Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home
Research Home
Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-04-091
Date: August 2004

Signalized Intersections: Informational Guide

PDF Version (10.84 MB)

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®

REFERENCES

  1. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), FHWA, 2003.
  2. Transportation Research Board (TRB). Highway Capacity Manual 2000. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (NRC), 2000.
  3. American association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) . a policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2001.
  4. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration(NHTSA). Traffic Safety Facts 2002: A Compilation of Motor vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates system. Washington, DC: USDOT, NHTSA, 2003.
  5. FHWA. Safety and Operations Electronic Reading Room. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/tfhrc/safety/intro.htm. Accessed may 2004.
  6. Robinson, B.W., L. Rodegerdts, W. Scarbrough, W. Kittelson, R. Troutbeck, W. Brilon, L. Bondzio, K. Courage, M. Kyte, J. Mason, A. Flannery, E. Myers, J. Bunker, and G. Jacquemart. Roundabouts: An informational Guide. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-067. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, June 2000.
  7. Americans with Disabilities act (ADA). Public Law 226, 101st Congress. July 26, 1990.
  8. Alexander, G. J., and H. Lunenfeld. Driver Expectancy in Highway Design and Operations. Report No. FHWA-TO-86-1. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, May 1986.
  9. Institute for Transportation Engineers (ITE). Traffic Safety Toolbox: a primer on Traffic Safety. Washington, DC: ITE. 1993.
  10. Smiley, A., C. MacGreger, and R. Dewar. Evaluation of Prototype Highway Tourist Signs for Ontario. Prepared by Human Factors North for the Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Research and Development Branch. Ontario, Canada: June 1996.
  11. Treat, J., N. Tumbas, S. McDonald, D. Shinar, R. Hume, R. Mayer, R. Stansfin, and N. Castellen. Tri-level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents. Report No. DOT-HS-034-3-535-77 (TAC), Indiana, 1977.
  12. Staplin, L., K. Lococo, S. Byington, and D. Harkey. Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-103. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2001.
  13. 1Alicandri, E. "Human Factors and Highway Safety," Intersection Safety workshop, Milwaukee, WI, November 14-16, 2001.
  14. Insurance institute for Highway Safety, fatality Facts, Passenger vehicles http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/fatality_facts/passenger_vehicles.pdf. Accessed September 2002.
  15. Insurance institute for Highway Safety, fatality Facts, Large trucks http://www.highwaysafety.org/safety_facts/fatality_facts/large_trucks.pdf. Accessed September 2002.
  16. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov), 2002.
  17. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (www.bts.gov), 2001.
  18. Highway Safety information System (HSIS). California database, 1994-1998.
  19. Mohamedshad, Y., L. Chen, and F. Council. Association of Selected Intersection Factors with Red-Light-Running Crashes. Report No. FHWA-RD-00-12. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2000.
  20. Stutts, J., D. Reinfurt, L. Staplin, and e. Rodgman. The Role of Driver Distraction in Traffic Crashes. Prepared for American automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2001.
  21. AASHTO. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 1999.
  22. FHWA. Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles. Report No. FHWA-RD-92-073. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, January 1994.
  23. Pein, W. E. Trail Intersection Design Guidelines. Prepared for State Bicycle/Pedestrian program, State safety Office, florida Department of Transportation. Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina. September 1996.
  24. Danish Road Directorate. Collection of Cycle Concepts. Copenhagen, Denmark: Road Directorate: 2000.
  25. NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts 2001: Pedalcyclists. http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/ncsa/tsf2001/2001pedal.pdf. 2001.
  26. FHWA. Injuries to Pedestrians and bicyclists: An analysis based on Hospital Emergency Department Data. Report No. FHWA-RD-99-078. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 1999.
  27. FHWA. Pedestrian and bicycle Crash Types of the Early 1990s. Report No. FHWA-RD-95-163. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 1995.
  28. Geary, R. R. "U.S. bicycle traffic Fatalities: Trends and Characteristics." Presented at vélo Mondial 2000, The Versatile Approach, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 19-22, 2000. http://www.velomondial.net/velomondiall2000/.
  29. Tomlinson, D. "Conflicts between cyclists and motorists in Toronto, Canada." Presented at vélo Mondial 2000, The Versatile Approach, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 19-22, 2000. http://www.velomondial.net/velomondiall2000/.
