U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
| Report |
| This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information |
 |
| Publication Number: FHWA-RD-98-074 Date: January 1999 |
Publication Number: FHWA-RD-98-074 Date: January 1999 |
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
This report documents the process of model development and the final models developed for the prediction of key portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement distress types and roughness. The models were developed using Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) data. Mechanistic-empirical models were developed for the following distress types: transverse joint faulting, transverse joint spalling, transverse cracking, and corner breaks. The roughness models developed were empirical.
The positive outcome of this study was the development of mechanistic-based performance models for use in pavement design and management This is expected to provide expanded capabilities for considering the effect of load-and climate-related stresses on PCC pavement performance. The development of mechanistic~based models reflects current trends of upgrading the pavement design and evaluation process through the use of mechanictis-basd design methods.
This report important to everyone who designs, constructs, and manages pavements
James D. Cooper, Acting Director
Office of Engineering, Research and Development
Notice
This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers' names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document.
