U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

 
PRESENTATION
This presentation is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Back to Publication List        
Publication Number:  N/A    Date:  January 2014
Publication Date: January 2014

 

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Strategic Bridge Performance Matrix

PDF Version (4.76 MB)

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®

TRB 93rd Annual Meeting
LTBP Program Workshop – Program Briefing
Washington, DC – Thursday January 16, 2014

Robert Zobel, Ph.D., P.E
Technical and Development Engineer
Long-Term Bridge Performance Program
Federal Highway Administration

Sue Lane, P.E.
Outreach and Development Engineer
Federal Highway Administration

Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D
Team Leader/Program Manager
Federal Highway Administration

Tom Saad, P.E.
Structural/Bridge Engineer
Federal Highway Administration


Presentation Outline


 • High-Priority Performance Topics >>

Based on input from stakeholders and considering current resources of the program, the following key topics are addressed:

CATEGORY ISSUE

Decks

Untreated Concrete Bridge Decks

Decks

Treated Concrete Bridge Decks

Joints & Bearings

Bridge Deck Joints

Steel Bridges

Coatings for Steel Superstructure Elements

Concrete Bridges

Embedded or Ducted Strands or Tendons


Presentation Outline


 • Strategic Performance Matrix >>

What is the LTBP Strategic Performance Matrix ?

It is high level generic framework or roadmap outlining the LTBP research process that can be applied to ANY identified high priority performance topic.

It is NOT intended to provide detail on what data to collect nor how to analyze or interpret it.  This information is found in a corresponding Operational Matrix which is currently under development (but we’ll take a sneak peak at it!)


 • Strategic Performance Matrix: Untreated Bridge Decks >>

1. Objectives Defining and improving bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:
Standardized and enhanced Inspection techniques and criteria Enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
2.
Questions
"Practical"
questions to be
answered:
Goal: provide
owners with data-
driven actionable
information
How should an
untreated concrete
deck be inspected?
When should an
untreated concrete
deck be inspected?
How should an
untreated deck be
preserved or
replaced?
When should an
existing deck be
preserved or
replaced?
How should an
untreated concrete deck
be designed and
constructed?
Overarching
"Fundamental"
questions to be
answered
Goal: explain
observed behavior
to support the
actions
How does live load influence performance?
How do environmental factors influence performance?
How does the design of the untreated concrete deck (e.g., cover) influence its performance? How do structural characteristics (e.g., flexibility) of a bridge influence performance?
How do preservation activities influence performance?
3.
Hypotheses
Key causal
factors
ENVIRONMENT DECK
DESIGN 
BRIDGE
DESIGN
LIVE
LOAD
OWNER
ACTIONS
Precipitation
Temperature
Proximity to the coast
Pollution
Age/deterioration
Cover
Rebar type
Concrete mix
Proportioning of rebars
Use of SIP forms
Span length
Girder stiffness
Girder spacing
Angle of skew
Bridge profile (bump at the end of the bridge)
Frequency
Axle weights & spacings
Speed
De-icing
Level of preservation
Load Permitting
Construction practices
4. solution Design of
experiment
  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions above
  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source
  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)
  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols
  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal
  6. Conduct data analysis
    1. Develop deterioration models
    2. Develop life-cycle cost models
  7. Address the question
5.
Outcomes
Products Best practices in NDE
and SHM techniques
for untreated
concrete decks
Data-driven,
reliability-based
inspection intervals &
criteria for untreated
concrete decks
1 -- Data-driven deterioration models for untreated concrete decks
2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for
preservation and replacement practices for
untreated concrete decks
2 -- Data-driven life-cycle
cost models for design and
construction practices for
untreated bridge decks

 • Strategic Performance Matrix: Concrete Bridge Deck Treatments >>

1. Objectives Defining and improving bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:
Standardized and enhanced inspection techniques and criteria Enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
2.
Questions
"Practical"
questions to be
answered:
Goal: provide
owners with data-
driven actionable
information

How should a
treated deck be
inspected?

When should a
treated deck be
inspected?

How should
a deck
treatment
be applied?

When
should a
deck
treatment
be applied?

How should
a treated
deck be
preserved or
replaced?

When should
a treated
deck be
preserved or
replaced?

Should a deck
treatment be
applied to a new
deck?
Overarching
"Fundamental"
questions to be
answered
Goal: explain
observed behavior
to support the
actions
Now does live load influence performance?
Now does environment influence performance?
How does the design & construction of the treatment influence performance?
How do structural characteristics of the bridge (such as flexibility) influence performance? How do preservation activities influence performance?
3.
Hypotheses
Key causal
factors
ENVIRONMENT TREATMENT
DESIGN 
BRIDGE
DESIGNS
LIVE
LOAD
OWNER
ACTIONS
Precipitation
Temperature
Proximity to the coast
Pollution
Age/deterioration
Type
Courses
Thicknesses
Surface prep
Span length
Girder stiffness
Girder spacing
Angle of skew
Bridge profile (bump at the end of the bridge)
Frequency
Axle weights & spacings
Speed
De-Icing
Level of preservation
Load permitting
Construction practices
4. solution Design of
experiment
  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions above
  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source
  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)
  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols
  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal
  6. Conduct data analysis
    1. Develop deterioration models
    2. Develop life-cycle cost models
  7. Address the question
5.
Outcomes
Products Best practices in
NDE and SHM
techniques for
treated decks
Data-driven,
reliability-based
inspection
intervals &
criteria for
treated decks

1 -- Data-driven deterioration models for treated concrete decks

2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for preservation
and replacement practices for treated decks
2 -- Data-driven
life-cycle cost
models for design
and construction practices for new bridges

 • Strategic Performance Matrix: Matrix: Joints & Bearings >>

1. Objectives Defining and improving bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:
standardized and enhanced inspection techniques and criteria enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
2.
Questions
"Practical"
questions to be
answered:
Goal: provide
owners with data-
driven actionable
information
How should joints
and bearings be
inspected
When should joints
and bearings be
inspected?
How should joints &
bearings be
preserved or
replaced?
When should joints
and bearings be
preserved or
replaced?
How should joints and bearings be
selected?
Overarching "Fundamental" questions to be answered Goal: explain observed behavior to support the actions How does live load influence performance?
How does environment influence performance?
How does the selection & installation of the joint or bearing influence performance?
How do structural characteristics of the bridge (such as skew) influence performance?
How do preservation activities influence performance?
3.
Hypotheses
Key causal
factors
ENVIRONMENT JOINT OR
SELECTION 
BRIDGE
DESIGNS
LIVE
LOAD
OWNER
ACTIONS
Precipitation
Temperature
Proximity to the coast
Pollution
Age/deterioration
Type
Materials
Installation Details
Span length
Girder stiffness
Girder spacing
Angle of skew
Bridge profile (bump at the end of the bridge)
Frequency
Axle weights & spacings
Speed
De-Icing
Level of preservation
Load permitting
Construction practices
4. solution Design of
experiment
  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions above
  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source
  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)
  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols
  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal
  6. Conduct data analysis
    1. Develop deterioration models
    2. Develop life-cycle cost models
  7. Address the question
5.
Outcomes
Products Best practices in NDE and SHM techniques for joints and bearings Data-driven, reliability-based inspection intervals & criteria for joints and bearings 1 -- Data-driven deterioration models for joints and bearings
2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for preservation and replacement practices for joints and bearings 2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for selection and Installation of joints and bearings

 • Strategic Performance Matrix: Coatings for Steel Components >>

1. Objectives Defining and Improving bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:
standardized and enhanced inspection techniques and criteria enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
2.
Questions
"Practical" questions to be answered: Goal: provide owners with data- driven actionable information How should coatings for steel components be inspected When should coatings for steel components be inspected? How should coatings for steel components be preserved or replaced? When should coatings for steel components be preserved or replaced? How should new steel components be coated?
Overarching "Fundamental" questions to be answered Goal: explain observed behavior to support the actions How does environment influence performance?
How does the selection & application of the coating influence performance?
How do preservation activities influence performance?
3.
Hypotheses
Key causal
factors
ENVIRONMENT COATING
SELECTION 
OWNER
ACTIONS
Precipitation
Temperature
Proximity to the coast
Pollution
Age/deterioration
Type
Coats
Thickness
Surface prep
De-icing
Level of preservation
Load permitting
Construction practices
4. solution Design of
experiment
  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions above
  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source
  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)
  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols
  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal
  6. Conduct data analysis
  7. Develop deterioration models
  8. Develop life-cycle cost models
  9. Address the question
5.
Outcomes
Products Best practices In NDE and SHM techniques for coatings for steel components Data-driven, reliability-based inspection intervals & criteria for coatings for steel components 1 -- Data-driven deterioration models for coatings for steel components
2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for preservation and replacement practices for coatings for steel components 2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for selection and application of coatings for steel component practices on new bridges

 • Strategic Performance Matrix: Embedded or Ducted Strands or Tendons >>

1. Objectives Defining and Improving bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:
standardized and enhanced inspection techniques and criteria enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
2.
Questions
"Practical" questions to be answered: Goal: provide owners with data- driven actionable information How should embedded or ducted strands or tendons be inspected When should embedded or ducted strands or tendons be inspected? How should embedded or ducted strands or tendons be preserved or replaced? When should embedded or ducted strands or tendons be preserved or replaced? How should a new embedded or ducted strands or tendons be designed and constructed?
Overarching "Fundamental" questions to be answered Goal: explain observed behavior to support the actions How does environment influence performance?
How does the design & construction of the strands or tendons influence performance?
How do preservation activities influence performance?
3.
Hypotheses
Key causal
factors
ENVIRONMENT STRAND OR TENDON DESIGN  OWNER
ACTIONS
Precipitation
Temperature
Proximity to the coast
Pollution
Age/deterioration
Type
Concrete Mix
Cover
Duct type
Anchorage type
Grout
De-icing
Level of preservation
Load permitting
Construction practices
4. solution Design of
experiment
  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions above
  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source
  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)
  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols
  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal
  6. Conduct data analysis
  7. Develop deterioration models
  8. Develop life-cycle cost models
  9. Address the question
5.
Outcomes
Products Best practices in NDE and SHM techniques for embedded or ducted strands or tendons Data-driven, reliability-based inspection intervals & criteria for embedded or ducted strands or tendons 1 -- Data-driven deterioration models for embedded or ducted strands or tendons
2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for preservation and replacement practices for embedded or ducted strands or tendons 2 -- Data-driven life-cycle cost models for design and construction practices for pre- tensioned or post-tensioned bridges

Presentation Outline


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

A watermark image of a map of the United States appears on the entire slide. A matrix obscures the middle and eastern parts of the US map. The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. The number one includes a leader line that corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. The number two has a leader line that corresponds to “2. Objectives” in the matrix. The number three has a leader line that corresponds to “3. Hypotheses” in the matrix. The number four has a leader line that corresponds to “4. Solution” in the matrix. The number five has a leader line that corresponds to “5. Outcomes” in the matrix. Text appears over the watermark. A small portion of the Department of Transportation’s logo appears on the lower-right corner of the slide; the logo is mostly obscured by the matrix.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

A watermark image of a map of the United States appears on the entire slide. A matrix obscures the middle and eastern parts of the US map. The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. In this slide, the number one is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text and includes a leader line that corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. The Objectives row is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text. The number two has a leader line that corresponds to “2. Objectives” in the matrix. The number three has a leader line that corresponds to “3. Hypotheses” in the matrix. The number four has a leader line that corresponds to “4. Solution” in the matrix. The number five has a leader line that corresponds to “5. Outcomes” in the matrix. Text appears over the watermark. A small portion of the Department of Transportation’s logo appears on the lower-right corner of the slide; the logo is mostly obscured by the matrix.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

To define and improve bridge health and performance for more effective safety, mobility, stewardship and asset management through:

  • Standardization and enhanced inspection techniques and criteria

  • Enhanced design, construction, preservation and operating practices from probabilistic data-driven tools
A photograph showing a concrete bridge surface with cracks, an orange traffic cone, and spray-painted markings on the cement is shown.

