Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home   |   Pavements Home
REPORT
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-12-035
Date: November 2012

 

Relating Ride Quality and Structural Adequacy for Pavement Rehabilitation/Design Decisions

BIBLIOGRAPHY

  1. Agarwal, P.K., Das, A., and Chakroborty, P. (2006). “Simple Model for Structural Evaluation of Asphalt Concrete Pavements at the Network Level,” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12(1), 41–49, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  2. Ali, H. and Selezneva, O. (2000). “Seasonal Trends and Causes in Pavement Structural Properties,” Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli: Third Volume, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  3. Carvalho, R., Ayres, M., Tayabji, S., and Selezneva, O. (2010). Impact of Design Features on Pavement Response and Performance in Rehabilitated Flexible and Rigid Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-10-066, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  4. Carvalho, R., Stubstad, R., Briggs, R., Selezneva, O., Mustafa, E., and Ramachandran, A. (2011). Simplified Techniques for Evaluation and Interpretation of Pavement Deflections for Network-Level Analysis, Report No. FHWA-HRT-12-023, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  5. Chakroborty, P., Agarwal, P.K., and Das, A. (2007). Simple Model to Predict Structural Condition of Asphalt Concrete Pavements at the Network Level, Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  6. Chatti, K., Buch, N., Haider, S.W., Pulipaka, A.S., Lyles, R.W., Gilliland, D., and Desaraju, P. (2005). “LTPP Data Analysis: Influence of Design and Construction Features on the Response and Performance of New Flexible and Rigid Pavements,” NCHRP Web Document No. 74, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  7. Choi, J.H., Adams, T.M., and Bahia, H.U. (2004). “Pavement Roughness Modeling Using Back-Propagation Neural Networks,” Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19(4), Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ.

  8. Corley-Lay, J.B. and Mastin, J. (2009). Evaluation of LTPP Profile Data for Flexible Pavements, Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  9. Evans, L.D. and Eltahan, A. (2000). LTPP Profile Variability, Report No. FHWA-RD-00-113, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  10. Federal Highway Administration. (1998). Roughness Trends of Flexible Pavements, TechBrief, Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-132, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  11. Fwa, T.F. and Setiadji, B.H. (2006). “Evaluation of Backcalculation Methods for Nondestructive Determination of Concrete Pavement Properties,” Transportation Research Record 1949, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  12. Guclu, A. and Ceylan, H. (2007). Condition Assessment of Composite Pavement Systems Using Neural-Network-Based Rapid Backcalculation Algorithms, Transportation Research Board 86th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  13. Helali, K., Voth, M.D., Bekheet, W., Amenta, J.A. and VanDerHurst, P. (2006). Development of Roughness Deterioration Models for National Park Service Network, Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  14. Jiang, Y.J. and Tayabji, S.D. (2000). “Evaluation of Concrete Pavement Conditions and Design Features Using LTPP FWD Deflection Data,” Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli: Third Volume, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  15. Jiang, Y.J. and Darter, M.I. (2005). Structural Factors of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements: SPS-2-Initial Evaluation and Analysis, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-167, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  16. Karamihas, S.M. and Senn, K.A. (2009). Detailed Profile Analysis on the Arizona SPS-5 Project, Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  17. Khazanovich, L., Darter, M., Bartlett, R., and McPeak, T. (1998). Common Characteristics of Good and Poorly Performing PCC Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-131, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  18. Ksaibati, K. and Mahmood, S.A. (2002). Utilizing the Long-Term Pavement Performance Database in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Smoothness, Mountain-Plains Consortium, Fargo, ND.

  19. Kutay, M.E., Weaver, E., and Wiser, L.J. (2007). “Development of Transfer Functions for Spectral Compatibility of Inertial Profilers Used in Long-Term Pavement Performance Program,” Transportation Research Record 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  20. La Torre, F., Domenichini, L., and Darter, M.I. (1998). Roughness Prediction Model Based on the Artificial Neural Network Approach, Fourth International Conference on Managing Pavements, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

  21. Lee, D., Chatti, K., and Baladi, G.Y. (2002). “Development of Roughness Thresholds for Preventive Maintenance Action Aimed at Reducing Dynamic Loads,” Transportation Research Record 1816, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  22. Lee, D., Chatti, K., and Baladi, G.Y. (2002). “Roughness Thresholds for Smoothing Pavements as a Preventive Maintenance Action,” Transportation Research Record 1816, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  23. Moody, E.D. (1997). “Analysis of LTPP Profile Data for Jointed Concrete Pavement Sections,” Transportation Research Record 1570, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  24. Owusu-Antwi, E.B., Titus-Glover, L., and Darter, M.I. (1998). Design and Construction of PCC Pavements, Volume I: Summary of Design Features and Construction Practices that Influence Performance of Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-052, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  25. Park, K., Thomas, N.E., and Lee, K.W. (2007). “Applicability of the International Roughness Index as a Predictor of Asphalt Pavement Condition,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133(12), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  26. Perera, R.W., Byrum, C., and Kohn, S.D. (1998). Investigation of Development of Pavement Roughness, Report No. FHWA-RD-97-147, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  27. Perera, R.W., Byrum, C., Kohn, S.D., and Richter, C.A. (1997). Roughness Characteristics of GPS Flexible Pavements in the LTPP Program, Eighth International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

  28. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D. (2002). “Issues in Pavement Smoothness: A Summary Report,” NCHRP Web Document 42, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  29. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D. (2001). “LTPP Data Analysis: Factors Affecting Pavement Smoothness,” NCHRP Web Document 40, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.

  30. Perera, R.W. and Kohn, S.D. (2006). Ride Quality Performance of Asphalt Concrete Pavements Subjected to Different Rehabilitation Strategies, Airfield and Highway Pavements: Proceedings of the 2006 Airfield and Highway Pavement Specialty Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  31. Rahim, A.M., Fiegel, G., Ghuzlan, K., and Khumann, D. (2009). “Evaluation of International Roughness Index for Asphalt Overlays Placed Over Cracked and Seated Concrete Pavements,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10(3), Taylor & Francis Ltd., Abingdon, United Kingdom.

  32. Raymond, C.M., Tighe, S.L., Haas, R., and Rothenburg, L. (2003). “Analysis of Influences on As-Built Pavement Roughness in Asphalt Overlays, Application Notes,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4(4), Taylor & Francis Ltd., Abingdon, United Kingdom.

  33. Ritcher, C.A. and Rauhut, J.B. (1989). SHRP Plans for Nondestructive Deflection Testing in the Development of Pavement Performance Prediction Models, First International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

  34. Saleh, M.F. and Mamlouk, M.S. (2002). “Calibration of a Pavement Roughness Model Based on Finite Element Simulation,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3(4), Taylor & Francis Ltd., Abingdon, United Kingdom.

  35. Stoffels, S., Lee, W.S., and Bae, A. (2006). Observed Effects of Subgrade Moisture on Longitudinal Profile, Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  36. Stubstad, R.N., Jiang, Y.J., and Lukanen, E.O. (2007). “Forward Calculation of Pavement Moduli with Load-Deflection Data,” Transportation Research Record 2005, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  37. Suthahar, N., Ardani A., and Morian, D.A. (2000). “Early Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance Specific Pavement Studies-2, Colorado,” Transportation Research Record 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  38. Teomete, E., Bayrak, M.B., and Agarwal, M. (2004). Use of Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Rigid Pavement Roughness, 2004 Transportation Scholars Conference, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

  39. Tighe, S., Haas, R., and Li, N. (2001). “Overlay Performance in Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program’s Long-Term Pavement Performance Study,” Transportation Research Record 1778, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  40. Titus-Glover, L., Owusu-Antwi, E.B., Hoener, T., and Darter, M.I. (1998). Design and Construction of PCC Pavements, Volume II: Design Features and Practices that Influence Performance of Pavements, Report No. FHWA-RD-98-127, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  41. Von Quintus, H.L., Eltahan, A., and Yau, A. (2001). “Smoothness Models for Hot-Mix Asphalt Surfaced Pavements: Developed from Long-Term Pavement Performance Program Data,” Transportation Research Record 1764, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  42. Von Quintus, H.L. and Simpson, A.L. (2003). Structural Factors for Flexible Pavements—Initial Evaluation of the SPS-1 Experiment, Report No. FHWA-RD-01-166, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  43. Von Quintus, H.L., Mallela, J., Jiang, J., and Buncher, M. (2007). “Expected Service Life of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements in Long-Term Pavement Performance Program,” Transportation Research Record 1990, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  44. Wang, K., Li, Q., Hall, K.D., and Elliott, R.P. (2007). “Experimentation with Gray Theory for Pavement Smoothness Prediction,” Transportation Research Record 1990, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  45. Wu, Z., Shekharan, R., Chowdhury, T., and Diefenderfer, B.K. (2009). Development and Implementation of Network-Level Selection of Pavement Maintenance and Rehabilitation Strategy: Virginia Practice, Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  46. Yin, H., Stoffels, S.M., and Antle, C.A. (2006). Profile Data Variability in Pavement Management: Findings and Tools from LTPP, Airfield and Highway Pavements: Proceedings of the 2006 Airfield and Highway Pavement Specialty Conference, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.

  47. Zoltan, G., Sidess, A., and Bonjack, H. (1992). “Rational Method for Selecting Maintenance Treatment Alternatives on the Basis of Distress, Structural Capacity and Roughness,” Transportation Research Record 1344, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

 


The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a part of the U.S. Department of Transportation and is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with field offices across the United States. is a major agency of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). Provide leadership and technology for the delivery of long life pavements that meet our customers needs and are safe, cost effective, and can be effectively maintained. Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) R&T Web site portal, which provides access to or information about the Agency’s R&T program, projects, partnerships, publications, and results.
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration