| Planning |
Serving Rural AmericaPROVIDING MOBILITY AND REBUILDING AMERICA'S INFRASTRUCTUREThe Status of our Rural Transportation Infrastructure: The ability to make clear distinctions between rural infrastructure and that which serves the Nation generally is limited by an absence of data unique to rural settings and rural transportation services. Nonetheless, based on the data that are available and partial evidence, some observations can be made. Compared to urban roadways, rural roads and highways are in relatively good condition overall. This should not obscure, however, that about one-third of rural interstates and other rural arterials are in poor or mediocre condition. Similarly, fewer rural bridges overall are deficient than is the case for the Nation as a whole, but upwards of one-fifth of all rural bridges are deficient. Progress has been made in improving highway and bridge conditions under ISTEA and should continue under TEA-21, and rural areas will continue to benefit. However, critical problems can arise in specific circumstances and locations, and the ability to deal with them needs to be in place. There is no unequivocal data to identify rural transit or railroad infrastructure. With respect to transit, slightly fewer small buses and vans - which more often typify rural transit vehicles - are overage on average than is true for larger transit vehicles. However, the problem with respect to rural transit is more often level of service than vehicle condition. There is little comprehensive condition data for railroads serving rural areas; however, there is information suggesting growing track maintenance and condition problems with the short-line and low density railroads, which are usually associated with rural areas and small communities. Like transit, rural aviation has significant service-level, rather than infrastructure, concerns. Indeed, existing airfield facilities have low levels of activity in smaller communities. As important freight movers, both pipelines and inland waterways provide essential service in rural areas, particularly in the case of waterways which are frequently used to transport agricultural exports. In both instances, the maintenance of the infrastructure is most often the key issue. Aviation ProgramsAirport PlanningAirport planning may be done on an areawide or individual airport basis, with input from local officials. Areawide planning includes preparation of airport system plans for states, regions and metropolitan areas. These plans identify the aviation facilities needed to meet current and future air transportation needs. Grants for airport system planning are made to planning agencies having jurisdiction over the area being studied. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) uses this information in preparing the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems.
Airport Improvement ProgramPurpose: The purpose is to promote the development of a system of airports to meet the Nation's air transportation needs. Eligible Projects: Eligible projects include airport system and master plans; construction, expansion or rehabilitation of runways, taxiways, and aprons; items necessary for safety or security; navigational aids; on-airport roadways; limited terminal buildings development; land acquisition, and noise control; aviation-related weather reporting equipment. These funds may be used for noise compatibility planning and other projects to mitigate adverse noise and environmental impacts, including projects for small commercial service and General Aviation airports. Applicants include owners/operators of public-use airports included in the National Plan of Integrated Airports Systems (3,344 airports of which 2,472 are general aviation airports). A public-use airport is an airport open to the public and publicly owned, or privately owned but designated by FAA as a reliever, or privately owned but having scheduled service and at least 2,500 annual enplanements. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies and the FAA Region or District Office. Funding: Preliminary numbers for fiscal year 2000 total $1.867 million, with 346 grants totaling $221.2 million for general aviation airports other than relievers. There was $121.7 million for 16 grants under the airport block grant program, which includes non-primary commercial service airports and relievers. One major feature of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century is the possibility of entitlement grant funds specifically for non-primary airports. Depending upon the total AIP amount made available, FAA will be able to calculate potential entitlement amounts for non-primary airports during each summer. Essential Air Service(Web site: http://ostpxweb.dot.gov/aviation/) Purpose: The Department guarantees scheduled passenger air service at many small communities throughout the United States. Eligible Projects: The EAS program was established in 1978 as part of the Airline Deregulation Act, to ensure that communities then receiving scheduled air would continue to receive at least some minimal level of scheduled air service - defined by statute as at least two round trips a day to a major airport. The Department subsidizes commuter air carriers where necessary to ensure that such service is provided. Currently, the Department subsidizes scheduled air service in approximately 115 communities, 32 of which are in Alaska, that would otherwise receive no scheduled air service. Contacts: U.S. DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis, (202) 366-1053. Funding: Congress has provided $50 million for the Essential Air Service (EAS) Program in fiscal years1999 - 2001. Surface Transportation Planning, Training, and Technical AssistanceStatewide Planning(Web site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/factsheets/statepln.htm) Purpose: The statewide planning process establishes a cooperative, continuous, and comprehensive framework for making surface transportation investment decisions throughout the state and is administered jointly by the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration. Eligible Activities: Eligible projects include statewide surface transportation planning projects. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: A two percent takedown of state apportionments for the Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System (NHS), Surface Transportation Program (STP), Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement, and Bridge Rehabilitation and Replacement Programs provides funding for statewide planning. This takedown averages $481.5 million per year for FYs 1998 - 2003, for a total of $2,888.8 million. Of the amounts set aside by the takedown, 25 percent must be used for research, development, and technology transfer activities. Statewide planning also is an eligible activity for additional funding under the NHS and STP programs.
