Non-Road Pricing Revenue: Resources
State Transportation Revenue Commission Resources
Many state have established commissions or study groups to investigate transportation funding gaps and suggest strategies for overcoming them. The map below identifies states that have established revenue commissions and study groups. The following table provides information on the different commissions and study groups, together with summaries of their recommendations and links to the reports that they have produced.
Download full-sized version of map (pdf)
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance
In December 2010, this committee established by the State Legislature made a number of recommendations to increase transportation revenues in Arkansas. They include:
- A 10-year phased-in transfer sales tax revenues on the sale of new and used vehicles, tires, batteries, and vehicle parts and services from general revenues to the Highway Fund.
- Indexing the current per-gallon tax on motor fuels to Arkansas's Highway Construction Cost Index.
- A revenue measure for a 10-year, ½-cent general sales tax dedicated to a statewide, bond-financed highway improvement program.
- Implementing a new excise tax on the wholesale price of motor fuels.
- Authorizing, by public vote, the reissuance of GARVEE bonds to improve our Interstate highways.
- Modifying funding for the current State Aid County Road Program and creating a new State Aid City Street Program - continuing dedicated funding for the successful State Aid program for counties, creating a mirror-image, equally-funded program for city streets, and providing revenue growth for these programs through indexing to the Arkansas Highway Construction Cost Index. Other Recommended Legislation
- Requiring a county minimum tax effort before a county or cities within that county can receive additional highway turnback funds - this would require counties to levy a minimum road tax on themselves before being allowed to share in the growth of highway turnback funds paid by others.
- Referring a Constitutional Amendment to allow counties to raise the 3-mill limit on their road tax by a vote of the people
Colorado Task Force on Transportation Finance
In an effort to further evaluate transportation funding needs, and to identify and recommend new and innovative funding sources for transportation, the Governor authorized the creation of the "Colorado Task Force on Transportation Finance" in December 2003. The purpose of the Task Force is to make recommendations regarding the level of investment needed to provide a transportation system for the State of Colorado that would allow for opportunities of economic development, and to maintain and/or improve the quality of life in Colorado. Additionally, the Task Force was asked to provide transportation financing options by focusing on existing funding sources that could be redirected to transportation in order to meet that level of investment. These recommendations may include, but are not limited to, changes that require approval by the General Assembly or by a vote of the people.
The Task Force confirmed that the state's current sources of transportation funding will not address the needs identified. Traditional sources of revenue have not kept pace with inflation, and the state's current budget shortfalls have restricted the possibility of other "non-traditional" sources of funding being allocated for transportation use.
The Task Force recommended:
- Expanding the use of design-build procurements
- Established candidate toll corridors
- Concentrating current funding on maintenance needs
- Accelerating environmental approvals
- Granting local government the ability to form regional authorities to fund transportation improvements
- Improving the state sales tax transfer process and using proceeds to bond and establish a revolving line of credit to support transportation improvement projects
- Expanding the State Infrastructure Bank
- Returning unused Colorado State Patrol and Ports of Entry funds to the Highway Users Tax Fund rather than the General Fund
Governor Malloy's Transition Team Transition Report
In January 2011, the Governor's Transition Team made the following recommendations:
- Develop dedicated state programs funded through specific revenue mechanisms to mitigate Connecticut's reliance on federal funding.
- Add 3Ps and other alternative delivery methods such as Design-Build and CMGC to the state's tool box.
- Gain state authorization legislation for P3s within six to 12 months.
- Key agency leads (DOT and DEP) must work together to streamline the process, which will enhance the use of all forms of project delivery to ensure expedient project development and construction, ultimately promoting job creation.
- Develop a cadre of employees with the mind-set and experience to develop and manage a robust 3P program.
- Develop tools to enable the State to ascertain and select those projects to be developed through a 3P or alternative delivery approach.
- Review how ConnDOT invests its funds for infrastructure improvement, with focus on how to prioritize projects and how to streamline the State Traffic Commission approval process for TOD projects.
- Review state assets (train stations, parking garages, state office buildings etc) to determine what is an essential public asset and what could be sold, leased or monetized through sale/lease back arrangements or other P3 arrangements.
- The STC approval process should be reviewed and revised to promote and prioritize Transportation Oriented Development. Outsource as much as possible from DOT to private sector, as appropriate, to expedite projects and reduces costs.
- Follow up on the 2008-2009 $1 million state-wide Congestion Pricing Study to promote a state-wide program of priced managed lanes.
Transportation Trust Fund Task Force
In March 2011, the Transportation Trust Fund Task Force established by the State Legislature provided information on possible additional revenues to address potential gaps in capital funding for the Transportation Trust Fund.
- Originally established in 1988, the TTF was utilized solely as a pool of funds for capital projects, supported by a revenue structure sized to meet the State's infrastructure needs. Beginning in 1992, shifts of operating funding for the Department of Transportation, the Delaware Transit Corporation and the Division of Motor Vehicles required approximately $3 billion in revenue that otherwise would have supported capital projects. Among the options for improving the sustainability of the TTF is to consider shifting operating costs over a period of time back to the General Fund or providing additional General Fund contributions.
- Establishing a fare box recovery rate policy for all Delaware Transit Corporation (DTC) modes of travel.
- Indexing revenues to allow revenues to fluctuate with increases in costs, allowing Trust Fund revenues to grow annually in a way which off-sets expense growth and construction costs.
Governor's Task Force on Modernizing Transportation Funding in Idaho
In January 2011, the Governor's Task Force on Modernizing Transportation Funding in Idaho submitted six recommendations to the Governor for consideration. The options were ranked in eight categories including revenue predictability, fairness
- Aligning revenue enhancements to improve cost equity among various vehicle classes based on State funds and the GARVEE "debt service" analysis provided in the 2010 Idaho Highway Cost Allocation Study, which shows automobiles currently have an equity ratio of 1.08 and combination trucks have an equity ratio of .86 and consider phasing these changes over several years.
- Allowing local jurisdictions to increase public transportation revenue using the options outlined in the public-transportation portion of the Revenue Options Matrix.
- Examining new methods to allocate funds to local jurisdictions in a manner that incentivizes efficiency and ensures the funds are used efficiently.
- Continuing the 3% distribution from the state fuel tax to the Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation.
- Implementing a funding shift from the Idaho State Police to the State Highway Account, which causes the need for a new funding source for ISP.
Illinois State Transportation Plan Special Report: Transportation Funding
This June 2007 report prepared by the Illinois State Department of Transportation identifies funding options that could help to bridge the gap between the state's transportation investment needs and available funding. The list of strategies is not comprehensive and does not represent a commitment toward any strategy. Strategies identified include:
- Increasing traditional taxes and fees that support transportation at the federal and state levels
- Implementing structural adjustments to existing motor fuel taxes, such as indexing
- Considering mileage-based taxes rather than quantity-based fuel taxes
- Expanding uses of outsourcing on activities including maintenance contracts, management contracts, and vehicle and equipment leasing, combined with hedges on fuel and electricity and strategic sourcing of equipment including mobile phones and other hand-held communication devices
- Combining public and private investments to make some transportation projects financially feasible
- Implementing local option impact fees in Illinois to help jurisdictions recover some of the costs related to the impacts of new developments on the transportation network. These beneficiary fees can include value capture fees, such as tax increment finance districts, which generate funds from taxes related to the added value of sites around transportation improvements.
- Allowing regions, as opposed to the whole state, to take on stronger roles by establishing regional mobility authorities (RMAs) and strengthening inter-municipal authorities with toll authority in their regions
Governor's 2020 Citizen Advisory Commission Report and Recommendations
This commission established by the Governor presented the following recommendations to address transportation funding shortfalls in November 2011:
- Increasing the state fuel tax rates across the board by eight to ten cents. It is estimated that this would raise $184 million to $230 million in annual income
- Increasing the five percent fee that is imposed on the sale of new and used motor vehicles and trailers to six percent, making it consistent with the state sales tax rate and raising an estimated $50 million in annual revenue
- Recommending a funding mechanism that applies to alternatively fueled, hybrid and high fuel efficiency vehicles to compensate for the fact that those vehicles pay no or limited fuel tax
- Directing new funding to the TIME-21 Fund up to the $225 million cap and distributing any additional funding in a manner consistent with the Road Use Tax Fund distribution formula.
- Following the requirements of the Iowa code for the Iowa DOT to "periodically review the current revenue levels of the road use tax fund and the sufficiency of those revenues for the projected construction and maintenance needs of city, county, and state governments in the future. " The Commission recommends the Code of Iowa be changed to require this study be completed every two years timed to coincide with the biennial legislative budget appropriation schedule, rather than at the current five year interval. This would enable the legislature to better respond to changing conditions, roadway needs and new technology.
- Convening annual meetings with cities and counties to review the operation, maintenance and improvement of Iowa's public roadway system and identify ways to jointly increase efficiency. Efficiency actions should be quantified, measured and reported to the public on a regular basis.
- Directing Iowa DOT to undertake a study looking at vehicles and equipment that use Iowa's public roadway system but pay no user fees or substantially lower user fees than other vehicles and equipment. This study should result in an assessment of whether fee structures could be modified and/or created so that all vehicles and equipment using Iowa's public roadways are pay equitable user fees.
Enhancing Kentucky's Transportation Funding Capacity: A Review of Six Innovative Funding Options
This 2005 report prepared by the University of Kentucky for the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet identifies six innovative financing options that could be used to enhance Road Fund revenues or to finance specific transportation improvements in the state. They include:
- Adjusting the indexing formula for the motor fuel tax to keep pace with inflation and account for changing vehicle fuel efficiency. The new indexing formula would provide a means for maintaining the purchasing power of motor fuel tax revenues and afford greater revenue stability.
- Eliminating exemptions and special tax treatments that currently erode the Road Fund tax base. This strategy would close loopholes in the vehicle usage tax and the motor fuels tax.
- Imposing usage taxes on motor vehicle repair parts and labor. This would add stability to the Road Fund since it would be countercyclical with vehicle purchase trends. Motor vehicle parts are currently subject to the state sales tax. Therefore, the imposition of the usage tax would reduce sales tax revenue directed into the General Fund.
- Establishing a supplemental vehicle enforcement fee to create a Motor Vehicle Safety enhancement Fund. This option would impose a supplemental fee on all motor vehicle violations as an add-on to existing fines. The resulting revenues could be used to finance some portions of the Kentucky State Policy operations.
- Using tax increment financing for local transportation improvements, by having the Transportation Cabinet partner with city and/or county governments in joint financing for transportation projects.
- Utilizing tolling to provide new revenues for constructing, maintaining and operating new and existing roads and bridges. The best candidate facilities for tolling would be large bridges and highly traveled limited access highways.
Sustainable Transportation Funding for Maine's Future
This January 2006 report prepared by the University of Maine for Maine DOT utilizes a literature review to identify twelve financing options, many of which are simultaneously aimed at generating revenue and addressing other transportation issues such as congestion. They include taxes, road/direct pricing, tolls and fees. The different alternative financing options identified include:
- Indexing motor fuel tax rates to a measure of inflation
- Local option transportation taxes
- Levying a percentage tax on motor fuel sales, with the ensuing revenue directed to transportation funding
- Implementing a sales tax at the local or state level, with revenues dedicated to transportation
- Levying a weight-based charge on natural resource extraction
- Levying a payroll tax on businesses to finance transit
- Levying a tax on alternative fuels such as natural gas
- Cordon pricing - implementing a charge for operating vehicles in a specified area
- Implementing variably priced tolls dependent upon time of day and level of congesting
- Implementing distance based tolls
- Implementing priced managed lanes
- Value capture - requiring private developers to pay fees to capture the benefit of transportation improvements
- Implementing variably priced user fees on bridges and other facilities based on the level of congestion
- Implementing tolls on a facility or per-mile rate for heavy duty vehicles based on weight
- Implementing a variable vehicle registration fee based on miles of travel
- Levying variable user fees based upon vehicle energy efficiency and environmental emissions
In assessing these different options, the report suggests considering the following criteria:
- What is the revenue raising potential of this option?
- Will this option meet equity standards (do people with equal ability to pay, pay equally?)
- Will this project meet pay-as-you-use standards (i.e. will those who use the system more, pay more)?
- Will citizens still be able to use the roadways/transportation mode under this option, even if they have limited financial resources?
- Will this option be enforceable and able to capture out of state travelers?
- Is this option in alignment with other policy objectives?
- Is this option politically feasible?
Final Report - Blue Ribbon Commission on Maryland Transportation Funding
This November 2011 report required by state statute addresses a wide range of recommendations concerning the structure of transportation funding in Maryland and the pressing need to infuse additional resources into the Transportation Trust Fund to meet critical transportation system obligations. The Commission's recommendations reflect the importance of transportation to the State's economic competitiveness, mobility, and employment.
The recommendations are structured around five issue areas with several recommended actions:
Issue Area1. Protect the Transportation Trust Fund:
- Amend the Maryland Constitution to prohibit transfers out of the Transportation Trust Fund for non-transportation purposes (except in declared fiscal emergencies)
- Enact a statute that requires the Governor and the General Assembly to declare a fiscal emergency and to obtain approval of each house of the General Assembly, along with a repayment plan, before making a transfer of money from the Transportation Trust Fund to the General Fund for non-transportation purposes
- Continue to require the local government portion of Highway User Revenues (HUR) be dedicated to transportation and maintain reporting and audit procedures to ensure expenditures comply with stated requirements
Issue Area II: Shore Up and Expand Core Transportation Funding
- Raise $870 million in Net New Annual Revenues for Transportation
- Restore the Annual Highway User Revenues (HUR) to the Local Governments
- Study Regional Transit Financing Authorities
- Reach the Transit Cost Recovery Ratio Goal of 35 Percent
- Establish a Methodology for Regular Adjustment of Transit Fares to Keep Pace with Inflation
- Eliminate Non-paying Transit Ridership
- Increase Bonding Capacity Commensurate with Revenue Adjustments
- Remove Cost Recovery Cap for Motor Vehicle Administration Fees
- Implement Tolls on Portions of Maryland Transportation Authority Roadways Where No Tolls are Currently Collected
- Explore Application of Possible Additional Tolls on New Facilities or New Capacity of Existing Facilities in Conjunction with Variable Pricing Techniques Facilitated by Recent Technology
- . Facilitate Goods Movement and Expand Investment in Freight Infrastructure through Additional Revenue Mechanisms
Issue Area III: Facilitate Smart Growth by Investing in Transportation in Growth Areas
- Establish a Strategic Framework for Transportation Investment Decisions to Ensure Transportation Infrastructure Investments Support Growth Areas and Preserve Rural Areas
- Work Cooperatively with Local Governments to Ensure County and Municipal Plans Reflect the State's Overall Growth Policies
Issue Area IV: Explore Policies and Legislation to Capture Value Created by Transportation Investments
- Identify Opportunities for Value Capture and Integrate Value Capture Analysis into Existing Transportation Decision-making Process
- Recognize Value Created by State Transportation Investments for Local and Private Entities and Work Collaboratively to Capture this Value to Help Facilitate Transportation Investment
- Seek Legislative Authority to Apply Tax Increment Financing Support to Highway Project Development, as Currently Provided for Targeted Transit Investment
Issue Area V: Explore Policies and Legislation to Facilitate Partnerships to Enhance Transportation Investment
- Establish Centralized Enabling Legislation for Public-Private Partnerships Outlining Efficient and Timely Legislative Reviews
- Revise the Transportation Public-Private Partnership Program Process
- Identify Future Public-Private Partnerships Opportunities and Integrate Public-Private Partnership Screening Analysis into Transportation Decision-making Process
- Engage Specialized Expert Assistance in the Development of a Transportation Public-Private Partnership Program
- Assess the Feasibility of Loaning State Funds to Localities and to Private Project Sponsors in Order to Facilitate Transportation Investment
- Prepare to Take Advantage of any National Infrastructure Bank Program
Transportation Finance in Massachusetts: Building a Sustainable Transportation Financing System
The Massachusetts Transportation Finance Commission was established by Statute to analyze the State's long-term transportation capital and operating needs for the next 20 years. The Commission identified the funds expected to be available, estimated the extent to which a gap exists; and made a series of 28 recommendation on closing the funding gap through potential cost savings efficiencies and strategies to raise new revenues.
The Commission made the following reform recommendations which it believes will save the state over $2.4 billion in annual transportation expenditures:
- Road and bridge investments should be selected and advanced based on rational and transparent criteria
- The Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works (EOTPW) should utilize alternative procurement methods and public private partnerships (P3)
- The use of private flagmen should be allowed on road and bridge projects
- Responsibility for the Department of Conservation and Recreation's (DCR) parkways and bridges should be transferred to MassHighway
- Maintenance Responsibilities for I-395, I-84 and I-291 should be transferred to the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority
- EOTPW should establish the position of Private Project Ombudsman
- The Commonwealth should end the practice of using bonded funds for operating personnel and expenses
- The Commonwealth should improve the predictability of highway funding and coordination of projects funded by multiple entities
- The rate of growth of MBTA fringe benefits costs should be reduced
- The unnecessary constraints on MBTA management should be removed
- The MBTA needs to fully fund its state of good repair program. This goal can and should be achieved by the Commonwealth assuming the debt from Central Artery/Tunnel transit commitments
- The Commonwealth should pay for all MBTA capital expansions, and before committing to a project, the MBTA should demonstrate that adequate revenues are in place to operate and maintain the expansions
- Regional Transit Authorities (RTAs) should be forward-funded
- The RTA's 2.5 percent per year cap in operating cost growth should be eliminated
- RTAs should be allowed to borrow with the full faith and credit of the Commonwealth
- The Secretary of Transportation should exercise a stronger coordinating role with respect to RTAs
- The Secretary of Transportation should have the authority to coordinate all aspects of the Commonwealth's transportation network
- The CEO of each Massachusetts transportation agency should institute a rigorous performance evaluation process
- All Massachusetts transportation agencies should have the same $100,000 tort liability limit as municipalities
- The vast majority of our funds for the foreseeable future should be devoted to maintenance and rehabilitation
- The Tobin Bridge should be transferred from Massport to the Metropolitan Highway System
- Transportation user fees must be dedicated to transportation uses
The Commission recognized the need to provide reliable sources of revenue sufficient in amount to erase the existing gap and to keep pace with rising costs over time. It found that significant new revenues were critically needed to simply maintain our current system, let alone embark upon improvements and expansions. We have identified those six "revitalization" recommendations to generate new net revenues to support transportation needs:
- The state motor fuel tax should be increased by 11.5 cents and indexed to inflation
- The Massachusetts Turnpike should develop a balanced operating budget for the Western Turnpike that does not rely upon spending down its reserve fund
- The Massachusetts Turnpike should develop a balanced operating budget for the Western Turnpike that does not rely upon spending down its reserve fund
- Toll increases on the Turnpike Extension and Harbor Tunnels must be carried out
- The Commonwealth should move to a system of direct road user fees as the principal source of transportation funding using modern technology
- The Commonwealth should investigate whether public private partnerships are appropriate for the development and/or funding of our transportation infrastructure
Transportation Solutions: A Report on Michigan's Transportation Needs and Funding Solutions
Established by the State Legislature, the Michigan Transportation Funding Task Force issued a report making a wide range of recommendations in November 2008. The report reviews investment needs by mode, identifies strategies to achieve greater efficiency and recommends strategies to increase transportation funding. Transportation revenues in Michigan currently come from user fees such as motor fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees. The Task Force considered alternatives involving both user fees and non-user fees, and found that a combination of alternatives would be required to achieve a "good" level of investment.
The Task Force identified the following revenue options.
- Increasing vehicle registration fees
- Eliminating registration discounts
- Increasing motor fuel taxes
- Taxing gasoline and diesel fuel at the same rate
- Abolishing the 1.5 percent cost of collection allowance on motor fuel taxes
- Enacting measures to control costs paid for with transportation funding through Inter-Departmental Grants.
- Increasing sales and use tax one percent and dedicate that additional revenue to transportation
- Directing all or a portion of the sales tax on fuel to the MTF
- Redirecting all or a portion of the Natural Resources Trust Fund to transportation
- Encouraging local investment in transportation by enabling a broad spectrum of local revenue options statewide. These could include:
- County registration fees
- County driver's license fees
- Local fuel taxes
- Allowing a region-wide, seasonal local fuel tax to provide additional revenue for winter maintenance
- Enabling corridor authorities to raise revenue along a certain alignment for a particular project that may span multiple counties or municipalities
- Enabling Public-Private Partnerships (P3s) for toll-financed reconstruction, expansion or new construction of freeways or other transportation systems
- Enabling toll-financed reconstruction, expansion, or new construction of freeways
Final Report by the Commission to Study Future Sustainable Revenue Sources for Funding the Improvement of State and Municipal Highways and Bridges
New Hampshire statute established the Commission to Study Future Sustainable Revenue Sources for Funding Improvements to State and Municipal Highways and Bridges in 2009. The Commission delivered its findings to the governor and the State Legislature in November 2010.
After an exhaustive accumulation of information enclosed in the Final Report, the Commission came to the conclusion that, at the present time, and for the next 10 to 15 years, there are only three sustainable and constitutionally allowed revenue sources available to the State of New Hampshire:
- Motor vehicle fees and surcharges, including licensing and vehicle registration;
- The Road Toll/Gas Tax; and,
Under current operating and capital budgets, the Commission found that there is an immediate $124 million dollar shortfall in the Highway Fund projected for the next biennium. In terms of sustainable Highway Funds revenue to meet the current and projected needs; the newly-elected General Court has three choices: 1) to raise the additional revenue from permanent registration fee increases, 2) to raise the additional revenue by increasing the road toll/gas tax rate, or 3) some combination of 1 and 2.
In the longer term, to meet the projected ten year $1.2 billion Highway Fund combined operating and capital budget deficits (which does not include the $230 million I-93 widening) all three sustainable revenue sources are potentially available to the Legislature. Toll revenues could indirectly fund the Highway Fund deficit through consolidation.
Recommendations for Ensuring a Strong Transportation Network for the 21st Century
Established in January 2003 by Governor James McGreevey, New Jersey Blue Ribbon Transportation Commission made recommendations on transportation funding and policy for a 10-year period. It found that significant new investment would be required to meet core transit system. It recommended a combined annual capital investment program of $3.1 billion to meet highway and transit needs. Specific recommendations included:
- Increasing the State Motor Fuels tax by 12.5 to 15 cents per gallon, with the new revenue should be constitutionally dedicated to the Transportation Trust Fund Authority (TTFA).
- Increasing the TTF capital program to a 50/50 pay-as-you-go bonding ratio over the life of the program.
- Providing for inflationary protection by indexing the Motor Fuels tax.
- Dedicating full yield from new Motor Fuels Tax (currently $49.5 million/penny).
- Capturing revenues generated from heavy truck fees, good driver surcharges and contributions from toll road authorities to the TTFA over the next 10 years.
- Capping the diversion of revenue from capital to fund maintenance and operation costs at the current level, with the goal of eliminating this practice over the next 10 years.
- Capping the level of the annual capital program so as to not exceed the financial resources of the TTF based on the above limitations.
- Indexing NJ TRANSIT fares to inflation
- Encourage private-sector-like efficiencies within NJDOT and NJ TRANSIT.
New Mexico Transportation Infrastructure Futures Task Force
This report is not available on line.
Final Report of Ohio's 21st Century Transportation Priorities Task Force
This report is not available on line.
Transportation Funding Advisory Commission Final Report
To address the growing gap in transportation funding, Governor Tom Corbett of Pennsylvania established the Governor's Transportation Funding Advisory Commission (TFAC) in April 2011. The TFAC was specifically created to develop a comprehensive, strategic proposal for addressing the transportation funding needs of Pennsylvania. The TFAC prepared a comprehensive listing of potential revenue sources as well as cost-saving modernization options that will support additional funding for all transportation modes. The TFAC's recommendations include:
- Capping and/or moving the $570 million that the Pennsylvania State Police receive from the Motor License Fund, and migrating all or a portion of that amount to the General Fund
- Restructuring Act 44 decreases with contributions from the Pennsylvania Turnpike that are currently directed to highways and bridges being reassigned to transit
- Indexing all vehicle and drivers' fees to the Consumer Price Index, allowing them to keep pace with inflation over time
- Uncapping the Oil Company Franchise Task (AWP) over a five-year period. The potential revenue of the AWP is now more than double the ceiling. Removing the ceiling would increase revenue significantly. Revenues go to PennDOT, municipalities, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, counties and the Department of Conservation of Natural Resources
- Increasing traffic violation fines by $50, without adding points on the offender's license
- Implementing a $100 surcharge on license violations
- Increasing vehicle registration fees, with revenues going for local transportation improvements
- Increasing the local funding transit match that is required to receive state funds
- Dedicating up to 2 percent of all state sales tax proceeds to transit
- Allowing marketing and advertising in state-owned rights-of-way
- Migrating the Department of Revenue's point of collection for the motor fuel tax from the wholesale distributor level to the terminal, or "RACK"
Blue Ribbon Commission, Rhode Island's Transportation Future: A Sustainable Approach to Transportation Funding
In recognition of the serious reduction in transportation funding and aging transportation infrastructure in critical need of repair or replacement, Governor Donald Carcieri of Rhode Island established a Blue Ribbon Panel in March of 2008 to assess the state's transportation needs and to identify options for potential funding sources. The panel's mission includes understanding transportation financing needs in Rhode Island, analyzing funding options, and recommending funding a set of mechanisms.
Because of the state's delicate economy the Panel appropriate to present two scenarios that would provide target funding levels of $150 million (Scenario 1) and $300 million (Scenario 2) each state fiscal year.
Scenario 1 includes the following revenue sources:
- Increasing state motor fuel taxes by 5 cents in 2009 and an additional 5 cents in 2012
- Increasing bi-annual vehicle registration fees by $40 in 2009 to $100 and by an additional $20 in 2013
- Levying a new Petroleum Products Gross Receipts Tax equivalent to a 10 cent in the per-gallon fuel cost in 2010 and an additional 5 cents in 2014
- Tolling on I-95 at the Rhode Island border with Connecticut
- Transferring the Sakonnet River Bridge to the Rhode Island Turnpike and Bridge Authority (RITBA), with the RITBA refunding RIDOT the amount being expended for replacing the bridge
Scenario 2 derives revenue from most of the same sources as Scenario 1, with higher revenue levels from the gas tax, petroleum products gross receipts tax and from tolling at all Interstate highway borders in Rhode Island. Two new funding mechanisms are included in Scenario 2: implementation of an annual vehicle mileage fee on all Rhode Island registered vehicles; and redirecting existing vehicle registry fees from the State's General Fund to the transportation trust fund.
Transportation Funding Options for the State of South Carolina
In 2009 South Carolina DOT retained Clemson University to prepare a report on transportation funding options for the state. The report is the first of a series of reports from the Jim Self Center on the Future to address this issue of funding transportation infrastructure needs. The report summarizes survey responses from 1,000 households in South Carolina to identify issues of particular concern and to determine the level of acceptance of alternative funding strategies for transportation infrastructure.
The study explored public opinion on the following potential transportation revenue options:
- Impact Fees
- General Funds
- State Loan Pool
- Tolls on Roads and Bridges
- Sales tax on new automobile purchases
- Income taxes
- Motor fuel taxes
- Property taxes
The study also researched public opinion on who should pay for transportation revenues.
Strategic Transportation Investments to Strengthen Washington's Economy and Create Jobs
The Connecting Washington Task Force issued its final report, Strategic Transportation Investments to Strengthen Washington's Economy and Create Jobs, in January 2012. Although the amount of new funding needed to address all of the Task Force's objective is estimated at $50 billion, the Task Force recommends an investment of $21 billion in state funding during the next ten years to preserve the transportation system and make strategic investments in the corridors that hold the key to job creation and economic growth.
To accomplish this, the Task Force recommended that the legislature considers new revenues derived from increase in fees that could be enacted by the legislature by a simple majority vote and tax increases that would require either a two-thirds vote of the legislature or a majority vote of the people. The Task Force also recommended that the Legislature expand funding options that can be enacted at the local level to support the transportation system. The Task Force also recommended that the State begin planning now for a transition to more sustainable funding sources for transportation. This could include mechanisms such as direct user fees based on miles traveled, wear-and-tear on the roadways, or other direct impact upon the transportation system, allowing the system to be managed and funded as a statewide transportation utility, with rates based upon use.
Medium term revenue increases to fund the $21 billion investment could include:
- A $2 increase in driver record abstract fees
- A $10 increase in vehicle title fees
- A $20 increase in fees for new drivers licenses and $15 for renewals
- A $5 per tire studded snow tire fee
- A $100 annual electric vehicle fee
- A 10 percent increase in the gross vehicle weight fee
- State impact fees or tax increment financing
- Tax increases directed to a dedicated maintenance fund account
- Increases in state motor fuel taxes
- State-wide motor vehicle excise tax
- A tax on all barrels of oil refined in Washington State
- A tax on the sale of hazardous substances
- An increase in the tax on the sale or lease of vehicle
- A vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax
- An emission tax levied on the carbon content of fuel
- Local option fuel taxes
- Local property taxes
- Local tolling
- Parking stall fees
- City street utility authorities
- Transportation district vehicle license fees
- Expanded use of employee taxes
- Local emission fees
- Elimination of exemptions on the sales tax on gas