Skip to contentU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration
Asset Management | Bridge Technology | Operations | Pavement

Pavement Health Track Graphical User Interface, User's Guide

Technical Information

The PHT analysis engine quantifies the Remaining Service Life (RSL) of the pavement for each highway section using the simplified Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) based pavement performance prediction models. The PHT analysis engine receives highway data and parameter metrics and determines the pavement RSL in accordance with its implementation process presented in Figure 33.

Figure 33. RSL Forecasting Process. A top to bottom flowchart shows the forecasting process through five levels. At the topmost level raw data input receives climate data, traffic data, inventory/design data, and performance data, feeding the results to the next level, process raw data. This level is a collection of data on properties including pavement type, age, temperature, thickness, and so on. The processed properties data feed into the next level, compute critical pavement responses. The responses are presented in terms of strain at the middle and bottom of HMA layer, at the middle of the base layer, and at the top of the subgrade. These results feed into the next level, composed of three models: New HMA and HMA/HMA; New Rigid (JPCP); and Composite HMA/PCC. Results from this level feed into Outputs, composed of tables with project level outputs.
Figure 33. RSL Forecasting Process

PHT Data Schema

The PHT source data derived from HPMS 2010 are listed in Table 6.

Table 6. PHT Data Fields
n_IDintegerUnique record identifier.
n_Year_RecordintegerYear of record.
n_State_CodeintegerState FIPS code.
n_County_CodeintegerCounty FIPS code.
s_Sample_IDtextUnique sample identifier.
s_Route_IDtextRoute identifier.
f_Begin_PointsingleBeginning milepost.
f_End_PointsingleEnding milepost.
f_Section_LengthsingleOverall section length.
n_Volume_GroupintegerThe AADT volume group for the facility.
n_Expansion_FactorsingleFactor to expand sample data to represent the universe data.
n_FSystemintegerThe FHWA approved functional system classification.
n_RU_CodeintegerRural/Urban code
n_Facility_TypeintegerOperational characteristics of the roadway.
n_Is_StructureintegerSection is completely on a structure, tunnel, or causeway.
n_Through_LanesintegerNumber of lanes of the entire facility.
n_AADTintegerAnnual average daily traffic.
n_AADT_Single_UnitintegerAADT for single unit trucks.
n_AADT_CombinationintegerAADT for combination trucks.
n_Future_AADTintegerForecasted AADT.
n_Future_AADT_YearintegerYear of forecasted AADT.
f_Lane_WidthsingleMeasure of existing lane width.
n_Shoulder_TypeintegerType of existing shoulder.
n_Speed_LimitintegerPosted speed limit.
n_Climate_ZoneintegerClimate zone for the facility.
n_Surface_TypeintegerSurface type of the facility.
n_Year_Last_ImprovedintegerYear in which the roadway surface was last improved.
n_Year_Last_ConstructionintegerYear the facility was last improved.
f_Last_Overlay_ThicknesssingleThickness of the most recent pavement overlay.
f_Thickness_RigidsingleThickness of the rigid pavement.
f_Thickness_FlexiblesingleThickness of the flexible pavement.
n_Base_TypeintegerThe base pavement type.
f_Base_ThicknesssingleThickness of the base pavement.
n_Soil_TypeintegerSoil class type.
f_IRIsingleInternational roughness index.
f_Cracking_FatiguesingleEstimate of total area or slabs with fatigue cracking.
f_Cracking_TransversesingleEstimate of total feet/mile of transverse cracking.
f_RuttingsingleEstimate of average rutting.
f_FaultingsingleEstimate of average vertical displacement between adjacent slabs.
f_PSRsinglePresent serviceability rating.

Data Aggregations

The PHT tool classifies pavement types as Rigid, Flexible, and Composite. The aggregation of the standard HPMS 2010 surface types into these three classifications is shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Surface Type Classifications
Classification RSL Analysis HPMS Code Description
noneNo0Not Reported
noneNo1Unpaved
FlexibleYes2Bituminous
RigidYes3JPCP - Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement
RigidNo4JRCP - Jointed Reinforced Concrete Pavement
RigidNo5CRCP - Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement
FlexibleYes6Asphalt-Concrete (AC) Overlay over Existing AC Pavement
CompositeYes7AC Overlay over Existing Jointed Concrete Pavement
CompositeNo8AC (Bi Overlay over Existing CRCP)
RigidNo9Unbounded Jointed Concrete Overlay on PCC Pavements
RigidNo10Unbounded CRCP Overlay on PCC Pavements
RigidNo11Bonded PCC Overlays on PCC Pavements
noneNo12Other

The PHT tool aggregates the standard HPMS 2010 functional classifications for highway sections into three categories of Interstate, Primary, and Secondary roadways as shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Functional System Classifications
Classification HPMS Code Description
Interstate1Interstate
Interstate2Principal Arterial - Other Freeways and Expressways
Interstate3Principal Arterial - Other
Primary4Minor Arterial
Primary5Major Collector
Secondary6Minor Collector
Secondary7Local

Parameter Metrics

The following tables describe the default values for the parameter metrics used by the PHT analysis tool including the terminal thresholds, maximum service life, and default pavement estimates. You may modify any of these values as needed.

