Methodologies to Measure and Quantify Transportation Management Center Benefits: Final Synthesis Report
References
- Intelligent Transportation Systems. (2005). Archived Data Management Systems: A
Cross-Cutting Study, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
-
Research and Innovation Technology
Administration. National ITS Architecture
Version 6.1, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. Obtained
from: http://www.iteris.com/itsarch/.
Site last accessed April 18, 2011.
-
Fuhs, C. (2010). Synthesis of Active Traffic Management Experiences in Europe and the
United States, Report No. FHWA-HOP-10-031, Federal Highway Administration,
Washington, DC.
-
Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway Capacity Manual, 5th Edition,
Washington, DC.
-
Urban Crossroads, Inc. (2006). PeMS Data Extraction Methodology and
Execution Technical Memorandum, Irvine, CA.
-
Varaiya, P. Creating
Transportation System Intelligence, University
of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA. Obtained from: http://paleale.eecs.berkeley.edu/~varaiya/papers_ps.dir/California'sPerformanceMeasurementSystem.pdf. Site last accessed April 15, 2011.
-
Martin, P.T. and Wu, P. (2003). Automated Data Collection, Analysis and
Archival, University of Utah
Traffic Lab, Salt Lake City, UT.
-
University of Florida Transportation Research
Center. (2008). Development of a Central
Data Warehouse for Statewide ITS and Transportation Data in Florida, Phase II:
Proof of Concept, Final Report, Gainesville,
FL.
-
Park, B. (2005). Transportation Management System Performance Monitoring, Evaluation and
Reporting-A Technical Handbook, FHWA
Report No. FHWA-HOP-07-142, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
- 10.
Shaw, T. (2003). Performance Measurements of Operational Effectiveness for Highway
Segments and Systems, NCHRP Synthesis 311, Transportation Research Board,
Washington, DC.
-
Gordon, R. Design
ITS, Plainview, NY. Obtained from: http://designints.com.
-
Dailey, D.J., Meyers, D., Pond, L., and
Guiberson, K. (2002). Traffic Data
Acquisition and Distribution, Report No. WA-RD-484.1, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA.
-
Washington State Department of Transportation. Annual Traffic Report, Olympia, WA.
Obtained from: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/travel/annualtrafficreport.htm.
-
Washington
State Department of Transportation. Ramp
and Roadway Report, Olympia, WA. Obtained from:
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Northwest/TrafficVolume/.
-
Turner, S., Margiotta, R., and Lomax, T. (2004). Monitoring Urban Freeways in 2003:
Current Conditions and Trends from Archived Operations Data, Report No.
FHWA-HOP-05-018, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
-
INRIX, Inc. (2009). Benchmarking Traffic Data Quality, Kirkland, WA.
- Ishimaru, J.M. and Hallenbeck, M.E. (1999). Flow Evaluation Design Technical Report, Report No WA-RD-466.2, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Higatani, A., Kitazawa, T., Tanabe, J., Suga,
Y., Sekhar, R., and Asakura, Y. (2009). "Empirical Analysis of Travel Time
Reliability Measures in Hanshin Expressway Network," Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(1), 28-38.
-
Weiss, N. and Hassett, M. (1988). Introductory Statistics, Addison Wesley
Publishing Company, Reading, PA.
-
Office of Operations. Travel Time Reliability: Making It There On Time, All The Time,
Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/tt_reliability/TTR_Report.htm#WhatisTTR. Site
last accessed November 19, 2010.
- Gordon, R.L. et al. (1996). Traffic Control Systems Handbook, Report No. FHWA-SA-95-032,
Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
-
Koonce, P. (2008). Traffic Signal Timing Manual, Report No. FHWA-HOP-08-024, Federal
Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
-
Florida Department of Transportation. (2000). Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies, FDOT
Manual Number 750-020-007, Tallahassee, FL.
- 24.
Washington State Department of Transportation. 2009 Washington State Collision Data Summary,
Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA. Obtained from: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/collision/pdf/Washington_State_Collision_Data_Summary_2009.pdf. Site last accessed December
6, 2010.
-
Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. (2004). Rochester ITS Evaluation and Integration
Planning, Monroe County, Draft
Technical Memorandum, Highway Accident Analysis
(Task 1.4), Bohemia, NY.
-
New York State Department of Transportation.