  30. Ho, G; and S. Hemsing. "A Review of Motor vehicle-Bicycle Collisions in British Columbia." ITE Joint Conference, 1997.
  31. USDOT. Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, http://nhts.ornl.gov/2001/index.shtml. 2001.
  32. Fruin, J. J. Pedestrian planning and Design. New York: Metro Association of Urban Designers and environmental Planning, 1971.
  33. U.S. Architectural and transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access board). Americans with Disabilities act accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (ADAAG). 36 CFR Part 1191. As amended through September 2002.
  34. Kirschbaum, J. B., P. W. Axelson, P.E. Longmuir, K. M. Mispagel, J. A. Stein, and D. A. Yamada. Designing Sidewalks and trails for Access, Part II of II: Best Practices Design Guide. Report No. FHWA-EP-01-127. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, September 2001.
  35. Zegeer, C.V., C. Seiderman, P. Lagerway, M. Cynecki, M. Ronkin, and R. Schneider. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide-Providing Safety and mobility. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-102. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2002.
  36. National Center for Statistics and Analysis (NCSA). Pedestrian Roadway Fatalities. USDOT, NCSA, April 2003.
  37. Leaf, W.A., and D.F. Preusser. Literature Review on Vehicle travel Speeds and Pedestrian injuries. Report No. DOT-HS-809-021. Washington, DC: USDOT, NHTSA, October 1999.
  38. Florida Department of Transportation, Florida pedestrian planning and Design Handbook, April 1999.
  39. Taoka, G.T. "Statistical Evaluation of Brake Reaction Time," Compendium of Technical Papers, 52nd Annual meeting of ITE, Chicago, IL, pp. 30-36, August 1982.
  40. Hooper, K. and mcGee, H. "Driver Perception-Reaction Time: Are Revisions to Current Specification Values in Order?" Transportation Research Record 904, pp. 21-30, 1983.
  41. Neuman, T.R. NCHRP Report 279: Intersection Channelization Design Guide. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1985.
  42. Woodson, W.E., B. Tillman, and P. Tillman. Human Factors Design Handbook: Information and Guidelines for the Design of Systems, facilities, Equipment, and Products for Human Use, Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1992.
  43. Gattis, J. L., and S. T. Low. Intersection angle Geometry and the Driver's Field of View. Final Technical Report 1073. University of Arkansas, 38 pp., March 1998.
  44. U.S. Architectural and transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access board). Draft Guidelines on accessible Public Rights-of-Way. http://www.access-board.gov/rowdraft.htm. June 17, 2002.
  45. U.S. Architectural and transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access board), Public Rights-of-Way Access advisory Committee. Building a True Community. http://www.access-board.gov/prowac/commrept/index.htm. January 2001.
  46. University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center. Florida pedestrian planning and Design Handbook. Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation. April 1999.
  47. City of Portland (Oregon). City of Portland Pedestrian Design Guide. Portland, OR: Office of Transportation, June 1998.
  48. Seymour, E., J. Green, and J. Black. "The Permitted Lead-Lag Left-Turn Display." In 1994 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 64th Annual meeting, La Jolla, CA, 1994.
  49. Brehmer, C., K. Kacir, D. Noyce, and m. Manser. NCHRP Report 493: Evaluation of Traffic Signal Displays for Protected/Permissive Left-turn Control. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003.
  50. Wainwright, W.S. "Tricks of the trade: How to Get More Capacity at Your Signalized Intersections, at Low Cost and without Compromising Safety." In 2003 Annual meeting and exhibit, CD Compendium, ITE, 73rd Annual meeting, Seattle, WA, August 24-27, 2003.
  51. Bentzen, B.L., and L.S. Tabor. Accessible Pedestrian Signals. Document a-37. http://www.access-board.gov/research&training/pedsignals/pedestrian.htm. Washington, DC: U.S. Architectural and transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access board), 1998.
  52. Barlow, J.M., B.L. Bentzen, and L.S. Tabor. "Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Synthesis and Guide to Best Practice." Research Results Digest Number 278. http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_278.pdf. Washington, DC: NCHRP, July 2003. Also available online at http://www.walkinginfo.org/aps/.
  53. Noyce, D.A., and J.M. Barlow. Interfacing Accessible Pedestrian Signals (APS) with Traffic Signal Control Equipment. http://www.access-board.gov/research&training/APS/report.htm. Washington, DC: U.S. Architectural and transportation Barriers Compliance Board (U.S. Access board), April 2003.