Additional funding for statewide planning is authorized from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund. The amount from the Mass Transit Account is guaranteed. FTA state transportation planning funding authorizations, however, may vary annually depending upon the amount of the non-guaranteed funds, authorized to be appropriated from the General Fund, that Congress actually appropriates. Guaranteed transit funding for statewide planning averages $10.5 million per year, for a total of $62.9 million from FYs 1998 - 2003. If Congress appropriates all the transit authorizations for statewide surface transportation planning, the average would rise to $15.4 million per year for the 6-year period. Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) and Tribal Technical Assistance Program (TTAP)(Web site: http://www.ltapt2.org/l) Purpose: As the primary transportation information resource for local and tribal governments, the Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) provides access to technical assistance, training, and information on new transportation technologies. Technology transfer activities are made available through a variety of projects including services provided by its network of 57 LTAP centers. Centers are located in each state and Puerto Rico; and six Tribal Technical Assistance Program centers (TTAP) serve the needs of tribal governments. The LTAP assists local and tribal governments in developing well-trained and motivated staffs, resulting in an improved transportation network that helps sustain rural economies. Eligible Projects: Each LTAP or TTAP Center director has the flexibility to tailor the program for local needs. Responsibilities include conducting training, delivering technical assistance, and publishing newsletters. The centers publish quarterly newsletters and maintain comprehensive mailing lists of rural, local, and tribal officials with transportation responsibilities. Centers adapt a mix of technology transfer and marketing tools to meet their localities' unique circumstances. Contacts: LTAP centers located in each state and Puerto Rico and the TTAPs. Funding: Funding is $51 million for FYs 1998 - 2003. Support for the centers also comes from State Departments of Transportation, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, universities, local agencies, and funds designated by state legislation. Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP)Purpose: The purpose is to provide resources for training, technical assistance, research, and related support services to support rural transit providers. Eligible Projects: Eligible projects include activities that support rural transit providers with training and technical assistance, research, and related support services. Each state gets an annual allocation of funds for RTAP that can be used for projects such as newsletters, training courses, scholarships for training, and circuit riders. In addition, RTAP funds are used for a national project that supports the state RTAP managers, maintains a rural transit database, produces training modules, and provides a rural transit resource center. There is no local share requirement. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: Funding is $30.75 million for FYs 1998 - 2003. Funds are allocated to each state by formula, but the minimum amount for a state is $65,000. Surface Transportation Construction Programs(Web Site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/index.htm) The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) substantially increased investment in core programs that are available for rural and urban areas through states and metropolitan planning organizations: The National Highway System (NHS)Purpose: The National Highway System (NHS) is composed of 163,000 miles of rural and urban roads that are to serve major population centers. The 46,000 mile Interstate System retains its separate identity within the NHS. The NHS program provides funding for improvements to rural and urban roads that are part of the NHS, including the Interstate System and designated connections to major intermodal terminals.