Table 9. Default Terminal Values
Surface Type Functional System IRI Cracking
Fatigue
Cracking
Transverse
Cracking
Reflection
Rutting Faulting
RigidInterstate170   10 %  0.15 in.
RigidPrimary220 15 %  0.20 in.
RigidSecondary220 20 %  0.20 in.
FlexibleInterstate17020 %640 ft/mi 0.40 in. 
FlexiblePrimary22045 %800 ft/mi 0.60 in. 
FlexibleSecondary22045 %1270 ft/mi 0.80 in. 
CompositeInterstate170  100 ft/mi  
CompositePrimary220  60 ft/mi  
CompositeSecondary220  60 ft/mi  
Table 10. Default Maximum Service Life
Treatment Type Years
New HMA20
New PCC30
Thick AC Overlay of AC Pavement10
Thin AC Overlay of AC Pavement6
Thick AC Overlay of PCC Pavement10
Unbonded PCC Overlay of PCC Pavement25
Bonded PCC Overlay of PXX Pavement15
Thin AC Overlay of AC/PCC Pavement6
Table 11. Default Pavement Estimates (All Functional Systems)
Pavement Estimate Category State System
On
State System
Off
Last overlay Thickness3 in.3 in.
Rigid Pavement Thickness10 in.10 in.
Flexible Pavement Thickness8 in.8 in.
Base TypeGranularGranular
Base Thickness4 in.4 in.
Binder TypeAC-40 to AC-49AC-40 to AC-49
Dowel BarTypically usedTypically used
Joint Space20 feet20 feet

HPMS 2010 File Format

The following table describes the data fields for the Comma Separated Variable (CSV) file for the HPMS2010 formatted data that is used by the PHT analysis tool. This format is taken from the HPMS reassessment 2010 Data Specifications document, September 2008, paragraph 3.2.2.2, with three additional data fields (highlighted in bold) inserted as needed by the PHT analysis tool. Data fields shown in gray are not used in the analysis.

Table 12. PHT Data Fields.
Year_Record
State_Code
County_Code (field inserted by PHT analysis tool)
Sample_ID (field inserted by PHT analysis tool)
Route_ID
Begin_Point
End_Point
Section_Length
F_System
Rural_Urban_Code (field inserted by PHT analysis tool)
Urban_Code (field not used in the analysis)
Facility_Type
Is_Structure
Access_Control (field not used in the analysis)
Ownership (field not used in the analysis)
Through_Lanes
HOV_Type (field not used in the analysis)
HOV_Lanes (field not used in the analysis)
Peak_Lanes (field not used in the analysis)
Counter_Peak_Lanes (field not used in the analysis)
Turn_Lanes_R (field not used in the analysis)
Turn_Lanes_L (field not used in the analysis)
Speed_Limit
Toll (field not used in the analysis)
Toll_Type (field not used in the analysis)
Route_Number (field not used in the analysis)
Route_Signing (field not used in the analysis)
Route_Qualifier (field not used in the analysis)
AADT
AADT_Single
Pct_Peak_Single (field not used in the analysis)
AADT_Combination
Pct_Peak_Combination (field not used in the analysis)
K_Factor (field not used in the analysis)
Dir_Factor (field not used in the analysis)
Future_AADT
Future_AADT_Year
Type_Signal (field not used in the analysis)
Pct_Green_Time (field not used in the analysis)
Number_Signals (field not used in the analysis)
Stop_Signs (field not used in the analysis)
At_Grade_Other (field not used in the analysis)
Lane_Width
Median_Type (field not used in the analysis)
Median_Width (field not used in the analysis)
Shoulder_Type
Shoulder_Width_R (field not used in the analysis)
Shoulder_Width_L (field not used in the analysis)
Peak_Parking (field not used in the analysis)
Widening_Obstacle (field not used in the analysis)
Widening_Potential (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_A (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_B (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_C (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_D (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_E (field not used in the analysis)
Curves_F (field not used in the analysis)
Terrain_Type (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_A (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_B (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_C (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_D (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_E (field not used in the analysis)
Grades_F (field not used in the analysis)
Pct_Pass_Sight (field not used in the analysis)
IRI
PSR
Surface_Type
Rutting
Faulting
Cracking_Fatigue
Cracking_Transverse
Year_Last_Improv
Year_Last_Construction
Last_Overlay_Thickness
Thickness_Rigid
Thickness_Flexible
Base_Type
Base_Thickness
Climate_Zone
Soil_Type
NHS
Future_Facility (field not used in the analysis)
STRAHNET (field not used in the analysis)
Truck_Net (field not used in the analysis)
VSF (field not used in the analysis)
Capacity (field not used in the analysis)
Design_Speed (field not used in the analysis)
Vertical_Alignment(field not used in the analysis)
Horizontal_Alignment(field not used in the analysis)
Volume_Group
Expansion_Factor
Updated: 10/31/2012