Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
PlanningEnvironmentReal Estate

HEP Events Guidance Publications Awards Contacts

Summary of Apportionments, Rescissions, and Obligations, FY 1993 to 2012

This table shows the Recreational Trails Program funds available to the States, obligated (committed) for specific projects, and rescissions made in response to Congressional requirements to rescind Federal-aid highway program funds.

Definitions:  
Allocation: An administrative distribution of funds for programs that (usually) do not have statutory distribution formulas. Allocations usually are for discretionary programs. However, the National Recreational Trails Funding Program allocated funds to the States in FY 1993, 1996, and 1997 by statutory formula. There were no funds in FY 1992, 1994, or 1995.
Apportionment: The distribution of funds as prescribed by a statutory formula. This table lists the amounts made available to States, after incorporating mandatory reductions taken across the entire Federal-aid highway program in FY 2002, 2003, and 2004. This table does not incorporate rescissions decided by the States.
Rescission: Funds rescinded by the States from amounts available for apportionment. There were rescissions in FY 2001-2011, but no additional rescissions in 2012.
Obligation: The Federal government's legal commitment (promise) to pay or reimburse the States or other entities for the Federal share of a project's eligible costs.
Obligational Authority: The total amount of funds that may be obligated in a year. For the Federal-aid Highway Program this is comprised of the obligation limitation amount plus amounts for programs exempt from the limitation.
Obligation Limitation: A restriction, or "ceiling" on the amount of Federal assistance that may be promised (obligated) during a specified time period. This is a statuatory budgetary control that does not affect the apportionment or allocation of funds. Rather, it controls the rate at which these funds may be used.
Obligation Rate: Percent of obligations compared to the amount available (apportioned and allocated) to the State.
Percent Obligation Authority: Percentage of all Federal-Aid Highway Program authorizations available for obligation, by State, cumulative for FY 1992-2006. If a State's RTP obligation rate is higher than the Percent Obligation Authority, then the State is obligating its RTP funds at a higher rate than for the overall Federal-aid highway program. If a State's RTP obligation rate is lower than the Percent Obligation Authority, then the State is obligating its RTP funds at a lower rate than for the overall Federal-aid highway program.

