Attachment 2: Writing the Evaluation
-
Be positive
Approach suggestions with a positive attitude. If the entire suggestion
cannot be adopted, consider whether it may be adopted in part or
with modification. In these instances, the suggester may be entitled
to an award based on the extent of influence the suggestion contributed
to management's action (a partial award). Be certain the reasons
for the non-adopt action are clear. If you cannot adopt a suggestion,
do not dwell on or overemphasize its shortcomings.
-
Summarize First
Start the evaluation with a brief summary of the suggestion so
the suggester knows you understand the idea. Follow with the reasons
for your decision and conclude with an expression of appreciation
for participation in the program.
-
Watch the Tone
Write answers that you would be willing to accept. Avoid a cold,
impersonal, or superior tone. (Remember that a copy of your evaluation,
with your name, will be sent to the suggester with a non-adoptive
letter.)
Write the answer with the suggester in mind. Use language that
the suggester will understand. A responsive answer often eliminates
requests for reconsideration.
-
Don't "Turn Off"
Avoid words or statements that might "turn off" suggesters, such
as:
- "scheme" (It sounds negative. Use "plan" or "idea");
- "impractical" (also unpleasant; use "not feasible");
- "gadget" (It belittles a suggester.); and/or
- "reject" or "rejection" (Use "not adopted"
or "declined.").
-
Be Brief
Try to keep your evaluation short. In other words, do not overwhelm
the reader with detail.
-
Be Timely
Respond in a timely manner. Remember that delaying the implementation
of an adopted suggestion can cost the Federal government money.
-
Consider Legality
Consider the legal aspects of your evaluation. If the idea has
legal implications, return it to the Suggestion Coordinator with
a note attached recommending review by the Chief Counsel and Chief
Financial Officer's Office.
-
Review
As you review your draft evaluation, ask yourself these questions:
- Is it written to the suggester?
- Is it clear as to why the suggestion will not be adopted?
- Is it motivational - does it encourage future suggestions?
- Is it appreciative? Does it thank the suggester for taking the time and effort to submit ideas for improving the organization?
- Is it possible to implement the suggestion in another unit in FHWA? Did I tell the suggester that?
- Am I totally satisfied with the research, data analysis, conclusions, and write-up of the evaluation?
- In writing the evaluation, have I been totally fair, "long-range minded," and objective?
- If I were the suggester, would I be satisfied to receive the evaluation?
If the answer is "NO" to any of the above, the evaluation should be revised accordingly.
PMM Chapter 9, Section 2
| Attachment 1 |
Attachment 3
|