  54. American association of State Highway Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) . Roadside Design Guide. Washington, DC: AASHTO, 2002.
  55. FHWA. Traffic Detector Handbook, (final draft). Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2003.
  56. Kell, J.H., and I.J. Fullerton. Manual of Traffic Signal Design, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  57. FHWA. Traffic Control Devices Handbook. Washington, DC: FHWA, 1983.
  58. Bonneson, J.A., and P.T. McCoy. Manual of Traffic Detector Design, 1st edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 1994.
  59. Wortman, R.H., and t.C. Fox. "A Reassessment of the traffic Signal Change interval." In Transportation Research Record 1069. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1986.
  60. ITE. Making Intersections safer: A Toolbox of Engineering Countermeasures to Reduce Red-Light Running. Washington, DC: ITE, 2003.
  61. ITE. Traffic Control Devices Handbook, J.L. Pline, editor. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  62. ITE. Traffic Signing Handbook. Washington, DC: ITE, 1997.
  63. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). American National Standard Practice for Roadway Lighting. Standard RP-8-00. June 2000.
  64. ITE. Statistical Evaluation in Traffic Safety Studies. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  65. State Farm Insurance. "10 Most Dangerous intersections and Photos." As documented by Cable News Network. "List of 'most dangerous' intersections released." http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/06/27/dangerous.intersections. June 27, 2001.
  66. Alexander, G. Positive Guidance in Maryland: Guidelines and Case studies, undated.
  67. Ho, G., S. Zein, and J. Nepomuceno. Traffic Conflict Procedure Manual, Second edition. Vancouver, BC, Canada: G.D. Hamilton associates Consulting Ltd., 1997.
  68. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Local Agency Safety Management System. Olympia, WA: WSDOT, September 2000.
  69. De Leur, P, and t. Sayed. "Developing a Systematic Framework for Proactive safety Planning." Proceedings for the 81st TRB Annual meeting. Washington, DC: TRB, 2002.
  70. Akçelik, R. and m. Besley. AASIDRA User Guide. Greythorn, Victoria, Australia: Ak├želik & Associates Pty Ltd., february 2002.
  71. Teply, S., D.I. Allingham, D.B. Richardson, and b.W. Stephenson. Canadian Capacity Guide for Signalized Intersections, 2nd edition. S. Teply, ed. ITE, District 7-Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, June 1995.
  72. Peterson, B.E., A. Hansson, and K.L. Bang. CAPCAL 2-Model Description of Intersection with Signal Control. Borlänge, Sweden: Swedish national Road Administration, 1995.
  73. TRB. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. Washington, DC: TRB, 1985.
  74. Chang, G.L, and Joseph, J. Empirical Investigation of Intersection Traffic Patterns Under Maryland Driving populations analysis of the Critical-Lane Volume Method at Signalized Intersections. College Park, MD: The University of Maryland at College Park. August 2001.
  75. TRB. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: TRB, 2004.
  76. TRB. Transportation Research Circular 212: Interim Materials on Highway Capacity. Washington, DC: TRB, 1980.
  77. TRB. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 1994 update. Washington, DC: TRB, 1994.
  78. TRB. Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, 1997 update. Washington, DC: TRB, 1997.
  79. Harwood, D.W., M.T. Pietrucha, M.D. Wooldridge, R.E. Brydia, and K. Fitzpatrick. NCHRP Report 375: Median intersection Design. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
  80. Radwan, A.E., K.C. Sinha, and H.L. Michael. Development and Use of a Computer Simulation Model for the Evaluation of Design and Control Alternatives for Intersections of Minor Roads with Multilane Rural Highways. Report Nos. FHWA-IN-79/8, FHWA-IN-79/9, and FHWA-IN-79/10. Joint Highway Research Project. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, July 1979.
  81. Priest, R.V. "Statistical Relationships between Traffic Volume, Median Width, and Accident frequency on Divided Highway Grade intersections." Highway Research news, No. 13. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, NRC, June 1964.
  82. Castronovo, S., P.W. Dorothy, and t.L. Maleck. "Investigation of the Effectiveness of Boulevard Roadways." In Transportation Research Record 1635. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1998.
  83. Dorothy, P.W., T.L. Maleck, and S.E. Nolf. "Operational Aspects of Michigan Design for Divided Highways." In Transportation Research Record 1579. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1997.
