Skip to contentU.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration FHWA HomeFeedback
Environment
Slide 2
Back | Next

STAM 2003 - Joel Lynch Presentation

Land & Water Conservation Fund Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Planning (SCORP)

"...Foremost among the developments..."

Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC) Recommendations

Land & Water Conservation Fund Act (1965)

Land & Water Conservation Fund Goals

New LWCF Role

Land & Water Conservation Fund Legacy

Land & Water Conservation Legacy: Trails

Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP)

New Priorities for SCORP Planning

SCORP Status

Convergence of Ideals

Some Cursory Observations

Staple SCORP Priorities

Emerging SCORP Priorities

Key Activity Priorities

Conclusion

Questions and Comments

National Park Service National Park Service logo background

"...Foremost among the developments... profoundly affecting American life are population growth, and the accelerated rate of urbanization and metropolitanization. The former implies a great increase in future demand for outdoor recreation... But the latter contains the possibility of greatly decreased outdoor recreation demand per capita..."

Philip M. Hauser (1962) Demographic and Ecological Changes in Outdoor Recreation, ORRRC


Notes:

To expand the quote fully...

"demand per capita... as one manifestation of man's accommodations to the urban environment, and hold forth, therefor, a quite different prospect for future aggregated demand.

What is interesting about this quote is that it was made in 1962. While strides have been made in many respects this quote still stand the test of time as it captures the challenges we face today.

When Philip M. Hauser wrote this, the population had grown by 28 million people in the decade from 1950 to 1960, which according to him was "higher than any decade of the 20th century." Today, in the decade from 1990 to 2000, 32.7 million people were added to the population which, according to US Bureau of Census, represent the greatest numerical increase in population ever. What is different between these two decades was that from 1950 to 1960 only 7% of the growth was tied to immigration, where as from 1990 to 2000 about 40% was from immigration. However, the continued mass migration to the suburbs remains the same today as it was then.


Back | Next

National Park Services logo background

To provide Feedback, Suggestions, or Comments for this page contact Christopher B. Douwes at christopher.douwes@fhwa.dot.gov.


FHWA Home | HEP Home | Feedback
FHWA