- Case Studies
- Impact Methodologies
- Site Map
- Search
| Planning |
|
Case Study:Portland, OregonApplicationUser BenefitsThe results in Table 2 show the aggregate direct user benefits in 2020 for each alternative. An example for one commodity group, wood products, and one alternative, "Hot Spots," illustrates the component parts of the benefits. Truck operators carrying wood products in the Hot Spots alternative experience over 58 percent ($617 thousand) of the total user benefit for all eight categories of heavy truck user benefits; 41 percent of all truck (heavy and medium) benefits; and two percent of total benefits (including HOV and SOV). Of the total annual user benefits of $617 thousand, in-vehicle travel time savings of $505 thousand account for 82 percent. Overall user benefits to truck traffic in this analysis were on the order of 10 percent of user benefits to automobile traffic. In this corridor, therefore, freight benefits make up a minor but still significant portion of total benefits. The proportion of benefits accruing to freight traffic will vary significantly among corridors or regions, depending upon the amount of truck traffic locally. Table 2.Annual Auto & Truck User Benefits1 for Each Alternative in 2020 (Thousands of 1995 Dollars)
2 "Hot Spots" includes capacity expansion at I-5 bottlenecks, an LRT extension, and interchange improvements . 3 Hot Spots + additional Columbia River Crossing (CRC) lanes. 4 Hot Spots + CRC + reversible express lanes on CRC + additional lanes on I-5 + LRT to Vancouver . 5 Hot Spots + CRC + new truck-only ramps. 6 Hot Spots + new freight bridge (port-to-port) . 7 Includes all eight categories of heavy trucks and the two categories of medium trucks. 8 Includes only the eight categories of heavy trucks. Source: Cambridge Systematics, Inc. [TOP] |