  84. FHWA. Vegetation Control for Safety: A Guide for Street and Highway Maintenance Personnel. Report No. FHWA-RT-90-003. Washington, DC: FHWA, 1990.
  85. Gluck, J., H.S. Levinson, and V.G. Stover. NCHRP Report 420: Impacts of Access Management techniques. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999
  86. ITE. Transportation and Land Development, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: ITE, 2002.
  87. TRB. Access Management Manual. Washington, DC: TRB, 2003.
  88. Xu, L. "Right turns Followed by U-Turns vs. Direct Left turns: A Comparison of Safety issues." ITE Journal, November 2001, pp. 36-43.
  89. Papayannoulis, V., J.S. Gluck, K. Feeney, and H.S. Levinson. "Access spacing and traffic Safety." In Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, December 2000.
  90. McLean, J. Transport Research Report 315: Practical Relationships for the Assessment of Road Feature treatments. Summary Report. Australian Road Research Board, 1997.
  91. Colorado Department of Transportation. Colorado Access Control Demonstration project: Final Report. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation, June 1985.
  92. Maze, T., D. Plazak, P. Chao, J. K. Evans, E. Padgett, and J. Witmer. Access Management Research and Awareness Program, Phase iV Final Report. CTRE Management Project 97-1, November 1999.
  93. McCoy, P.T., and J.E. Heimann. "Effect of Driveway Traffic on Saturation Flow Rates at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, february 1990, pp. 12-15.
  94. Vargas, f.A., and Y. Gautam. "Problem: Roadway Safety vs. Commercial Development access." In 1989 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 59th Annual meeting, San Diego, CA. Washington, DC: ITE, 1989, pp. 46-50.
  95. ITE. The traffic Safety Toolbox: a primer on Traffic Safety. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  96. Rakha, H., A. Medina, H. Sin, f. Dion, M. Van aerde, and J. Jenq. "Traffic Signal Coordination across Jurisdictional boundaries: Field evaluation of Efficiency, Energy, Environmental, and Safety impacts." In Transportation Research Record 1727. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 2000.
  97. Avgoustis, A. Quantifying the safety impacts of Intelligent transportation Systems. Master of Engineering Thesis, Civil Engineering Department, Virginia polytechnic Institute and State University, 1999
  98. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. SEMCOG Traffic Safety Manual, Third edition. 1998
  99. Colorado Department of Transportation. Colorado Access Control Demonstration project: Final Report. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation, June 1985.
  100. Collura, J., J. Chang, E.W. Willhaus, and J. Gifford. "Traffic Signal Preemption and Priority: Technologies, Past Deployments, and System Requirements." In 2001 ITs america Conference Proceedings, Miami Beach, FL, 2001.
  101. Zegeer, C.V., and C. Seiderman. "Designing for Pedestrians." In 2001 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 71st annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  102. King, M. "Calming New York City intersections." In Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, December 2000.
  103. Retting, R.A., and R. Van Houten. "Safety Benefits of Advance stop Lines at Signalized Intersections: Results of a Field evaluation." ITE Journal, September 2000, pp. 47-49, 54.
  104. Zegeer, C.V., and m.J. Cynecki. "Evaluation of Countermeasures Related to RTOR Accidents that involve Pedestrians." In Transportation Research Record 1059. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1986.
  105. Lalani, N. and the iTE Pedestrian and bicycle task Force. Alternative treatments for At-Grade Pedestrian Crossings. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  106. Lord, D., A. Smiley, and A. Haroun. "Pedestrian accidents with Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections: Characteristics, Human Factors and Unconsidered Issues." Presented at tRB 77th Annual meeting, 1998.
  107. Zaidel, D.M., and I. Hocherman. "Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections." In Transportation Research Record 1141. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1987.
  108. Barlow, J. "Making Intersections accessible for the Visually impaired." In 2001 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 71st annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  109. Van Houten, R., J.E.L. Malenfant, J. Van Houten, and R.A. Retting. "Auditory Pedestrian Signals increase Pedestrian Observing Behavior at Signalized Intersections." Presented at tRB 77th Annual meeting, 1998.
  110. Allsbrook, L. "Pedestrian Signal Countdown Device." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  111. Chester, D.C., and m. Hammond. "Evaluation of Pedestrians Understanding of Pedestrians Countdown Signals." In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  112. Bernier, L. Economic Evaluation of Implementing a New Signalization System: Digital Countdown Device. Quebec, Canada: Project de transports, 1996.
