![]() |
840 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 310 West Trenton, New Jersey 08628 Phone (609) 637-4200 Fax (609) 538-4913 |
New Jersey Division Office
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1
Facts, System Trends and Projections
CHAPTER 2
Strategic Implementation Plan Goals
APPENDICES
1-A: DFS Executive Performance
Appraisal Record
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) New Jersey Division Office fiscal year (FY) 2009 Strategic Implementation Plan outlines the Division Office near term strategy to achieve the multi-year goals and objectives in the FHWA and U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) strategic plans, as well as the goals and objectives developed in collaboration with our customers/partners at the local level.
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) was established in 1967 as one of the operating administrations within the United States Department of Transportation. The agency has been in existence since 1893. Prior to 1967, the agency was known by other names such as the Office of Road Inquiry and the Bureau of Public Roads. Through the years, our name has changed, but our dedication to providing world-class transportation in America has remained the same.
The organizational structure of FHWA consists of the Washington Headquarters, the Resource Center, 52 Division offices and the Federal Lands Highway offices. Approximately one half of FHWA's employees are located in Washington, D.C., where legislation and regulations are developed. The Resource Center provides technical expertise and serves the technical needs of the Division offices. The center acts as an internal consultant to the Divisions on technical issues. The Division offices are located in the 50 States, plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. These offices work closely with their respective State Transportation Agency to implement the Federal-aid program. The Federal Lands Highway offices handle road construction projects on Federal and publicly owned lands such as National Parks. There are three Federal Lands Highway offices and numerous project offices across the nation.
Under the Federal-aid highway program, FHWA does not decide which roads and bridges will be improved or who will do the work. Instead, the Federal-aid highway program is a federally assisted, State-administered partnership. The State Transportation Agencies, working with local officials and acting through metropolitan and statewide planning processes, determine where the Federal funds should be spent. FHWA provides technical assistance and approvals at key phases of the project, including compliance with related laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act.
Strategic Direction:
The FHWA Vision is "Our Agency and Our Transportation System Are the Best in the World."
The FHWA Mission is "Improve Mobility on our Nation's Highways through National Leadership, Innovation, and Program Delivery."
Role of the FHWA:
Leaders for National Mobility
The role of FHWA is to carry out our mission by providing leadership, expertise, resources, and information in cooperation with our multi-modal transportation partners at all governmental levels. Our success depends upon each FHWA employee's ability to provide leadership in his or her daily activities, program responsibilities, and personal contacts.
Stewards for National Highway Programs
The strategic implementation plan provides the necessary strategic focus and direction in the delivery of financial and technical assistance to our partners and stakeholders responsible for planning, constructing, improving, preserving, and operating America's highway system. Every unit in the FHWA contributes to the strategic implementation plan through the delivery of the Federal-aid highway program (FAHP). Accomplishment of the national strategies and objectives can only be achieved through an efficient and effective program delivery system. It is through this system that the FHWA provides national leadership, ensures the resources entrusted to the Agency are used in the public interest, protects the fiscal and technological integrity of the program, and maintains the public trust.
Innovators for a Better Future
To meet the challenges ahead, transportation managers will need the benefits of technology and innovation that only a carefully considered, well-developed, and clearly communicated Research and Technology (R&T) program can provide. The FHWA meets these challenges by realizing its full potential as a leader in the transportation research and technology field.
Strategic Goals:
The new strategic plan framework consists of four goals:
National Leadership - FHWA leads in developing and advocating solutions to national transportation needs.
Program Delivery - Federal Highway Programs are effectively and consistently delivered through successful partnerships, value-added stewardship, and risk-based oversight.
System Performance - The Nation's highway system provides safe, reliable, effective, and sustainable mobility for all users.
Corporate Capacity - Organizational resources are optimally deployed to meet today and tomorrow's missions.
