1 on page 16. The correct information is below:
| City of Minneapolis | Sheboygan County | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status of Plans for Projects |
|
|
||||||||||||
| Approach to Management |
|
|
||||||||||||
| Existing Bike/Ped Facilities |
|
|
||||||||||||
| Project Mix |
|
|
||||||||||||
| Project Selection Criteria |
|
|
||||||||||||
| Leveraged Funds / Prospects for Leveraging Funds |
|
|
On page 27, the title of Table 2.4 should read "Sample of Minneapolis' Projects."
-
On page 30:
- The text under Figure 2.4 should read: "Among other accomplishments, Staff and the CATC finalized its project selection criteria, which were approved by the JRTC. This is a crucial step in setting up an equitable process to review proposals."
- The reference to the County's Pedestrian and Bicycle Comprehensive Plan 2025 should instead read County's Pedestrian and Bicycle Comprehensive Plan 2035.
-
On page 31, the last three bullet items under the paragraph that begins, "Five projects are especially innovative..." should read:
- Implementing the countywide "Walk to School Initiative" two times per year (i.e., one in spring and one in fall). The City of Sheboygan Falls School District recorded that almost half of the elementary school students participated in the first Walk to School Day. The Village of Kohler held a concurrent event attracting a 99% participation rate. Over 2,200 children and roughly 400 adults have participated thus far in the two events (Education/Promotion).
- The County Planning and Resources Department has sponsored bike corrals at a number of community events. In the summer of 2007 over 400 cyclists participated (Education/Promotion).
- Comprehensive build-out of the City of Sheboygan Falls bicycle/pedestrian network. Especially innovative, are two road diet projects included in the plan (Infrastructure).
On page 31, Table 2.5 for Sheboygan's Projects to Date should read:
| Project Type | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure |
|
All projects are funded |
| Education / Promotion |
|
All projects are funded |
| Planning / Research / Policy |
|
Funded |
On page 46, Footnote 11 should be removed.
Updates related to Spokane, WA, the comparison site:
The original report included values for the City of Spokane, WA instead of values for Spokane County. The updates listed below provide updates with the values for Spokane County.
- In Table 1.1 on page 5, the values for Spokane in the original report were for the City of Spokane. They should have presented the values for Spokane County. The updated values are below:
| Spokane (Control) | |
| Geographic Area (sq mi) | 1764 |
| Persons per sq mi | 241.3 |
| Total | 425,684 |
| % enrolled in college or grad school | 7.2 |
| Total population 25 and older | 276,887 |
| Less than high school | 10.9 |
| High school or equivalence | 26.8 |
| Some college, no degree | 27.2 |
| Associate or bachelors degree | 26.4 |
| Grad or professional degree | 8.7 |
| MEDIAN AGE | 35.4 |
| Total # of households | 163,611 |
| Less than $ 25,000 | 32.2 |
| $ 25,000-49,999 | 32.1 |
| $ 50,000-74,999 | 19.3 |
| $ 75,000-99,999 | 8.5 |
| $ 100,000 or more | 7.9 |
| Median household income (2006 $)4 | $45,145 |
| White (alone) | 88.4 |
| Black (alone) | 1.3 |
| Asian (alone) | 2.1 |
| Other race or multi-racial | 4.1 |
| Hispanic (any race) | 3.1 |
| Total # of workers 16 and over | 191,195 |
| Car, truck or van -- drive alone | 76.7 |
| Car, truck or van -- carpool | 12.3 |
| Public (includes taxi) | 2.8 |
| Walk | 2.8 |
| Other means | 1.2 |
| Worked at home | 4.1 |
| Mean travel time (minutes) | 21.2 |
| Bike commute (MSA) | 0.57 |
| Total # occupied units | 175,005 |
| Owner occupied | 65.5 |
| Renter occupied | 34.5 |
| Average household size | 2.5 |
| Households with own child under 18 | 34.7 |
| Average number of vehicles per household (owner-occupied units) | 1.6 |
| Average number of vehicles per household (renter-occupied units) | 1.3 |
- Because of updates to the Spokane data in Table 1.1, there were updates for Figures 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, , and 1.5. These figures are presented below:





- In Table 1.3 on page 13, the Average Daily Trips by pedestrians in Spokane should be 2.0. The total annual estimated reduction in auto travel due to bicycling and walking (in miles) should be 35,635,777.
- In Table 5.4 on page 49, the average for Spokane should be 35,635,777.
| Previous | Return to TOC | |