  113. Van Houten, R., R.A. Retting, J. Van Houten, C.M. Farmer, and J.E.L. Malenfant. "Use of Animation in LED Pedestrian Signals to Improve Pedestrian Safety." ITE Journal, february 1999, pp. 30-38.
  114. Jolibois, S., J. Guerrier, D. Ospina, T. Baker, and L. Hermantin. Interventions to Promote Pedestrian Safety at Urban intersections. Report No. WPI-0510760, final Report; State Job 99700-3314-010; FIU Project 57-18-225-00. Florida International University, June 1997.
  115. Van Houten, R., R.A. Retting, C.M. Farmer, and J. Van Houten. "Field evaluation of a Leading pedestrian internal Signal Phase at three Urban intersections." Presented at tRB 77th Annual meeting, 1998.
  116. Zegeer, C, K. Opiela, and m. Cynecki. Pedestrian Signalization alternatives. Report No. FHWA-RD-83-102. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 1983.
  117. New Jersey Department of Transportation. Pedestrian Compatible-Planning and Design Guidelines. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Department of Transportation, 2001.
  118. Herrstedt, L., M.A. Nielsen, L. Agústson, K.M.L. Krogsgaard, E. Jørgensen, and N.O. Jørgensen. Safety of Cyclists in Urban areas: Danish Experiences. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Road Directorate, 1994.
  119. Jensen, S.U., and M.A. Nielsen. "The Marking of Bicycle Crossings at Signalized Intersections" (in Danish). Summarized in Nordic Road & Transport Research, No. 1, 1997, p. 27.
  120. Leden, L., P. Garder, and U. Pulkkinen. "Measuring the safety Effect of Raised bicycle Crossings Using a New Methodology." Presented at the 1998 TRB Annual meeting, Washington, DC, 1998.
  121. Texas transportation institute. TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus stops. Transit Cooperative Research Program, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996.
  122. Park, Y, and w.C. Kloos. "Applicability of Countermeasures to Implement farside travel Lane Bus stops Case study: Lloyd District transit Hub, Portland, Oregon." In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  123. New York State Department of Transportation. Accident Reduction Factors. http://www.dot.state.ny.us/traffic/files/rftab95a.pdf. Accessed September 2002.
  124. Wortman, R.H. and t.C. Fox. Final Report: Optimization of Traffic Signal Change intervals. Report Number ATTI-85-2. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona Department of Transportation, 1985.
  125. Eccles, K.A., and H.W. McGee. A History of the Yellow and All-Red Intervals for Traffic Signals. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  126. Zador, P.L., H.S. Stein, S.R. Shapiro, and P.J. Tarnoff. "Effect of Clearance interval Timing on Traffic Flow and Crashes at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, November 1985, pp. 36-39.
  127. Retting, R.A., and m.A. Greene. "Influence of Traffic Signal Timing on Red-Light Running and Potential Vehicle Conflicts at Urban intersections." In Transportation Research Record 1595. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1997.
  128. ITE. "Determining Vehicle Change intervals: a proposed Recommended Practice." ITE Journal, May 1985, pp. 61-64.
  129. Retting, R.A., J. Chapline, and A. Williams. Changes in Crash Risk Following Re-Timing of Traffic Signal Change intervals. Insurance institute for Highway Safety, 2000.
  130. Brewer, M., J. Bonneson, and K. Zimmerman. "Engineering Countermeasures to Red-Light-Running." Presented at iTE 2002 Spring Conference, Palm Harbor, FL, March 2002.
  131. Schattler, K.L., C. Hill, and t.K. Datta. "Clearance interval Design and Red Light violations." Presented at iTE 2002 Spring Conference, Palm Harbor, FL, March 2002.
  132. Agent, K., N. Stamatiadis, and S. Jones. Development of Accident Reduction Factors. Kentucky Highway Research Program, Research Report KTC-96-13. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, 1996.
  133. Ontario Ministry of Transportation. Ontario Traffic Manual book 12-Traffic Signals. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Ontario Ministry of Transportation, July 2001.
  134. Gaberty, M.J. II and J.C. Barbaresso. "A Case study of the Accident impacts of Flashing Signal Operations along Roadways." ITE Journal, July 1987, pp. 27-28.
