Formulas, Takedowns, and Setasides
Current Law |
Administration Proposal
H.R. 2088 & S. 1072 as Modified
SAFETEA of 2003 |
House
H.R. 3 as Passed House
TEA-LU |
Senate
H.R. 3 as Passed Senate
SAFETEA of 2005 |
Coordinated Border Infrastructure Program |
Comparable program is not a formula program. |
Comparable program is not a formula program. |
New formula program [1302] |
New formula program [1810] |
Takedowns: |
|
|
None |
None |
Formula Factors: |
|
|
Funds are apportioned only to States with an international land border with Canada or Mexico. |
Funds are apportioned to border States, defined to be AK, AZ, CA, ID, ME, MI, MN, MT, NH, NM, NY, ND, TX, VT, WA. |
|
|
20% number of incoming commercial truck crossings through land border ports of entry (POE) |
25% average annual cargo weight entering State by commercial vehicle across Canadian or Mexican border (averaged over the last 5 years for which data are available) |
|
|
30% number on incoming personal vehicle and incoming bus crossings through land border POEs |
25% average trade value of cargo imported into or exported from the border State by commercial vehicle across Canadian or Mexican border (averaged over the last 5 years for which data are available) |
|
|
25% total weight on incoming cargo by commercial trucks through land border POEs |
25% number of commercial vehicles annually entering the border State across Canadian or Mexican border. |
|
|
25% total number of land border POEs |
25 % number of passenger vehicles annually entering the border State across the Canadian or Mexican border. |
Minimum Apportionment: |
|
|
None |
1/2% (border states only) |
Setasides: |
|
|
None |
None |