An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways - Appendix D

Appendix D

Figure D.1 Capacity Bottlenecks on Freeways Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table D.1 Top 25 Capacity Bottlenecks on Freeways Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
85	Mecklenburg, North Carolina	4	94,761	18,005	19%	212,021	260,786
75	Henry, Georgia	6	133,850	34,801	26%	148,845	266,134
75	Henry, Georgia	6	137,399	35,724	26%	148,056	180,036
80	Yolo, California	6	133,207	11,989	9%	85,317	194,437
93	Rockingham, New Hampshire	4	98,403	11,808	12%	67,024	67,024
580	Alameda, California	8	158,093	30,038	19%	64,881	115,684
95	Mercer, New Jersey	6	110,159	19,829	18%	60,228	63,300
77	Iredell, North Carolina	4	76,834	14,598	19%	57,778	165,880
IS95	Stafford, Virginia	6	124,787	14,974	12%	55,103	137,206
10	Pima, Arizona	4	82,344	31,291	38%	50,247	50,247
95	Harford, Maryland	8	138,995	29,189	21%	49,414	49,414
15	Weber, Utah	4	92,058	23,015	25%	48,088	48,088
93	Rockingham, New Hampshire	4	84,369	10,124	12%	46,136	46,136
95	Mercer, New Jersey	6	109,359	19,685	18%	43,941	46,182
95	Harford, Maryland	6	106,982	22,466	21%	42,756	94,704
85	Rowan, North Carolina	4	64,715	11,649	18%	39,756	68,778
78	Hunterdon, New Jersey	6	108,031	19,446	18%	35,923	37,755
85	Anderson, South Carolina	4	42,763	11,974	28%	29,161	78,211
95	Baltimore, Maryland	8	149,757	22,464	15%	28,182	73,527
78	Hunterdon, New Jersey	6	98,785	17,781	18%	25,143	25,143
93	Rockingham, New Hampshire	4	94,043	11,285	12%	24,545	24,545
95	Middlesex, New Jersey	6	115,783	20,841	18%	24,303	25,542
85	Rowan, North Carolina	4	61,532	11,691	19%	24,190	41,849
87I	Orange, New York	6	94,696	17,045	18%	23,466	23,466
85	Rowan, North Carolina	4	66,678	16,003	24%	23,430	121,064

Figure D.2 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table D.2 Top 25 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intercity Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
99	San Joaquin, California	4	109,083	21,817	20%	617,667	975,913
99	San Joaquin, California	4	113,123	28,281	25%	123,662	226,301
101	Sonoma, California	4	108,493	7,595	7%	77,816	199,132
37	Solano, California	2	32,822	5,580	17%	71,618	124,258
57	Los Angeles, California	10	216,303	25,956	12%	65,984	65,984
61	DeSoto, Mississippi	2	34,977	6,646	19%	58,088	142,780
71	Riverside, California	2	46,680	5,135	11%	41,448	83,476
U.S. 59	Montgomery, Texas	4	92,945	10,224	11%	40,193	40,193
99	San Joaquin, California	4	82,824	15,737	19%	37,224	68,120
101	Marin, California	4	95,481	4,774	5%	33,241	85,065
95	Clark, Nevada	6	207,515	6,225	3%	27,668	27,668
12	Napa, California	2	33,518	2,681	8%	16,952	57,399
24	Harnett, North Carolina	2	19,665	2,753	14%	16,608	46,071
74	Orange, California	2	16,665	1,667	10%	15,374	77,424
101	San Benito, California	4	61,854	9,278	15%	15,064	16,857
28	Hampshire, West Virginia	2	6,067	849	14%	14,524	96,335
37	Sonoma, California	2	32,557	2,930	9%	13,453	23,341
99	Fresno, California	6	87,602	21,024	24%	12,448	31,854
101	Monterey, California	4	77,451	12,392	16%	11,364	20,795
19E	Yancey, North Carolina	2	13,792	1,931	14%	10,789	29,648
395	Douglas, Nevada	2	8,202	1,312	16%	10,750	23,199
421	Wilkes, North Carolina	2	28,309	3,963	14%	10,612	35,318
NJTPK	Gloucester, New Jersey	4	54,341	8,151	15%	10,306	10,306
23	Washtenaw, Mississippi	4	66,980	6,698	10%	10,277	10,277
101	San Luis Obispo, California	4	68,686	6,182	9%	10,098	11,300