 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. The number one corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. In this slide, the number two is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text and includes a leader line that corresponds to the 2. “Objectives” row. The Objectives row is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text. The number three has a leader line that corresponds to “3. Hypotheses” in the matrix. The number four has a leader line that corresponds to “4. Solution” in the matrix. The number five has a leader line that corresponds to “5. Outcomes” in the matrix. Text appears over the watermark.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

Untreated Decks – Questions to be answered

Practical (Providing Actionable Information)

Fundamental (Underpin Forecasting and Asset Management)


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. In this slide, the number three is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text and includes a leader line that corresponds to the 3. “Hypotheses” row. The Hypotheses row is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text. The number one corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. The number two has a leader line that corresponds to “2. Questions” in the matrix. The number four has a leader line that corresponds to “4. Solution” in the matrix. The number five has a leader line that corresponds to “5. Outcomes” in the matrix.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

Untreated Decks – Hypotheses

The observed deterioration of bridge decks is caused by the individual and combined influences of…


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. In this slide, the number four is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text and includes a leader line that corresponds to the 4. “Solution” row. The Solution row is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text. The number one corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. The number two has a leader line that corresponds to “2. Questions” in the matrix. The number three has a leader line that corresponds to “3. Hypotheses” in the matrix. The number five has a leader line that corresponds to “5. Outcomes” in the matrix.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

Untreated Decks – Solution

  1. Design an appropriate experiment for addressing the practical and fundamental questions

  2. Select a network of bridges (reference and clusters) as the primary population source

  3. Conduct paper study (tacit/legacy data collection)

  4. If the paper study proves inconclusive, conduct field data collection using the appropriate LTBP data collection protocols

  5. Handle all data management through the LTBP Portal

  6. Conduct data analysis

    1. Develop deterioration models

    2. Develop life-cycle cost models

  7. Address the question

Specific details provided within an “Operational Matrix”


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

The numbers three, four, and five appear to the left of the matrix, and the numbers two and one appear above the matrix. In this slide, the number five is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text and includes a leader line that corresponds to the 5. “Outcomes” row. The Outcomes row is highlighted in a different color than the rest of the text. Five arrows appear in the matrix, starting in the “2. Questions” row and continuing across the matrix and down to the “5. Outcomes” row. The number one corresponds to the “Objectives” heading in the matrix. The number two has a leader line that corresponds to “2. Questions” in the matrix. The number three has a leader line that corresponds to “3. Hypotheses” in the matrix. The number four has a leader line that corresponds to the “4. Solution” row in the matrix. The table also contains five blue arrows, extending from the second row of five questions to be answered to the bottom row labeled “Outcomes” of five products.


 Research Approach & Methodology: Description of Untreated Bridge Deck Matrix

Untreated Decks – Outcomes

Question: How should an untreated concrete deck be inspected?
Outcome: Best practices in NDE and SHM techniques for untreated concrete decks
     
Question: When should an untreated concrete deck be inspected?
Outcome: Data-driven, reliability-based inspection intervals & criteria for untreated concrete decks
     
Question: How should an untreated deck be preserved or replaced?
  When should an existing deck be preserved or replaced?
  How should an untreated concrete deck be designed and constructed?
Outcome: Data-driven deterioration models for untreated concrete decks
    a) data-driven life-cycle cost models for preservation and replacement practices for untreated concrete decks
    b) data-driven life-cycle cost models for design and construction practices for untreated bridge decks

Presentation Outline


 Research Operational Matrix >>

Two Components of Operational Matrix

(There is a layer of Matrix for Each High Priority Performance Issue)

Data Collection

Data Analysis

An example of what this looks like in concept …..

 

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101