|
|
| FHWA > HfL > Projects > Table of Contents |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Next >> |
Printable version of this report (.pdf, 2.4 mb)
![]() |
The purpose of the Highways for LIFE (HfL) pilot program is to accelerate the use of innovations that improve highway safety and quality while reducing congestion caused by construction. LIFE is an acronym for Longer–lasting highway infrastructure using Innovations to accomplish the Fast construction of Efficient and safe highways and bridges.
Specifically, HfL focuses on speeding up the widespread adoption of proven innovations in the highway community. "Innovations" is an inclusive term used by HfL to encompass technologies, materials, tools, equipment, procedures, specifications, methodologies, processes, and practices used to finance, design, or construct highways. HfL is based on the recognition that innovations are available that, if widely and rapidly implemented, would result in significant benefits to road users and highway agencies.
Although innovations themselves are important, HfL is as much about changing the highway community's culture from one that considers innovation something that only adds to the workload, delays projects, raises costs, or increases risk to one that sees it as an opportunity to provide better highway transportation service. HfL is also an effort to change the way highway community decisionmakers and participants perceive their jobs and the service they provide.
The HfL pilot program, described in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) Section 1502, includes funding for demonstration construction projects. By providing incentives for projects, HfL promotes improvements in safety, construction–related congestion, and quality that can be achieved through the use of performance goals and innovations. This report documents one such HfL demonstration project.
Additional information on the HfL program is at www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl.
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
| 1. Report No. | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
| 4. Title and Subtitle I-85 Interchange Design-Build Project Using Prefabricated Bridge Elements in West Point, GA |
5. Report Date November 2009 |
||
| 6. Performing Organization Code | |||
| 7. Author(s) Jagannath Mallela; Paul Littleton, P.E.; Gary Hoffman, P.E., R.L.S.; Salil Gokhale (formerly ARA, Inc.); and Gerald L. Ullman |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
| 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Applied Research Associates, Inc. 100 Trade Centre Drive, Suite 200 Champaign, IL 61820 |
10. Work Unit No.(TRAIS) C6B | ||
| 11. Contract or Grant No. | |||
| 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Draft Final Report May 2007—November 2009 |
||
| 14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
| 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officers Technical Representatives: Byron Lord, Mary Huie |
|||
| 16. Abstract
As part of a national initiative sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration under the Highways for LIFE program, the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) was awarded a $1 million grant to demonstrate the use of proven, innovative technologies to deliver an $81 million project in less time than conventional construction. This report documents the design-build project in Troup County to construct a new Interstate 85 interchange, 10 miles (16 kilometers) of four-lane frontage and access roadway, another bridge, and all other items associated with this large economic development project. The interchange includes prefabricated bridge substructure elements, used for the first time in the State. This report discusses the use of the design-build (D-B) contracting method, a first for Georgia, implemented under newly passed State legislation. The project also includes other firsts for Georgia, including requiring the D-B contractor to propose state-of-the-art methods to achieve performance expectations, the use of prefabricated elements to construct the bridge substructure and real-time traffic operations support through speed band monitoring on I-85. GDOT also set traffic incident response time goals for this project. Under conventional construction, the impact of this project on the traveling public was estimated at 30 months, but with the use of the D-B contracting technique and prefabricated bridge elements, the impact was reduced to only 16.5 months. Using D-B and other innovative techniques to accelerate the delivery schedule had a significant influence on the net construction cost. A comprehensive economic analysis including construction costs and user costs shows that the project saved about $1.98 million or about 45 percent over traditional contracting and construction methods. Because of the success of this project, GDOT is more comfortable with using the D-B method and prefabricated bridge elements on future large- scale projects. |