Eligible Projects: In addition to NHS roads, including the Interstate, eligible projects were expanded by TEA-21 to include natural habitat mitigation, publicly-owned intracity and intercity bus terminals, and infrastructure-based intelligent transportation system capital improvements. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: It is funded at $28.6 billion for FYs 1998 - 2003. Funds are distributed based on a formula that includes each state's lane-miles of principal arterials (excluding the Interstate), vehicle-miles traveled on those arterials, diesel fuel used on the state's highways and per capita principal arterial lane-miles. The Interstate Maintenance ProgramPurpose: The Interstate Maintenance Program provides funding for resurfacing, restoring, rehabilitating, and reconstructing (4R) most routes on the Interstate System. Eligible Projects: TEA-21 expanded eligible projects to include reconstruction. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: It is funded at $23.8 billion for FYs 1998 - 2003. Funds are distributed based on each state's lane-miles of Interstate routes open to traffic, vehicle-miles traveled on those Interstate routes, and contributions to the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund attributable to commercial vehicles. The Surface Transportation Program (STP)Purpose: The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by states and localities on projects on any Federal-aid highway, including the NHS, bridge projects on any public road, transit capital projects, and public bus terminals, and facilities. Eligible Projects: TEA-21 expanded and clarified eligible projects to include several environmental provisions, modification of sidewalks to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act, infrastructure-based intelligent transportation systems capital improvements, and privately-owned intercity bus terminals and facilities. Of the amount available to the states, the state is required to use a certain amount (based on FY 1991 Federal-aid Secondary program funding) in areas with a population of less than 5,000. This amount is about $590 million per year. A new provision, enacted in TEA-21, allows up to 15 percent of this amount to be spent on roads functionally classified as rural minor collectors. Ten percent of the funds distributed to the states is set aside for safety construction activities (discussed under the safety programs) and another 10 percent is set aside for transportation enhancements (discussed under the community and environmental programs). Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: The STP is funded at $33.3 billion over the six-year period. Funds are distributed among the states based on each state's lane-miles of Federal-aid highways, total vehicle-miles traveled on those Federal-aid highways, and estimated contributions to the Highway Account of the HTF. Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation - Off System Bridges(Web site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/factsheets/bridge.htm) Purpose: The purpose is to replace or rehabilitate deficient highway bridges and to seismic retrofit bridges located on any public road.
Eligible Projects: Eligible projects include bridges on public roads. At least 15 percent, but not more than 35 percent, of a state's apportionment must be used for public bridge projects that are not on Federal-aid roads (off-system bridges). Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: Funding is $20.4 billion for FYs 1998 - 2003. The 15 percent set aside requirement translates into about $470 million annually for off-system bridges for FYs 1999 - 2003, but the requirement can be waived if it is determined that this expenditure is not needed. The set aside for high-cost bridges is retained, but the set asides for timber bridges and Indian Reservation Road bridges have been eliminated. Federal Lands Highways(Web site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/factsheets/fedland.htm) Purpose: The purpose is to provide funding for more than 80,000 miles of federally-owned and public-authority owned roads and transit facilities that serve Federal lands. They include the following categories: Indian Reservation Roads, Park Roads and Parkways, Public Lands Highways (discretionary and Forest Highways), and (Wildlife) Refuge Roads. Eligible Projects: Eligible projects include:
Funds can be used to pay 100 percent of the eligible costs. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: Funding is $4,066 million for FYs 1998 - 2003. Emergency Relief(Web site: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tea21/factsheets/er.htm) Purpose: The purpose is to assist state and local governments with the cost of repairing serious damage to Federal-aid highways and roads on Federal Lands caused by natural disasters or catastrophic failures from an external cause.
Eligible Projects: Eligible projects include only emergency repairs to restore essential highway traffic, to minimize damage or to protect the remaining facility and make permanent repairs. Contacts: State Transportation Agencies. Funding: Funding is $100 million annually for FYs 1998 - 2003. Rail Programs
|