(2010). NYSDOT Safety Information
Management System: Average Accident
Costs/Severity Distribution State Highways 2009, NYSDOT, Albany, NY. Obtained from: https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/operating/
osss/highway-repository/2009%20Avr.%20Accident%20Cost%20Severity.pdf.
Site last accessed January 17, 2011.
- Kar, K. and Datta, T. (2010). "An Approach to
Identify Areas with Potential Risks Associated with Driver Behavioral Issues," ITE Journal.
-
The National Work Zone Safety Information
Clearinghouse. Work Zone Safety
Performance Measures Guidance Booklet, Federal Highway Administration,
Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.workzonesafety.org/fhwa_wz_grant/atssa/atssa_wz_performance_measures. Site last accessed December 10, 2010.
-
ITS Florida. (2008). Why We Need Road Rangers, Florida Department of Transportation,
Tallahassee, FL. Obtained from: http://www.itsflorida.org/attachments/documents/Road_Ranger_Paper_Dec2008.pdf. Site last accessed December 15,
2010.
- Transportation Research Board. (2002). National Conference on Traffic Incident
Management: A Road Map to the Future, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/conferences/TIM/TIMProceedings.pdf.
Site last accessed December 6, 2010.
-
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). MOVES (Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator),
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Obtained from: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm.
Site lat accessed February 21, 2011.
-
Federal Highway Administration. Flexibility in Highway Design, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC. Obtained from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/publications/flexibility/. Site last accessed December 5, 2010.
- American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials. (2004). A
Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
- Puget Sound Regional Council. (2003). Adopted Level of Service Standards for Regionally Significant State
Highways, Seattle, WA.
- Poister, T.H., Berryman, A.F., Roberts, A., and
Xu, J. (2007). 2006 Motorist Survey
Pilot Statewide Results, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. Obtained
from: http://www2.gsu.edu/~padthp/gdot_reports/2006_statewide_motorist_report.pdf.
Site last accessed December 22, 2010.
-
Levinson, D. et al. (2004). Measuring the Equity and Efficiency of Ramp Meters, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN.
-
Nee, J. and Hallenbeck, M. (2001). Evaluation of the Service Patrol Program in
the Puget Sound Region, Washington State Transportation Center Research
Project T1803, Task 37, Seattle, WA. Obtained from: http://depts.washington.edu/trac/bulkdisk/pdf/518.1.pdf.
Site last accessed December 24, 2010.
-
Skabardonis, A., Petty, K., Varaiya, P., and
Bertini, R. (1998). Evaluation of the
Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) in Los Angeles, California Path Research
Report UCB-ITS-PRR-98-31, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Obtained from: http://www.path.berkeley.edu/PATH/Publications/PDF/PRR/98/PRR-98-31.pdf. Site last
accessed December 24, 2010.
-
University of California at Berkeley and
California Department of Transportation. (2007). ITS Decision, Sacramento,
CA. Obtained from: http://eng.odu.edu/transportationitsdecision/existingitsd/calccit.org_itsdecision/itsdecision/serv_and_tech/Freeway_servpat/freeway_full.html.
Site last accessed December 26, 2010.
-
Courage, K. and Lee, S. (2008). Development of a Central Data Warehouse for
Statewide ITS and Transportation Data in Florida, Phase II: Proof of Concept,
Report No. FR-51449, University of Florida Transportation Research Center,
Gainesville, FL.
- Bertini, R.L., Hansen, S., Matthews, S.,
Rodriguez, A., and Delcambre, A. (2005). Portal:
Implementing a New Generation Archived Data User Service in Portland, Oregon, 12th
World Congress on ITS, San Francisco, CA.
-
Hagemann, et al. (2010). ITS Technology Adoption and Observed Market Trends From
ITS Deployment Tracking, Research and Innovative Technology Administration,
Washington, DC.
-
Smith, B. and Venkatanarayana, R. (2007). System Operations Data Integrity Assessment,
Report No. UVACTS-14-5-129, University
of Virginia Center for Transportation Studies, Charlottesville, VA.
- I-95 Corridor Coalition. (2010). Validation of INRIX Data: Two Year Summary
Report, July 2008 -June 2010, Rockville, MD.
-
Niver, E., Mouskos, K., Batz, T., and Dwyer, P. (2000).
"Evaluation of the TRANSCPM's System for Managing Incidents and Traffic
(TRANSMIT)," IEEE Transactions on
Intelligent transportation Systems, 1(1).
-
Balke, K.N., Engelbrecht, R.J., Sunkari, S.R.,
and Charara, H. (2005). TTI's
Hardware-in-the-Loop Traffic Signal Controller Evaluation System, Report
No. FHWA/TX-05/5-1752-
01-1, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
-
Liu, H.X. and Ma, W. (2007). Real-Time Performance Measurement System for
Arterial Traffic Signals, Presented at the 87th Annual meeting of the
Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
- Sharma,
A., Bullock, D.M., and Bonneson, J. (2007). "Input-Output and Hybrid Techniques
for Real-Time Prediction of Delay and Maximum Queue Length at a Signalized
Intersection," Transportation Research Record 2035, 88-96, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
-
ASTM E2259-03a. (2011). "Standard Guide for
Archiving and Retrieving ITS-Generated Data," Book of Standards Volume 04.03, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA.
-
ASTM E2468-05. (2005). "Standard Practice for
Metadata to Support Archived Data Management Systems," Book of Standards Volume 04.03, ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
PA.
- ASTM E2665-08. (2008). "Standard Specification
for Archiving ITS-Generated Traffic Monitoring Data," Book of Standards Volume 04.03, ASTM International, West
Conshohocken, PA.
- Houston TranStar Consortium. (2009). Houston TranStar 2009 Annual Report,
Houston, TX. Obtained from: http://www.houstontranstar.org/about_transtar/docs/Annual_2009_TranStar.pdf. Site last accessed January 14, 2011.
- 53.
Michigan Department of Transportation. (2010). Michigan Intelligent Transportation Systems
Center, Lansing, MI.
- 54.
Naperville Web site. (2007). Ogden Avenue/US Route 34 Traffic Signal
System, Naperville, IL. Obtained from: http://www.naperville.il.us/emplibrary/SCAT%20Results2.pdf.
Site last accessed December 6, 2010.
-
Maccubin, R.P. et al. (2003). Intelligent Transportation System Benefits
and Costs: 2003 Update, Report
No. FHWA-OP-03-075, Mitretek Systems, Inc., Washington, DC.
- New York State Department of Transportation.
(2004). Intelligent Transportation
Systems Scoping Guidance: Project Development Manual-Appendix 6, NYSDOT,
Albany, NY. Obtained from: https://www.nysdot.gov/divisions/engineering/design/dqab/dqab-repository/pdmapp6.pdf.
Site last accessed December 27, 2010.
-
Maricopa Association of Governments. (2003). Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: Final Report, Phoenix, AZ.
- Bertini, R.L. and El-Geneidy, A.M. Using Advanced Traffic Management System
Data to Evaluate Intelligent Transportation System Investments, Portland
State University, Portland, OR. Obtained from: http://web.pdx.edu/~bertini/papers/evaluation.pdf.
Site last accessed October 22, 2010.
-
Federal Highway Administration and Federal
Transit Administration. (1999). Transportation
Management Center Concepts of Operation: Implementation Guide, Washington, DC.
-
I-95 Corridor Coalition. (2008). Sample Validation of Vehicle Probe Data
Using Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring Technology, Rockville, MD. Obtained
from: http://www.i95coalition.org/i95/Portals/0/Public_Files/uploaded/Vehicle-Probe/June%2017%20Comparison
%2029%20July%202008.pdf. Site last accessed January 7, 2011.
-
Klein, L.A. (2001). Sensor Technologies and Data Requirements for ITS, Artech House,
Boston, MA.
-
Mirshahi, M. et al. (2007). Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management,
Report No. FHWA-PL-07-012, Federal Highway Administration,
Washington, DC.
- Schoppert, D. et al. (1978). Quality of Flow in Urban Arterials-Phase 1,
Vol. 1, Report No.
FHWA-RD-78-199, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
- Wright, D.R. and Ishimaru, J.M. (2007) Data Quality Handling Approach of TRACFLOW
Software, Technical Report, Report No. WA-RD 679.1, University of
Washington,
Seattle, WA.
[1] Review the scope of work for this report for additional information.
[2] Although not strictly needed for the detector to link relationships, figure 3 includes DMS in the
domain definitions to facilitate the implementation of messaging using a common reference frame.