Office of Planning, Environment, & Realty (HEP)
In This Issue
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) continues the trend in Federal transportation legislation for increased transportation safety. Following is a summary of the safety provisions in the law:
Highway Safety I
mprovement Program (HSIP)
MAP-21 is the new Federal transportation
bill designed to move transportation forward.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)
Requires regular recurring updates;
Other safety provisions in the law include emphasis on safety performance management (see companion article), changes in the Safe Routes to School program, and the establishment of a new tribal safety program.
The following is a summary of some of the planning provisions in the law:
For additional information, visit the FHWA MAP-21 web site at http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/map21/.
Safety Performance Measures & MAP-21
By Tony Giancola, P. E.,
Transportation & Local Government Consultant
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) establishes an outcome-driven approach that tracks performance and will hold states and MPOs accountable for improving the conditions and performance of their transportation assets, a situation helped by utilizing performance targets.
Performance measures include fatalities and
serious injuries by number and VMT.
Within 18 months of the enactment of MAP-21, U.S. DOT will establish, through rulemaking, performance measures for seven national goals, one of which is safety. State DOTs will have one year to develop performance targets in consultation with MPOs and other stakeholders. States and MPOs must incorporate the measures and targets into their transportation planning processes. The safety performance measures identified in MAP-21 are the number of serious injuries and fatalities and serious injuries and fatalities per Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT).
MAP-21 imposes penalties on states that fail to meet their performance targets under the National Highway Performance Program and the HSIP. States that fail to meet their safety performance targets are required to devote an amount of their obligation equal to the prior year's HSIP apportionment to safety projects.
The availability and appropriateness of safety data, which is critical to developing realistic performance measures, will continue to be a challenge as State and local government agencies compete for available safety dollars. A current National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis Report 20-05/Topic 44-05: Safety and Crash Data Management among State and Local Agencies will be surveying the state and local governments to determine current practices.
Tony Giancola is a long time member of the TSPWG, an APWA Life Member, Secretary of the Roadway Safety Foundation,and Retired Executive Director, National Association of County Engineers
The Cheyenne Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is currently updating their award winning Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), Plan Cheyenne. For many MPOs, safety is a critical consideration during the transportation planning process. Planners identify crash locations or characteristics, and program safety countermeasures. The Cheyenne MPO is committed to this approach, but is also interested in integrating safety elements into all future highway, transit, bicycle, pedestrian, operations, and freight projects.
To identify ideas and concrete actions for considering safety in the context of all transportation projects, planners at the Cheyenne MPO, Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Division Office, and local jurisdictions participated in an interactive workshop designed to provide participants with a seven-step framework for institutionalizing safety in the LRTP.
For each step, participants learned about the national state of the practice, discussed how each step is currently addressed in the Cheyenne region, reviewed how other MPOs or state agencies are implementing each step, and brainstormed ideas for how to consider the step during the Cheyenne LRTP process.
Based on discussion, the Cheyenne MPO decided upon a number of actions to move safety integration forward in the region, including:
For more information on the Cheyenne MPO, visit their website at www.plancheyenne.org.
The Important Role of Transportation Planners in Safety
When people take to the road, whether by vehicle, public transit, walking, or biking, they expect to get where they are going safely. Transportation planners have the tools and knowledge to ensure people meet this safety goal as evidenced by the following:
by Anthony Butzek, PE, PTOE, Metro, Portland, OR
The Portland, Oregon metropolitan region recently completed a detailed regional safety analysis called the State of Safety report, which will be used to develop a data-driven Regional Safety Plan. Metro led the analysis with support from regional government, technical experts including staff from cities, counties, the State of Oregon, TriMet (the regional transit agency), Portland State University, and safety consultants.
The State of Safety report sheds light on the distinct crash patterns involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists in an urban area of 1.5 million people, focusing on fatal and severe injury crashes. The analysis considered relationships between fatal and severe injury crashes and roadway characteristics such as functional classification, number of lanes, degree of roadway congestion, and lighting, as well as other influencing factors such as weather, month, day of the week, time of day, and user behavioral factors.
The results showed 59 percent of the fatal and severe injury crashes occur on arterial streets, with only 12 percent occurring on freeways and freeway ramps. Arterial streets comprise two-thirds of fatal and severe pedestrian crashes and more than half of fatal and severe injury bicyclist crashes. On these arterial streets, higher rates of fatal and severe injury crashes per traffic volume correlate with increasing number of traffic lanes and with decreasing congestion, likely due to the higher speeds. The report indicated street lighting was inadequate in a large number of the fatal and severe injury pedestrian crashes, which echoes previous research.
