Answer 1: No. Highway safety improvement projects include, but are not limited to, the list of example eligible activities under 148(a)(4)(B). In addition, the statute specifies that a highway safety improvement project must be a strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with a State Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature, or addresses a highway safety problem.

Answer 2: Yes. Highway safety improvement projects include any strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with a State SHSP, and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature, or addresses a highway safety problem. As such, traditional safety infrastructure-related improvements, as well as non-infrastructure safety projects, are eligible for HSIP funds if identified through a data-driven process (i.e., on the basis of crash experience, crash potential, crash rate, or other data-supported means).

Answer 3: MAP-21 did not include the 10 percent cap on flexible funding under HSIP established in SAFETEA-LU. MAP-21 expanded the HSIP eligibility such that HSIP funds can be used for both infrastructure and non-infrastructure highway safety improvement projects that are consistent with the State's SHSP, address a data-driven need and reduce fatalities and serious injuries. There is no longer a limit to how much a State can spend on these types of projects. Highway safety improvement projects include any strategy, activity or project on a public road that is consistent with a State SHSP, and corrects or improves a hazardous road location or feature, or addresses a highway safety problem.

Answer 4: No. States are no longer required to certify they have met safety infrastructure needs in order to fund non-infrastructure projects.

Answer 5: Yes. If SRTS activities otherwise meet the requirements for a highway safety improvement project, they would be eligible for HSIP funds.

Answer 6: Yes. Subject to approval by the Secretary, HSIP funds may be used for workforce development, training and education activities that are directly related to and support HSIP implementation efforts.

Answer 7: Generally no. As specified in section 1533 of MAP-21, HSIP funds may not be used for any program to purchase, operate, or maintain an automated traffic enforcement system (i.e., any camera that captures an image of a vehicle for the purposes of traffic law enforcement). However, HSIP funds may be used for automated traffic enforcement systems used to improve safety in school zones. Section 31102 of MAP-21 also places a similar prohibition for automated traffic enforcement in 23 U.S.C. 402(c)(4). However, automated traffic enforcement systems may be eligible for other Federal-aid funding.

Answer 8: Yes. Projects to maintain minimum levels of retroreflectivity for traffic signs and pavement markings generally are eligible under HSIP. In addition, under 23 U.S.C. 148(e)(1)(c), HSIP funds may be obligated for a project to maintain minimum levels of retroreflectivity on a public road, without regard to whether that project is included in an applicable State SHSP. However, in keeping with HSIP requirements, highway safety improvement projects, including the maintenance of minimum levels of retroreflectivity, should correct or improve a hazardous road location or feature or address a highway safety problem.

Answer 9: Under 23 U.S.C.148(a)(6), the term "project to maintain minimum levels of retroreflectivity" means a project designed to maintain a highway sign or pavement marking retroreflectivity at or above the minimum levels prescribed in Federal regulation (i.e., Section 2.A.08 of the 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) pursuant to 23 CFR Part 655).

Answer 10: The Federal share for highway safety improvement projects is 90 percent, except as provided in 23 U.S.C. 120(c) and 130. Section 120(c) allows certain types of highway safety improvement projects to be funded at 100 percent (i.e., traffic control signalization, traffic circles, safety rest areas, pavement marking, commuter carpooling and vanpooling, rail-highway crossing closure, or installation of traffic signs, traffic lights, guardrails, impact attenuators, concrete barrier end treatments, breakaway utility poles, or priority control systems for emergency vehicles or transit vehicles at signalized intersections). Section 1508 of MAP-21 added two project types to this list that are eligible for 100 percent Federal share: (1) maintaining minimum levels of retroreflectivity of highway signs or pavement markings, and (2) shoulder and centerline rumble strips and stripes.

Answer 11: Specific HSIP eligibility questions should be directed to the FHWA Division office in your State. A list of FHWA Division offices is available at www.fhwa.dot.gov/field.html.

Answer 12: The first year the HRRR Special Rule would apply is Fiscal Year 2014. States will be notified by the end of calendar year 2012 if the HRRR Special Rule applies to them.