- Briefing Room
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
U.S. Department of
|Subject:||Information: Revised Surface Transportation Program (STP) Implementation Guidance||Date:||July 21, 2014|
|From:||Walter C. Waidelich, Jr.
Associate Administrator for Infrastructure
|In Reply Refer To:||HIPA-10|
Directors of Field Services
Director of Technical Services
On July 6, 2012, the President signed the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) into law (P.L. 112-141). The attached Implementation Guidance provides policy direction on the Surface Transportation Program (STP) and provides information on funding, eligible activities, and specific requirements.
This memorandum supersedes the “STP Implementation Guidance” dated November 19, 2012.
The revision is the addition of C.1.c)(2) and C.1.c)(3). This revision incorporates existing eligibilities from 23 U.S.C. 144.
The effective date of this MAP-21 STP eligibility guidance is October 1, 2012. The STP requirements in effect on October 1, 2012, will apply to all related funding obligated on or after that date, whether carryover or new.
This document will be accessible on the MAP-21 website http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/ and through the Policy Guidance Center.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Peter Kleskovic (202-366-4652) or Mr. David Bartz (512-536-5906) of the Office of Program Administration.
Section 1108 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) establishes the STP under 23 U.S.C. 133. Section 1105 of MAP-21 provides for the apportionment of funds under 23 U.S.C. 104.
Authorization Levels under MAP-21: Section 1101 of MAP-21 authorizes funds for the STP and Section 1105 amends 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(2) to provide for apportionment of funds. The estimated amounts of STP funds are as follows:
MAP-21’s approach to distribution of formula funds is based on the amounts of formula funds each State received under SAFETEA-LU.
Once each State’s total Federal-aid apportionment is calculated, amounts are set aside for Metropolitan Planning and the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, and the remainder is divided among the rest of the formula programs as follows: National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) (63.7%), STP (29.3%), and Highway Safety Improvement Program (7.0%).
The Program Codes for these STP funds are as follows:
|Program Code||Program Description||Statutory Reference 1|
|M240||Surface Transportation Program (STP) Flex||Section 1101(a)(1)|
|M230||STP - Urbanized Areas With Population Over 200K||Section 1108(c)|
|M231||STP - Areas with Population Over 5K to 200K||Section 1108(c)|
|M232||STP - Areas with Population 5K and Under||Section 1108(c)|
|M233||STP Off-System Bridge||Section 1108(f)|
|M234||Special Rule for Areas of 5,000 or Less Population||Section 1108(f)|
1 1 All references are to MAP-21 (Public Law 112-141) unless otherwise noted.
From the State’s STP apportionment, the following sums are to be set aside:
Period of Availability: STP funds are contract authority. STP obligations are reimbursed from the highway account of the Highway Trust Fund. STP funds are available for obligation for a period of 3 years after the last day of the fiscal year for which the funds are authorized. Thus funds are available for obligation for up to 4 years.
Obligation Limitation: STP funds are subject to the annual obligation limitation imposed on the Federal-aid highway program.
Federal share: The Federal share is governed by 23 U.S.C. 120. It is generally 80 percent, subject to the upward sliding scale adjustment for States containing public lands. The Federal share for projects on the Interstate System is 90 percent, subject to the upward sliding scale adjustment, unless the project adds lanes that are not high-occupancy-vehicle or auxiliary lanes. For projects that add single occupancy vehicle capacity, that portion of the project that increases single occupancy vehicle capacity will revert to the 80 percent level.
Certain safety improvements as listed in 23 U.S.C. 120(c)(1) (traffic control signalization, maintaining minimum levels of retroreflectivity of highway signs or pavement markings, traffic circles/roundabouts, safety rest areas, pavement marking, shoulder and centerline rumble strips and stripes, commuter carpooling and vanpooling, rail-highway crossing closure, and installation of traffic signs, traffic lights, guardrails, impact attenuators, concrete barrier endtreatments, breakaway utility poles, or priority control systems for emergency vehicles or transit vehicles at signalized intersections) may have a Federal share of 100 percent, but this provision is limited to 10 percent of the total funds apportioned to a State under 23 U.S.C. 104.
The Federal share for workforce development, training, and education activities carried out with STP funds under 23 U.S.C. 504(e) is 100 percent. For projects funded under the Local Technical Assistance Program, the 50 percent non-Federal share may be satisfied with up to 100 percent STP funds. This provision will be the subject of further guidance.
The Federal share for projects located on toll roads, and subject to the provisions of 23 U.S.C. 129, is limited to 80 percent.
For fiscal years 2012 through 2021, the Federal share payable for the cost of constructing highways and access roads on the Appalachian Development Highway System under 40 U.S.C. 14501, with apportioned Federal funds is 100 percent. (Section 1528 of MAP-21).
Projects incorporating Innovative Project Delivery, as described in 23 U.S.C. 120(c)(3), may have an increased Federal share. This provision will be the subject of further guidance.
As provided for in Section 1116 of MAP-21, projects that demonstrate an improvement to the efficient movement of freight and are identified in a State freight plan are eligible for an increased Federal share at the discretion of the Secretary of Transportation: 95 percent for projects on the Interstate System and 90 percent for all other projects. This provision will be the subject of further guidance.
States may use a lower Federal share on Federal-aid projects as provided in 23 U.S.C. 120.
Transferability of STP Funds: A State may transfer up to 50 percent of the amount apportioned for the fiscal year to any other 23 U.S.C. 104(b) apportionment for the State. However, funds suballocated under 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(1)(A), may not be transferred. Additionally, from the TAP funds, only those funds allocated under 23 U.S.C. 213(c)(1)(B) are available for transfer.
Eligible Projects and Activities:
a) Location of Projects (23 U.S.C. 133(c)): In general, the location of STP projects is not limited. However, STP projects may not be undertaken on roads functionally classified as local or rural minor collectors unless the roads were on a Federal-aid highway system on January 1, 1991, except—
b) Eligible Activities (23 U.S.C. 133(b)):
c) In addition the following activities are eligible to be funded with STP funds:
Applicability of Planning Requirements (23 U.S.C. 133(c)(5)): Projects must be identified in the STIP/TIP and they must be consistent with the Long-Range Statewide Transportation Plan and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan(s). When obligating suballocated funding (discussed below), the State must coordinate with relevant MPO or rural planning organizations. Programming and expenditure of funds for projects under this section shall be consistent with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135.
SUBALLOCATION (23 U.S.C. 133(d)) - Fifty percent of a State’s STP apportionment (after deducting the set-asides for SPR and TAP) is suballocated to areas based on their relative share of the total State population with the other 50 percent available for use in any area of the State. The suballocated funds are divided into three categories:
Urbanized areas with a population over 200,000. These funds are further distributed among the individual areas based on their relative share of the population of the areas. The State and the relevant metropolitan planning organizations may jointly apply to the FHWA division office for permission to base the distribution on other factors. These funds may be obligated in the metropolitan area established under 23 U.S.C. 134 that encompasses the urbanized area.
Areas with a population of 5,000 or less.
Urban areas with a population of 5,001 to 200,000. Prior to obligating funds attributed to an area of this type, the State must consult with the regional transportation planning organizations that represent the area, if any.
SPECIAL RULE FOR AREAS OF 5,000 OR LESS POPULATION (23 U.S.C. 133(h)) - The special rule for funding projects on minor collectors has been continued in MAP-21. Up to 15 percent of the amounts required to be obligated in areas with a population of 5,000 or less for each of fiscal years 2013 through 2014 may be obligated on roads functionally classified as minor collectors. The Secretary may suspend this special rule with respect to a State if the FHWA division office determines that this authority is being used excessively by the State. Prior to MAP-21, the comparable rural special rule was applicable to areas with populations of less than 5,000.
ADMINISTRATION (23 U.S.C. 133(e)) - MAP-21 continues the authority under the STP that gives States the option to administer a program of STP-funded projects as a program under a single project agreement. In advancing a program of STP-funded projects, the following requirements apply:
Projects used to satisfy the State match of a program must meet all applicable Federal requirements.
BRIDGES NOT ON FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS (23 U.S.C. 133(g))
Section 1108(f) of MAP-21 amends 23 U.S.C. 133(g) to add the definition of off-system bridge as a highway bridge located on a public road that is not a Federal-aid highway. Eligible activities are those described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(2) and 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(4). MAP-21 continues to provide a set-aside for minimum expenditures on off-system bridges. By special rule, States shall obligate for activities described in 23 U.S.C. 133(b)(2) an amount not less than 15 percent of the amount of funds apportioned to the State for the Highway Bridge Program for fiscal year 2009. These obligations must be from the funds identified in 23 U.S.C. 133(d)(1)(B); suballocated amounts identified in 23 U.S.C. 133 (d)(1)(A) are not to be used. The FHWA Administrator, after consultation with State and local officials, may reduce the requirement for expenditures for off-system bridges if the FHWA Administrator determines that the State has inadequate needs to justify the expenditure.
Credit for Bridges Not on Federal-Aid Highways is also continued. Under MAP-21, up to 80 percent of the construction costs incurred from bridge replacement and rehabilitation projects that are not on Federal-aid highways and are wholly funded by State and local sources (additional requirements must also be met) may be credited to the non-Federal share of the cost of other bridge projects that are eligible under the STP.