State Apportionments
Before Rescissions
1993-2012
Total
Rescissions
2001-2011
Apportionments
After Rescissions
1993-2012
Obligations
1993-2012
Obligation
Rate Before
Rescissions
1993-2012
Obligation
Rate After
Rescissions
1993-2012
Percent Federal-Aid
Highway Program
Obligation Authority
1992-2006
Alabama $20,084,581 -$210,196.00 $19,874,385 $19,874,385 98.95% 100.00% 94.82%
Alaska 16,035,081 -3,072,264.06 12,962,817 12,655,728 78.93% 97.63% 99.71%
Arizona 20,894,933 -349,915.97 20,545,017 14,252,229 68.21% 69.37% 94.77%
Arkansas 16,986,249 -3,461,840.00 13,524,409 11,525,446 67.85% 85.22% 94.65%
California 68,537,414 -11,478,160.16 57,059,254 45,794,843 66.82% 80.26% 93.93%
Colorado 19,532,117 -914,218.86 18,617,898 17,106,861 87.58% 91.88% 94.84%
Connecticut 11,714,891 -320,408.26 11,394,483 10,869,115 92.78% 95.39% 95.82%
Delaware 10,638,192 -985,620.88 9,652,571 7,954,989 74.78% 82.41% 94.23%
Dist. Columbia 9,734,669 -1,394,299.80 8,340,369 6,140,107 63.07% 73.62% 94.84%
Florida 33,771,534 -3,416,875.00 30,354,659 24,306,294 71.97% 80.07% 94.54%
Georgia 23,686,014 -1,270,481.00 22,415,533 18,733,136 79.09% 83.57% 94.33%
Hawaii 11,054,790 -466,954.00 10,587,836 9,347,878 84.56% 88.29% 93.93%
Idaho 17,458,047 -1,186,388.00 16,271,659 16,176,852 92.66% 99.42% 94.34%
Illinois 22,839,054 -856,560.00 21,982,494 18,575,769 81.33% 84.50% 94.49%
Indiana 15,830,177 -410,551.00 15,419,626 12,187,937 76.99% 79.04% 94.37%
Iowa 16,414,041 -154,957.00 16,259,084 12,741,506 77.63% 78.37% 94.99%
Kansas 16,164,120 -155,018.00 16,009,102 15,856,253 98.10% 99.05% 95.34%
Kentucky 16,530,912 -151,531.00 16,379,381 14,154,960 85.63% 86.42% 94.71%
Louisiana 19,937,474 -1,206,279.00 18,731,195 15,652,684 78.51% 83.56% 96.21%
Maine 15,472,640 -1,501,784.73 13,970,855 13,864,472 89.61% 99.24% 94.88%
Maryland 13,919,638 -343,732.00 13,575,906 13,356,879 95.96% 98.39% 95.22%
Massachusetts 15,023,851 -2,978,467.25 12,045,384 8,585,462 57.15% 71.28% 97.99%
Michigan 30,519,694 -289,200.00 30,230,494 29,472,734 96.57% 97.49% 94.43%
Minnesota 24,623,832 -1,454,612.00 23,169,220 23,082,940 93.74% 99.63% 94.95%
Mississippi 17,916,321 -465,666.00 17,450,655 15,951,368 89.03% 91.41% 95.43%
Missouri 19,968,084 -717,389.64 19,250,694 18,349,573 91.89% 95.32% 94.57%
Montana 17,143,001 -982,638.00 16,160,363 15,718,611 91.69% 97.27% 95.18%
Nebraska 13,705,592 -1,131,183.84 12,574,408 11,643,005 84.95% 92.59% 95.02%
Nevada 14,422,411 -848,175.09 13,574,236 13,491,670 93.55% 99.39% 97.58%
New Hampshire 13,332,137 -429,000.00 12,903,137 12,903,137 96.78% 100.00% 95.54%
New Jersey 16,274,066 -149,428.00 16,124,638 15,137,000 93.01% 93.87% 94.66%
New Mexico 16,909,660 -1,212,114.94 15,697,545 14,092,188 83.34% 89.77% 94.48%
New York 24,554,326 -3,805,274.00 20,749,052 14,385,268 58.59% 69.33% 94.27%
North Carolina 21,358,690 -225,754.00 21,132,936 20,379,742 95.42% 96.44% 94.37%
North Dakota 12,376,224 -623,916.11 11,752,308 11,530,027 93.16% 98.11% 94.31%
Ohio 22,435,756 -1,751,609.44 20,684,147 18,415,494 82.08% 89.03% 94.67%
Oklahoma 19,026,231 -189,936.00 18,836,295 15,297,899 80.40% 81.22% 95.56%
Oregon 17,787,569 -1,311,349.37 16,476,220 15,495,841 87.12% 94.05% 94.08%
Pennsylvania 23,548,107 -1,117,665.90 22,430,441 21,420,375 90.96% 95.50% 93.53%
Puerto Rico 69,952 0.00 69,952 0 0.00% 0.00% ***
Rhode Island 10,521,993 -866,366.01 9,655,627 7,048,388 66.99% 73.00% 95.52%
South Carolina 15,197,154 -746,790.64 14,450,363 12,686,570 83.48% 87.79% 95.08%
South Dakota 12,614,369 -125,029.00 12,489,340 12,489,128 99.01% 100.00% 94.83%
Tennessee * 18,681,222 -667,234.17 18,013,988 18,868,108 101.00% 104.74% 94.45%
Texas 45,335,264 -3,762,632.46 41,572,632 38,536,186 85.00% 92.70% 94.51%
Utah 17,070,506 -554,598.47 16,515,908 16,515,908 96.75% 100.00% 95.3%
Vermont 12,094,052 -237,814.00 11,856,238 11,671,468 96.51% 98.44% 96.44%
Virginia 19,305,990 -709,467.00 18,596,523 18,596,523 96.33% 100.00% 94.08%
Washington 22,183,994 0.00 22,183,994 22,183,994 100.00% 100.00% 96.66%
West Virginia 14,717,111 -736,173.65 13,980,937 10,390,267 70.60% 74.32% 95.78%
Wisconsin 22,856,948 -195,960.00 22,660,988 19,271,427 84.31% 85.04% 94.75%
Wyoming 15,535,501 -26,255.27 15,509,246 14,987,611 96.47% 96.64% 94.61%
Total to States 984,600,453 -61,619,734.97 922,980,718 830,194,291 84.32% 89.95% n/a
FHWA Takedown 12,318,483.00 n/a 12,318,483.00 0.00 n/a n/a n/a
Total USA 996,918,936.00 n/a 935,299,201.03 830,194,291.13 n/a n/a n/a

Federal-aid Transfers (23 U.S.C. 126)
States may transfer Federal-aid highway program funds among Federal-aid categories under 23 U.S.C. 126 (HTML / PDF). These transfers are not included in the apportionments listed in the Table above.

