|
|
| FHWA > HfL > Projects > North Dakota Demonstration Project |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
The purpose of the Highways for LIFE (HfL) pilot program is to accelerate the use of innovations that improve highway safety and quality while reducing congestion caused by construction. LIFE is an acronym for Longer–lasting highway infrastructure using Innovations to accomplish the Fast construction of Efficient and safe highways and bridges.
Specifically, HfL focuses on speeding up the widespread adoption of proven innovations in the highway community. "Innovations" is an inclusive term used by HfL to encompass technologies, materials, tools, equipment, procedures, specifications, methodologies, processes, and practices used to finance, design, or construct highways. HfL is based on the recognition that innovations are available that, if widely and rapidly implemented, would result in significant benefits to road users and highway agencies.
Although innovations themselves are important, HfL is as much about changing the highway community's culture from one that considers innovation something that only adds to the workload, delays projects, raises costs, or increases risk to one that sees it as an opportunity to provide better highway transportation service. HfL is also an effort to change the way highway community decisionmakers and participants perceive their jobs and the service they provide.
The HfL pilot program, described in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU) Section 1502, includes funding for demonstration construction projects. By providing incentives for projects, HfL promotes improvements in safety, construction–related congestion, and quality that can be achieved through the use of performance goals and innovations. This report documents one such HfL demonstration project.
Additional information on the HfL program is at www.fhwa.dot.gov/hfl.
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
| 1. Report No. | 2. Government Accession No. | 3. Recipient's Catalog No. | |
| 4. Title and Subtitle North Dakota Demonstration Project: Whitetopping on U.S. 2 West of Rugby |
5. Report Date September 20, 2010 |
||
| 6. Performing Organization Code | |||
| 7. Author(s) Paul Littleton, P.E., Jagannath Mallela, Gary Hoffman, P.E., R.L.S. |
8. Performing Organization Report No. | ||
| 9. Performing Organization Name and Address Applied Research Associates, Inc. 100 Trade Centre Drive, Suite 200 Champaign, IL 61820 |
10. Work Unit No.(TRAIS) C6B | ||
| 11. Contract or Grant No. | |||
| 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Office of Infrastructure Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 |
13. Type of Report and Period Covered Draft Final Report |
||
| 14. Sponsoring Agency Code | |||
| 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officers Technical Representatives: Byron Lord, Mary Huie |
|||
| 16. Abstract
As part of a national initiative sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration under the Highways for LIFE program, the North Dakota Department of Transportation was awarded a $1 million grant to demonstrate the use of proven, innovative thin concrete overlay known as whitetopping and full lane closure for resurfacing U.S. Highway 2, west of the town of Rugby. This report details the use of whitetopping to rehabilitate this major interregional highway. Using full lane closure during construction greatly reduced the duration of traffic interruption compared with traditional methods. Full lane closure on a major highway has been used on reconstruction projects in North Dakota but is typically not used for overlay projects. As a result, an estimated 19 days and $32,927 in road user costs were saved by implementing a full lane closure on this project. A life cycle cost analysis shows that the costs of whitetopping are within 1.8 percent of an asphalt alternative for both agency and road user costs during construction and future maintenance and rehabilitation. The success of this project will encourage the use of whitetopping and full lane closure techniques as viable alternatives for future rehabilitation projects. |
|||
| 17. Key Words full lane closure, Highways for LIFE, life cycle cost analysis, whitetopping |
18. Distribution Statement No restriction. This document is available to the public through the Highways for LIFE website: |
||
| Security Classif. (of this report) Unclassified | 19. Security Classif. (of this page) Unclassified |
20. No. of Pages 36 |
21. Price |
Form DOT F 1700.7 (8–72) Reproduction of completed page authorized
| APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS | APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS FROM SI UNITS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol | Symbol | When You Know | Multiply By | To Find | Symbol |
| LENGTH | LENGTH | ||||||||
| in | inches | 25.4 | millimeters | mm | mm | millimeters | 0.039 | inches | in |
| ft | feet | 0.305 | meters | m | m | meters | 3.28 | feet | ft |
| yd | yards | 0.914 | meters | m | m | meters | 1.09 | yards | yd |
| mi | miles | 1.61 | kilometers | km | km | kilometers | 0.621 | miles | mi |
| AREA | AREA | ||||||||
| in2 | square inches | 645.2 | square millimeters | mm2 | mm2 | square millimeters | 0.0016 | square inches | in2 |
| ft2 | square feet | 0.093 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 10.764 | square feet | ft2 |
| yd2 | square yards | 0.836 | square meters | m2 | m2 | square meters | 1.195 | square yards | ac |
| ac | acres | 0.405 | hectares | ha | ha | hectares | 2.47 | acres | mi2 |
| mi2 | square miles | 2.59 | square kilometers | km2 | km2 | square kilometers | 0.386 | square miles | |
| VOLUME | VOLUME | ||||||||
| fl oz | fluid ounces | 29.57 | milliliters | ml | ml | milliliters | 0.034 | fluid ounces | fl oz |
| gal | gallons | 3.785 | liters | l | l | liters | 0.264 | gallons | gal |
| ft3 | cubic feet | 0.028 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 35.71 | cubic feet | ft3 |
| yd3 | cubic yards | 0.765 | cubic meters | m3 | m3 | cubic meters | 1.307 | cubic yard | yd3 |
| NOTE: Volumes greater than 1000 l shall be shown in m3 | |||||||||
| MASS | MASS | ||||||||
| oz | ounces | 28.35 | grams | g | g | grams | 0.035 | ounces | oz |
| lb | pounds | 0.454 | kilograms | kg | kg | kilograms | 2.202 | pounds | lb |
| T | short tons (2000 lb) | 0.907 | megagrams | Mg | Mg | megagrams | 1.103 | short tons (2000 lb) | T |
| TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | TEMPERATURE (exact degrees) | ||||||||
| °F | Fahrenheit | 5(F–32)/9 or (F–32)/1.8 | Celcius | °C | °C | Celsius | 1.8C +32 | Fahrenheit | °F |
| ILLUMINATION | ILLUMINATION | ||||||||
| fc | foot–candles | 10.76 | lux | l | lx | lux | 0.0929 | foot–candles | fc |
| fl | foot–Lamberts | 3.426 | candela/m2 | cd/m2 | cd/m2 | candela/m2 | 0.2919 | foot–Lamberts | fl |
| FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | FORCE and PRESSURE or STRESS | ||||||||
| lbg | pounds | 4.45 | newtons | N | N | newtons | 0.225 | poundforce | lbf |
| lb/in2 | pound per square inch | 6.89 | kilopascals | kPa | kPa | kilopascals | 0.145 | poundforce per square inch | ib/in2(psi) |
| k/in2 | klps per square inch | 6.89 | megaPascals | mPa | MPa | megaPascals | 0.145 | klps per square inch | k/in2(ips) |
| DENSITY | DENSITY | ||||||||
| ib/ft3(pcf) | pounds per cubic foot | 16.02 | kilograms per cubic meter | kg/m3 | kg/m3 | pounds per cubic foot | 0.062 | kilograms per cubic meter | ib/ft3(pcf) |
The project team would like to acknowledge the invaluable insights and guidance of Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Highways for LIFE Team Leader Byron Lord and Program Coordinators Mary Huie and Kathleen Bergeron, who served as the technical panel on this demonstration project. Their vast knowledge and experience with the various aspects of construction, technology deployment, and technology transfer helped immensely in developing both the approach and the technical matter for this document. The team also is indebted to North Dakota Department of Transportation Engineers Robert Fode, Greg Semenko, Chris Holzer, andDarin Lindblom for their assistance and coordination during this project.
| AASHTO | American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials |
|---|---|
| ACPA | American Concrete Pavement Association |
| AADT | annual average daily traffic |
| dB(A) | A–weighted decibel |
| CDOT | Colorado Department of Transportation |
| DOT | Department of Transportation |
| FHWA | Federal Highway Administration |
| HfL | Highways for LIFE |
| HMA | hot-mix asphalt |
| Hz | hertz |
| IRI | International Roughness Index |
| LID | locked incentive date |
| M&R | lightweight deflectometer |
| MV | million vehicles |
| NDDOT | Minnesota Department of Transportation |
| NPV | net present value |
| OBSI | onboard sound intensity |
| OSHA | North Dakota Department of Transportation |
| SAFETEA-LU | Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users |
| SI | sound intensity |
| SRTT | standard reference test tire |
Mary Huie
Highways for LIFE
202-366-3039
mary.huie@dot.gov