The expected maintenance-free life span of a noise barrier varies considerably based on many factors, including the barrier material type, surface texture, color, and component parts. Climatic conditions and the barrier's relationship to the roadway also play a role in the durability of most barriers. Many of these issues have been discussed elsewhere in this manual. Additional considerations are discussed below.
12.1 Repairs
Noise barriers will become damaged at some point in their life, either from handling mishaps
during construction, installation defects that appear well after the barrier has been installed,
vehicles or debris hitting the wall, or simply from old age and exposure to the elements over time
(see Figures 242 to 245). The reasons to initiate a repair may vary depending on the severity and
extent of the damage and the policies of the governing responsible organization. In all cases, the
following factors should be considered in the decision to repair. The relative weight that each of
these factors is assigned may vary locally. However, the order of importance should not deviate
significantly from the order in which they are presented.
(1) Safety - Is the damage severe enough that the structural integrity of the barrier has been compromised; or have components been repositioned to create an obstacle/hazard to vehicles or pedestrians?
(2) Durability - Is the damage severe enough to diminish the durability or life expectancy of some or all the noise barrier components?
(3) Performance - Is the damage severe enough to significantly reduce the attenuation provided by the noise barrier system; or, in the case where the barrier also acts as a fence, is it possible for someone to have access through the wall?
(4) Aesthetics - Is the damage severe enough to create an unsightly appearance that is deemed unacceptable by the neighboring community?
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 242. Repairs photo #736a |
Figure 243. Repairs photo #2488 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 244. Repairs photo #1052 |
Figure 245. Repairs photo #450 |
The issue of future availability becomes even more critical when the components have to be custom fitted with either very few or none of the pieces the same. In this situation, stock piling may not be an option. This consequence should be seriously considered during the design stage and should be avoided if at all possible.
12.3 Access
Section 9.4 discussed a variety of means for providing
access to both sides of noise barriers for
general maintenance and emergency access purposes. These requirements exist for both
ground-mounted and structure-mounted noise barriers. The placing of a noise barrier is usually
dictated by the results of acoustical analyses which are aimed at determining the best location to
block line-of-sight between the noise source and the receivers. This location may or may not be
the
most accessible from either a construction or maintenance standpoint. These accessibility issues
should be considered in the design phase in conjunction with the acoustical, construction,
maintenance, and barrier material selection issues. If the only location to place an effective noise
barrier is relatively inaccessible, then the design should focus on developing a barrier and related
surface treatment and landscaping which is relatively maintenance free.
12.4 Surface/Material Wear and
Deterioration
All noise barrier materials will wear over time. The severity is dependent on the type of material,
proximity to the roadway, exposure to deicing chemicals, climate, and component design. Typical
damage associated with wear are:
In some cases and climatic conditions, surfaces of barriers may never completely dry or may require extended periods of dry weather before drying. The resulting mildew and mold can compromise the aesthetic appearance of the barrier (see Figure 248). In such areas, consideration should be given in the design phase to selecting a barrier and surface treatment which can minimize such conditions and be capable of being cleaned on a regular basis.
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 247. Deterioration from
moisture photo #449 |
Figure 248. Deterioration from
moisture photo #1008 |
|
![]() |
| Figure 249. Deterioration from ultraviolet
light photo #1501 |
The damage is usually only to the stain or coating and is typically an aesthetic issue. However, if the coating or stain is providing protection for the barrier material, then it becomes an issue of reduced life expectancy of the material.
The typical repair is to remove any loose material from the surface and repaint or stain with an appropriate durable finish to match the surrounding colors.
With wood, the common cause is excessive moisture in the wood and improper curing causing the warping. In some cases, it can also be attributed to improper fastening. This defect usually creates gaps or cracks in the noise wall affecting its performance to varying degrees. If the openings are small enough, the repairs could probably be done with caulking material or small pieces of plywood sheeting. Otherwise, the affected components may have to be replaced.
With respect to the oil canning of metal sheeting, warping is usually caused by the absence of stiffening features in the panel profile and is only evident after the panels have been subjected to stresses associated with normal temperature changes. This is a design flaw that normally only affects the aesthetics of the barrier and rarely jeopardizes its safety, durability, and performance.
Concrete warping is more noticeable in stacked panel systems. While full height panels also warps, such warping is not normally visible.
