U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
202-366-4000


Skip to content
Facebook iconYouTube iconTwitter iconFlickr iconLinkedInInstagram

Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology
Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations

Report
This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information
Publication Number: FHWA-HRT-10-041
Date: December 2010

Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings

REFERENCES

  1. Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.

  2. NCUTCD Bicycle Technical Committee. (2007). Proposed Shared Lane Marking Part 9 of the MUTCD, National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Obtained from: http://members.cox.net/ncutcdbtc/sls/slmtoncjan07.pdf. Site last accessed August 3, 2010.

  3. Alta Planning + Design. (2004). San Francisco's Shared Lane Pavement Markings: Improving Bicycle Safety, San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic, San Francisco, CA.

  4. Pein, W.E., Hunter, W.W., and Stewart, J.R. (1999). Evaluation of the Shared-Use Arrow, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL.

  5. CALTRANS. (2003). California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.

  6. Hunter, W.W., Stewart, J.R., Stutts, J.C., Huang, H.F., and Pein, W.E. (1999). A Comparative Analysis of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes: Final Report, FHWA-RD-99-034, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.

  7. Wachtel, A. and Lewiston, D. (1994.). "Risk Factors for Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Collisions at Intersections," ITE Journal, 30–35. Obtained from: http://www.bicyclinglife.com/Library/riskfactors.htm. Site last accessed November 6, 2009.

  8. Hunter, W.W., Stewart, J.R., and Stutts, J.C. (1999). "Study of Bicycle Lanes Versus Wide Curb Lanes," Transportation Research Record 1674, 70–77, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  9. Harkey, D.L. and Stewart, J.R. (1997). "Evaluation of Shared-Use Facilities for Bicycles and Motor Vehicles," Transportation Research Record 1578, 111–118, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  10. McHenry, S.R. and Wallace, M.J. (1985). Evaluation of Wide Curb Lanes as Shared Lane Bicycle Facilities, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD.

  11. Hunter, W.W., Feaganes, J.R., and Srinivasan, R. (2005). "Conversions of Wide Curb Lanes: The Effect on Bicycle and Motor Vehicle Interactions," Transportation Research Record 1939, 37–44, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  12. Van Houten, R. and C. Seiderman. (2005). "How Pavement Markings Influence Bicycle and Motor Vehicle Positioning: Case Study in Cambridge, Massachusetts," Transportation Research Record 1939, 3–14, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.

  13. SPSS Inc. (1999). SigmaScan Pro 5.0 User's Guide, Chicago, IL.

Federal Highway Administration | 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE | Washington, DC 20590 | 202-366-4000
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center | 6300 Georgetown Pike | McLean, VA | 22101