|
|
| FHWA > HfL > Projects > Iowa Demonstration Project: Accelerated Bridge Construction on US 6 over Keg Creek |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
| Table 1. | Detour route travel times |
|---|---|
| Table 2. | Bid results |
| Table 3. | Capital cost calculation table |
| AADT | annual average daily traffic |
|---|---|
| AASHTO | American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials |
| ABC | accelerated bridge construction |
| ADT | average daily traffic |
| dB(A) | A-weighted decibel |
| DOT | department of transportation |
| EDC | Every Day Counts |
| FHWA | Federal Highway Administration |
| HfL | Highways for LIFE |
| HPC | high performance concrete |
| HPS | high performance steel |
| IRI | International Roughness Index |
| ITS | intelligent transportation system |
| OBSI | onboard sound intensity |
| OSHA | Occupational Safety and Health Administration |
| PBES | prefabricated bridge elements and systems |
| PCC | portland cement concrete |
| SAFETEA-LU | Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users |
| SAVER | Safety Analysis, Visualization, and Exploration Resource |
| SCC | self-consolidating concrete |
| SHRP 2 | Strategic Highway Research Program |
| SI | sound intensity |
| SRTT | standard reference test tire |
| TRB | Transportation Research Board |
| UHPC | ultra high performance concrete |
| VOC | vehicle operating cost |
The purpose of the Highways for LIFE (HfL) pilot program is to accelerate the use of innovations that improve highway safety and quality while reducing congestion caused by construction. LIFE is an acronym for Longer–lasting highway infrastructure using Innovations to accomplish the Fast construction of Efficient and safe highways and bridges.
Specifically, HfL focuses on speeding up the widespread adoption of proven innovations in the highway community. "Innovations" is an inclusive term used by HfL to encompass technologies, materials, tools, equipment, procedures, specifications, methodologies, processes, and practices used to finance, design, or construct highways. HfL is based on the recognition that innovations are available that, if widely and rapidly implemented, would result in significant benefits to road users and highway agencies.
Although innovations themselves are important, HfL is as much about changing the highway community's culture from one that considers innovation something that only adds to the workload, delays projects, raises costs, or increases risk to one that sees it as an opportunity to provide better highway transportation service. HfL is also an effort to change the way highway community decisionmakers and participants perceive their jobs and the service they provide.
The HfL pilot program, described in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) Section 1502, includes funding for demonstration construction projects. By providing incentives for projects, HfL promotes improvements in safety, construction–related congestion, and quality that can be achieved through the use of performance goals and innovations. This report documents one such HfL demonstration project.
Additional information on the HfL program is at www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl.
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
| 1. Report No. | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
| 4. Title and Subtitle Iowa Demonstration Project: Accelerated Bridge Construction on US 6 over Keg Creek |
5. Report Date July 2012 |
||
| 6. Performing Organization Code | |||
| 7. Author(s) Paul Littleton, P.E and Jagannath Mallela |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
| 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Applied Research Associates, Inc. 100 Trade Centre Drive, Suite 200 Champaign, IL 61820 |
10. Work Unit No.(TRAIS) C6B | ||
| 11. Contract or Grant No. | |||
| 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report August 2011 —July 2012
|
||
| 14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
| 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officers Technical Representatives: Byron Lord, Mary Huie |
|||
| 16. Abstract
As part of a national initiative sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) under the Highways for LIFE program, the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) was awarded a $400,000 grant to demonstrate the use of proven, innovative accelerated bridge construction (ABC) technologies to deliver this $2.7 million project in less time than conventional construction. This project represents a cooperative effort among the FHWA, Iowa DOT, and the Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) project R04 research team to demonstrate the latest advances in ABC methods. This report details the ABC innovations used to replace the US 6 bridge over Keg Creek featuring prefabricated superstructure and substructure systems, high- and ultra-high-performance concrete, self-consolidating concrete, and fully contained flooded backfill. The new bridge was completely prefabricated off-site and installed into placeāa first in Iowa and in the United States. The ABC approach and innovations in this project increased safety, enhanced quality, and allowed the contractor to replace the bridge during a 16-day road closure instead of 6 months, as would have been required under traditional construction methods. Using prefabricated bridge systems and innovative materials nearly doubled the initial bridge construction cost compared to traditional construction. However, a comprehensive economic analysis including user cost savings shows that the project saved road users about $0.44 million (or about 29 percent less than conventional construction). The experience gained on this successful project will help the Iowa DOT implement these innovations more routinely on future projects. |
