Highway Concrete Technology Development and Testing Volume III: Field Evaluation of SHRP C-205 Test Sites (High Performance Concrete)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

• CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
  • BACKGROUND
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE FIELD SECTIONS
  • SUMMARY OF SECTION PROPERTIES-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
  • OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY
• CHAPTER 2. VISUAL EXAMINATION OF SHRP C-205 SITES
  • ARKANSAS
  • ILLINOIS
  • NEBRASKA
  • NEW YORK
  • NORTH CAROLINA
  • SUMMARY OF VISUAL EXAMINATION RESULTS
• CHAPTER 3. CONCRETE CORE TESTING
  • CORING PLAN
  • SIGNIFICANCE OF PERFORMANCE TESTS AND LABORATORY TEST PROTOCOLS
  • DESCRIPTION OF METHODS USED FOR DATA ANALYSIS
  • DATA ANALYSIS
• CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
  • CONCLUSIONS
  • RECOMMENDATIONS

• APPENDIX A. CURVATURE INDEX

• REFERENCES

LIST OF FIGURES

• Figure 1. Graph. Plot of compressive strength versus age for test site in Arkansas
• Figure 2. Graph. Plot of compressive strength versus age for test site in Illinois
• Figure 3. Graph. Plot of strength gain for the different experiments (aggregate type and water reducer type) in North Carolina
• Figure 4. Graph. Plot of compressive strength versus age for test site in Nebraska
• Figure 5. Graph. Plot of compressive strength versus age for test site in New York(data available for insulated sections only)
• Figure 6. Graph. Plot of cores' compressive strength versus cylinders' compressive strength.
• Figure 7. Graph. Plot of static elastic modulus versus age for the three aggregate types analyzed
• Figure 8. Graph. Plot of the measured and predicted EPCC from compressive strength for crushed granite
• Figure 9. Graph. Plot of the measured and predicted EPCC from compressive strength for marine marl
• Figure 10. Graph. Plot of the measured and predicted EPCC from compressive strength for limestone
• Figure 11. Graph. Plot of charge passed versus concrete age for Arkansas
• Figure 12. Graph. Plot of charge passed versus concrete age for Illinois
• Figure 13. Graph. Plot of charge passed versus concrete age for North Carolina
• Figure 14. Graph. Plot of charge passed versus concrete age for Nebraska
• Figure 15. Graph. Plot of charge passed versus concrete age for New York
• Figure 16. Bar chart. Histogram showing RCPT results from the top and bottom sections of concrete cores (Illinois)
• Figure 17. Bar chart. Histogram showing RCPT results from the top and bottom sections of concrete cores (North Carolina)
• Figure 18. Bar chart. Histogram showing RCPT results from the top and bottom sections of concrete cores (Nebraska and New York)
• Figure 19. Graph. Plot of AC impedance versus age for concrete cores (Arkansas, limestone).
• Figure 20. Graph. Plot of AC impedance versus age for concrete cores (Illinois, limestone).
• Figure 21. Graph. Plot of AC impedance versus age for concrete cores (North Carolina, granite).
• Figure 22. Graph. Plot of AC impedance versus age for concrete cores (Nebraska, limestone).
• Figure 23. Graph. Plot of AC impedance versus age for concrete cores (New York, limestone).
• Figure 24. Graph. RCPT versus AC impedance for the 100-Hz test
• Figure 25. Graph. Distress map for patch NC-1 in North Carolina–1994
• Figure 26. Graph. Distress map for patch NC-1 in North Carolina–1998
• Figure 27. Graph. Distress map for patch NC-2 in North Carolina–1994
• Figure 28. Graph. Distress map for patch NC-2 in North Carolina–1998
• Figure 29. Graph. Distress map for patch AR-1 in Arkansas–1994
• Figure 30. Graph. Distress map for patch AR-1 in Arkansas–1995
• Figure 31. Graph. Distress map for patch AR-2 in Arkansas–1994
• Figure 32. Graph. Distress map for patch AR-2 in Arkansas–1995
• Figure 33. Graph. Distress map of section in New York–1994
• Figure 34. Graph. Distress map of section in New York–1998
• Figure 35. Graph. Distress maps for patches IL-1 and IL-2 in Illinois–1994
• Figure 36. Graph. Distress maps for patches IL-1 and IL-2 in Illinois–1995
• Figure 37. Graph. Distress maps for patches IL-1 and IL-2 in Illinois–1996
• Figure 38. Graph. Distress maps for patches IL-1 and IL-2 in Illinois–1997
• Figure 39. Graph. Distress maps for patches IL-1 and IL-2 in Illinois–1998
• Figure 40. Graph. Distress maps for patches NE-1 and NE-2 in Nebraska–1994
• Figure 41. Graph. Distress maps for patches NE-1 and NE-2 in Nebraska–1995
• Figure 42. Graph. Distress maps for patches NE-1 and NE-2 in Nebraska–1996
• Figure 43. Graph. Distress maps for patches NE-1 and NE-2 in Nebraska–1997
• Figure 44. Graph. Distress maps for patches NE-1 and NE-2 in Nebraska–1998

LIST OF TABLES

• Table 1. Comparison of final laboratory and actual field concrete mix proportions for the New York site
• Table 2. Comparison of final laboratory and actual field concrete mix proportions for the Illinois site
• Table 3. Comparison of final laboratory and actual field concrete mix proportions for the Arkansas site
• Table 4. Comparison of final laboratory and actual field concrete mix proportions for the Nebraska site
• Table 5. Summary of materials, site factors, and fresh concrete properties for the SHRP C-205 sites
• Table 6. Distress summary of SHRP C-205 section in North Carolina
• Table 7. Summary of testing performed
• Table 8. Matrix of climate and material properties used in grouping the test sites for analysis
• Table 9. Summary of strength gain for combined compressive strength test data
• Table 10. RCPT Chloride permeability ratings
• Table 11. Summary of chloride permeability for test sites evaluated
• Table 12. RCPT and 100-Hz AC impedance test ratings
• Table 13. Summary of ANOVA results for the effect of curing method on strength
• Table 14. Summary of analysis of variance results for the effect of curing method on concrete permeability
• Table 15. Summary of analysis of variance results for the effect of aggregate type on strength
• Table 16. Summary of analysis of variance results for the effect of aggregate type on concrete permeability
• Table 17. Summary of analysis of variance results for evaluating specimen RCPT results

Events

• View all Upcoming Pavements Events

Contact

Aramis Lopez
Turner Fairbank
202-493-3145
E-mail Aramis