Key Business Processes
The FHWA has identified the following core business processes in the Division offices:
Most of the national strategies and activities identified in the strategic implementation plan require the execution of the key business processes. Our partners and customers rely on the NJ Division Office to provide front-line program delivery and technical assistance, including but not limited to, planning and environmental support, design, construction, asset management, civil rights, engineering services, technology transfer, research, and technical expertise. In addition, we assist our partner agencies in understanding and complying with the laws and requirements that are a prerequisite to using FAHP funds.
Why Does the New Jersey Division Office Exist?
The New Jersey Division office contributes to the national goals by focusing on the following products and services:
Customer Service
Quality
Measurable Results
New Jersey (NJ) Risk Assessment Process
Nationally, Federal Highway Administration implemented a quantitative Risk Assessment Process to identify the top risks within a given state. A Risk Assessment quantifies the affects of a future event that is either detrimental or beneficial to a program. Identifying risks helps to better align our resources with top concerns in New Jersey. The Division office continues to seek input from our partners at the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT) in the Risk Assessment Process. Any program reviews, process reviews/product evaluations, program evaluation techniques, and continuous process improvement initiatives developed through the Risk Assessment Process are then documented as activities in teams' work plans or individual performance objectives.
Prioritized Program Delivery IMPROVEMENT Tool (PDIT) Core Elements CORE ELEMENTS |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Locally Administered Project (Finance) | 16. Managing Traffic Under Normal Traffic Conditions | 31. Project Authorization/Mods | 46. EEO Contractor Compliance |
| 2. Highway Safety Improvement Program | 17. Emergency Preparedness | 32. DBE | 47. Geotechnical Engineer |
| 3. Pavement Smoothness | 18. Fiscal Constraint | 33. STIP/TIP Development | 48. Material Quality |
| 4. Programming and Financing | 19. Bridge Load Rating & Posting | 34. Context Sensitive Solutions | 49. Material Quality Assurance |
| 5. Management Systems and Systematic Process | 20. Research | 35. Program Management | 50. Managing Traffic Under Unusual Traffic Conditions |
| 6. Locally Administered Project (Construction) | 21. Environmental Stewardship | 36. Air Quality Transportation Conformity | 51. Crash Data Collection and Analysis |
| 7. PS&E | 22. Highway Beautification | 37. Traveler Information System | 52. Hydraulic Engineering |
| 8. Funds Management | 23. Major Projects | 38. Required Safety Programs | 53. Bridge and Structure Design |
| 9. Strategic Highway Safety Plan | 24. Acquisition/Appraisal | 39. ITS | 54. Planning/NEPA Linkage |
| 10. Data Collection/Inventories | 25. Relocation Assistance | 40. ADA/504 | 55. Bridge Management |
| 11. Contract Administration | 26. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) | 41. Highway Bridge Program | 56. Travel Demand Modeling |
| 12. Roadway Design | 27. Internal EEO/AA | 42. Interagency Coordination | 57. Planning/NEPA Linkage (Planning) |
| 13. Bridge Construction | 28. Focused Safety Programs | 43. Strategic Planning and Performance Measure | 58. Congestion Management Process |
| 14. Environmental Process | 29. Title VI | 44. Foundation for Operations | 59. Public Involvement and State DOT Consultation/Coordination w/ MPO and Locals |
| 15. Pavement Design | 30. Federal-Aid Billing | 45. Consultant Selection and Administration | |
