Tribal Consultation
Appendices
APPENDICES
Appendix A
For Further Reading
Appendix B
Practice While You Learn! - One Possible Response
APPENDIX A
For Further Reading
Historical References
APPENDIX B
Practice While You Learn! from Page 3
One Possible Response
1. Reconnaissance
Your search finds:
- No
notifications in tribal records from FHWA, DOT or MPO on the proposed action.
- Tribal
records however show there are tribal properties at the proposed SR456 alignment
that are sacred grounds. Several are listed in the National Registry of
Historic Places.
- When
asked, the FHWA and MPO had no record of past notifications to the tribe.The
State DOT has no Tribal Liaison and found only one notification sent three
years ago to a Tribal Planner who no longer works for the tribe.
2. Literature and Legal Review
Your review finds:
- The
proposed housing development is written into the regional comprehensive land
use and long range transportation plans, and was approved by the MPO Policy
Board.
- The
State DOT STIP shows description, level of Federal funding, start and end dates
for the SR456 improvement.
- Federal
law states State DOTs and MPOs must consult with tribes for projects that may impact
their lands and cultural properties.
- The
FHWA is responsible for notifying and consulting with federally recognized
tribes. This is a Federal responsibility - not the State’s.
- Your
tribe is federally recognized. Federal consultation and notification procedures
were not followed.
3. Report to Tribal Leadership
- Summarize
your research and findings.
4. Recommend Strategy
You could recommend:
- Tribal
leadership transmit a certified letter to FHWA documenting your findings and requesting
FHWA and the State DOT suspend activity and funding for the proposed SR456 extension
and any other Federal and State activity supporting the project.
- The
letter would include a request for immediate consultation with FHWA.
- The
letter would be preceded by a telephone call to FHWA from the Tribal President
advising of the tribe’s conce