Skip to content U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway AdministrationU.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration

Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
Planning · Environment · Real Estate

HEP Events Guidance Publications Glossary Awards Contacts

An Introduction to Panel Surveys in Transportation Studies

REFERENCES

1. Stopher, P. R. & Metcalf, H. (1996). Methods for Household Travel Surveys: A Synthesis of Highway Practice. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

2. Pendyala, R. M. & Pas, E. I. (1997). Multiday and multiperiod data for travel demand analysis and modeling. Resource paper prepared for Workshop 5 of Transport Surveys: Raising the Standard, International Conference on Transport Survey Quality and Innovation, Grainau, Germany, May 24-30.

3. Kitamura, R. (1990). Panel analysis in transportation planning: An overview. Transportation Research, 24A( 6), 401-415.

4. Kitamura, R. (1987). Regularity and irreversibility of weekly travel behavior. Transportation, 14, 227-251.

5. Goodwin, P. B. (1992). Panel analysis of travel behavior; some empirical findings. In T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long (eds.), Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

6. Bradley, M. (1992). A practical comparison of modeling approaches for panel data. In T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long (eds.), Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

7. Baanders, A., De Boer, R. H., & Kroes, E. P. (1989). Impact of a new railway line on travel patterns: The Flevo line in the Netherlands. PTRC 17th Summer Annual Meeting; Proceedings of Seminar D, Brighton.

8. Supernak, J. (1992). Experiences with San Diego I-15 carpool lanes panel. In T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long (eds.), Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

9. Smart, H. E.( 1984). The dynamics of change -applications of the Panel Technique to transportation surveys in Tyne and Wear. Traffic Engineering and Control, 25, 595-598.

10. Kish, L. (1965). Survey Sampling. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.

11. Lawton, T. K., & Pas, E. I. (1996). Resource Paper, Survey Methodologies Workshop. In Proceedings, Conference on Household Travel Surveys: New Concepts and Research Needs. Conference Proceedings No. 10, Transportation Restack Board, Washington, DC.

12. Goulias, K., Pendyala, R. & Kitamura, R. (1992). Updating a panel survey questionnaire. In Ampt, E., Richardson, A., Meyburg, A. (eds.) Selected Readings in Transport Survey Methodology. Melbourne, Australia: Eucalyptus Press, 209-245.

13. McCormick, M., Butler, D. & Singh, R. (1992). Investigating time in sample effect for the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings in Boston, MA, August.

14. Kalton, G. & Miller, M. (1991). The seam effect with social security income in the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 7( 2), 235-245.

15. Neter, J. & Wakesberg, J. (1964). A study of response errors in expenditures data from household surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 18-55.

16. Bailar, B. (1975). The effects of rotation group bias on estimates from panel surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70( 349), 23-30.

17. Meurs, H., van Wissen, L., & Wisser, J. (1989). Measurement biases in panel data. Transportation, 16, 175-194.

18. Golob, T. F., & Meurs, H. (1986). Biases in response over time in a seven-day travel diary. Transportation, 13, 163-181.

19. Pas, E. I, & Sundar, S. (1995). Intrapersonal variability in daily urban travel behavior. Some additional evidence. Transportation, 22, 135-150.

20. U. S. Department of Commerce. (1992). Bureau of the Census. 1990 Census of Population and Housing . Technical Documentation. Summary Tape File 3 on CD-ROM.

21. Murakami, E., & Watterson, W. (1990). The Puget Sound Transportation Panel after two waves. Transportation, 19, 141-158.

22. Meurs, H., & Ridder, G. (1997). Attrition and response effects in the Dutch Mobility Panel. In T. Golob, R. Kitamura, and L. Long (eds.), Panels for Transportation Planning: Methods and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, M. A.

23. U. S. Department of Commerce (1978). Bureau of the Census. Technical Paper 40. The Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology.

24. The Ohio State University (1995). Center for Human Resource Research.. National Longitudinal Survey Users' Guide 1995.

25. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

26. Zimowski, M. F., Tourangeau, R., Ghadialy, R., & Pedlow, S. (1997). Nonresponse in Household Travel Surveys. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration

27. Goulias, K., & Ma, J. (1996). Analysis of Longitudinal Data From the Puget Sound Transportation Panel. Task D: Development and Performance of Sample Weights for PSTP. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

28. Cohen, S. B. (1990). Estimation concerns for family level analysis in National Panel Surveys. Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. American Statistical Association, 141-146.

Updated: 03/28/2014
HEP Home Planning Environment Real Estate
Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000