USDOT Federal Highway Administration USDOT Home | FHWA Home | Feedback
Skip to main content

Road Pricing: Resources

USDOT Resources: Overcoming the Challenges of Congestion Pricing 2011 FHWA Webinar Series

Patrick DeCorla-Souza, Tolling and Pricing Program Manager, FHWA
Lee Munnich, Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota
Kenneth Buckeye, Minnesota Department of Transportation
John Doan, SRF Consulting

Office of Innovative Program Delivery
Federal Highway Administration

Third Part of a Webinar Series on Overcoming the Challenges of Congestion Pricing.

Session 3: Institutional Issues in Congestion Pricing- Webinar

Presenters:

  • Donald Samdahl, Fehr & Peers
  • Patrick Vu, P.E.
  • Stephanie Wiggins
  • Jeff Weidner
  • DeCorla-Souza

Audience Q&A:

  • Addressed after each presentation, please type your questions into the chat area on the right side of the screen

Upcoming Webinars:

  • Congestion Pricing Equity Impacts on May 26, 2011
  • Email symounj@saic.com to be placed on the webinar notification email list.

Part 1: Congestion Pricing Institutional Issues

FHWA Webinar Series: Overcoming the Challenges of Congestion Pricing
Donald Samdahl, Fehr & Peers
April 2011

Background

  • Successful Congestion Pricing Projects blend several features:

    • Location
    • Modes
    • Technology
    • Funding
    • Partnerships
  • Institutional relationships are key to moving the projects into implementation

Institutional Topics

Topic Examples
Intra-agency
  • Roles and responsibilities
  • Project champions
  • Resources
Inter-agency
  • Project Management
  • Revenue sharing
  • Agreements
Legislative
  • Enabling legislation
  • Political support
  • Public consensus
Implementation
  • Project delivery
  • Daily operations

Webinar Purpose

  • Identify institutional lessons learned from Congestion Pricing Projects
  • Presentations:
    • Atlanta - I-85 - Patrick Vu
    • Los Angeles - Stephanie Wiggins
    • Miami - I-95 - Jeff Weidner and Jim Udvardy
    • Federal Perspective - Patrick DeCorla-Souza

Part 2: Partnership for Progress - HOV to HOT

UPA/CRD Atlanta Institutional
Lessons Learned to Date
Presented by: Patrick Vu, P.E. Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority
April 19, 2011

Image of two images, HOV and HOT lanes

Overview

  • Atlanta I-85 CRD Background
  • Determining Needs and Solution
  • Roles and Responsibility
  • Interagency Relationship
  • Project Delivery
  • Financial Issues

USDOT CRD Grant for I-85

  • $110 million USDOT Congestion Reduction Demonstration (CRD) grant awarded on November 21, 2008
  • I-85 Express Lanes, $60 million
    • ~16 miles long, from Chamblee Tucker near I-285 to Old Peachtree Road
    • Existing HOV2+ lane  conversion to HOT3+
    • GDOT civil construction, SRTA tolling system implementation and operations
    • Open August 2011
  • Regional transit improvements, $122 million
    • New Xpress Park and Ride Lots including 3 along I-85
    • New Xpress commuter coaches
    • Georgia Regional Transportation Authority construction and operations of Xpress
    • Transit completion in 2012
  • Total cost $182 million

Determining Needs and Solution

  • Finding the common ground, "Transportation Choice" to address regional congestion
    • "Can't build your way out of it"
    • Holistic transportation solution approach
    • Tolling, transit, technology, not mode transportation biased
  • UPA/CRD program galvanized local partners
    • "New" money, not taking away from existing transportation initiatives
    • Opportunity from the Federal level, demonstration with Federal funding
    • Ultimately had to make commitment to implement instead of doing another study
    • Tight time schedule - need to make decision quickly, visible results wanted quickly

Roles and Responsibilities

  • "Who is in charge of the project?" is an important question to answer early on
    • Agency/authority lead roles
      • Operators/designers (DOT, Toll Authority, Transit Authority, Dept. of Public Safety)
      • Regulators (MPO, Dept. Natural Resources, EPA, FHWA, FTA)
    • Project champions at all levels, elected officials to staff levels
  • Teams were created based on essential disciplines
    • Policy
    • Finance
    • Public Outreach
    • Environmental
    • Civil design
    • Tolling design/Traffic Management Center
    • Enforcement
    • Transit

Interagency Relationships

  • 3 lead agencies proposed on the grant together (DOT, Tolling, Transit), but engaged partners from the beginning during grant writing
  • Strong support from elected officials, particularly the Governor
  • Educating agency leaders, boards, elected officials, and staff on pricing
    • One-on-one briefings
    • Workshops, as part of transportation retreat
    • Expert panels/Peer-exchanges
    • Many listening sessions to hear concerns
  • Coordination of project messaging, staying on message
    • Press releases, public outreach, environmental outreach, marketing
  • Same people have been actively involved from grant writing, project development, procurements, through to implementation. Thus preserves institutional knowledge and provides project continuity.

Project Delivery

  • With the accelerated time schedule, the agency partners needed to figure out how to do some things differently
  • Procurements
    • Design-build, design-bid build, potential outsourcing of operations
    • Reducing technology procurement risks by partnering with vendors during RFP proposal submittal process
    • Open protocols/standards and multi award contracting for technology
  • Permitting
    • Projects in the TIP and STIP
    • Air quality permitting (PM 2.5/NOx, Transportation Control Measures, Non-attainment area)
    • NEPA Environmental Assessment

Financial Issues

  • "Who is in charge of keeping track of fund?"  Need official budget keeper
  • Managing multi-agency financial committed and funding sources
    • Multiple funding sources: General Obligation Bonds, Motor Fuel Tax, RITA grant, FTA toll revenues, etc
    • Multiple MOUs and procurements
    • Complex flows of funds and expenses
  • Toll revenue policy considerations
    • Anticipated revenue based on Traffic and Revenue study
    • Address potential revenue shortfalls during ramp up
    • Long term operational costs
    • Existing formula funding and original fund sources for the facility
    • Regional vs corridor policy
    • FHWA vs FTA vs regional policies and statues
    • Funding for system build out, transit, etc

Financial Issues

  • Flow of revenue funds considerations

Chart: HOT Revenue Expenditure Diagram

Questions?

Contact Information:
Patrick Vu, P.E.
Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority
patrickvu@georgiatolls.com
(404) 893-6130

Part 3: Metro ExpressLanes
Institutional Lessons Learned, April 19, 2011

Presented by: Stephanie Wiggins

Program Overview

  • Conversion of HOV lanes to HOT lanes on I-10 and I-110
  • Multi-modal Integrated Corridor Emphasis (15 individual projects)
  • 1 of 6 Nationwide Federal Demonstration Projects for Congestion Pricing
  • Tolling Begins Fall 2012

Map

Project Goals

  • Move More People, Not More Vehicles
  • Increase Throughput of HOT Lanes
  • Effectiveness (Mode Shift)
  • Efficiency (Cost of Project Relative to Benefits)
  • Equity (Address Impact on Low Income Commuters)
  • Educate Community (Extensive Community Outreach)
  • Execute as a 1-Year Demonstration Project

Graphic showing the effect of 64 separate cars or mass transit options

20+ Intra-Agency Partners

  • Funding & Program/Project Oversight
    • FHWA & FTA
  • Project Partners
    • Metro & Caltrans
  • Mobility Partners
    • Foothill Transit, Gardena Transit, Los Angeles Department of Transportation, Metrolink, Torrance Transit
  • Interoperability (California Toll Operators Committee)
    • SBX, TCA, OCTA, BATA, SANDAG, RCTC, ACCMA
  • Regulatory (Enforcement, Design-Build, RTP, Utilities)
    • CHP, CTC, SCAG, SCE, DWP, County of Los Angeles, Caltrans

Overcoming Intra-Agency Hurdles

  • Identify Subject Matter Experts (SME) within all partner agencies EARLY in the process and obtain buy-in to the project at both the Executive and SME level to avoid delays in the schedule.
  • Establish an Executive Committee of Project Partners to address time sensitive issues.
  • Hold Lessons Learned Workshops at key project milestones rather than waiting until the completion of the entire project.
  • Formal Partnering Sessions also help build team cohesiveness.

Overcoming Project Management Hurdles

  • CEO as Internal Champion is a Must.
  • Integrated Project Status Reporting is Key.
  • Ensure Adequate Staffing Resources.

Addressing Legislative Hurdles

  • A Political Champion is a Must
  • Net Revenues to Be Reinvested in the Corridor Where Generated for Transit & Carpool lane improvements
  • Address Equity Issues Early in the Planning Process
  • Identify Performance Measurements Early in the Planning Process
  • Substantial Federal Grant Funding

Project Schedule

Description 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Toll Policy X        
Low Income Commuter Assessment   X      
Environmental Documents Approved   X      
Preliminary Engineering   X      
Privacy Policy   X      
Award Design-Build-Operate-Maintain Contract   X      
TO BE COMPLETED          
Launch Marketing Campaign     X    
Begin Construction     X    
ExpressLanes Open to Traffic       X  

Part 4: Miami Urban Partnership Agreement
FDOT Institutional Issues/Lessons Learned

Florida Department of Transportation
FHWA Webinar April 19, 2011
Presented by: Jeff Weidner

Presentation Outline

  • Background
  • Institutional Issues
    • Tolling Statute
    • Multi-modal O&M
  • Lessons Learned
    • What we did right
    • What we still need to improveMap of Project Area

95 Express Project Scope

  • 21 miles from Miami to Ft. Lauderdale
  • HOT Conversion of 2 HOV Lanes plus 2 New Express Lanes
  • Registered 3+ Carpools, Vanpools
  • Dynamically Priced Tolls
  • Express Bus/Bus Rapid Transit
  • Increased Effective Capacity with Minimal Construction Disruption

 

Institutional Issues -Opportunities

  • Major Congestion, No benefit for HOV and Transit
  • Cost Intensive Improvements Planned
  • Aggressive Multi-Modal Element
    • Transit
    • Carpool, Vanpool
    • Transit Signal Priority and Branding

Florida Statutes: 338.166 High-occupancy toll lanes or express lanes.

  • The department may continue to collect the toll on the high-occupancy toll lanes or express lanes after the discharge of any bond indebtedness related to such project. All tolls so collected shall first be used to pay the annual cost of the operation, maintenance, and improvement of the high-occupancy toll lanes or express lanes project or associated transportation system.

Contract Budget

Contract Budget
Operator 1 Full Time operator 24/7
Engineering Support 900 Hrs for engineering support
software 900 Hrs for software support
PM 900 Hrs for Proj. mngmt/sr egnr. support
Clerical 900 Hrs for clerical support
IT support 450 Hrs for IT support
public information Lump Sum
Toll & Revenue Updates Lump Sum
Survey/Reports UPA etc Lump Sum
Computer Services 2 Full time employees
Road Ranger Support  
Road Ranger Tow Truck 24/7 @ $45 per hour (8760 hours)
Road Ranger Flatbed Tow Truck 24/7 @ $50 per hour (8760 hours)
Incident Response, FHP  
Incident Response Vehicle @ $350k/each/year
FHP - Enforcement @ $16000/mile/year
Equip Maint & Repair  
Detector @ $300/year
Cameras @ $750/year
Variable Message Signs (VMS) @ $1800/year
Toll Buildings @ $9000/year
Sunguide & Misc Software Development  
Sunguide Software Support/enhance @ 150K/district/year
Utility Locates @ $2500/mile/year

Operating Budget

Operating Budget
Expense
Communication absorbed
Staff supplies absorbed
TME
Electricity
Tolling Gantries @ $2300/Yr
Variable Message Signs (VMS) @ $2300/Yr * .75 factor
Toll Buildings @ $4000/Yr
Communication Hubs @ $2300/Yr
Equipment Replacement/Upgrades/parts - (devices inventory)(device cost)(15%)/Yr
Detectors @ ($5000/device)(15%)/Yr
Cameras @ ($5000/device)(15%)/Yr
VMSs @ ($5000/device)(15%)/Yr
Fiber Optics 7 Power Repairs