  135. Polanis, S. "Improving Intersection Safety Through Design and Operations." Presented at iTE 2002 Spring Conference, Palm Harbor, FL, March 2002.
  136. Hasson, P., P. Lutkevich, B. Ananthanarayanan, P. Watson, and R. Knoblauch. "Field test for Lighting to Improve safety at Pedestrian Crosswalks." Presented at the 2004 TRB Annual meeting, Washington, DC, 2004.
  137. Ogden, K.W. Safer Roads: A Guide to Road Safety Engineering. Hampshire, England: Averbury Technical Press, 1996.
  138. Mucsi, K., and A.M. Khan. "Effectiveness of Additional Lanes at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, January 2003, pp. 26-30.
  139. Hanna, J.T., T.E. Flynn, and w.K. Tyler. "Characteristics of Intersection accidents in Rural municipalities." In Transportation Research Record 601. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1976.
  140. Department of Transport and Roads (Australia). Web page, www.dotars.gov.au/transprog/downloads/road_bs_matrix.pdf, Accessed September 2002.
  141. Hummer, J.E., and J.D. Reid. "Unconventional Left-Turn alternatives for Urban and Suburban arterials: An Update." In Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, December 2000.
  142. Hummer, J.E. "Unconventional Left-Turn alternatives for Urban and Suburban arterials-Part One." ITE Journal, September 1998, pp. 26-29.
  143. Hummer, J.E. "Unconventional Left-Turn alternatives for Urban and Suburban arterials-Part two." ITE Journal on the Web (accessed October 2003), http://www.ite.org/membersonly/itejournal/pdf/JKA98B01.pdf (access restricted to ITE members). November 1998, pp. 101-106.
  144. New Jersey Department of Transportation. Highway Design Manual. http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/cpm/RDMEnglish/. Accessed October 2003.
  145. Reid, J.D., and J.E. Hummer. "Travel Time Comparisons between Seven Unconventional Arterial Intersection Designs." In Transportation Research Record 1751. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 2001.
  146. Boone, J.L., and J.E. Hummer. Unconventional Design and Operation Strategies for Oversaturated major Suburban arterials: Final Report. Project 23241-93-9. North Carolina State University, Department of Civil Engineering, Center for Transportation Engineering Studies, April 1995.
  147. Michigan Department of Transportation. Bureau of Highways Design Guide for Crossovers. http://www.mdot.state.mi.us/tands/plans.cfm. Accessed October 2003.
  148. Bared, J.G., and e.I. Kaisar. "Median U-Turns Design as an alternative treatment for Left turns at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, february 2002, pp. 50-54.
  149. Reid, J.D., and J.E. Hummer. "Analyzing System Travel Time in arterial Corridors with Unconventional Designs Using Microscopic Simulation." In Transportation Research Record 1678. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1999.
  150. Jagannathan, R., and J.G. Bared. "Design and Operational Performance of the Crossover Displaced Left-Turn (XDL) Intersection (Also Called Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI))." Presented at the 2004 TRB Annual meeting, Washington, DC, 2004.
  151. Fuess, M., C. Cadena, D. Szplett, and F. Mier. "Development and Application of an intelligent intersection: A Summary of the Benefits and Drawbacks." Unpublished paper.
  152. Goldblatt, R., f. Mier, and J. Friedman. "Continuous Flow Intersections." ITE Journal, July 1994, pp. 35-42.
  153. Abramson, P., C. Bergen, and R. Goldblatt. "Human Factors study of the Continuous Flow Intersection at the Dowling College National Aviation and transportation Center." Presented at Dowling College transportation Symposium, Summer 1995.
  154. Reid, J.D. "Using Quadrant Roadways to Improve Arterial Intersection Operations." ITE Journal, June 2000, pp. 34-36, 43-45.
  155. Kramer, R.P. "New Combinations of Old techniques to Rejuvenate Jammed Suburban arterials." Strategies to Alleviate traffic Congestion, Proceedings of the iTe s 1987 National Conference, ITE, Washington, DC, 1988.
  156. Bared, J.G., and e.I. Kaisar. "Benefits of Split intersections." In Transportation Research Record 1737. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 2000.
  157. Polus, A. and R. Cohen. "Operational Impact of Split intersections." In Transportation Research Record 1579. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1997.
