Kenneth R. Buckeye and Lee W. Munnich, Jr.
After a decade of public discussion and political debate, the I-394 MnPASS Express Lane, Minnesota's ﬁrst high-occupancy toll lane, opened in May 2005. The MnPASS project was designed to improve the efficiency of I-394 by increasing the person- and vehicle-carrying capabilities of existing high-occupancy vehicle lanes, maintaining free-ﬂow speeds for transit and carpools, and using electronic toll collection (tags/transponders and readers) for dynamic pricing and electronic enforcement. While previous road pricing initiatives in Minnesota, as in other states, have provided opportunity for public feedback, the process tends to be confrontational and less than satisfying for all parties. Both citizens and politicians often believe comments and concerns are minimized and rarely taken seriously enough to alter project plans. The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force, however, was formed to help citizens and stakeholders fully understand the project and its goals and to provide a more effective vehicle to give advice and guidance during the development of the project. Through this process, the task force members became an informed voice for the project and an essential part of an extensive education, outreach, and public involvement process that has been critical to the success of the I-394 MnPASS project. If proved successful in the long run, this task force model increases the likelihood that Minnesota citizens will support such projects in the future.
In May 2005, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) opened the state's ﬁrst high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes facility, called the I-394 MnPASS Express Lane (Figure 1). Among a number of innovations on this facility was the method used to guide Mn/DOT and its partners through a challenging implementation process. The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force was formed to help citizens and stakeholders fully understand the project and its goals. The mission of the task force was to provide advice and guidance to the commissioner of transportation during the development of the I-394 MnPASS project. Input from the task force was taken seriously and altered the project in several important ways:
Minnesota has had a tumultuous history with other road pricing project proposals. Two previous attempts at introducing pricing as a ﬁnancing and demand management tool were defeated by organized public opposition (1). Efforts to involve and inform decision makers and the public through effective education and outreach were determined imperative to the success of the I-394 MnPASS project.
When the Interstate 394 facility was originally opened in 1992, the high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes were designated for carpools with two or more passengers, buses, and motorcycles. Shortly after opening, however, congestion in the general purpose lanes plus a less-than-full HOV facility created a perception that the HOV lanes were underutilized.
This perception persisted and led to periodic requests that the HOV lanes be opened to solo drivers. This culminated with a request by the legislature that Mn/DOT conduct a study to evaluate the feasibility of this action. The study, which was completed in 2001, concluded that the I-394 HOV facility was underused but that opening it to general traffic would not be cost-effective and would result in a congested facility. The same study concluded that conversion to a HOT lane operation could be a more cost-effective alternative (2).
A Value Pricing Advisory Task Force of elected officials, business, transportation, and other community leaders laid the groundwork for the I-394 HOT lanes project by recommending that Minnesota pursue a pilot project in the corridor. Legislative action ultimately ensued in 2003 permitted the conversion of HOV facilities to HOT lanes. The governor and lieutenant governor (also the transportation commissioner) became immediate supporters of the concept, realizing the project's potential to help address multiple transportation problems.
Congestion pricing has long been advocated by economists as a more efficient way of allocating scarce road space among users. For many years the technology limited the ability to apply congestion pricing since tollbooths would defeat the purpose of the congestion charge by adding delay to the systems. The widespread use of electronic tolling technology, which is now rapidly replacing tollbooths, has made toll collection simpler and more efficient without slowing traffic.
In the 1990s the federal government encouraged states and regions to implement pilot projects to demonstrate how congestion pricing works. The Congestion Pricing Pilot Program authorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and its successor the Value Pricing Pilot Program authorized in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) in 1998 and in Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) in 2005, have encouraged states and regions to develop and implement pricing projects.
The program had a slow start in the 1990s due to political and institutional issues at the state and local levels. In 1994, a national Committee for Study on Urban Transportation Congestion Pricing summarized the problem as follows: "The reasons for rejection of congestion pricing in the past have not changed. Any shift from the current system of ﬁnancing and using the transportation system toward more marketlike mechanisms can be expected to engender public and political resistance" (3).
The FHWA pilot programs helped in the initiation and evaluation of value pricing projects in southern California, Texas, Florida, and New York in the 1990s and demonstrated the technical feasibility, value, and public support for such projects (4, 5). Despite these initial successes and broad national interest in the potential for HOT lanes, states have been slow in implementing projects beyond these few pilots.
Public management studies have shown that neglecting or underestimating the information needs and concerns of stakeholders frequently leads to poor performance, outright failure, or even disaster (6). Nutt (7) analyzed 400 strategic decisions and found that half had failed in large part because decision makers failed to attend to interests and information held by key stakeholders. Wildavsky (8) argued that a key to effective policy change is "creating problems that could be solved," linking technical rationality with political rationality "to mobilize support for substance."
Since 1994 the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs has conducted research on congestion and value pricing and worked with Mn/DOT to educate stakeholders and the general public about the concept. In 1996 the Humphrey Institute, in its report Buying Time, recommended six key components for successful implementation of congestion pricing:
All six components were critical for Minnesota to get to the point at which a value pricing project could move forward in 2003.
Mn/DOT has pursued value pricing in various forms for nearly a decade (10). Within the context of demographic and traffic forecasts for the coming decades, the department has recognized that not enough funding could be expected to expand the existing transportation system or to provide transit service at a level that would manage congestion at reasonable levels. Value pricing, however, has held promise of providing a demand management tool as well as a revenue stream to fund operations and perhaps make transit and other roadway improvements in the corridors in which funding is collected.
Road pricing in any form, however, has proved to be a highly contentious issue with the driving public. While new roads themselves, ﬁnanced at least partly with tolls, have been controversial but achievable, almost no amount of economic rationale has been able to convince the public that conversion of existing general purpose lanes to toll lanes is equitable. Conversion of the non-barrier-separated diamond lanes on I-394 - partially HOV and partially open to all users - is in a sense a partial lane takeaway.
The MnPASS project, authorized by the legislature, set the department toward development of a project with many nuances that required innovation in management and technology as well as in outreach and education. The importance of achieving "informed consent" was recognized early as key to the project's success, and signiﬁcant resources have been applied to this effort throughout the project development process.
Mn/DOT recognized that, given the complexity of the project, it was imperative to develop a meaningful education and outreach process to ensure successful implementation. At the request of Mn/DOT staff, the governor and lieutenant governor formed the I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force composed of legislators, community leaders, interest groups, and concerned citizens. At the same time, under a federal value pricing grant, Mn/DOT pursued a comprehensive education and outreach activity modeled after an earlier effort described in the next section.
An important precursor to the I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force was formed in 2001 after several unsuccessful attempts to introduce road pricing in Minnesota. In those earlier attempts to introduce the state to road pricing, the public overwhelmingly rejected the notion as demonstrated in a citizens' jury process (11). The 30-member Value Pricing Advisory Task Force - composed of state legislators; mayors; city council and county board members; and business, environmental, and transportation association leaders - was assembled to explore appropriate and feasible value pricing options in Minnesota. Over time, polls conducted in conjunction with the task force showed a strong shift in public opinion. [One poll showed that 55% of the public in Minnesota preferred an option to pay a toll to bypass congestion and 52% favored a gas tax increase (12).] In concluding their work, after more than a year of study, the task force concluded that the state should proceed with a demonstration project (13).
Members of this task force decided to continue to champion the cause of value pricing and to communicate their reasons for supporting the concept. A project team led by the State and Local Policy Program of the University of Minnesota's Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs developed and carried out a research, education, and communications strategy for value pricing during 2002 and 2003 to help generate interest and support as the state explored various transportation funding and congestion mitigation options (14).
Broad political support for value pricing ﬁnally began to emerge in Minnesota after nearly a decade of effort. A number of signiﬁcant social, economic, and political factors contributed to this changing climate including the following:
Largely as a result of the emergence of political champions from the Value Pricing Advisory Task Force, bipartisan support and leadership resulted in 2003 legislation supporting conversion of HOV lanes into express lanes, allowing solo drivers to access the lanes for a fee. A newly elected governor and lieutenant governor endorsed moving forward with the conversion of HOV lanes to HOT lanes. Nearly all associated with the project agreed that the HOV lanes on I-394 from Minneapolis through the western suburbs would provide the best early test of the HOT lane concept (Figure 2).
Traditional public involvement models, which may include open houses and formal hearings, fall short of providing meaningful public deliberations and decision making. These approaches allow for little interaction between stakeholders and transportation agencies, leave citizens feeling that their questions and concerns are not being addressed, and give the transportation agency too little opportunity to respond and integrate public input into the solution. More important, it is difficult to establish a level of trust and ownership with public sessions that allow little opportunity for involvement in key decisions.
The process Mn/DOT has pursued requires sharing control of project details and decisions, making more effective use of community input during project design and implementation, and developing an atmosphere of trust while reducing confrontation.