|||
| 17. Key Words bridge connections, design–build, Highways for LIFE, PBES, prefabricated bridge elements and systems, performance contracting, real–time traffic operations management, return on investment, roller–compacted concrete, speed band monitoring |
18. Distribution Statement No restriction. This document is available to the public through http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl. |
||
| 19. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
20. No. of Pages 39 |
21. Price | |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8–72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
| Approximate Conversions to SI Units | Approximate Conversions from SI Units | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| When you know | Multiply by | To find | When you know | Multiply by | To find |
| (a) Length | |||||
| inch | 25.4 | millimeter | millimeter | 0.039 | inch |
| foot | 0.305 | meter | meter | 3.28 | foot |
| yard | 0.914 | meter | meter | 1.09 | yard |
| mile | 1.61 | kilometer | kilometer | 0.621 | mile |
| (b) Area | |||||
| square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | square millimeters | 0.0016 | square inches |
| square feet | 0.093 | square meters | square meters | 10.764 | square feet |
| acres | 0.405 | hectares | hectares | 2.47 | acres |
| square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | square kilometers | 0.386 | square miles |
| (c) Volume | |||||
| fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | milliliters | 0.034 | fluid ounces |
| gallons | 3.785 | liters | liters | 0.264 | gallons |
| cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | cubic meters | 35.32 | cubic feet |
| cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | cubic meters | 1.308 | cubic yards |
| (d) Mass | |||||
| ounces | 28.35 | grams | grams | 0.035 | ounces |
| pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kilograms | 2.205 | pounds |
| short tons (2000 lb) | 0.907 | megagrams (tonne) | megagrams (tonne) | 1.102 | short tons (2000 lb) |
| (e) Force | |||||
| pound | 4.448 | Newton | Newton | 0.2248 | pound |
| (f) Pressure, Stress, Modulus of Elasticity | |||||
| pounds per square foot | 47.88 | Pascals | Pascals | 0.021 | pounds per square foot |
| pounds per square inch | 6.895 | kiloPascals | kiloPascals | 0.145 | pounds per square inch |
| (g) Density | |||||
| pounds per cubic foot | 16.019 | kilograms per cubic meter | kilograms per cubic meter | 0.0624 | pounds per cubic feet |
| (h) Temperature | |||||
| Fahrenheit temperature(°F) | 5/9(°F– 32) | Celsius temperature(°C) | Celsius temperature(°C) | 9/5(°C)+ 32 | Fahrenheit temperature(°F) |
Notes:
| |||||
The project team would like to acknowledge the invaluable insights and guidance of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highways for LIFE Team Leader Byron Lord and Program Coordinators Mary Huie and Kathleen Bergeron, who served as the technical panel on this demonstration project. Their vast knowledge and experience with the various aspects of construction, technology deployment, and technology transfer helped immensely in developing both the approach and the technical matter for this document. The team also is indebted to Darryl VanMeter, acting administrator of the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) Office of Innovative Program Delivery. Our sincere gratitude is also due to Greg Wiggins and Greg Bowen of GDOT for their assistance and coordination during the construction of this project. Finally, the team also appreciates the technical support for this report provided by C.W. Matthews Contracting, Inc. and the Arcadis design-build team.
| AADT | Annual average daily traffic |
|---|---|
| ARAN | Automatic Road Analyzer |
| dB(A) | A-weighted decibel |
| D-B | Design-build |
| DOT | Department of transportation |
| FHWA | Federal Highway Administration |
| GDOT | Georgia Department of Transportation |
| Hfl | Highways for LIFE |
| HMA | Hot-mix asphalt |
| Hz | Hertz |
| IRI | International Roughness Index |
| NB | Northbound |
| OBSI | Onboard sound intensity |
| OSHA | Occupational Safety and Health Administration |
| PBSE | Prefabricated bridge substructure element |
| PCC | Portland cement concrete |
| RCC | Roller-compacted concrete |
| RFP | Request for proposal |
| SAFETEA-LU | Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users |
| SB | Southbound |
| SI | Sound intensity |
| SRTT | Standard reference test tire |
| VOC | Vehicle operating cost |
| Next >> |
Mary Huie
Highways for LIFE
202-366-3039
mary.huie@dot.gov