U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations
|This techbrief is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information|
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-09-054
Date: October 2009
Double Crossover Diamond Interchange
FHWA Contact: Joe Bared,
PDF Version (1.5 MB)
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®
This document is a technical summary of the Federal Highway Administration report, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Information Report (AIIR) (FHWA-HRT-09-060).
Today's transportation professionals, with limited resources available to them, are challenged to meet the mobility needs of an increasing population. At many highway junctions, congestion continues to worsen, and drivers, pedestrians, and bicyclists experience increasing delays and heightened exposure to risk. Today's traffic volumes and travel demands often lead to safety problems that are too complex for conventional interchange designs to properly handle. Consequently, more engineers are considering various innovative treatments as they seek solutions to these complex problems.
The corresponding technical report, Alternative Intersections/Interchanges: Informational Report (AIIR) (FHWA-HRT-09-060), covers four intersection designs and two interchange designs that offer substantial advantages over conventional at-grade intersections and grade-separated diamond interchanges. The AIIR provides information on each alternative treatment covering salient geometric design features, operational and safety issues, access management, costs, construction sequencing, environmental benefits, and applicability. This TechBrief summarizes information on one alternative interchange design—the double crossover diamond (DCD) interchange (see figure 1).
The DCD interchange, also known as a diverging diamond interchange (DDI), is a new interchange design that has much in common with the design of a conventional diamond interchange. The main difference between a DCD interchange and a conventional diamond interchange is in the way left and through movements navigate between the cross street intersections with ramps (see figure 2). The DCD design accommodates left-turning movements onto arterials and limited-access highways while eliminating the need for a left-turn signal phase at signalized ramp terminal intersections. On the cross street, the traffic moves to the left side of the roadway between the signalized ramp intersections. This allows drivers of vehicles on the cross street who want to turn left onto the ramps the chance to continue to the ramps without conflicting with opposing through traffic and without stopping.
Several DCD interchanges have been built in France,
including the intersection of
Figure 2. Illustration. Crossover movement in a DCD interchange.
The primary elements of a DCD interchange design are as follows:
Figure 3. Illustration. Typical DCD interchange movements.
Traffic Signal Control
A DCD interchange typically has two signalized junctions or nodes at the points of left-turn crossovers. The signals operate with just two phases, with each phase dedicated to the alternative opposing movements. The two-phase operation of a DCD interchange allows for shorter cycle lengths and reduced lost time per cycle compared to the three- or four-phase operation at conventional diamond interchanges. Signals on a DCD interchange may be fully actuated to minimize delay, and both signalized junctions can be operated using either one or two controllers.
The traffic simulation software VISSIM was used to compare the operational performance of DCD interchanges to conventional diamond interchanges. Two DCD interchange designs and two conventional diamond interchange designs were simulated under high and low traffic volumes.
At the higher traffic volume simulations, the DCD interchange demonstrated overall better performance. It had less delays, fewer stops, reduced stop times, and shorter queue lengths compared to the conventional design. Delays were reduced by 15 to 60 percent, and throughput was increased by 10 to 30 percent. However, at lower volumes, the performance of the DCD interchange and conventional diamond interchanges were similar.
The simulation showed that service volumes of left-turn movements (650 vehicles per hour per lane (veh/h/lane)) could be twice that of the corresponding left-turn service volumes of a conventional diamond. An advantage of the DCD interchange over the conventional diamond is that exclusive left-turn lanes are not necessary for the DCD interchange.
A DCD interchange has only 14 conflict points and two crossing points. In comparison, a conventional diamond interchange has 26 conflict points. Missouri Department of Transportation designers noted that the DCD interchange geometry also has traffic calming features that reduce speeds while maintaining capacity. This is expected to result in fewer and less severe crashes than in a conventional intersection. They also noted that the shorter clearance distances on the DCD interchange ramps compared to an equivalent conventional diamond interchange could result in reduced vehicle exposure times within the intersection and thereby lead to improved safety. Another noted feature of a DCD interchange is that wrong-way movements onto ramps are eliminated.
The main reasons to choose a DCD interchange design instead of a conventional interchange design include traffic operational benefits, potential safety benefits, right-of-way benefits, and reduced construction costs. DCD interchanges are especially suitable in suburban/urban settings where limited and costly right-of-way and reduced duration of construction are critical issues. Environmental benefits have not yet been estimated, but it is clear that the reduced congestion and possible safety benefits will result in reduced fuel consumption and pollution. Some situations where DCD interchanges are most applicable are as follows:
The DCD interchange offers benefits over conventional interchange designs with its efficient two-phase operation, narrower bridge structure width, lower costs, fewer conflict points, expected increase in throughput, reduced vehicular delay, decreased speeds, and reduced environmental impact. At this time, there is one existing DCD interchange site in the United States and three DCD interchanges in France. Other State transportation departments have initiated and planned the construction of several additional DCD interchanges. More details on DCD interchanges and other innovative intersection designs can be found in the full AIIR available from the Federal Highway Administration.
Topics: research, safety, intersection safety, interchanges, non-signalized intersection, diverging diamond interchanges
Keywords: research, safety, diverging diamond interchange, DDI, alternative interchange, double crossover diamond, DCD