Although there were divergent points of view among legislators and other political leaders, there was general consensus on at least three fundamental points:
As a result of continuing discussion, and at least partially as the result of Value Pricing Advisory Task Force findings, the 2003 Minnesota Legislature enacted High Occupancy Toll Lane Legislation (160.93, Sec. 7) authorizing the commissioner of transportation to implement user fees on high-occupancy vehicle lanes in Minnesota (15). Highlights of the legislation are as follows:
Five project objectives were deﬁned with the legislative authority given to Mn/DOT to implement the I-394 MnPASS project:
Mn/DOT and the I-394 Community Task Force recognized that, in a number of aspects, MnPASS is a ﬁrst-of-its-kind application in the United States. As such, it is important to monitor and evaluate its operation carefully, and be prepared to make adjustments and improvements periodically to ensure that the project objectives are achieved.
With the authority to proceed on HOV-to-HOT conversions, it was clear that a new creative and responsive public involvement process was imperative to the project's success or otherwise risk facing imposing obstacles similar to those that previous pricing projects had faced. Despite what appeared to be a sea change in public opinion, due to a changing political and economic climate, as well as growing congestion, public acceptance of the project was not ensured. The question of equity remained large and was sure to remain prominent because I-394 would be the only toll facility in the state and therefore would require careful consideration.
In response to this recognition, the I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force was established. The task force was a 22-person group of leaders and citizens appointed by the lieutenant governor, by the House and Senate leadership of the state legislature, and by the communities themselves. The governor appointed the chair of the task force.
A mayor or city council member and a citizen member from each of the cities in the corridor - Minneapolis, Golden Valley, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Plymouth, and Wayzata - were represented. In addition, state legislators, private-sector organizations (American Automobile Association, Minnesota Trucking Association), public organizations (Downtown Minneapolis Transportation Management Organization and Transit for Livable Communities), public agencies (Metropolitan Council, Metro Transit, Hennepin County, Mn/DOT), and private citizens were represented. The task force met monthly from September 2003 through October 2004 (16).
The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force mission was articulated as follows:
Conversion of high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes to express lanes was authorized by the 2003 Minnesota Legislature. Express lanes permit single occupant drivers to pay tolls for the privilege of using HOV lanes. The I-394 Express Lane project is Minnesota's ﬁrst facility based value pricing demonstration and is a new and signiﬁcant change in highway facility management. The Minnesota Department of Transportation recognizes that community involvement and acceptance are imperative to the successful application of this concept. The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force has been established to assist the Commissioner of Transportation in delivering a project that reﬂects the needs and values of the corridor and broader community to create a forum for public discourse.
The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force will provide the Commissioner of Transportation with advice and guidance on public involvement, communications, community outreach and education. Other policy issues that the Task Force might address include operations, pricing, access, and violations and enforcement.
A former state senator who was appointed by the governor chaired the task force. Although an agenda was developed in advance of each meeting as a means to guide technical presentations and discussions, the chair painstakingly ensured that all concerns were adequately aired by the task force members as well as citizens attending the meetings. The process focused on consent building as well as open discussion.
Early in the deliberations, the task force members were provided information on the rationale behind HOT lanes and were briefed on projects in other parts of the country. The task force chair and ﬁve other members of the task force visited the I-15 HOT lane project in San Diego, California, and the SR-91 express lane project in Orange County, California. This visit provided task force members a much better understanding of how these projects work as well as the differences between the two projects.
As the project was being designed, the task force members were briefed by members of the project team and given the opportunity to raise issues that needed to be addressed or studied further. While it was clear that Mn/DOT would make the ﬁnal decisions about the project, the department leaders made it clear that they wanted to incorporate the recommendations of the community task force into the plans for the project and, in fact, did so.
With public and political patience running thin concerning the HOV lane performance on I-394, Mn/DOT used a streamlined procurement process similar to design–build as a means to deliver MnPASS at least a year earlier than under traditional project delivery. As such, a request for proposals for partners was issued in July 2003, and Mn/DOT entered into a contract with the team of Wilbur Smith, SRF Consulting Group, Raytheon, and Coﬁroute to implement the MnPass project on I-394 in December 2003.
The public–private partnership between Mn/DOT and the Wilbur Smith team is referred to as the MnPASS Partnership Team. This group became integral to the process and acted as expert consultants to the I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force.
The Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota and Mn/DOT engaged in a study to learn of the public's perception and attitudes associated with implementing HOV buy-in capabilities on I-394. Market research among citizens who live in the western metropolitan area of the Twin Cities (Minneapolis and St. Paul) was commissioned with the following objectives in mind:
Focus group discussions were selected as the means to accomplish these objectives. Focus groups are an exploratory research technique designed to elicit insights, attitudes, and issues through moderated group discussions. While the results are not statistically projectable to the population as a whole, they can provide revealing feedback and directional data on complex topics and newly proposed ideas.
