|FHWA > Engineering > Construction > Contract Admin > SEP-14 > CM/GC - Construction Manager/General Contractor|
Printable version of this report (.docx, 22 kb)
Procurement Evaluation Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP-14)
CM/GC - Construction Manager/General Contractor
Colorado Department of Transportation Initial Report: Procurement Phase
The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) submits this initial report under the provisions of Special Experimental Project No. 14 (SEP 14) for the use of innovative contracting practices as written in the November 9, 2009 CDOT Workplan.
The Region 1 Mountain Project Management Team developed the necessary documentation, solicited proposals, and appointed a selection panel of five members to select a Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) services contractor. A CM/GC services contract has been executed for the Replacement of 2400 Medium Volt Master Control Cabinets located at the Eisenhower Johnson Memorial Tunnels (EJMT) in Clear Creek County, Colorado. This initial report includes a brief scope of the CM/GC project, a brief summary of the procurement process, effects on the bids received, estimates of cost and time savings, lessons learned thus far, and industry reaction to the process.
The scope of this project is to produce the final design and specifications for the replacement of the 2400v Motor Control Cabinets (MCC's) at the EJMT while successfully deploying the first CM/GC delivery method on a CDOT project.
The design work includes the selection of a replacement option from the Preliminary Report, electrical design, master control center procurement and shop drawing development, FOR plan development, and final plan development.
The CM/GC services work includes constructability reviews, cost savings reviews, value engineering proposals, plan set visual and written reviews, confirmation of all quantities, development of an open cost model for project development, and submittal of a GMP (Guaranteed Maximum Price) Proposal.
C. Procurement Process
During August through November 2009, CDOT evaluated different delivery systems to select a method that best fits the guidelines and project requirements for the 2400v MCC replacement. Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build, and CM/GC were individually researched. Disadvantages and advantages for each method were analyzed and compared. CM/GC was selected because of the requirement of CDOT control of the project site and to accelerate the design and construction schedules.
Within CDOT, support for a CM/GC pilot project was strong and the unit's thorough evaluation encouraged team endorsement of the delivery method. CDOT applied for SEP 14 approval. During this process, the FHWA team asked for specific information on Colorado law regarding Innovative Contracting. The Attorney General's office was consulted and found that while not specific in allowing CM/GC, statue did allow for multiple methods in innovated contracting. CDOT received procurement go ahead on January 25th, 2010 and developed Request for Proposal documents for a Design Consultant and a CM/GC services contractor. These documents were based on the Colorado State Buildings RFP documents and the Utah Department of Transportation CM/GC program.
CDOT advertised for a CM/GC services contractor and a design services consultant in parallel procurement processes to allow for both firms to begin working on the project simultaneously. Procurement began in March 2010 and selections were made in May 2010. Due to the relatively new processes, contract execution and Notice to Proceed for each firm was not successful until October 2010. This process included writing a CM/GC services contract based on the Colorado State Buildings contract while modifying the document to comply with all state and CDOT procedures. Team hierarchy, construction contract language, and roles and responsibilities were challenging revisions that were required to adapt to how CDOT does business.
The design consultant process followed the typical CDOT consultant selection process with changes to support the CM/GC delivery method. The CM/GC selection process was based on the Colorado State Buildings process and UDOT's CM/GC process. This included proposal guidelines, proposal requirements, scoring system for proposals and interviews, and the request for Cost Proposal Statement. This Cost Proposal was a proprietary item that, like a bid, would be confidential and unsealed after the interviews were complete.
The proposals, interview, and cost proposal from the contractors were scored on the following criteria by a 5 person selection panel.
Proposal - 60 Points
This document was a proposal from the Contractor with a 20 page limit that detailed the following information with point weights:
Interview - 20 Points
The interview was an hour meeting that included a short project presentation summarizing the proposal and a question/answer session. The questions were ten questions asked to each short listed contractor.
Cost Proposal - 20 Points
The Cost Proposal was a proprietary bid that included a proposed Preconstruction fee, Construction fee, cost of general conditions, and other reimbursable general conditions. The Preconstruction fee is the cost of completing the CM/GC services. The rest of the fees and costs are part of the price of completing the construction of the project and would be rolled into the GMP during the design phase.
D. Bids Received
Due to the unique electrical work and size of the construction project, CDOT received only two proposals for both the CM/GC services and the design services Request for Proposals. This presented a situation where Chief Engineer approval to proceed with less than three proposers was required and granted based on the recommendation of the Region 1 Project Team.
E. Procurement Cost and Time Savings Estimates
A full Cost and Time savings analysis will be conducted after the design and construction phases are complete.
F. Lessons Learned
A 3.5 month delay due to process development and inexperience with CM/GC services procurement led the Project Team to make the following recommendations:
G. Industry Reaction
The two contractors who submitted proposal packages and interviewed for the project were debriefed on the procurement process. Feedback from the debrief meetings included:
The 2400 Medium Volt MCC Replacement project has entered into its design phase. While the Innovative Contracting Advisory Committee will begin to address CM/GC for CDOT's future use and has representation from the Colorado Contractors Association (CCA) and American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC).
H. Design Phase Report and Overall Report
CDOT will submit its intermediate report after the design phase and an overall project report at the end of the construction phase. The overall report will incorporate the procurement and design phase reports.
Word files can be viewed with the Word Viewer
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®