Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program

Appendix F - Allocations by State

**National Corridor Planning and Development and Coordinated Border Infrastructure (NCPD/CBI)**
**Allocations by State, FY 1999 - FY 2003**
State	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	State Totals
Alabama	$0	$0	$6,146,423	$26,217,000	$15,000,000	$47,363,423
Alaska	$600,000	$0	$1,756,121	$15,536,000	$2,500,000	$20,392,121
Arizona	$5,500,000	$4,175,000	$1,548,343	$0	$0	$11,223,343
Arkansas	$4,004,348	$6,034,149	$614,085	$26,945,250	$16,678,000	$54,275,832
California	$7,740,000	$11,540,000	$9,259,218	$21,847,500	$11,244,500	$61,631,218
Colorado	$0	$0	$3,512,242	$0	$5,000,000	$8,512,242
Connecticut	$0	$500,000	$1,498,397	$2,233,300	$1,500,000	$5,731,697
Delaware	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
District of Columbia	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Florida	$0	$1,742,000	$9,219,635	$27,673,500	$3,500,000	$42,135,135
Georgia	$1,500,000	$0	$0	$971,000	$875,000	$3,346,000
Hawaii	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0
Idaho	$1,200,000	$100,000	$1,668,315	$9,710,000	$8,000,000	$20,678,315
Illinois	$3,000,000	$6,968,000	$15,070,125	$16,992,500	$10,150,000	$52,180,625
Indiana	$3,650,000	$3,042,605	$5,944,667	$7,608,756	$600,000	$20,846,028
Iowa	$3,000,000	$2,100,000	$0	$679,700	$6,500,000	$12,279,700
Kansas	$560,000	$0	$0	$4,855,000	$2,000,000	$7,415,000
Kentucky	$5,152,174	$4,846,794	$7,331,525	$41,966,620	$22,840,000	$82,137,113
Louisiana	$5,195,652	$1,401,622	$2,582,451	$29,906,800	$6,800,000	$45,886,525
Maine	$1,000,000	$130,650	$131,091	$3,398,500	$1,500,000	$6,160,241
Maryland	$500,000	$0	$0	$971,000	$500,000	$1,971,000
Massachusetts	$0	$0	$1,756,121	$5,340,500	$7,250,000	$14,346,621
Michigan	$12,220,000	$4,035,000	$2,996,793	$8,739,000	$1,275,000	$29,265,793
Minnesota	$764,000	$3,075,000	$0	$9,710,000	$2,500,000	$16,049,000
Mississippi	$923,913	$2,996,708	$434,977	$33,499,500	$8,000,000	$45,855,098
Missouri	$1,100,000	$449,438	$3,512,242	$14,807,750	$10,500,000	$30,369,430
Montana	$150,000	$82,251	$0	$3,398,500	$3,000,000	$6,630,751
Nebraska	$0	$0	$0	$0	$1,500,000	$1,500,000
Nevada	$0	$0	$0	$0	$1,000,000	$1,000,000
New Hampshire	$150,000	$1,175,850	$1,186,000	$971,000	$0	$3,482,850
New Jersey	$1,000,000	$200,000	$0	$0	$850,000	$2,050,000
New Mexico	$4,000,000	$2,000,000	$0	$971,000	$4,000,000	$10,971,000
New York	$4,420,000	$7,163,000	$3,296,472	$10,049,850	$4,522,000	$29,451,322
North Carolina	$0	$800,000	$439,030	$3,398,500	$2,000,000	$6,637,530
North Dakota	$200,000	$262,000	$0	$0	$0	$462,000
Ohio	$0	$400,000	$526,836	$6,797,000	$5,762,500	$13,486,336
Oklahoma	$3,000,000	$0	$0	$1,456,500	$1,500,000	$5,956,500
Oregon	$2,000,000	$0	$878,060	$4,855,000	$6,500,000	$14,233,060
Pennsylvania	$4,000,000	$2,500,000	$0	$1,505,050	$7,100,000	$15,105,050
Rhode Island	$0	$0	$0	$0	$1,000,000	$1,000,000
South Carolina	$0	$0	$0	$0	$3,000,000	$3,000,000
South Dakota	$3,000,000	$2,000,000	$4,752,914	$11,652,000	$1,000,000	$22,404,914
Tennessee	$3,434,783	$5,787,024	$491,364	$971,000	$3,900,000	$14,584,171
Texas	$18,239,130	$21,501,660	$10,025,511	$19,808,400	$20,950,000	$90,524,701
Utah	$0	$0	$399,572	$0	$0	$399,572
Vermont	$350,000	$0	$0	$0	$2,000,000	$2,350,000
Virginia	$0	$400,000	$4,390,302	$582,600	$2,188,000	$7,560,902
Washington	$11,249,000	$3,484,000	$878,060	$33,014,000	$12,900,000	$61,525,060
West Virginia	$6,500,000	$10,452,000	$8,780,605	$52,434,000	$16,615,000	$94,781,605
Wisconsin	$3,000,000	$10,452,000	$6,629,906	$16,507,000	$9,000,000	$45,588,906
Wyoming	$1,300,000	$0	$0	$0	$0	$1,300,000
Sub-Total	$123,603,000	$120,796,751	$117,657,403	$477,980,576	$255,000,000	$1,095,037,730
GSA	$0	$1,000,000	$5,292,338	$0	$0	$6,292,338
GrandTotal	$123,603,000	$120,796,751	$117,657,403	$477,980,576	$255,000,000	$1,101,330,068

Explanatory Notes Regarding NCPD/CBI Awards and Allocations

The allocations for FY 2002 are projected.
The major difference between the two tables is that for some multistate awards, suballocations were made among the partner States at their request. For example, there were multistate awards made in FY 1999, FY 2000 and FY 2001 to Arkansas as the lead State for a multistate application for future I-69. Similarly, Vermont received an allocation for a multistate project for which Maine was the lead State. In each case, subsequent to the award, the funds were suballocated to the individual States at their request. The suballocations were to facilitate project implementation
Total allocations were less than awards in FY 2001. This was because the FHWA, subsequent to awards, had to reduce allocations in compliance with the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, P.L. 106-554 of December 15, 2000.
The figures shown for GSA in the allocation table were actually based on reimbursable funding agreement between the FHWA and the GSA. This is very close to the same function as an allocation and thus is counted similarly.
All the GSA projects funded were in either Michigan or Texas. The awards for Michigan projects were $2,990,000. The awards for Texas projects were $3,308,000. The allocations for Michigan projects were $2,987,873. The allocations for Texas projects were $3,304,465.
Projects in New York and Texas, at first awarded to those two States were subsequently implemented through various funding agreements with the GSA. These, however, are counted as part of the State totals because of the fact that State applications were the reason for the award.
Some multistate projects were administered by one State but clearly benefit other States. For example, Arizona received the award and allocation for the Hoover Dam Bypass project. However, Nevada benefits about as much as Arizona from this project. Similarly, awards for an I-29/I-35 ITS project were made to Missouri in FY 1999 and Iowa in FY 2000 for a multistate Mexico to Canada project. Since both projects were studies and could be conveniently be managed by a single State, the funds were not suballocated. However, many States benefited from the two studies.