Recurring Annual Budget

Recurring Annual Budget
Signs, Delineators, Maintenance
Cantilever signs (inspection and maintenance)
Delineators  
Maintenance Of Traffic (MOT) for Toll Repairs
Sound wall maintenance  
Transit Budget@ $2300/Yr
Miami-Dade Transit 15 buses, 13 hours service by 2013
Broward County Transit 7 buses, 2, 3 hour peak periods service by 2013

Operating and Maintenance by Budget Item

Operating and Maintenance by Budget Item
Budget Item 2009/2010 2010/2011 201/2012 2012/2013 2013/2014
Contract Budget 48% 42% 36% 41% 41%
Operating Budget 5% 6% 6% 7% 7%
Recurring Annual Budget 21% 15% 12% 13% 13%
Transit Budget 26% 37% 45% 39% 39%
Broward County Transit 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Institutional Challenges: Multiple Jurisdictions

  • 2 Counties, 2 MPOs, 3 Transit Agencies, 2 FDOT Districts
    • Different levels of congestion
    • Different Transit Fare Systems
    • Incident Management Protocols
    • Limited Vehicle Branding

photo of two branded buses

Lessons Learned, What we did right?: Development of the Toll Rule

  • State of Florida Administrative Code 14-100-.004
  • Toll Free Users: 3+Carpools
  • Hybrid Vehicles
  • South Florida Vanpools
  • Over the Road Motor Coaches
  • 95 Express Transit Vehicles
  • Public School Buses

Registered Users of 95 Express

  • Register 3+Carpool, Vanpool, and Hybrid Vehicles
  • SFCS Web-based data transfer to SunPass
  • Receive 95 Express Decal
  • Place decal in windshield
  • Utilize lanes as "toll-free users"
    • All SunPass devices must be shielded to avoid charges
  • SunPass verifies registration against the photographed license plate
  • User is not charged
  • Renewal process

Lessons Learned, What we still need to improve: Enforcement

  • Florida Highway Patrol monitors both HOV and managed lanes
  • Paid User Violations:
    • Using the lanes without a SunPass
  • Toll Free User Violations:
    • 3+ Carpool with less than 3 people
      Violation -$149 + toll amount
  • Challenge to enforcement:
    • Safety (Narrow shoulder, no monitoring space)

Questions & Discussion

Logo: Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of Transportation

Jeremy.mullings@dot.state.fl.us
954-777-4365

jeff.weidner@dot.state.fl.us
954-214-0024

Part 5: Congestion Pricing Institutional Issues

FHWA's Webinar Series on Overcoming the Challenges of Congestion Pricing
April 19, 2011
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Operations & Office of Innovative Program Delivery

Federal Requirements to Address

  • Long Range Plan (LRP):
    • funded tolling and non-tolling projects
  • Transportation Improvement Program (STIP and/or TIP)
  • NEPA review:
    • may not apply to non-toll projects
  • Tolling authority (for toll projects only)

Integrating Transit into Tolling Proposals

  • UPA/CRD projects presented in this webinar:
    • Transit funding came from a one-time program
  • Other pricing projects operating/planned:
    • Converting existing HOV lanes to HOT - I-394, MN.
    • New HOT lanes - Capital Beltway, Northern Virginia
    • New express lanes - Northwest Corridor, Atlanta
  • Potential options for the future:
    • Full-facility pricing  --SR 520, Seattle
    • Converting existing regular lanes to HOT-3 lanes
  • Issue: Ability and willingness to use toll revenue for transit

Federal Tolling Authority

  • For construction or reconstruction:
    • Section 129 - non-Interstate facilities and Interstate bridges/tunnels only
    • Interstate toll pilots
  • For demand management:
    • Section 166 (HOT lanes)  --unlimited projects
    • Express Lanes Demonstration - 15 projects
    • Value Pricing - 15 slots, each with unlimited projects
  • For more information:
    http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ipd/revenue/

Federal Role

  • Technical assistance:
    • Selecting the tolling program to use, tolling agreement
    • Other - analysis tools, etc.
  • Outreach:

Institutional Issues - Next Steps

  • Peer Exchange on Institutional Issues
    • Bring together pricing experts to discuss strategies used to address challenges in implementing both tolling and non-tolling projects
      Prepare a white paper
  • Develop Primer
    • Based on material gathered from various outreach efforts such as outcomes from the webinar, face-to-face peer exchange and white paper.