Figure D.3 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Urban Truck Corridors
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table D.3 Top 25 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Urban Truck Corridors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
NJ 17	Bergen, New Jersey	6	129,291	15,515	12%	115,448	639,235
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	154,770	10,834	7%	50,368	126,928
SL 8	Harris, Texas	6	163,410	3,268	2%	45,480	146,173
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	144,450	10,112	7%	35,104	88,462
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	147,461	10,322	7%	27,426	69,113
237	Santa Clara, California	6	126,247	8,837	7%	24,614	24,614
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	147,462	10,322	7%	20,305	51,167
85	Santa Clara, California	6	144,783	2,896	2%	17,341	17,341
U.S. 202	Montgomery, Pennsylvania	4	123,415	8,639	7%	7,743	28,532
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	159,885	9,593	6%	6,968	17,559
SH 183	Tarrant, Texas	6	159,886	9,593	6%	6,913	17,420
NJ 4	Bergen, New Jersey	6	100,247	12,030	12%	6,848	109,700
U.S. 30	Camden, New Jersey	4	82,920	8,292	10%	5,956	29,422
NJ 4	Bergen, New Jersey	6	114,035	13,684	12%	4,964	27,486
NJ 4	Bergen, New Jersey	5	100,247	12,030	12%	3,836	61,449
SR 60	Hillsborough, Florida	8	180,798	12,656	7%	3,833	8,106
31	Hamilton, Indiana	4	73,229	13,181	18%	3,791	3,791
U.S. 1	12086	6	92,612	6,483	7%	3,722	15,952
SH 114	Tarrant, Texas	6	121,989	7,319	6%	3,386	8,534
22	Los Angeles, California	4	97,972	2,939	3%	3,177	3,177
U.S. 22	Union, New Jersey	5	95,560	11,467	12%	2,903	46,497
DEL141	New Castle, Delaware	4	78,532	6,283	8%	2,328	2,328
1	Wake, North Carolina	4	46,843	3,747	8%	2,284	4,609
165	Ouachita, Louisiana	4	67,187	16,797	25%	2,140	2,140
SR 60	Hillsborough, Florida	8	146,482	8,789	6%	2,108	4,458

Figure D.4 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intermodal Connectors (Code 1-2-3)
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table D.4 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Intermodal Connectors
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
36	Marion, Indiana	4	68,833	5,507	8%	402	1,440
	Shelby, Tennessee	4	69,316	2,773	4%	331	639
2	Chittenden, Vermont	4	61,963	3,718	6%	281	281
2	Chittenden, Vermont	4	49,694	2,982	6%	144	144
-	Shelby, Tennessee	4	67,108	2,684	4%	60	117

Figure D.5 Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Truck Access Routes
HPMS Sample Sections Only

Table D.5 Top Capacity Bottlenecks on Arterials Used As Truck Access Routes
*HPMS Sample Sections Only*
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	All Vehicles-2004	All Trucks-2004
Route Number	Bottleneck Location	No. of Lanes	AADT	AADTT	Percent of All Vehicles	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks	Annual Hours of Delay All Trucks (Expanded)
-	Montgomery, Maryland	4	75,398	4,524	6%	5,937	29,139
-	Santa Clara, California	4	72,025	5,762	8%	1,517	1,517
-	Oakland, Mississippi	4	85,248	1,705	2%	1,074	3,257
-	Oakland, Mississippi	4	71,196	3,560	5%	1,046	3,849
-	Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	4	61,212	1,836	3%	493	993
-	Washtenaw, Mississippi	4	55,019	4,402	8%	457	457
-	Tulsa, Oklahoma	4	62,560	626	1%	384	384
-	Tulsa, Oklahoma	4	62,560	626	1%	304	304
-	Champaign, Illinois	4	49,077	2,945	6%	202	202
-	Washtenaw, Mississippi	4	43,324	3,466	8%	150	224
-	Pulaski, Arkansas	4	44,558	1,337	3%	95	254