  158. Bared, J.G., A. Powell, and e. Kaisar. "Traffic Planning Models for Single-point and tight Diamond Interchanges." TRB Paper No. 03-3736. Presented at the 2003 TRB Annual meeting, Washington, DC
  159. Smith, M.J. and N.J. Garber. "Guidelines for Selecting Single-Point Urban and Diamond Interchanges: Nationwide survey and Literature Review." In Transportation Research Record 1612. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1998.
  160. Leisch, J.P., T. Urbanik II, and J.P. Oxley. "A Comparison of Two Diamond Interchange Forms in Urban areas." ITE Journal, May 1989, pp. 21-27.
  161. Messer, C.J., J.A. Bonneson, S.D. Anderson, and w.F. McFarland. NCHRP Report 345: Single-Point Urban interchange Design and Operations analysis. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, December 1991.
  162. Fowler, B.C. "An Operational Comparison of the single-Point Urban and tight-Diamond Interchanges." ITE Journal, April 1993, pp. 19-24.
  163. Selinger, M.J., and w.H. Sharp. "Comparison of SPUI and tUDI Interchange Alternatives with Computer Simulation Modeling." In 2000 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 70th Annual meeting, Nashville, TN. Washington, DC: ITE, 2000.
  164. Bonneson, J.A., and S. Lee. "A Technique for Comparing the Operation of Alternative interchange types." TRB Paper Number 02-2090. Presented at the 2002 TRB Annual meeting, Washington, DC, 2002.
  165. Bhesania, R.P. "Impact of Mast-Mounted Signal Heads on accident Reduction." ITE Journal, October 1991, p. 25-29.
  166. Voss, L. "Accident Reduction Factors." Missouri Valley Section institute of Traffic Engineers (MOVITE) Journal, Volume 38, No. 2, 1997.
  167. Sayed, T., W. Abdelwahab, and J. Nepomuceno. "Safety Evaluation of Alternative signal Head Design." In Transportation Research Record 1635. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1998.
  168. G.D. Hamilton associates Consulting Ltd. Safety Benefits of Additional Primary Signal Heads. Vancouver, BC, Canada: G.D. Hamilton associates Consulting Ltd., 1998.
  169. Miska, E., P. de Leur, and t. Sayed. "Road Safety Performance Associated with Improved traffic Signal Design and Increased Signal Conspicuity." In 2002 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 72nd Annual meeting, Philadelphia, PA. Washington, DC: ITE, 2002.
  170. Sayed, T., H. Vahidi, and F. Rodriguez. "Advance Warning Flashers: Do They improve safety?" In Transportation Research Record 1692. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1999.
  171. Farraher, B.A., B.R. Weinholzer, and m.P. Kowski. "The Effect of Advanced warning Flashers on Red Light Running: A Study Using Motion imaging Recording System Technology at trunk Highway 169 and Pioneer Trail in Bloomington, Minnesota." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  172. Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2001 Solicitation for Federal Transportation Funding, Hazard elimination Safety Program. June 2001.
  173. Teply, S. "Safety implications of Advanced Flashing Amber at Signalized Intersections." Presented at traffic Safety Summit in alberta VII, Annual Western Canada Traffic Association Conference, October 4-7, 1998.
  174. Laughland, J.C., L.E. Haefner, J.W. Hall, and D.R. Clough. NCHRP Report 162: Methods for Evaluating Highway Safety improvements. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1975.
  175. Schaerer, P. Engineering Studies for Snow Removal. Highway Research Board (HRB), Special Report 115. Washington, DC: HRB, 1970.
  176. Hatcher, C. "Grooving streets and highways can help stop skid crashes" Traffic Engineering, April 1974.
  177. Bray, J. "The Role of Crash Surveillance and Program Evaluation: NYSDOT's skid Accident Reduction program (SKARP)." Presented at 28th International Forum on Traffic Records and Highway information Systems, Orlando, FL, 2002.
  178. North Carolina Department of Transportation. "Safety Project Development Guide." http://www.doh.dot.state.nc.us/preconstruct/traffic/safety/project_guide/. Accessed September 2002.
  179. California Department of Transportation. "Chapter 9-Hazard elimination Safety Program." Local Assistance Program Guidelines. California Department of Transportation, 1997.
  180. David, N.A., and J.R. Norman. Motor vehicle Accidents in Relation to Geometric and traffic Features of Highway intersections: Volume iI-Research Report. Report No. FHWA-RD-76-129. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, July 1975.
