Skip to contentU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration
Home > MAP-21 > Presentations > Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

MAP-21 - Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)

Printable PDF Version [11 MB]
To view PDF files, you can use the Acrobat® Reader®.

August 2012

After 10 extensions, a 27-month bill

  • SAFETEA-LU expired on 9/30/09

  • 10 extensions (final one from 7/1/12 - 7/6/12)

  • Strong bipartisan vote for 27-month transportation bill
    • Passed 373-52 in the House
    • Passed 74-19 in the Senate

  • Also includes major non-transportation provisions, e.g.,
    • Extension of 3.4% interest rates for student loans
    • Reauthorization of flood insurance program

MAP-21 themes

  • Strengthens America’s highway and public transportation systems
  • Creates jobs and supports economic growth
  • Supports the Department’s aggressive safety agenda
  • Simplifies and focuses the Federal program
  • Accelerates project delivery and promotes innovation
  • Establishes a performance-based Federal program

Stable funding

  • Program authorized through FY14
    • Current law through end of FY12
    • Most new provisions go into effect on October 1st
  • Avg. annual funding at FY12 levels (plus minor inflation)

  • Extends Highway Trust Fund taxes and ensures 2 years of solvency for Highway Trust Fund (HTF)

  • Substantial programmatic consolidation
    • No earmarks
    • Most discretionary programs eliminated

Apportioned programs

Program structure

MAP-21 Current Law
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP) NHS, IM, & Bridge (portion)
Surface Transportation Program (STP) STP & Bridge (portion)
Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) CMAQ
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) HSIP (incl. High Risk Rural Roads)
Railway-Highway Grade Crossing (takedown from HSIP) Railway Highway Grade Crossing
Metropolitan Planning Metropolitan Planning
Transportation Alternatives (setaside from NHPP, STP, HSIP, CMAQ, and Metro Planning) TE, Recreational Trails, and Safe Routes to School

A new approach to formulas

Authorize lump sum for all apportioned programs

Calculate total amount to apportion to each State

Divide State lump sum among programs

Division of a State’s apportionment among programs

CMAQ

State’s lump sum multiplied by...

  • State’s FY09 CMAQ
  • State’s total FY09 apportionment

Metro Planning

State’s lump sum multiplied by...

  • State’s FY09 Metro Planning
  • State’s total FY09 apportionment

Remainder

(net of CMAQ, Metro Planning) divided among...

  • NHPP (63.7%)
  • STP (29.3%)
  • HSIP (7.0%)

...and then setasides for Rail-Highway Grade Crossings and the Transportation Alternatives program

$37.7 billion/year in formula funding

  • Surface Transportation Program ($10.0)
  • National Highway Performance Program ($21.8)
  • HSIP ($2.2)
  • Railway-Highway Crossing ($0.2)
  • CMAQ ($2.2)
  • Transportation Alternatives ($0.8)
  • Metro Planning ($0.3)

Note: Amounts in $ billions; individual program amounts do not add exactly to total due to rounding

National Highway Performance Program ($21.8B)

  • Funds an enhanced National Highway System, combining functions of the existing NHS, IM and Bridge Programs
  • Enhanced NHS includes existing NHS, all principal arterials, STRAHNET, and intermodal connectors
  • Requires an asset management plan
  • States set targets for conditions and performance
  • Min. standards for Interstate & bridge conditions in a State
    • DOT to set minimum standard for Interstate pavement condition
    • Law sets standard for NHS bridges -- no more than 10% of deck area may be structurally deficient

Surface Transportation Program ($10.0B)

  • Continued flexible funding for Federal-aid highways, plus safety and bridges on any public road
  • Eligibility for transportation enhancements, rec trails, ferry boats, consolidated border infrastructure program, truck parking facilities, and safe routes to schools (no set-aside)
  • 50% of funds subject to suballocation based on population
  • Rural provisions enhanced
    • Rural planning organizations, if any, must be consulted
    • Up to 15% of rural suballocation may be spent on minor collectors

Highway Safety Improvement Program ($2.4B)

  • Dramatically increases size of existing program
  • Maintains current structure; adds requirement for regular update of the strategic highway safety plan
  • Keeps setaside ($220M/year) for rail-highway grade crossings
  • No high risk rural roads setaside unless safety statistics worsen
  • Secretary to establish measures and States to set targets for number of injuries and fatalities (and number per VMT)
  • Strengthens link between HSIP and NHTSA programs

Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement Program ($2.2B)

  • Continues the current program with changes
  • Performance plans for large TMAs (to include air quality and congestion measures)
  • States with PM 2.5 areas must use a portion of their funds to reduce PM 2.5
  • Some expanded authority to use funds for transit operations
  • Explicit support for installation of facilities serving electric or natural gas-fueled vehicles
  • CMAQ outcomes assessment study required

Transportation Alternatives (TA) ($814M)

  • Incorporates eligibilities from many current programs
    • Most (but not all) formerly TE-eligible activities
    • Recreational trails program
    • Safe Routes to Schools program
    • Planning, designing, or constructing roadways within the ROW of former Interstate or other divided highways
  • Similar funding level to TEs under SAFETEA-LU
    • Total TA $ equal to 2% of MAP-21 highway funding
    • Funded via takedown from each State’s formula funds
    • 50% suballocated for more local control
    • 50% State allocation can be transferred to other formula programs

Other programs/key provisions

Federal Lands & Tribal Transportation

Generally followed Administration’s proposed structure:

  Annual $
Federal Lands Transportation Program (with new partners) $300 million
Federal Lands Access Program $250 million
Tribal Transportation Program (new formula for distribution among tribes) $450 million

Federal Lands Transportation Program ($300M)

  • For projects that improve access within the Federal estate (e.g., national forests, national recreation areas) on infrastructure owned by the Federal government

  • Combines Park Roads & Refuge Roads programs; adds new partners—Forest Service, BLM & Corps of Engineers

  • Some funds reserved for National Park Service & Fish and Wildlife Service roads; remainder awarded competitively

Federal Lands Access Program ($250M)

  • For projects that improve access to the Federal estate on infrastructure owned by States and local governments

  • Distributed by formula based on
    • Recreational visitation
    • Federal land area
    • Federal public road mileage
    • Federal public bridges
  • 80% of funds go to States with ≥1.5% of total public land

  • Each State’s programming decisions made by committee

  • Requirement for local match

Tribal Transportation Program ($450M)

  • For projects improving access to and within Tribal lands

  • New statutory formula for distribution among tribes (to be phased in)

  • Various set-asides
    • Up to 6% for BIA and FHWA project management & oversight expenses
    • Up to 2% for transportation planning
    • Up to 2% for priority program for improving deficient Tribal program- eligible bridges
    • Up to 2% for safety projects on Tribal lands
    • Tribal supplemental funding

TIFIA

  • Lending capacity expanded – up to $17 billion in credit assistance over 2 years

  • Notice of Funding Availability released July 27, 2012

  • Program reforms
    • Letters of Interest / applications accepted throughout the year
    • Allows TIFIA participation for up to 49% of eligible project costs
    • Master credit agreement for programs of projects (secured by a common pledge) or phased single projects
    • Allows up to 10% to be set aside for rural projects; for these projects, increased eligibility and lower interest rates

Tolling/pricing provisions

  • Expands Section 129 (general toll program)
    • Mainstreams tolling/pricing of new capacity, including Interstate (but generally requires current level of free capacity to remain unchanged)
    • Removes requirement for USDOT/State toll agreements

  • Extends Section 166 (HOV to HOT conversions)
    • Removes requirement for USDOT/State toll agreements
  • Extends Value Pricing Pilot Program (congestion pricing) – but without discretionary grants

  • Extends Interstate System Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Pilot Program (allows tolling of all lanes)

  • Requires toll interoperability on Fed-aid highways within 4 years

Emergency Relief Program

  • Authorized at $100 million per year

  • State must apply and provide a complete list of project sites and costs within 2 years of event

  • May not exceed cost to repair/reconstruct comparable facility

  • Emergency repairs—
    • Option for Secretary to extend the 180-day limit on emergency repairs at 100% when access to damaged areas is limited
    • For permanent repairs, up to 90% share if cost = State’s annual apportionments
  • Debris removal from Stafford Act disasters funded by FEMA

  • Maintenance/operation of additional ferryboats or transit eligible as substitute service

Projects of Natl. & Regional Significance ($500M in FY13 only)

  • Aimed at critical high-cost capital projects

  • Maintains most SAFETEA-LU PNRS language
    • Title 23-eligible projects, including freight railroad projects & activities
    • Competitive grants to States, tribes, & transit agencies
    • No designated projects (vs. fully earmarked under SAFETEA-LU)
  • $ from General Fund; must be appropriated

  • Report that identifies and analyzes a comprehensive list of PNRS compiled via a survey of States

Freight provisions

  • National Freight Policy
    • Establishment of National Freight Network, incl. Primary Freight Network, remainder of Interstate System, and critical rural freight corridors
    • National freight strategic plan
    • Freight transportation conditions and performance reports
    • Development of transportation investment data and planning tools