** Non-PDAT Core Element.
| Program Area | Top Risk Statements | Risk Response Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| System Preservation | (1) If the remaining service life (RSL) as a performance objective for pavements and bridges is not utilized in performance processes and if inefficient/sufficient funding continues then rapid deterioration of New Jersey's infrastructure will result in poor investment decisions, inefficient use of Federal-aid funds & lack of investment impact on the performance system. | Mitigate - incorporate performance measures and actions into 2009 NJ Strategic Implementation Planning efforts. Participate on NJDOT Asset Management Steering Committee. |
| Safety | (2) If safety needs are identified but are not programmed or if safety needs are programmed but a request for funding authorization is not submitted by NJDOT then NJDOT will continue to maintain substantially high unobligated balances of dedicated safety funding, and this can lead to NJ losing safety funds permanently. | Mitigate - incorporate performance measures and actions into 2009 NJ Strategic Implementation Planning efforts. |
| Finance | (3) If NJDOT financial systems and FHWA FMIS do not record and/or disclose the unfunded elements of Multi-year Funded (MYF) Projects then this failure to record and report unfunded elements of MYF projects may result in undisclosed financial risks to NJ's Regional Transportation Plans and STIP. | Accept threat and continue to monitor. |
| Finance | (4) If NJDOT does not have a systematic process for financial oversight in locally administered projects, then this may result in non-compliance with federal and state laws, regulation, and procedures. | Mitigate - perform FIRE reviews to address key concerns. |
| Finance | (5) If attrition in the NJDOT CFO area continues eroding essential Federal-aid knowledge, skills, and abilities and if NJDOT financial systems become increasingly subject to maintenance issues and potential failure, then NJDOT's inability to rely on financial systems and operational controls may result in interruption in the flow of federal aid to NJ. | Transfer and enforce requirements to NJDOT to maintain expertise. |
| Design | (6) If NJDOT staff reductions continue through attrition, early retirement, transfers, etc. then the quality of PS&E submissions may decrease and the time necessary to produce such submissions may increase. | Transfer and enforce requirements to NJDOT to maintain expertise. |
| Finance | (7) If NJDOT is unable to audit contract cost pursuant to requirements of 23 CFR 172 and if the audit backlog continues to be approximately $1 billion, then this will result in delays in final determination of actual Federal Aid project cost impacting final voucher and timely project closure and may negatively impact stewardship of Federal-aid funds. | Mitigate - work with NJDOT through special Financial taskforces to address concern. |
| Construction | (8) If construction operations that have been deemed nonessential are performed without NJDOT materials field supervision and use of consultants is increased on construction operations deemed non-essential then this can lead to lesser quality materials being accepted. Items such as these can create higher total costs, prolonged contract lengths, and lower project life expectancies. | Mitigate - incorporate performance measures and actions into 2009 NJ Strategic Implementation Planning efforts. |
| Operation | (9) If the current travel demands continue then an increase in total miles covered by real time traffic technology is needed to reduce congestion. | Mitigate - incorporate performance measures and actions into 2009 NJ Strategic Implementation Planning efforts. |
| Construction (Locally Administered Projects) | (10) If local aid policies and procedures continue to lack a uniform, comprehensive direction for oversight of federally funded projects then inconsistencies amongst district offices will continue and this leads to challenges with FHWA oversight. | Mitigate - incorporate performance measures and actions into 2009 NJ Strategic Implementation Planning efforts. |
NJ Process Reviews
The following are three areas which the NJ Division plans on conducting process reviews:
Tentative Milestone Dates |
||
|---|---|---|
| Process Reviews | Create Work Plan | Complete Review |
| F.I.R.E- Review of Utility relocations | Fall 2008/Winter 2008 | Spring 2009 |
| Prestressed Concrete - On-site field visits or plant visits | Completed | Fall 2009 |
| Design Exception- Review of Design Exceptions on the Interstate | Winter 2008 | Spring/Summer 2009 |
As the process reviews advance during fiscal year 2009, a more definitive time schedule will be created.
NJ Stewardship and Oversight Program
FHWA is charged to be stewards of the public funds entrusted to us. The Division Office must ensure that the Federal-aid highway program in NJ is delivered in a method consistent with all applicable federal laws, regulations, and policies in an efficient and effective manner. To accomplish this task the Division Office performs a number of stewardship and oversight activities. At the project level, Division personnel perform financial reviews at time of authorization, PS&E reviews, construction inspections, technical reviews, and etc. At the program level, Division personnel are involved in process reviews, certifications, listening sessions, risk assessments, and etc. In addition, the Division is heavily involved with state and local developmental meetings such as the Capital Program Committee meeting where fiscal year transportation projects are discussed and approved at key stages of development.