Five focus groups were conducted. Three focus groups were held with single-occupancy vehicle drivers (solo drivers, SOVs) who travel I-394 (or an adjacent highway) into or beyond downtown Minneapolis during peak commuting hours to and from work. One focus group was held with carpoolers (HOVs) who travel the same route as above to and from work, and a ﬁfth focus group was held with people who ride the bus to and from work, traveling I-394 into or beyond downtown Minneapolis. The focus groups were held in February and March 2004.
The participants in the focus groups represented a general cross section of the population from the Twin Cities (mix of age, income, employment, and gender) who commute from the western metropolitan area into or beyond downtown Minneapolis during peak commuting hours and travel I-394 or an adjacent highway, such as Highway 55 or Highway 7. The participants were recruited randomly by telephone from the local areas, answered an advertisement that appeared in the Star Tribune or a local newspaper, or responded to a ﬂyer that was distributed at downtown parking garages that offer discounted parking to carpoolers. Qualiﬁed individuals were invited to come to a central location to discuss this topic.
The following were typical reactions by focus group members about the I-394 corridor:
When the MnPASS project was explained to focus group members, the following were typical reactions:
The focus group participants raised the following concerns about the I-394 MnPASS project:
The focus groups occurred during the same period as the task force meetings, and a few of the task force members observed one or more of the focus groups. The results of the focus groups were presented to the full task force and used as additional input in their deliberations.
The task force encouraged and participated in public outreach and education activities during the course of the project. These activities included an open house for all citizens in the corridor; brieﬁngs and discussions at city council and county board meetings within the corridor; and presentations and discussions with community, business, and civic organizations.
The Humphrey Institute also conducted public roundtables on topics related to value pricing and HOT lanes, which the task force members were encouraged to attend. One of these roundtables brought in the researchers who had done the evaluations of the SR-91, I-15, and Katy Freeway projects to learn more about how they had conducted evaluations of similar HOT lane or express lane projects, and how this might apply to the I-394 MnPASS project evaluation.
A website was established for the project, www.mnpass.org. It included information on the MnPASS project and the task force, minutes of task force meetings, PowerPoint presentations, and related reports. The website was also linked to the Humphrey Institute's website, www.valuepricing.org, which includes more extensive information on projects in other states.
The task force deliberated on a variety of I-394 Express Lane issues that were either determined by the project management team to be of signiﬁcance or determined by the task force itself to be important to consider. The areas of discussion included
Because the I-394 MnPASS project was breaking new ground in the area of HOT lane pricing, it was imperative to evaluate these topics thoroughly and consider realistic solutions. Meeting agendas were planned carefully to provide ample opportunity for task force members to hear technical and policy presentations on these topics and to provide ample time to discuss topics in sufficient detail. A hallmark of the process was the receptive and respectful manner in which the chair facilitated discussion and encouraged participation.
The following principles were used to facilitate the most meaningful input process possible:
This last point, leaving no question unanswered, became a matter of pride for the project team. During the project, a Humphrey Institute research assistant diligently recorded all questions that were raised by the task force or in other public forums and brieﬁngs. If questions could not be answered immediately, the project team would do additional research to ﬁnd the answer and report back at the next meeting of the task force. The assistant compiled answers to frequently asked questions into FAQs that were handed out at brieﬁngs and were available on the project website.
Minnesota's experience with the I-394 Express Lanes Community Task Force offers a number of lessons for states or regions implementing HOT lane or value pricing projects.
After many years of discussion and deliberation, a number of factors converged to result in political, institutional, and public support for a HOT lane project in Minnesota. The collaboration between Mn/DOT and the Humphrey Institute on research, outreach, and education, through a grant from FHWA's Value Pricing Pilot Program, was critical in building the political and institutional support for an initial project in Minnesota.
Once the legislature, the governor, and Mn/DOT decided to move forward on the I-394 MnPASS project, however, an extensive public involvement process was needed within the corridor to ensure public and political support. The I-394 Express Lane Community Task Force was created as the centerpiece of this public involvement strategy and was given full access to all details of the project in the design and preimplementation phase. The task force served as an important element in ensuring that all aspects of potential concern were addressed by Mn/DOT while implementing its ﬁrst HOT lane project and in increasing the likelihood of success.
K. R. Buckeye, Minnesota Department of Transportation, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330, St. Paul, MN 55155. L. W. Munnich, Jr., State and Local Policy Program, Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, 157 Humphrey Center, 301 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1960, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 80–86.
The Congestion Pricing Committee sponsored publication of this paper.