Problem: Highway capacity is insufficient to meet growing demand
Traffic congestion on highways in the United States continues to be an area of concern to the traveling public. Every year, congestion continues to grow as vehicle travel increases and the Nation's bridges and roads deteriorate. To help alleviate this growing congestion, capacity on the Nation's highways and major roads must be expanded. In many circumstances, however, roadway embankment widening or new alignments may require construction over soft or loose soils that are incapable of supporting increased loads. Embankment construction projects must identify innovative materials and construction techniques to accelerate project schedules by reducing vertical stress on the underlying soil.
Solution: Get in, get out, and stay out with expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam
What is EPS geofoam? EPS geofoam is a lightweight, rigid foam plastic that has been used around the world as a fill for more than 30 years. EPS geofoam is approximately 100 times lighter than most soil and at least 20 to 30 times lighter than other lightweight fill alternatives. This extreme difference in unit weight compared to other materials, makes EPS geofoam an attractive fill material. Because it is a soil alternative, EPS geofoam embankments can be covered to look like normal sloped embankments or finished to look like a wall.
What are the advantages of EPS geofoam for highway construction?
EPS geofoam can be used as an embankment fill to reduce loads on underlying soils, or to build highways quickly without staged construction. EPS geofoam has been used to repair slope failures, reduce lateral load behind retaining structures, accelerate construction on fill for approach embankments, and minimize differential settlement at bridge abutments.
Because EPS geofoam weighs only 16 to 32 kilograms per cubic meter (1 to 2 pounds per cubic foot), large earthmoving equipment is not required for construction. After the material is delivered to the site, blocks easily can be trimmed to size and placed by hand. In areas where rightof- way is limited, EPS geofoam can be constructed vertically and faced, unlike most other lightweight fill alternatives. It also can be constructed in adverse weather conditions.
Putting It in Perspective
Successful Applications: States' results demonstrate EPS geofoam advantages
Many States have used EPS geofoam in large and small highway projects.
By using EPS geofoam as a lightweight fill, engineers at the Minnesota Department of Transportation (DOT), the Maine DOT, and the Indiana DOT have realized significant time and cost savings for small and moderate sized roadway embankment projects over deep, soft organic soil deposits prevalent in the State.
After years of searching for permanent solutions to failing slope problems, the New York State DOT and the Alabama DOT turned to EPS geofoam. By replacing upper sections of the slide area, State engineers significantly reduced the driving forces that were causing the slide and successfully rehabilitated the roadway section.
Three large and high-profile jobs--the Big Dig in Massachusetts, I-15 in Utah, and the Woodrow Wilson Bridge in Virginia--turned to EPS geofoam to construct large embankment sections. EPS geofoam helped the projects maintain extremely tight construction schedules that would not have allowed enough time for conventional embankment construction. Both projects illustrated the ease and speed with which EPS geofoam can be constructed for highway embankments.
National Deployment Statement
This technology is a lightweight, rigid foam plastic that is approximately 100 times lighter than most soil, and at least 20 to 30 times lighter than other lightweight fill alternatives. This extreme difference in unit weight, compared to other materials, makes EPS geofoam an attractive fill material to significantly accelerate construction schedules.
National Deployment Goal
By October 2010, EPS geofoam will be a routinely used lightweight fill alternative for State DOTs on embankment projects where the construction schedule is of concern. By October 2011, all States will have evaluated EPS geofoam as a lightweight fill alternative.
National Deployment Status
The Resource Center and headquarters have been conducting demonstrations, showcases and presentations, and providing training and technical assistance on design and construction issues. The initial goal has been achieved for several States. Additional work is continuing to achieve widespread use.
Phase of Deployment
PHASE III-Delivery Activities
To learn more, visit http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/resourcecenter/.
To request additional copies of this publication, contact:
FHWA Corporate Research, Technology, and Innovation Management
|»||Corporate Master Plan (CMP) for Research and Deployment of Technology & Innovation (FHWA-RD-03-077)|
|»||Innovation Life Cycle|
|»||Highways for Life|
|»||FHWA Resource Center|
|»||Local and Tribal Technical Assistance Program|
|»||AASHTO Focus Technologies|
|»||AASHTO Additionally Selected Technologies|
|»||Priority, Market-Ready Technologies and Innovations Summary List|
|»||511 Traveler Information|
|»||Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer (ACTT)*|
|»||Air Void Analyzer (AVA)*|
|»||Asset Management Guide|
|»||Bridge and Tunnel Security|
|»||Cable Median Barriers*|
|»||Construction Analysis for Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies (CA4PRS)|
|»||Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piles|
|»||Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Geofoam|
|»||Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP)*|
|»||Highway Economic Requirements System, State Version (HERS-ST)|
|»||Improved Decisionmaking Using Geographic Information Systems|
|»||ITS Deployment Analysis System (IDAS)|
|»||Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) and Rating of Structures|
|»||Pavement Smoothness Methodologies|
|»||Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PFBES)*|
|»||Road Safety Audits (RSA)*|
|»||Transportation, Economics, and Land Use System (TELUS)|