Behavioral issues are a major contributing factor to severe crashes in the region as well. Alcohol or drugs were a factor in 57 percent of the region's fatal crashes. Aggressive driving and excessive speed were also frequent factors. More information, including the State of Safety report, is available at
Collecting and analyzing data is a key part of any transportation planner's job. The difficulty is making sure sufficient data is available. Two reports will help make the planner's job easier by providing additional information on data. The Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria (MMUCC) is a voluntary guideline of data elements and their attributes that states are encouraged to collect at the scene of a crash. All states collect a large percentage of the data recommended in the Guideline, and most states continue to revise their Police Accident Report forms so they are consistent with the MMUCC recommendations. A 4th Edition of the Guideline, first developed in 1998, includes some important changes such as a more comprehensive definition of distracted driving. It also includes a better definition of serious injuries by breaking injuries into five categories and providing definitions for each category. There are also new data elements describing speed-related crashes, crashes on private property, and secondary crashes. The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) co-managed the update process, which was underwritten with funding from NHTSA. It is available online at www.mmucc.us.
The National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA), an office of NHTSA, is responsible for providing data in a variety of topics and formats. On the NCSA website, users can find traffic safety fact sheets on specific topics, state specific traffic safety information, and links to the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). Recently NCSA released their Traffic Safety Facts Overview, which reported in 2010, 32,885 people were killed, and 2,239,000 people were injured. Compared to 2009, this is a three percent decrease in the number of fatalities, and a one percent increase in the number of people injured. To visit the NCSA website, go to http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/cats/.
A Framework for Institutionalizing Safety in the Transportation Planning Process, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) 08-76 will continue research by implementing and evaluating the framework through a lead state initiative, and develop a guidebook based on the experience with input from practitioners. The framework, which is available at http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=2502, provides transportation planners at the state and regional level with an "ideal" seven-step framework for integrating and institutionalizing safety in the transportation planning process. The framework has been tested by Department of Transportation (DOT) and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) planners in Nevada, during a four-hour Boot Camp workshop at the 2012 TRB Planning to Programming conference, and by the Cheyenne MPO (see Cheyenne MPO - Integrating Transportation Safety into Plan Cheyenne article). The research team will utilize the results from the research to revise the framework and implementation approach.
Transportation planners working on pedestrian safety issues will be interested in a new report from NCHRP. NCHRP Synthesis 436, Local Policies and Practices That Support Safe Pedestrian Environments, documents the regulatory, administrative, and financial tools used by communities to provide safe pedestrian environments. The report identifies the effective tools and strategies in a range of contexts (e.g., geography, community size, weather, demographics, and regulatory requirements) as well as the development conditions such as new and infill development, street reconstruction, and retrofitting. The report notes the most successful initiatives recognize high-quality pedestrian environments are places where pedestrians are anticipated and encouraged. To view a copy, go to http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_syn_436.pdf.
The FHWA Office of Safety will release the Strategic Highway Safety Plan Champion's Guidebook to Saving Lives: Second Edition in the Fall of 2012. The Guide will be a resource for safety stakeholders, including planners, who are involved in the update of their state's SHSP. It will also serve as a reference for professionals who are new to the State's safety and planning efforts, particularly the SHSP process. The first Champion's Guide was a valuable document to states during the initial development of SHSPs providing guidance on legislative requirements, the steps to undertake, and who to involve. While the Second Edition is not a guidance document, it does provide helpful information on SHSP fundamentals such as data collection and analysis; organization and structure; emphasis area action plans; and SHSP preparation, implementation, and evaluation. Visit the Office of Safety website for more information at http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/shsp/.
A new report from the National Conference of State Legislatures, On the Move: State Strategies for 21st Century Transportation Solutions, reviews a number of surface transportation laws, policies, and programs that policymakers are considering as ways to take the nation's transportation system into the 21st Century. Since transportation planners are often called upon to give their views on transportation needs to elected officials at the state and local level, it may be helpful to see what legislators view as important considerations. To view the report, go to http://www.ncsl.org/documents/transportation/On-THE-MOVE.pdf.
By Tony Giancola, P. E., Transportation & Local Government Consultant
Several TRB committees focus on rural and local roadway safety. Following are the activities, initiatives, and publications of these committees that are of interest to planners and other local road practitioners.
Research Needs Statements
The Transportation Research Board Transportation Safety Planning (TSP) subcommittee (ANB10(3)) is interested in your transportation safety planning (TSP) research ideas! Contact Ed Stollof, TSP Subcommittee Chair at email@example.com, with your ideas.
Rural Road Safety, Policy, Programming & Implementation Joint Subcommittee (ANB10 & AFB30) – This joint subcommittee focuses on research-based activities that improve rural roadway safety through policies, programming, and countermeasure implementation. Recently the subcommittee proposed funding for a National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) synthesis on Best Practices for Safety and Crash Data Management among State and Local Agencies Exploring Safety Investments With and Without Crash Data. This synthesis will examine the availability and accessibility of reliable and current data, and explore the activities of state and local agencies that are using the systemic risk-based approach to making safety improvements.
Low Volume Roads Committee (ABF30) – This is another important committee which is concerned with all aspects of low-volume roads including planning, design, construction, safety, maintenance, operations, environmental and social issues. For instance, one topic discussed by the committee was safety on gravel (unpaved roads). To learn more, visit the committee website at http://sites.google.com/site/trbcommitteeafb30/.
Roadway Safety Cultures Subcommittee (AN000(1)) – The first meeting of this subcommittee was held at the 2012 Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting. The vision states the Subcommittee is committed to eliminating roadway fatalities, reducing injury crashes, and increasing safe driving experiences through peer-reviewed, science-based research; a connection to safety performance variables that define roadway safety cultures; an integration of research into professional tools, practices, and policies; and advancement for the state of practice. To learn more, visit the subcommittee website at https://sites.google.com/site/trbsafetyculture/.
In addition to the work of these TRB committees/subcommittees, several other publications provide useful information for local government public works and transportation agencies including the following:
The American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) and National Association of County Engineers (NACE) joint February 2012 publication Cost Effective Local Road Safety Planning and Implementationprovides a general guide that local officials can utilize to identify and quantify existing safety issues, potential solutions to those issues, and possible state and local partnerships to fund them. To view a copy of the report, go to
Roadway Safety Foundation's publication Roadway Safety Guideis a resource for elected officials, community leaders, civic groups and all stakeholders interested in improving safety on their highways and roads. The guide is available at http://www.roadwaysafety.org/wp-content/uploads/guide3.pdf.
The Governors Highway Safety Association's annual meeting, Public Health + Highway Safety: Saving Lives Together, was held August 27-29 in Baltimore, MD. General sessions and breakout workshops explored highway safety from the public health perspective, focusing on how to apply public health successes to the field of highway safety. As planners become more involved in multidisciplinary projects like Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSP), they will benefit from an understanding of the role of state highway safety offices. For more information on the meeting, go to http://www.ghsa.org/html/meetings/annual/2012/index.html.
The National Highway Institute now has a suite of training courses that focus on the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Strategic Highway Safety Plans (SHSP). Following is a brief description of each course. To find out dates and times, visit the NHI website at http://www.nhi.fhwa.dot.gov/home.aspx.
The HSIP Overview course provides a basic understanding of the purpose of the HSIP and the processes for planning, implementation, and evaluation. The course provides an overview of safety data including data collection and management methods, sources, quality measures, and overcoming data challenges.
The HSIP Project Identification course provides the background and information to identify HSIP projects. Background information includes data analysis concepts such as regression-to-the mean, safety performance functions, and the Empirical Bayes method.
The HSIP Project Evaluation course provides a description of safety effectiveness evaluation, an overview of fundamentals needed to perform safety effectiveness evaluation, and information about why safety effectiveness evaluation is important to the HSIP.
The SHSP Development course provides a basic understanding of SHSP development processes, which are consistent throughout the life cycle of the plan. The course will benefit States presently in the implementation stage or those in the process of updating their SHSP.
The SHSP Implementation course provides strategies and examples of the processes that will help safety partners implement their state's SHSP. The intended audience for SHSP Implementation encompasses a wide range of safety stakeholders involved in SHSP implementation efforts at all levels (e.g., local, regional, state, and Federal) .
October 28-31, 2012
November 15-19, 2012
January 13-17, 2013
Research Needs Statement
The Transportation Research Board Transportation Safety Planning (TSP) Subcommittee (ANB10(3)) is interested in your transportation safety planning (TSP) research ideas! Contact Ed Stollof, TSP Subcommittee Chair at firstname.lastname@example.org, with your ideas.
The TSPWG includes representatives from agencies and organizations dedicated to advancing the integration of safety in the transportation planning process. If your organization is interested in participating, contact Rick Pain, TSPWG Moderator, at email@example.com. The TSPWG members are:
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
American Planning Association (APA)
American Public Transportation Association (APTA)
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO)
Community Transportation Association of America (CTAA)
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA)
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Inc. (ITE)
International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP)
National Association of County Engineers (NACE)
National Association of Development Organizations (NADO)
National Association of Regional Councils (NARC)
National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL)
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC)
Transportation Research Board (TRB)
Planning It Safe
Rick Pain, TRB
Research, Content, Format, and Web Master
Cambridge Systematics, Inc.