| FHWA > Engineering > Pavements > Concrete > High Performance Concrete Pavements: Project Summary > Chapter 26 |
High Performance Concrete Pavements
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS | RECOMMENDED RANGE OR VALUE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| PERFORMANCE CLASSIFICATION 1 | PERFORMANCE CLASSIFICATION 2 | PERFORMANCE CLASSIFICATION 3 | |
| System Parameters | |||
| ESAL applications, millions | 50-150 | > 150 | |
| Maximum bearing stress, lbf/in2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Limiting IRI rating | 1.5 | 1.75 | |
| Limiting faulting, in./mi | 20 | 15 | 10 |
| Limiting transverse cracks/mi | 30 | 20 | |
| Design life, years | 20 | 30 | > 40 |
| Design reliability, % | 75-85 | 85-95 | |
| Terminal serviceability index | 2.5 | 3 | |
| PCC Slab Materials | |||
| Modulus of rupture, lbf/in2 | 500-650 | 650-700 | > 700 |
| Elastic modulus, lbf/in2 | 25-50 | 50-100 | > 100 |
| Freeze-thaw (ASTM C666), % | 60-80 | > 80 | |
| Scaling (ASTM C672) | x = 4, 5 | x = 2, 3 | x = 0, 1 |
| Abrasion (ASTM C944-90a) | 1-2 | 0.5-1 | < 0.5 |
| Permeability (ASTM C1202), coulombs | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 |
| Coarse aggregate (AASHTO M80-87), class | D | C | B |
| Fine aggregate (AASHTO M6-93), class | B | A | |
| Slab Constructibility | |||
| Fast track, hours to 3000 lbf/in2 | < 24 | < 18 | < 12 |
| Slab Performance | |||
| Mean friction number (ASTM E 274) | 40-50 | 35-40 | 30-35 |
| Initial smoothness (profilograph), in./mi | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| Texture (ASTM E965), in. | 0.13 | 0.13-0.25 | 0.25-0.30 |
| Joint Materials | |||
| Rubberized asphalt (ASTM D1190, D3405), % | 15-20 | 20-30 | > 30 |
| Low-Modulus rubberized asphalt (ASTM D3405), % | 30-40 | 40-50 | > 50 |
| Non-self-leveling silicone (ASTM D3893), % | 30-40 | 40-50 | > 50 |
| Self-leveling silicone (ASTM D3893), % | 30-40 | 40-50 | > 50 |
| Preformed compression seal (ASTM D2628), % | 45-65 | 65-85 | > 85 |
| Joint Constructibility | |||
| Load transfer coefficient, J | 3.0-3.2 | 2.8-3.0 | < 2.8 |
| Joint Performance | |||
| Joint faulting, in. | < 0.13 | < 0.10 | |
| Base Materials | |||
| Liquid limit (AASHTO T89) | 25-28 | 28-32 | > 32 |
| Plastic limit (AASHTO T90) | < 10 | < 20 | |
| Abrasion (ASTM C131) | 50 max | ||
| Drainage coefficient, Cd | 0.9-1.1 | 1.1-1.2 | > 1.2 |
| Stabilized base k-value, lbf/in2/in. | 100-200 | 200-300 | > 300 |
| Subgrade k-value, lbf/in2/in. | 100 | 150-200 | 200-250 |
| Subgrade California bearing ratio, % | 60-70 | 70-80 | > 80 |
| Base Constructibility | |||
| In-place recycling, % | < 10 | < 20 | < 30 |
| Speed, ft/day | < 500 | < 1500 | < 3000 |
| Base Performance | |||
| Erosion resistance (cement-treated base), % | 3-5 | 5-7 | 7-8 |
| Friction coefficient, f | 0.9-1.2 | 1.2-2.0 | > 2.0 |
The High Performance Concrete Pavement Optimization Program is available for use by State highway agencies (Goodspeed 1999). The computer program allows for one or more key design variables to be selected for optimization subject to certain constraints. Generally, slab thickness is the design variable that will be optimized, although other design variables, such as joint spacing or PCC compressive strength, can also be selected for optimization.
When optimizing, acceptable ranges must be entered for each variable being optimized. Furthermore, a cost equation must also be defined for each variable being optimized. The cost equation relates the cost of the variable to the design of the pavement system. Several default cost equations are provided for key variables, but users may also define their own unique cost equations (Goodspeed 1999).
Constraint parameters for various performance indicators must also be defined. These are generally equations that link the different design variables to pavement performance. Again, several default constraint parameters are contained in the program (for example, the 1993 AASHTO design procedure [AASHTO 1993] and the 1998 AASHTO Supplement [AASHTO 1998]), but users may define their own unique performance equations (Goodspeed 1999).
After defining the optimization variables and the constraint parameters, the user runs the optimization program to obtain the cost result and the values associated for each optimization variable. A summary report window is generated that summarizes the selected constraint equations, the optimization variable limits, the parameters, the cost equation results, and the optimized variable results (Goodspeed 1999).
The software program is currently available and free upon request. The software can be requested from either the New Hampshire Technology Transfer (T2) Center or the Florida T2 Center:
Charles Goodspeed
University of New Hampshire
Kingsbury Hall
Room 236
Durham, NH 03824
(603) 862-1443
chgi@cisunx.unh.edu
Gib Peaslee
University of Florida
Civil Engineering Department
Transportation Research Center
P.O. Box 116585
512 Wiel Hall
Gainesville, FL 32611-6585
(352) 392-2371, ext 245
gib@ce.ufl.edu
Charles H. Goodspeed
University of New Hampshire
Kingsbury Hall, Room 236
Durham, NH 03824
(603) 862-1443
chgi@cisunx.unh.edu
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 1993. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
---. 1998. Supplement to the Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
Goodspeed, C. H. 1999. High Performance Concrete for Bridge and Pavement Applications. CD-ROM (with HPCP definitions, presentation files and computer program). Durham, NH.
| << Previous | Contents | Next >> |
Sam Tyson
Office of Asset Management, Pavement, and Construction
202-366-1326
E-mail Sam