Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
Planning · Environment · Real Estate

Events Guidance Publications Awards Contacts

Recommendation 3: Establish a Reasonable Process for Re-Designation

Why do it:

The prospect and action of re-designation will keep all byways thinking about maintaining their status, demonstrating value to the traveler and the collection, and showing quality progress in facilities, promotion and protection. The absence of such a process as re-designation provides little incentive for byways to maintain their status or move forward. While this is not a widespread problem, it is likely to be an issue for some byways at any given time. Further, unlike de-designation—a penalty process (and one not likely to be initiated except in extreme cases)—re-designation is a pro-active process asking byways to showcase their accomplishments.

How to do it:

  1. Tie re-designation to periodic corridor management plan updates. Through this process re-designation is not based on the evaluation by a person or committee regarding the worthiness of a given corridor to maintain its status (such as de-designation), but rather on the byway group exhibiting the energy, initiative, and pride to showcase its successes and to examine and articulate its efforts and plans for future accomplishments. While it is not politically feasible or conceptually straightforward for any committee or person to make the decision on whether a byway has not followed through on protecting intrinsic qualities, or otherwise adhered to the values of the Program, it is feasible to rely on the grassroots nature of this Program to ask the question, "Are you, as a local group, still interested in managing your corridor as a byway?" Preparation of a corridor management plan update is a clear "yes". Ignoring the corridor management plan update or being unable or unwilling to perform the requirement would be a clear "no" under most circumstances. In most instances, failure to update the corridor management plan would result in de-designation—an act brought on by inactivity, rather than decree.
  2. Develop a guidebook for updating corridor management plans. Based on the above discussion, the Program should prepare a concise document that describes a reasonable plan update process. The 14 elements must be addressed and updated, but this does not mean that an entirely new document must be written. See Corridor Management Plan Update Memo below for a discussion on this topic.
  3. Add the re-designation provision to next reauthorization of the NSBP.
  4. Add the re-designation provision when Interim Policy is finalized.

Corridor Management Plan Update Memo

As a part of its pursuit to enhance the quality the America's Byways® collection, the National Scenic Byways Program will require that all corridor management plans be updated once every ten years. In order to ensure that the collection is comprised of both quality roads and active byway groups, the preparation of this corridor management plan update will be required in order to maintain designation status. Failure to prepare an updated plan will result in de-designation. Any byways that fail to update their plans will be de-designated and will be able to pursue re-designation through the established byway nomination and designation process used for all newly designated byways.

In recognition of the effort required to prepare a corridor management plan, the following minimum standards have been developed. These standards acknowledge that the update process should focus on the following issues:

Updated: 09/03/2013
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000