U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
2023664000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information 

Publication Number: FHWARD98085 
The Delta Basin Shape Factors are perhaps the oldest and simplest of the basin shape factors. Simply put, a Delta factor is the difference between the center deflection (defl_{0}) and the deflection measured at some distance away from the center (defl_{x}). The general equation is:
Delta_{x} = defl_{0}  defl_{x}
Where:
x = Offset from the center of the load plate, in.defl_{0} = Deflection measured at an offset of 0 in., µm
defl_{x} = Deflection measured at and offset of x in., µm
Following industry practice at the expense of using mixed units, the sensor offsets used in the Delta factors presented here are in US customary units. Correction factors for Delta_{8}, Delta_{12} (sometimes called the Surface Curvature Index), Delta_{18}, Delta_{24}, Delta_{48} and Delta_{60} are presented here.
The Delta_{x} factor is primarily dependent on the HMA thickness and stiffness, however as "x" increases, so does the influence of the base and subgrade layers. The influence of the lower layers is dependent on many things, such the ratio of "x" to the thickness of the HMA layer and the stiffness of the HMA layer relative to the stiffness of the lower layers, so care should be exercised in the use of the Delta factors to characterize properties of the HMA layer.
As the Delta factors are strongly influenced by the stiffness of the HMA layer, they are therefore temperature dependent. This dependence is shown in Figures 2224 using the Delta_{12} factor. Similar figures for the other Delta factors are available here.
Figure 22. Sample Deflection Basins Measured at the Same Point
Figure 23. Delta_{12} factors from Figure 22 vs. Temperature
Figure 24. Delta_{12} versus temperature for a single test location
The LTPP SMP data was used to develop regression equations relating the Delta basin shape factors to pavement characteristics including the thickness of the HMA layer, the temperature at the middepth of the HMA layer, the 9 kip loadnormalized deflection at the 36 in. offset (which provides a substitute for subgrade stiffness) and the latitude (which is used as a surrogate for binder stiffness).
Delta_{8}
Log(Delta_{8}) = 3.02  1.49*Log(ac) + 0.541*Log(theta) + 0.394*Log(defl_{36})  0.0230*T + 0.0111*T*Log(ac)*Log(theta)
Delta_{12}
Log(Delta_{12}) = 3.45  1.59*Log(ac) + 0.489*Log(theta) + 0.449*Log(defl_{36})  0.0275*T + 0.012*T*Log(ac)*Log(theta)
Delta_{18}
Log(Delta_{18}) = 4.18  1.52*Log(ac) + 0.317*Log(theta)*Log(defl_{36})  0.0265*T + 0.0112*T*Log(ac)*Log(theta)
Delta_{24}
Log(Delta_{24}) = 3.30  1.32*Log(ac) + 0.514*Log(theta)*Log(defl_{36})  0.00622*T*Log(theta)*Log(defl_{36}) + 0.00838*T*Log(ac)*Log(theta)
Delta_{36}
Log(Delta_{36})= 3.05  1.13*Log(ac) + 0.502*Log(theta)*Log(defl_{36})  0.00487*T*Log(theta)*Log(defl_{36}) + 0.00677*T*Log(ac)*Log(theta)
Delta_{60}
Log(Delta_{60})= 2.67  0.770*Log(ac) + 0.650*Log(defl_{36}) + 0.00290*T*Log(ac)
Where:
ac = Total thickness of the HMA, mmtheta = Latitude of the pavement section
defl_{36} = Deflection (loadnormalized to 40.5 kN (9 kip)) at 915 mm (36 in.) from the center of the load plate, µm
T = Temperature at middepth of the HMA, °C
The Delta factors decrease as the log of the thickness of the AC increases and increase as the temperature of the HMA increases (the second term with T dominates the first term with T). The latitude is a substitute for the stiffness of the binder used in the HMA mix. The Delta factors increase as the latitude increases because, generally, softer binders are used in north and harder binders are used in the south. The coefficient on the terms where the latitude appears are positive, indicating that as the latitude increases, the Delta12 factor increases, which is consistent with the relationship between the Delta factors and stiffness. The coefficient for the term with the defl_{36} variable is positive, indicating an increase in defl_{36}increases the Delta factors. The defl_{36} varies inversely with the subgrade stiffness, so as defl_{36} increases, the subgrade stiffness decreases.
Use of the Delta basin factors generally will require that the calculated Delta values be adjusted for temperature. Temperature adjustment factors can be calculated by using the respective Delta equation to calculate an Delta factor for the pavement tested using the middepth HMA temperature at the time of the test (T_{m}). The Delta is then calculated again using the middepth HMA temperature, or reference temperature (T_{r}) that it is to be adjusted to. The Basin Adjustment Factor for Delta_{x}, or BAFDelta_{x}, is the Delta_{x} at the reference temperature divided by the Delta_{x} at the measured temperature. This procedure is illustrated in the following equation:
BAFDelta_{x} = Delta_{x, Tr} / Delta_{x, Tm}
Where:
BAFDelta_{x} = Basin Adjustment Factor for Delta_{x}Delta_{x, Tr} = Delta_{x} factor calculated for the reference temperature
Delta_{x, Tm} = Delta_{x} factor calculated for the reference temperature
Source code for implementing the Delta_{8}, Delta_{12}, Delta_{18}, Delta_{24}, Delta_{36} and Delta_{60} temperature regression equations is included, as is sample data for checking code.
Source code for implementing the basin adjustment factors for Delta_{8}, Delta_{12}, Delta_{18}, Delta_{24}, Delta_{36} and Delta_{60} is also included.
Topics: research, infrastructure, pavements and materials Keywords: research, infrastructure, pavements and materials TRT Terms: Pavements, AsphaltUnited StatesTemperature, Pavements, AsphaltPerformanceUnited States, LongTerm Pavement Performance Program (U.S.), Adjustment factors, Asphalt pavements, Backcalculation Updated: 04/23/2012