  • Prioritization of projects to improve freight movement
    • For these projects, increases Federal share payable to 95% on the Interstate System and 90% elsewhere
    • USDOT must certify project improves efficiency of freight movement
    • Project must be identified in a State freight plan
  • State freight advisory committees & freight plans encouraged; plan required to qualify for increased Federal share

Research, Technology Deployment, Training & Education

  Annual $
Highway Research & Development $115.0 million
Technology & Innovation Deployment $62.5 million
Training & Education $24.0 million
ITS Program $100.0 million
University Transportation Centers $72.5 million
Bureau of Transportation Statistics $26.0 million
SHRP 2 implementation (funded as setaside of State Planning and Research funds) TBD

Research, Technology Deployment, Training & Education

  • Funding is almost earmark free ($12M for pavement)

  • State planning and research (SPR) funded by 2% set- aside from NHPP, STP, CMAQ and HSIP

  • SHRP-2 to be funded from SPR funds; 75% of States must agree to a percentage of funds for this use

  • Centers of Excellence funded by Training & Education $

  • International “Outreach” Program repealed; international research & collaboration built into core R&D program


Performance & planning

Performance management

  • MAP-21 identifies national goal areas
  • USDOT establishes measures, with input
  • States set targets
  • State & metro plans describe how the organization will use program and project selection to help achieve targets
  • States report to USDOT on progress toward targets (within 4 yr of enactment; biennially thereafter)
  • Reports typically lead to corrective actions (not sanctions)
  • Consequences if condition of NHS falls below thresholds

Transportation planning

  • Metropolitan planning
    • Population thresholds for MPOs and TMAs unchanged
    • MPOs to establish performance targets
    • Long range plan incorporates other performance plans
    • TIP to be updated at least every 4 yr
    • MPO serving a TMA selects all projects except those on NHS, which are selected by State with MPO cooperation

  • Statewide & nonmetropolitan planning
    • Transition to performance-based, outcome-driven planning process, with State setting performance targets
    • Long range plan includes report on conditions & performance of system relative to established performance measures
    • Long range plan incorporates other performance plans

Project delivery

Accelerating project delivery

  • Any State can choose to assume specific CE designations in FHWA NEPA regulations
  • Use of construction manager/general contractor (CMGC) method of contracting
  • Accelerated completion of complex projects (4 yr) when State requests technical assistance
  • Demonstration project for lump sum payments for purchase of ROW
  • Increased Federal share for some innovative techniques

Accelerating the environmental process

  • Environmental review process streamlining
    • FEIS and ROD combined in certain conditions
    • Allows for the use of planning products in the NEPA process
    • Deadlines for issue resolution, with penalties for agencies
    • Programmatic mitigation plans
    • Reduced statute of limitations on claims (150 days, not 180)

  • Expanded authority for categorical exclusions
    • Multi-modal projects
    • Projects to repair roads damaged in declared emergency
    • Projects within existing operational right-of-way
    • Projects receiving limited Federal assistance

Other provisions

Workforce & DBE

  • Continues current law goals for use of small business concerns owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals

  • Continues on-the-Job & DBE Supportive Services programs
    • Each authorized at $10M per year
    • No changes to program administration
  • Continues States’ ability to use formula funds for surface transportation workforce development, training, & education

Appalachian development highways

  • No dedicated funding, but eligible under STP and NHPP as appropriate

  • ADHS routes eligible for 100% federal share –
    • if funded with FY12 or prior year ADHS funds or funds earmarked for an ADHS route; or
    • under all formula programs in FY12 and subsequent years

  • State plans for completing designated ADHS corridors
    • Submitted by October 1, 2013
    • Must include annual targets and completion date

Other provisions

  • Continued funding for territorial ($40 million) and Puerto Rico ($150 million) highways
  • Newly-formularized ferry program
  • States may approve overweight permits for divisible loads during major Stafford Act disasters
  • Truck size and weight—no changes, but requires a new study and inventory of current state laws
  • Electric vehicle charging infrastructure in new or previously funded fringe and corridor parking facilities may be funded on otherwise eligible facilities

Other provisions

  • Revised bridge inspection rules (+ tunnel inspections)
  • Uniform Relocation Act payment levels updated and may be updated in future through regulation
  • Secretary may delegate approval of Interstate [access] justifications to State
  • Under revised Buy America, any federal funds on contract cause application to entire project
  • Higher threshold for value engineering requirements; not required off NHS, or for design-build
  • State may allow limited commercial activity in Interstate rest areas; commercial activities may be privately operated

Next steps

  • Communication
    • Webpage
    • Summary
    • Fact sheets and Q&As

  • Implementation
    • October 1 “phase in”
    • Transitional procedures
    • Follow-on guidance and regulation
  • http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21

Return to top