12.5 Landscaping
Comprehensive discussion of landscaping, its relationship to other barrier elements, and its
relationship to
maintenance factors is contained in Section 6.2. The issue
of consistency between the barrier's aesthetic
treatment, including landscaping, and the maintenance philosophy of the owner of the barrier, as
discussed
in Section 6.2, is critical and bears repeating here. No
matter how well designed and coordinated a
landscape plan may be from the aesthetic standpoint, it is only as good as the ability of the
responsible
organization to adequately maintain it. It is a waste of time and money to design an aesthetic
treatment for
which there is neither the commitment (in terms of manpower) nor the funding (long term) to
adequately
maintain. No matter what the desire from an aesthetic standpoint, the landscape plan needs to be
responsive to these financial and manpower constraints. Such constraints may appropriately lead
to the
selection of vegetation that is native "maintenance free" and to a plan that will foster growth of
natural
vegetation.
| 12.6 Graffiti | |
| Section 5.9.3 discusses the various maintenance aspects of the varieties of coatings, stains, and anti-graffiti coatings available for application on noise barriers (see Figure 250). | ![]() |
| Figure 250. Graffiti photo #757 |
|
| 12.10 Issues Related to Specific Barrier Types | |
| Special or unique barrier types may sometimes have unique maintenance related issues which should be considered in the design process. Barriers in a "zig-zag" configuration (see Sections 3.5.5.2 and 4.1.2.3.1) present opportunities for plantings within the barriers "pockets" or recesses, but may make mowing operations more difficult. Barriers with large caps (see Section 6.1.3) or special barrier tops (see Section 3.5.5.3) may shade the top portion of a barrier and prevent the natural cleansing of that area by rain water (see Figure 254). Planted noise barriers (see Section 4.1.2.3.2) and noise barriers constructed behind the top of a retaining wall (see Section 4.2.2) may require irrigation and protective fencing (to prevent unauthorized access and climbing). Barriers mounted on structures (see Section 4.2.1) may create special access conflicts if utilities such as electric, gas, fiber optic lines, water lines, or sewer lines are suspended from the bridge or contained in conduits within the bridge beams or parapets. | ![]() |
| Figure 254. Issues related to specific barrier
types photo #3125 |
|
|
Maintenance considerations for all noise barriers. | ||||
| Item# | Main Topic | Sub-Topic | Consideration | See Also Section |
| 12-1 | Availability of Replacement Parts | . | If barrier components are custom made for a specific project, then the issue of replacement parts becomes very critical. | 12.2 |
| 12-2 | Access | . | If the only location to place an effective noise barrier is relatively inaccessible, then the design should focus on developing a barrier and related surface treatment and landscaping which is relatively maintenance free. | 12.3 |
| 12-3 | Surface/ Material Wear and Deterioration | Deterioration from Moisture | If the design may result in moisture ponding on its surface, consideration should be given to redesign replacement parts. In some climatic conditions, consideration should be given in the design phase to selecting a barrier and surface treatment which can minimize mildew and mold growth and be capable of being cleaned on a regular basis. | 12.4 |
| Deterioration from Ultraviolet Light Exposure | When using paints, stains, graffiti coatings, and stenciled designs, consideration should be given to the effects of ultraviolet light, especially in the design of transparent barriers. | 12.4 | ||
| Loss of Stains and Painted Coatings | If the coating or stain is providing protection for the barrier material, then it becomes an issue of reduced life expectancy of the material. | 12.4 | ||
| 12-4 | Landscaping | . | The issue of consistency between the barrier's aesthetic treatment, including landscaping, and the maintenance philosophy of the owner of the barrier is critical. Manpower and financial constraints may appropriately lead to the selection of vegetation that is native "maintenance free" and to a plan that will foster growth of natural vegetation. | 12.5 |
| 12-5 | Litter | . | Barrier design should consider the location of a noise barrier in terms of litter susceptibility, the barrier's ability to "trap" litter, and the philosophy of the responsible organization regarding cleanup of litter. Landscaping in a high litter area should also consider what type of vegetation is best to use. A thorny type of bush may make litter cleanup more difficult than such litter removal from a grassy area. Special design features such as insert areas, planter boxes, etc. may "catch" litter or even become target areas for litterers. | 12.7 |
| 12-6 | Snow | Storage | Consideration must given to a barrier's susceptibility to damage from snow ploughing operations by both the force of the snow being thrown against the barrier and the resultant pressure of the snow piled-up against the barrier. | 12.8 |
| Drifting | Consideration should be given to snow drifting in the design stage so that, in critical areas, the possibilities of wide shoulders and minimum necessary barrier heights can be incorporated. | 12.9 | ||