Problem: Transportation agencies seek a more uniform level of safety and reliability for highway structures
A 1987 Transportation Research Board study concluded that the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges contained gaps and inconsistencies and did not use the latest design philosophy and knowledge. In response, AASHTO first adopted the Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specification in 1994 and the Guide Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges in 2002.
What is LRFD?
LRFD incorporates state-of-the-art analysis and design methodologies with load and resistance factors based on the known variability of applied loads and material properties. These load and resistance factors are calibrated from actual bridge statistics to ensure a uniform level of safety.
How does LRFD work?
With LRFD, a bridge designer focuses on a design objective or limit state, which can lead to a similar probability of failure in each component. Bridges designed with the LRFD specifications should have more uniform safety levels, which should ensure superior serviceability and long-term maintainability.
Because of LRFD's impact on the safety, reliability, and serviceability of the Nation's bridge inventory, AASHTO, in concurrence with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), has set a transition deadline of October 1, 2007. After this date, States must design all new bridges according to the LRFD specifications.
Solution: Provide resources to help States implement LRFD
To facilitate and ensure that the States accomplish this transition by the 2007 deadline, FHWA has developed a strategic plan. The plan involves the following:
Identify past, current, and future State LRFD implementation plans.
Identify and deploy showcases of successful State LRFD implementations.
Deploy a general implementation plan and guidelines that States can use to identify and prioritize steps toward a successful LRFD implementation: make decisions, set priorities, determine actions, review performance on a regular basis, and make needed changes to the plan.
Deploy planning assistance to provide handson implementation and transition planning that integrates States into the detailed implementation planning process.
Deploy comprehensive design examples.
Deploy prompt technical LRFD training and assistance to States.
Deploy training seminars and workshops.
Develop and deploy detailed, hands-on training courses.
Compile and maintain a comprehensive list of LRFD resources (books, software, courses).
Support LRFD research.
FHWA has a team of structural engineers who are available to meet with individual States and provide guidance in developing a State-specific LRFD implementation plan. In addition, the following products have been developed to assist States:
Tips for successful LRFD implementation.
A model State implementation plan.
Comprehensive LRFD resource list.
Two comprehensive design examples (steel and prestressed (PS) concrete from deck to foundation).
1-day steel and PS concrete workshops.
Comprehensive 1-week substructure and superstructures training courses.
Putting It in Perspective
Successful Applications: Sixteen States have fully implemented LRFD
According to the AASHTO Oversight Committee (OC) 2005 survey, 16 States have fully implemented LRFD, and most remaining States are progressing toward full implementation.
National Deployment Statement
LRFD is a design platform that is routinely used around the world for the design of civil engineering features. The benefits of LRFD design compared with other designs are many, including uniform safety, improved communication between structural and geotechnical disciplines, and more cost-effective and efficient designs.
National Deployment Goal
By October 2010, all new retaining walls and culverts using Federal-aid funds will be designed using LRFD. All new bridges designed after October 2010 with LRFD will be load rated using LRFR.
National Deployment Status
Remaining deployment goals are on track.
Phase of Deployment
PHASE III-Delivery Activities
For More Information Contact:
Firas I. Sheikh Ibrahim, FHWA Office of Bridge Technology
Tom Saad, FHWA Resource Center
|»||Corporate Master Plan (CMP) for Research and Deployment of Technology & Innovation (FHWA-RD-03-077)|
|»||Innovation Life Cycle|
|»||Highways for Life|
|»||FHWA Resource Center|
|»||Local and Tribal Technical Assistance Program|
|»||AASHTO Focus Technologies|
|»||AASHTO Additionally Selected Technologies|
|»||Priority, Market-Ready Technologies and Innovations Summary List|
|»||511 Traveler Information|
|»||Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer (ACTT)*|
|»||Air Void Analyzer (AVA)*|
|»||Asset Management Guide|
|»||Bridge and Tunnel Security|
|»||Cable Median Barriers*|
|»||Construction Analysis for Pavement Rehabilitation Strategies (CA4PRS)|
|»||Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) Piles|
|»||Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Geofoam|
|»||Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP)*|
|»||Highway Economic Requirements System, State Version (HERS-ST)|
|»||Improved Decisionmaking Using Geographic Information Systems|
|»||ITS Deployment Analysis System (IDAS)|
|»||Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) and Rating of Structures|
|»||Pavement Smoothness Methodologies|
|»||Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems (PFBES)*|
|»||Road Safety Audits (RSA)*|
|»||Transportation, Economics, and Land Use System (TELUS)|