Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home   |   Pavements Home
Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-05-054
Date: September 2005

Quantification of Smoothness Index Differences Related To Long-Term Pavement Performance Equipment Type

References

  1. Karamihas, S.M.; Gillespie, T.D.; Perera, R.W.; and Kohn, S.D., Guidelines for Longitudinal Pavement Profile Measurement, NCHRP Report 434, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1999.
  2. Sayers, M.W. and Karamihas, S.M., The Little Book of Profiling: Basic Information About Measuring and Interpreting Road Profiles, UMTRI, Ann Arbor, MI, 1998.
  3. Bertrand, C.; Harrison R.; and Hudson, W.R., Evaluation of a High-Resolution Profiling Instrument for Use in Road Roughness Calibration, Transportation Research Record 1291, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1991.
  4. Manual for Profile Measurements: Operational Field Guidelines, Report No. SHRP-P-378, SHRP, Washington, DC, 1994.
  5. Perera, R.W.; Kohn, S.D.; and Rada, G.R.J., Operational Procedures for K.J. Law T-6600 Profilometer: Legacy Document, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2002.
  6. Perera, R.W.; Kohn, S.D.; and Rada, G.R.J., LTPP Manual for Profile Measurements and Processing, Version 4.1, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2004.
  7. Macpherson, D.; Olmedo, C.; and Merrill, C., ProQual 2004: User Guide, FHWA, Washington, DC, 2004.
  8. Macpherson, D., ProQual 2004: Overview, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2004.
  9. Sayers, M.; Gillespie, T.D.; and Paterson, W.D.O., Guidelines for Conducting and Calibrating Road Roughness Measurements, World Bank, Washington, DC, 1986.
  10. Hadley, W.O., and Roper, H., Comparative Testing of Strategic Highway Research Program Profilers, Transportation Research Record 1311, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1991.
  11. Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Profilometer Comparison, SHRP North Central Region, Plymouth, MI, November 1992.
  12. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D., Comparison of the SHRP Profilometers, Report No. SHRP-P-639, SHRP, Washington, DC, 1993(http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/shrp/SHRP-P-639.pdf).
  13. Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Comparison Testing of LTPP Profilers-July 1998, Plymouth, MI, 1998.
  14. Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Comparison Testing of LTPP Profilers-December 2000, Plymouth, MI, 2001.
  15. Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Comparison Testing of LTPP Profilers, Plymouth, MI, 2004.
  16. PIARC (World Road Association), International Experiment to Harmonize Longitudinal and Transverse Profile Measurement and Reporting Procedures, Niveau, France, 2000.
  17. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D., Road Profiler Data Analysis and Correlation, Final Report, Research Report No. 92-30, Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Plymouth, MI, 1994.
  18. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D., Road Profiler Data Analysis and Correlation, Final Report, Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., Plymouth, MI, 1995.
  19. Evans, L. and Eltahan, A., LTPP Profile Variability, Report No. FHWA-RD-00-113, FHWA, Washington, DC, June 2000.
  20. Sayers, M.W., Profiles of Roughness, Transportation Research Record 1260, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1990.
  21. Karamihas, S., Development of Cross-Correlation for Objective Comparison of Profiles, Report 2002-36, UMTRI, Ann Arbor, MI, 2002.
  22. Bendant, J.S. and Piersol, A.G., Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, Wiley InterScience®, New York, NY, 1971.
  23. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, RoadRuf: Software for Analyzing Road Profiles, Tutorial, Ann Arbor, MI, October 1997.
  24. ERES Consultants, Inc., Comparison Testing of the North Central Region New/Old Profilometers and Dipstick®, Champaign, IL, 1996.
  25. ITX Stanley Ltd., LTPP Profiling Equipment Comparison Test: New/Old Profilometers and Dipstick®, North Atlantic Region, Amherst, NY, 1996.
  26. Brent Rauhut Engineering, Inc., Comparison Testing of New/Old Profilometers and Dipstick®: Southern Region, Austin, TX, 1996.
  27. Nichols Consulting Engineers, Chtd., New/Old Profiler-Dipstick® Comparison Test: Western Region, Reno, NV, 1996.
  28. Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc., 2002 Comparison of LTPP K.J. Law and ICC Profilers, Plymouth, MI, 2004.
  29. American Society for Testing and Materials, “E1926-98 (2003), Standard Practice of Computing International Roughness Index of Roads From Longitudinal Profile Measurements, Volume 4.03, Road and Paving Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004.
  30. Sayers, M.W., On the Calculation of International Roughness Index from Longitudinal Road Profile, Transportation Research Record 1501, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1995.
  31. American Society for Testing and Materials, “ E1364-95 (2000), Standard Test Method for Measuring Road Roughness by Static Level Method, Volume 4.03, Road and Paving Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004.
Previous | Table of Contents

 


The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Provide leadership and technology for the delivery of long life pavements that meet our customers needs and are safe, cost effective, and can be effectively maintained. Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) R&T Web site portal, which provides access to or information about the Agency’s R&T program, projects, partnerships, publications, and results.
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration