U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000

Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-07-059
Date: October 2007

Updates to Research on Recommended Minimum Levels for Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity to Meet Driver Night Visibility Needs

PDF Version (660 KB)

PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®

REFERENCES

  1. Zwahlen, H. T. and T. Schnell. Pavement marking Visibility Research and Proposed Values for Minimum Required Pavement marking Retro Reflectivity. Unpublished report, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Ohio University Athens, Ohio. August, 1998 .
  2. Carlson, P.J., J.D. Miles, M.P. Pratt, and A.M. Pike. Evaluation of Wet-Weather Pavement markings: First Year Report. Research Report No. 0-5008-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2005.
  3. Austin, R.L., and R.J. Schultz. Guide to Retroreflection Safety Principles and Retroreflective Measurements. Gamma Scientific, San Diego , California , 2002.
  4. Bahar, G., M. Masliah, T. Erwin, E. Tan, and E. Hauer. Pavement marking Materials and Markers: Real-World Relationship between Retroreflectivity and Safety over Time. NCHRP Web Only Document 92. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2006.
  5. Higher Highway Safety Standards Initiative. “Survey Finds Visibility of Road Markings a Critical Safety Issue for U.S. Drivers.” Retrieved from http://www.highwaysafetymatters.org/pdf/SurveyResultsRelease031405.pdf on February 26 , 2007.
  6. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  7. Turner, J.D. Pavement marking Retroreflectivity: Research Overview and Recommendations. Unpublished report, FHWA, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development. 1999.
  8. Gene Hawkins, Greg Schertz, Jim Carlson, Rick Beck. Minimum Levels of In-Service Retroreflectivity for Pavement markings: Summary of Workshop Findings. Federal Highway Administration, August 2000, unpublished report.
  9. Hawkins, H.G., and M.P. Pratt. Impacts of Implementing Minimum Levels of Pavement marking Retroreflectivity. Draft Final Report. Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., January 2007.
  10. Ethen, J.L., and H.L. Woltman. Minimum Retroreflectance for Nighttime Visibility of Pavement markings. Transportation Research Record 1093. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 43–47, 1986.
  11. Graham, J.R., and L.E. King. Retroreflectivity Requirements for Pavement markings. Transportation Research Record 1316. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 18–23, 1991.
  12. Graham, J.R., J.K. Harrold, and L.E. King. Pavement marking Retroreflectivity Requirements for Older Drivers. Transportation Research Record 1529. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 65–70, 1996.
  13. Loetterle, F.E., R.A. Beck, and J. Carlson. Public Perception of Pavement marking Brightness. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Roseville , Minnesota , 1998.
  14. Parker, N.A. Evaluation of the Performance of Permanent Pavement markings and Retroreflectors in Snowplowable Raised Pavement Markers. Report 55657-01-13, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, New Jersey, 2002.
  15. Finley, M.D., P.J. Carlson , N.D. Trout, and D.L. Jasek. Sign and Pavement marking Visibility from the Perspective of Commercial Vehicle Drivers. Research Report No. 4269-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2002.
  16. Schnell, T., H.T. Zwahlen, and R. Smith. Reflective Properties of Selected Road Surfaces for an Automobile Headlamp Geometry. Transportation Research Record 1657. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 79–90, 1999.
  17. Gibbons, R.B., C. Andersen, and J. Hankey. Wet Night Visibility of Pavement markings: A Static Experiment. Transportation Research Record 1911. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 113–122, 2005.
  18. Gibbons, R.B., M.J. McElheny, and C.J. Edwards. The Impact of Pavement marking Width on Visibility Distance. TRB 2006 Annual Meeting CD-ROM. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washi ngton D.C. , 2006.
  19. Rumar, K., M. Sivak, E.C. Traube, and T. Miyokawa. Nighttime Visibility of Retroreflective Pavement markings from Trucks versus Cars. Report UMTRI-99-34, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor , Michigan , 1999.
  20. Uding, K.D. Exact Road Geometry Output Program for Retroreflective Road Sign Performance. Transportation Research Record 1421. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., pp. 61–68, 1993.
  21. Carlson, P.J., and H.G. Hawkins. Minimum Retroreflectivity Levels for Overhead Guide Signs and Street-Name Signs. Report No. FHWA-RD-03-082, Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
  22. Paniati, J.F., and D.J. Mace. Minimum Retroreflectivity Requirements for Traffic Signs. Report FHWA-RD-93-077. Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1993.
  23. Schoettle, B., M. Sivak, M.J. Flannagan, and W.J. Kosmatka. A Market-Weighted Description of Low-Beam Headlighting Patterns in the U.S.: 2004. Report UMTRI-2004-23, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2004.
  24. Zwahlen, H.T., and T. Schnell. Visibility of New Centerline and Edge Line Pavement markings. Transportation Research Record 1605. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 49–61, 1997.
  25. Cottrell, B. H. The Effects of Wide Edge Lines on Lateral Placement and Speed on Two-Lane Rural Roads. Transportation Research Record 1069. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., pp. 1–6, 1986.
  26. Hall, J.W. Evaluation of Wide Edgelines. Transportation Research Record 1114. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 21–30, 1987.
  27. Carlson, P.J., J.D. Miles, A.M. Pike, and E.S. Park . Evaluation of Wet-Weather and Contrast Pavement marking Applications: Final Report. FHWA/TX-07/0-5008-2, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2007.
  28. Gates, T.J., and H.G. Hawkins. The Use of Wider Longitudinal Pavement markings. Research Report 0024-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 2002.
  29. Molino, J.A., K.S. Opiela, C.K. Andersen, and M.J. Moyer. Relative Luminance of Retroreflective Raised Pavement Markers and Pavement marking Stripes on Simulated Rural Two-Lane Roads. Transportation Research Record 1844. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 45–51, 2003.
  30. Molino, J.A., B.J. Katz, D.E. Duke, K.S. Opiela, C.K. Andersen, and M.J. Moyer. Field Validation for the Relative Effectiveness of Combinations of Pavement markings and Retroreflective Raised Pavement Markers in Recognizing Curves at Night. TRB 2004 Annual Meeting CD-ROM. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , 2004 .
  31. Bahar, G., C. Mollett, B. Persaud, C. Lyon, A. Smiley, T. Smahel, and H. McGee. Safety Evaluation of Permanent Raised Pavement Markers. Report 518, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2004.
  32. Zwahlen, H.T., and T. Schnell. Visibility of Road Markings as a Function of Age, Retroreflectivity under Low-Beam and High-Beam Illumination at Night. Transportation Research Record 1692. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., pp. 152–163, 1999.
  33. Freedman, M., L.K. Staplin, D.P. Gilfillan, and A.M. Byrnes. Noticeability Requirements for Delineation on Non-Illuminated Highways. Report No. FHWA-RD-88-028, Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1988.
  34. Requirements for Horizontal Road Marking. COST 331. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1999.
  35. He, Y., T. Schnell, P.J. Carlson, and C.D. Debaillon. Updates to Research on Recommended Minimum Levels to Pavement marking Retroreflectivity to Meet Driver Night Visibility Needs. Technical Memorandum No. 1. Prepared for Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., September 2006.
  36. Aktan, F., and T. Schnell. Enhanced Nighttime Visibility: Design and Implementation of TARVIP, a Visibility Prediction Model. Operator Performance Laboratory, University of Iowa , Iowa City, IA, 2004.
  37. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Maximum Posted Speed Limits for Passenger Vehicles as of June 2006. http://www.iihs.org/laws/state_laws/speed_limit_laws.html IIHS Highway Loss Data Institute, Arlington, Virginia. Retrieved February 5, 2007.
  38. Federal Highway Administration. Highway Statistics 2003–Functional System Travel–Table VM-2. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs03/htm/vm2.htm FHWA, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 5, 2007.
  39. Donnell, E.T., P.M. Garvey, S. Sathyanarayanan, and D. Lee. Methods to Maintain Pavement marking Retroreflectivity. Draft Final Report, Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., December 2005.
  40. Zwahlen, H.T., and J.Y. Park. Curve Radius Perception Accuracy as Function of Number of Delineation Devices (Chevrons). Transportation Research Record 1495. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C. , pp. 99–106, 1995.
  41. ASTM International. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Retroreflective Pavement marking Materials with CEN-Prescribed Geometry Using a Portable Retroreflectometer. Designation E1710-05. West Conshohocken , PA , 2005.
  42. Federal Highway Administration. Highway Statistics 2003–Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles–Table VM-1. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohim/hs03/htm/vm1.htm FHWA, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Retrieved February 12, 2007.
  43. Tsyganov, A.R., R.B. Machemehl, and N.M. Warrenchuk. Safety Impact of Edge Lines on Rural Two-Lane Highways, FHWA/TX-05/0-5090-1, Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, September 2005.
  44. Burns, D.M., T.P. Hedblom, and T.W. Miller. Modern Pavement marking Systems: The Relationship Between Optics and Nighttime Visibility, Proceedings from the 18 th Biennial Transportation Research Board’s Visibility Symposium, College Station, TX, April 2007.

Previous | Table of Contents | Next

 

Privacy Policy | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Accessibility | Web Policies & Notices | No Fear Act | Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse
U.S. DOT Home | USA.gov | WhiteHouse.gov

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101