|||
| 17. Key Words Highways for LIFE, prefabricated bridge systems, innovative construction, high-performance materials, UHPC, fully contained flooded backfill, self-consolidating concrete, economic analysis |
18. Distribution Statement No restriction. This document is available to the public through the Highways for LIFE website: |
||
| 19. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
20. No. of Pages 55 |
21. Price | |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8–72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
| APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS | APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol | Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol |
| LENGTH | LENGTH | ||||||||
| in | inches | 25.4 | millimeters | mm | mm | millimeters | 0.039 | inches | in |
| ft | feet | 0.305 | meters | m | m | meters | 3.28 | feet | ft |
| yd | yards | 0.914 | meters | m | m | meters | 1.09 | yards | yd |
| mi | miles | 1.61 | kilometers | km | km | kilometers | 0.621 | miles | mi |
| AREA | AREA | ||||||||
| in2 | square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | mm2 | mm2 | square millimeters | 0.0016 | square inches | in2 |
| ft2 | square feet | 0.093 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 10.764 | square feet | ft2 |
| yd2 | square yards | 0.836 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 1.195 | square yards | ac |
| ac | acres | 0.405 | hectares | ha | ha | hectares | 2.47 | acres | mi2 |
| mi2 | square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | km2 | km2 | square kilometers | 0.386 | square miles | |
| VOLUME | VOLUME | ||||||||
| fl oz | fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | ml | ml | milliliters | 0.034 | fluid ounces | fl oz |
| gal | gallons | 3.785 | liters | l | l | liters | 0.264 | gallons | gal |
| ft3 | cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 35.71 | cubic feet | ft3 |
| yd3 | cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 1.307 | cubic yard | yd3 |
| NOTE: Volumes greater than 1000 l shall be shown in m3 | |||||||||
| MASS | MASS | ||||||||
| oz | ounces | 28.35 | grams | g | g | grams | 0.035 | ounces | oz |
| lb | pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kg | kg | kilograms | 2.202 | pounds | lb |
| T | short tons (2000 lb) | 0.907 | megagrams | Mg | Mg | megagrams | 1.103 | short tons (2000 lb) | T |
| TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | ||||||||
| °F | Fahrenheit | 5(F–32)/9 or (F–32)/1.8 | Celcius | °C | °C | Celsius | 1.8C +32 | Fahrenheit | °F |
| ILLUMINATION | ILLUMINATION | ||||||||
| fc | foot–candles | 10.76 | lux | l | lx | lux | 0.0929 | foot–candles | fc |
| fl | foot–Lamberts | 3.426 | candela/m2 | cd/m2 | cd/m2 | candela/m2 | 0.2919 | foot–Lamberts | fl |
| FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | ||||||||
| lbg | pounds | 4.45 | newtons | N | N | newtons | 0.225 | poundforce | lbf |
| lb/in2 | pound per square inch | 6.89 | kilopascals | kPa | kPa | kilopascals | 0.145 | poundforce per square inch | ib/in2(psi) |
| k/in2 | klps per square inch | 6.89 | megaPascals | mPa | MPa | megaPascals | 0.145 | klps per square inch | k/in2(ips) |
| DENSITY | DENSITY | ||||||||
| ib/ft3(pcf) | pounds per cubic foot | 16.02 | kilograms per cubic meter | kg/m3 | kg/m3 | pounds per cubic foot | 0.062 | kilograms per cubic meter | ib/ft3(pcf) |
The project team would like to acknowledge the invaluable insights and guidance of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highways for LIFE Team Leader, Byron Lord, and Program Coordinators Mary Huie and Kathleen Bergeron, as well as the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Senior Program Officer, Dr. Monica Starnes, who served as the technical panel on this demonstration project. Their vast knowledge and experience with the various aspects of construction, technology deployment, and technology transfer helped immensely in developing both the approach and the technical matter for this document. The team also is indebted to Iowa Department of Transportation Engineers, Ahmad Abu-Hawash and Bruce Flippin, and FHWA Engineers Andrew Wilson and Benjamin Beerman for their assistance during this project. Thanks to Mike LaViolette of HNTB Corporation for sharing photographs and valuable insights into the lessons learned from the design and construction process.
Mary Huie
Highways for LIFE
202-366-3039
mary.huie@dot.gov