NJ Strategic Implementation Plan
The role of the Division Office is to assure that the New Jersey portion of the Nation's transportation system meets the needs of all citizens. This is accomplished through our assistance to the State of New Jersey in delivering a quality transportation program through the Federal-aid highway program. To help accomplish these goals and to determine our performance, the Division office develops a Strategic Implementation Plan each year through a collaborative process utilizing teams comprised of Division and NJDOT staff. Input is gathered from the FHWA National Strategic Implementation Plan, our partners at the NJDOT, MPOs, and Division Office Staff. This collaboration helps ensure the goals and measures included in the plan are consistent with the State and MPO Capital Investment Strategies, Regional Transportation Plans and Transportation Improvement Plans. The National Plan identifies the National Goals and Objectives and activities that will be required of the Division Office.
The Division Office has identified 16 performance measures that will form the basis of our collective success. 7 of the 16 performance measures represent "Key Performance Measures" Senior Staff have formed as a realistic approach for achievement during FY 2009. The "Key Performance Measures" represent a controllable measurement in determining the collective success of the Division Office for team awards, performance awards, and office recognition. All 16 performance measures will be utilized for trends and included within the mid-year and annual reports. However the 7 Key Performance Measures will be exclusively tracked during the FY 2009 year on a monthly basis and discussed in the senior staff meetings for progress results.
FY 2009 Key Performance Measures:
1. Develop a decision support tool for prioritizing of projects by September 30, 2008.
2. Increase the obligation of safety projects and safety funds (Q21 and Q24 funds) obligated by 10% in 2009. Safety projects are defined as pedestrian, intersection, and roadway departure locations. (FY 2008 Baseline: $22 million)
3. Authorize the installation of scour countermeasures on 20 scour critical bridges.
4. Implement recommendations from the Division's local project oversight reviews to ensure proper oversight of locally administered projects.
5. Implement Crucial Conversation training for New Jersey Division employees by 2009.
6. Reduce the running balance of inactive projects reported by FMIS using FIRE criteria by 10% in 2009. (FY 2008 Baseline: 105 projects with unexpended balances approximately $ 37 million)
7. Complete all process reviews on schedule. (FY 2009 target is 3 projected process reviews).
Although the remaining 9 performance measures are vital to the Division office, the factors determining success will occur over several years. In addition, several of the performance measures arose for reporting purposes and managing of the Federal-aid program. The Division office will utilize these performance measures for internal evaluation of performance in a long-term capacity. As stated previously, all performance measures will be utilized for trends and included within the mid-year and annual reports. The remaining performance measures are provided below.
8. Establish travel times on Dynamic Message Signs on at least one interstate. (FY 2009 Target: 1; FY 2008 Baseline: NA)
9. Establish timeframes for EISs (FY 2009 target is 100% of EISs in the EDTS with established schedules).
10. Track and report deficient deck area of NJ bridges.
11. Integrate FHWA's Highways-for-Life concept with NJDOT innovative methods.
12. Increase percent of travel on NHS with IRI of <95 inches per mile. (FY 2009 Target: 43; FY 2008 Baseline: 41)
13. Develop an entry-level Federal Aid Process CD for the state of New Jersey. Training will focus on New Jersey employees within the Division, State, and Local governments.
14. Increase the number of projects involving accelerated construction. (Establish baseline in FY 09)
15. Establish benchmark for number of construction inspections performed during and up to project completion by Division staff in 2009.
16. Improve disaster preparedness, response, and recovery plans at the federal, state, and local level.
Figures 1 thru 11 contain charts tracking some of our key performance indicators.

Sources: New Jersey Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, FY 2009-2012
Figure 1

Sources: NJDOT, Factbook 2005; 2004 National Highway System Route List
Figure 2

Figure 3

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Fatal Accident Reporting System
Figure 4

Source: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Fatal Accident Reporting System
Figure 5

Source: FMIS as of 8/2008
Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey
Figure 9

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey
Figure 10

Figure 11
Four broad policy goals have framed this plan:
The New Jersey Strategic Implementation Plan is New Jersey's efforts to demonstrate our accountability to Congress and the American public. In this chapter, we explore these goals and the descriptions of performance targets and staff actions. Within these goals, the Administration has identified the vital few goals: National Leadership, Program Delivery, System Performance, and Corporate Capacity.
The Division works as a team to promote, educate, monitor, and share in the successes and failures of performance measuring. We break each goal into discrete objectives, and provide metrics and performance measurements over time to track our progress in achieving these goals. We include input from each of the Division's teams, in addition to discussions with the NJDOT, NJTPA, DVRPC, SJTPO, and other relevant stakeholders.
In addition to charting the Division's own progress in meeting the Strategic Implementation Plan goals, the plan defines a complimentary set of measures to gauge the performance of the entire statewide transportation system as improved by the projects implemented through the New Jersey Statewide Transportation Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2009-2013. These system performance measures include safety ratings, pavement and structures conditions, and technology deployment.
National Leadership
Goal: FHWA leads in developing and advocating solutions to national transportation needs.
United States is looked upon as a global leader in many technical advances. Maintaining the leadership edge globally within the transportation arena is vital to promoting United States interests throughout the world. FHWA has an important role to lead efforts and be an agency of change to identify and address transportation needs and issues.
Two means outlined within the FHWA Strategic Plan is through the advancement of innovation and policy leadership. The New Jersey Division has long been a proponent of leadership. Working as technical experts we continuously provide training to our transportation partners in implementing of the Federal aid Highway Program. As leaders, New Jersey Division office aims to collaboratively work with our transportation partners to assure that the needs of the motoring public are satisfied. New Jersey has long held an open door policy with state constituents and public officials to hear and address their transportation concerns.
National Performance Objectives NL1: Advance Innovation (includes SP6 from the original FY'09 Plan). (NL1) |
|
Division Performance Objectives
|
Division Performance Measures
|
Goal: Federal Highway Programs are effectively and consistently delivered through successful partnerships, value-added stewardship, and risk-based oversight.

Summary
Countless people regularly practice preventive maintenance to preserve the value of assets such as their homes, furnaces, and automobiles. But when it comes to public infrastructures such as roads and bridges, both road agencies and users tend to be blind to the concept. Road agencies are increasingly coming to view their highway systems as assets worthy of preservation in the same sense as equipment or buildings. These road agencies correctly perceive the negative consequences, such as higher costs, that result from poor maintenance policies and practices. While road construction skills are often plentiful, preservation skills are in short supply, and some managers find it easier to build new roads than keep existing roads in good operating condition. Emergency repairs-short term fixes-are typically superficial and do not address structural damages. Ultimately, failed roads will need to be reconstructed many years earlier than anticipated. Using funds originally budgeted for maintenance on emergency repairs depletes resources available for preserving good roads.
New Jersey commits a significant portion of its resources to maintaining the State's existing infrastructure (fix it first). Highways and bridges need constant repaving and repair; signal timing plans need to be adjusted over time; cracks in sidewalks and bike paths must be remedied. All of this work requires ongoing funding, which must be part of the State's overall transportation program.
In conjunction with our transportation partners, New Jersey Division office aims to oversee transportation projects and programs and efficiently manage FAHP funds; improve the state of the art in transportation planning; ensure customer and employee satisfaction, and enhance effectiveness in determining research priorities and deploying technologies and innovation. New Jersey Division takes asset management very seriously and aims to assist our transportation partners in moving towards key asset management principles.
In September 2008, FHWA and NJDOT signed a comprehensive Stewardship Agreement that defines our roles in assuring a quality transportation system in the state of New Jersey. Delivery of the Federal aid Highway Program is a key role within that Stewardship Agreement. Among our many responsibilities for program oversight and stewardship, we will place a special emphasis on more cost efficient funds administration and project management and more effective use of FAHP funds.
National Performance Objectives PD1: Program Integrity (includes SP3, PD1/2 from the original FY'09 Plan). |
Division Performance Objectives
|
Division Performance Measures
|
Proactive environmental stewardship is essential if we are to preserve and sustain our natural resources. Maintenance of the transportation system requires significant resources and investment in management strategies that minimize environmental effects. FHWA promotes actions that show we are responsible stewards of the environment. We take advantage of opportunities to enhance environmental protection and encourage partnerships that promote eco-system conservation or encourage broader mitigation strategies that seek corridor or watershed based approaches.
Proactive stewardship and oversight of the State's security measures will be essential for the security and well being of the State and the nation as a whole. In the post-9-11 era, National Security has become a focus area for the entire nation, including the FHWA. The highway system is not only critical to the Nation's economic vitality and quality of life, but it also plays a key role in virtually every emergency event. New Jersey's transportation system must function efficiently in order to evacuate threatened populations, allow first responders to get to the scene, facilitate the movement of supplies into and out of an area, and restore mobility in the days and months after an event. Major social and economic impacts result when the transportation system is affected by an extreme event such as earthquakes, fire, collision, or scour. Since 9-11, we have been more aware that the transportation infrastructure may be the target of terrorist attacks.
| Division Actions | Team |
|---|---|
|
Infrastructure |
NJDOT/MPO Actions
|
Goal: The Nation's highway system provides safe, reliable, effective, and sustainable mobility for all users.
Route 4 & 17 Interchange Project

Summary
New Jersey is the most densely populated state in the nation, and the only state that has every county deemed urban as define by the Bureau of Census. Traditional approaches such as building new roads and adding highway lanes are too costly to be considered as reasonable solutions. In order to mitigate traffic congestion in New Jersey, there must be a balance between new transit facilities and improving the operation of the highway system with the use of advanced technology such as intelligent transportation systems (ITS).
The FHWA has consistently stressed the importance of the systems approach to operating transportation facilities and services. Programs that support this system operations concept continue to grow and evolve. The NJDOT's integrated ITS network include the traffic operations center, emergency service patrol, and 511 traveler information system. Overtime, ITS in New Jersey has evolved, becoming more sophisticated in utilizing advanced technologies: computers, communications, and control systems that are integrated with other transportation systems.
New Jersey Division has placed special interest in improving the safety of the motoring public. SAFETEA-LU requires States to develop and implement Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSPs), in consultation with other key State and local highway safety stakeholders. NJ's Comprehensive Strategic Highway Safety Plan was approved by Corzine in September 2007. Therefore, implementation of the plan will continue during fiscal year 2009.
The goal of NJ's CSHSP is to:
Continually reduce the number and severity of crashes on New Jersey 's roadways
| Overall Performance Indicators | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Total Crashes | Fatal Crashes | Injury Crashes |
2003 |
283,627 |
649 |
76,627 |
2004 |
282,252 |
666 |
75,851 |
2005 |
274,029 |
678 |
72,028 |
2006 |
255,425 |
662 |
67,100 |
2007 |
263,525 |
645 |
65,857 |
Source: NJDOT Crash Records (excludes private and US government property and State/County Park and Institutions)
NJ's CSHSP identifies eight areas where we should focus our efforts to best achieve these goals. These emphasis areas include:
Reduce Impaired Driving |
Increase Driver Safety Awareness |
Reduce Crashes Involving Young Drivers |
Improve the Design & Operation of Intersections |
Prevent and Minimize Roadway Departure Crashes |
Sustain Safe Senior Mobility |
Reduce Pedestrian, Bicycle, Rail and Vehicular Conflicts |
Curb Aggressive Driving |
| National Performance Objectives SP1: Performance Indicators. (SP1) SP2: Performance Improvements (includes SF1/2, RC1/2, SP2/3/4, GC1/2, EN4, and SE1 from the original FY'09 Plan). (SP2) |
| Division Performance Objectives | Division Performance Measures |
|---|---|
|
|
| Division Actions | Team |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure |
NJDOT/MPO Actions
|
Goal: Organizational resources are optimally deployed to meet today and tomorrow's missions.
Summary
In FY 2009, the FHWA defined corporate capacity in terms of our ability to effectively and efficiently use available resources to meet current and future missions. Since 2001, the President's Management Agenda addressed five key areas to improvement the management of federal government agencies. The President's Management Agenda involves proactively addressing strategies to make government operate successfully New Jersey Division contributes to these initiatives through ensuring employee job satisfaction, enhancing Division effectiveness, and identifying resource gaps. As strong supporters of the Baldridge Award Criteria, we continue to perform self evaluations every two years to identify opportunities for improvement and to highlight our significant accomplishments.
Resource sharing is a mechanism to broaden staff experience or to highlight staff expertise. A number of employees have participated in some form of resource sharing outside of New Jersey. FHWA has been instrumental in the development and continuous improvement of the New Jersey Quality Initiative (NJQI). NJQI is currently being revitalized for a more defined quality role within New Jersey.
National Performance Objectives CC1: Workforce (includes OE1 from the original FY'09 Plan). |
Division Performance Objectives
|
Division Performance Measures
|
| Division Actions | Team |
|---|---|
| Infrastructure |
NJDOT/MPO Actions
|
Director of Field Services- North (DFS-North)
2009 Executive Performance Appraisal
| Weight | OBJECTIVES WITH PERFORMANCE TARGETS | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
Strategic Plan Goals (75%): Develop and administer policies and programs that contribute to providing fast, safe, efficient, and convenient transportation at the lowest cost consistent with the national objectives of general welfare, economic growth and stability, the national security, and the efficient use and conservation of the resources of the United States. Unless otherwise stated, targets are written at the Achieved Results level. |
|||
Safety Goals: Enhance public health and safety by working toward the elimination of transportation-related deaths and injuries.
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
Reduced Congestion Goals: Reduce congestion and other impediments to using the Nation's transportation System. Secretarial Office/Operating Administration Goal(s):
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
Environmental Stewardship Goals: Promote transportation solutions that enhance communities and protect the natural and built environment. Secretarial Office/Operating Administration Goal(s):
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
Security, Preparedness, and Response Goals: Balance homeland and national security transportation requirements with the mobility needs of the Nation for personal travel and commerce. Secretarial Office/Operating Administration Goal(s):
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
FHWA Program Delivery Goal: Programs are effectively and consistently delivered through successful partnerships, value-added stewardship, and risk-based oversight. Secretarial Office/Operating Administration Goal(s):
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
Organizational Excellence Goals: Advance the Department's ability to manage for results and achieve the goals of the President's Management Agenda.
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
Leadership Goals (25%): Provide executive leadership to the Department and to staff including accountability for employee performance plans and appraisals, development plans for employees, customer and employee feedback, diversity and EEO. Unless otherwise stated, targets are written at the Achieved Results level. |
|||
Goals:
Performance Targets with Measures:
|
|||
NOTE: THERE ARE FIVE RATING LEVELS: ACHIEVED EXCELLENCE, EXCEEDED EXPECTATIONS, ACHIEVED RESULTS, MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY, AND UNSATISFACTORY. A WRITTEN RATIONALE MUST BE ATTACHED FOR EACH ASSESSMENT OF MINIMALLY SATISFACTORY OR UNSATISFACTORY FOR AN INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE. ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED, NARRATIVE FEEDBACK IS RECOMMENDED FOR ALL RATINGS. AN EXECUTIVE MAY BE ASKED TO PROVIDE A SELF-ASSESSMENT FOR EACH OBJECTIVE. |
|||
FHWA Home | New Jersey Division Home | Feedback