Apportionments and Obligations

Note: Recreational Trails Program apportionments were revised for FY 2009 through 2012. See Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Factors for Revised Apportionments for FY 2009 to 2012 for an explanation.

• Summary of Apportionments, Rescissions, and Obligations, FY 1993 to 2012
• 2013 Apportionments
• 2012 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2011 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2010 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2009 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2008 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2007 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2006 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2005 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2004 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2003 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2002 Apportionments and Obligations
• 2001 Apportionments and Obligations
• Detailed Apportionments and Obligations: SAFETEA-LU (FY 2005 to 2012)
• Detailed Apportionments and Obligations: TEA-21 (FY 1998 to 2004)
• Detailed Apportionments and Obligations: ISTEA (FY 1993, 1996, and 1997)

Notes:

The State DOTs may limit the amount of the RTP Apportionment available for obligation in a given fiscal year. See the RTP guidance on Obligation Limitation.

^[1] For 1993-1997, FHWA was allowed up to 3% for administration. For 1998-2003, FHWA received up to 1.5% for administration (with FY 2003 subject to a 0.65% reduction). For 2004, FHWA received $750,000 for administration (subject to a 0.59% reduction). For FY 2005-2009, FHWA is authorized for $840,000 per year. The FY 2007 amount includes an additional $14,587 from FY 2007 Revenue Aligned Budget Authority allocation per 23 U.S.C. 110(b).