Funds transferred to the RTP become RTP funds for the purpose of obligation: this may result in an obligation rate greater than 100 percent. Funds transferred from the RTP are no longer available for obligation under the RTP. Use the transfer figures below to calculate the true obligation rate.

* For example: Tennessee transferred Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds to the RTP in several years: FY 2000: $448,112 / FY 2001: $661,701 / FY 2002: $790,617 / FY 2003: $225,547 / FY 2007: $100,000 / FY 2008: $277,778 / TOTAL: $2,503,755. After accounting for these transfers: Tennessee's funds available before rescissions would be $17,568,200; obligation rate of 107.72%. Tennessee's funds available after rescissions would be $16,900,965.83; obligation rate of 112.71%.

Other States also have transferred funds to or from the RTP.

FY 2003: Michigan transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $120,000 (FY 2003 funds)
FY 2005: Illinois transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $463,179.34 (FY 2003 funds)
FY 2006: Alaska transferred from RTP to Alaska Marine Highway: $187,280.08 ($111,403.85 in FY 2003 funds; $75,876.23 in FY 2004 funds).
Nevada transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $80,000 (FY 2005 funds)
FY 2008: New York transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $90,843.00 (FY 2003 funds)
FY 2009: Connecticut transferred from STP Flexible to RTP: $112,271.00.
Nebraska transferred from NHS to RTP: $333,146.00.
New York transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $74,197.00 ($28,000 in FY 2004 funds, $46,197 in FY 2003 funds).
Oregon transferred from STP TE funds to RTP: $625,000.00
FY 2010: Connecticut transferred from STP Flexible to RTP: $112,271.00.
Indiana transferred from STP TE to RTP: $284,354.00.
Oklahoma transferred from RTP to BR REP and REH: $0.60
FY 2011: Nebraska transferred from STP TE to RTP: $701,020.00.
New York transferred from RTP to STP Flexible: $62,265.00.

Notes:

The FY 1992-2012 Percent Federal-Aid Highway Program Obligation Authority figures are not yet available.

Revised March 21, 2006, pursuant to a 1 percent across-the-board rescission contained in Division B, Chapter 8, section 3801 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-148. See the Apportionment Notice at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/n4510595.htm.

The State DOTs may limit the amount of the RTP Apportionment available for obligation in a given fiscal year. See the RTP guidance on Obligation Limitation.

The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) established the National Recreational Trails Funding Program as a formula allocation program, subject to annual appropriations. Funds were provided in FY 1993, 1996, and 1997 through FHWA's administrative funds. Puerto Rico only met eligibility requirements in FY 1993. There were no funds available in FY 1994 or 1995.

The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) established the Recreational Trails Program (RTP) as a formula apportioned program with contract authority for FY 1998-2003. FY 2003 Apportionments had a 0.65% reduction required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2003 (P. L. 108-7).

*FY 2004 Apportionments were calculated based on a $60 million program. They had a 0.59% reduction required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-199), but include the Restoration of FY 2004 Funds pursuant to section 13 of the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2004, Part V, P.L. 108-310.

The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) authorized RTP apportionments for FY 2005-2009.

Please see the following Notices:


For 1993-1997, FHWA was allowed up to 3% for administration. For 1998-2003, FHWA received up to 1.5% for administration (with FY 2003 subject to a 0.65% reduction). For 2004, FHWA received $750,000 for administration (subject to a 0.59% reduction). For FY 2005-2009, FHWA is authorized for $840,000 per year. The FY 2007 amount includes an additional $14,587 from FY 2007 Revenue Aligned Budget Authority allocation per 23 U.S.C. 110(b).

Updated: 04/18/2013
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000