  181. FHWA. The 1996 Annual Report on Highway Safety improvement Programs. Report No. FHWA-SA-96-040. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 1996.
  182. Oregon Department of Transportation. Highway Design Manual. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation, 2003.
  183. 183. Harwood, D. NCHRP Report 330: Effective Utilization of Street Width. NCHRP, TRB, NRC. Washington, DC: TRB, August 1990.
  184. 184. McCoy, P.T., P.S. Byrd, and G. Pesti. Pavement Markings to Improve Opposing Left-Turn Lane sight Distance. Nebraska Department of Roads Project No. STPP-STWD(36) and City of Lincoln project No. 700791. Mid-America Transportation Center, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, September 1999.
  185. 185. Malone, B. and G. Forbes. "Reducing Crashes in Multiple turn Lanes on One-Way Streets." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  186. 186. Agent, K.R., N. Stamatiadis, and b. Dyer. Guidelines for the installation of Left-Turn phasing. Research Report KTC-95-23. Lexington, KY: Kentucky Transportation Center, December 1995.
  187. 187. Oregon Department of Transportation. Traffic Signal Policy and Guidelines. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation, November 19, 1999.
  188. 188. Harwood, D.W., K.M. Bauer, I.B. Potts, D.J. Torbic, K.R. Richard, E.R. Kohlman Rabbani, E. Hauer, and L. Elefteriadou. Safety Effectiveness of Intersection Left- and Right-Turn Lanes. Report No. FHWA-RD-02-089. Washington, DC: USDOT, FHWA, 2002.
  189. 189. Polanis, S.F. "Low Cost Safety improvements an Update." In 2001 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 71st annual meeting, Chicago, IL. Washington, DC: ITE, 2001.
  190. 190. Thomas, G., and D. Smith. Effectiveness of Roadway Safety improvements. Center for Transportation Research and education, 2001.
  191. 191. Ackeret, K.W. "Criteria for the Geometric Design of Triple Left-Turn Lanes." ITE Journal, December 1994, pp. 27-33.
  192. 192. Ackeret, K.W., S.S. Nambisan, and R. Menon. "Evaluation of Side swipe Crashes at triple and Dual Turn Lanes in Las Vegas, Nevada." In 1999 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 69th Annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV. Washington, DC: ITE, 1999.
  193. 193. Belluccia, A.G., Harter, G.L., and Rechtoric, M.J. "Triple Left-turn Lanes: Getting the First One Approved." In 1998 Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE, 68th Annual meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Washington, DC: ITE, 1998.
  194. 194. Nassi, R., Tucson, AZ. Telephone conversation, October 3, 2002.
  195. 195. Frederickson, J. Letter to the Arizona Insurance information association. October 2000.
  196. 196. Tarrall, M.B. and K.K. Dixon. "Conflict analysis for Double Left-turn Lanes with Protected-Plus-Permitted Signal Phases." In Transportation Research Record 1635. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1998.
  197. 197. Tsao, S. M., and S. W. Ando. "A Study on adjustment factors for U-Turns in Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections." In Journal of Advanced transportation, Volume 29, Issue 2, August 1995, pp. 183-192.
  198. 198. Shebeeb, O. "Safety and efficiency for Exclusive Left-Turn Lanes at Signalized Intersections." ITE Journal, July 1995, pp. 52-59.
  199. 199. Hurley, J.W. "Utilization of Auxiliary Through Lanes at Signalized Intersections." In Transportation Research Record 1484. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1995.
  200. 200. Tarawneh, M.S. "Utilization of Auxiliary Through Lanes at intersections of Four-Lane, Two-Way Roadways." In Transportation Research Record 1737. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 2000.
  201. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Highway Design Manual. Olympia, WA: Environmental and engineering Services Center, WSDOT, September 2002.
  202. Lin, f.-B. "Right-Turn-on-Red Characteristics and Use of Auxiliary Right-Turn Lanes." In Transportation Research Record 1010. Washington, DC: TRB, NRC, 1985.
  203. Dixon, K.K., J.L. Hibbard, and H. Nyman. "Right-Turn Treatment for Signalized Intersections." In Transportation Research Circular E-C019: Urban Street Symposium Conference Proceedings, Dallas, TX, June 28-30, 1999.

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

ResearchFHWA
FHWA
United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration